The Child with Multiple Fractures, What Next?

Evaluating and optimizing bone health in children with chronic health conditions

Paediatric health care providers (HCPs) play an important role in optimizing bone health. Early intervention is essential to maximize the accrual of peak bone mass in adolescence and young adulthood and to reduce osteoporosis and fracture risk later in life. Children and adolescents with chronic health conditions may have several risk factors for poor bone health, including underlying inflammatory conditions, reduced weight-bearing activity, delayed puberty, and inadequate intake of calcium and vitamin D. Some medications-particularly glucocorticoids-can compromise bone mass and place a child at risk for fragility fractures. This practice point describes a targeted approach to identifying bone health risk factors in children and youth with chronic health conditions, highlights office initiatives aimed at optimizing bone mass accrual, and links HCPs to useful web-based tools and medical references. Indications for referral to a bone health specialist and bone-specific pharmacotherapeutic interventions are also reviewed.

L'évaluation et l'optimisation de la santé osseuse chez les enfants ayant des affections chroniques

Les professionnels de la santé des enfants jouent un rôle important dans l'optimisation de la santé osseuse. Il est essentiel d'intervenir rapidement pour maximiser le pic de masse osseuse à l'adolescence et au début de l'âge adulte et d'ainsi réduire le risque d'ostéoporose et de fractures plus tard dans la vie. Les enfants et les adolescents ayant une affection chronique peuvent présenter plusieurs facteurs de risque de mauvaise santé osseuse, notamment des maladies inflammatoires sous-jacentes, des activités avec mise en charge limitées, un retard pubertaire et un apport insuffisant de calcium et de vitamine D. Certains médicaments, et particulièrement les glucocorticoïdes, peuvent compromettre la masse osseuse et exposer l'enfant à un risque de fractures de fragilisation. Le présent point de pratique décrit une approche ciblée pour déterminer les facteurs de risque liés à la santé osseuse chez les enfants et les adolescents ayant une affection chronique, expose les mesures à prendre en cabinet pour optimiser l'acquisition de la masse osseuse et propose des outils en ligne utiles et des références médicales à l'intention des professionnels de la santé des enfants. Les indications pour diriger les patients vers un spécialiste de la santé osseuse et pour procéder à des interventions pharmacologiques visant les os sont également abordées.

Diagnostic utility of next-generation sequence genetic panel testing in children presenting with a clinically significant fracture history

We assessed the diagnostic utility of genetic panel testing to detect pathogenic variants associated with osteogenesis imperfecta in children presenting with multiple fractures. Thirty-five percent of children had a pathogenic variant. A history of a femur fracture or a first fracture occurring under 2 years of age were significant clinical predictors.

PURPOSE

The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) genetic panels offers a comprehensive rapid diagnostic test to evaluate for pathogenic variants in the expanding list of genes associated with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). We aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of this method in children with a clinically significant fracture history.

METHODS

NGS panel testing was performed in 87 children presenting with multiple long bone or vertebral fractures. Subjects with a known family history of OI were excluded. Associations between genetic findings and clinical characteristics were analyzed in a retrospective observational study.

RESULTS

Thirty-five percent of patients were found to have a disease-causing variant, with a higher detection rate in those patients with extra-skeletal features of OI (94 vs. 20%, p < 0.001). In subjects with extra-skeletal clinical OI features, 69% were found to have pathogenic variants in COL1A1 or COL1A2. In children without extra-skeletal features, 14 of 70 (20%) had pathogenic variants, of which 7 were variants in type 1 collagen, and the remaining 7 variants were associated with osteoblast function or signaling (PLS3, SP7, LRP5). Clinical predictors for detecting a disease-causing variant included a history of having a first fracture that occurred under 2 years of age (Odds ratio 5.5, 95%CI 1.8, 16.9) and a history of a femur fracture (Odds ratio 3.3, 95%CI 1.0, 11.1).

CONCLUSION

NGS panel testing will detect causative pathogenic variants in up to a third of children with a clinically significant fracture history, particularly where there is a history of early femur fracture.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry in pediatrics: a practical review and update

The assessment of pediatric bone mineral content and density is an evolving field. In this manuscript we provide a practical review and update on the interpretation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in pediatrics including historical perspectives as well as a discussion of the recently published 2019 Official Position Statements of the International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) that apply to children.

History, epidemiology and prevalence of neonatal bone mineral metabolic disorders

The evolutionary patterns of human migration and historical pre/post-industrial revolution have changed the face of bone metabolic disease through past centuries. Cultural, religious, and lifestyle practices continue to alter nutritional recommendations for this expanding diagnosis. Likewise, modern advancements in the field of neonatology and, more specifically, aggressive nutritional management of premature infants have shaped the epidemiology of neonatal bone metabolism over the past two decades. Decreased use of long-term parenteral nutrition, early fortification of enteral nutrition, and stringent American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) practice guidelines instituting early supplementation of vitamin D have attributed to improved bone mineralization outcomes in both term and preterm infants. Nevertheless, neonatal bone mineral metabolic disorders remain prevalent. In this review, we provide an in-depth look at the diagnoses, therapeutics, and subset populations-both genetic and non-genetic-affected by neonatal bone mineral metabolic disorders.