Evaluation of ALA-PDT of ovarian cancer in the Fisher 344 rat tumor model

Potential therapeutic efficacy of photodynamic therapy on female hormonal-dependent cancers in a hormonal simulated microenvironment

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved cancer treatment. Sex hormones, the key drivers for the development of female hormonal dependent cancers, might affect cancer treatment. There are seldom studies to evaluate the effect of sex hormones mimicked the menstrual cycle on the PDT mediated by prodrug 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and its ester derivatives to the hormonal dependent cancers.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of sex hormones on Hexyl-ALA-PDT in hormonal dependent cancers and the effect of the sex hormones on heme biosynthetic pathway.

METHODS

Cell culture system that mimicked the fluctuation of sex hormones 17β-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (PG) in the menstrual cycle was developed. Two pairs of hormonal-independent and hormonal dependent uterine sarcoma and breast cancer cell lines were used as cell models. Hexyl-ALA induced PpIX production and intracellular localization were examined. Key enzymes for PpIX synthesis were analysed. Hexyl-ALA-PDT mediated phototoxicity was evaluated.

RESULTS

The PpIX generation was increased in the hormonal-dependent cells (28-50 %) when cultured in the hormonal microenvironment with long incubation of Hexyl-ALA for 15 and 24 h compared to that cultured without hormones; whereas only slight difference in PpIX generation in their hormonal-independent counterpart. The PpIX generation was in a time-dependent manner. The CPOX, PPOX and FECH expressions were significantly enhanced by Hexyl-ALA-PDT in uterine sarcoma cells in hormonal microenvironment. Hexyl-ALA-PDT triggered significant increase of PPOX expression in breast cancer cells in hormonal microenvironment. The Hexyl-ALA-PDT phototoxicity was enhanced by 18-40 % in cells cultured in the hormonal system in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSION

The PpIX generation and the efficacy of Hexyl-ALA-PDT in both uterine sarcoma and breast cancer cells was significantly enhanced by the sex hormones via cultured in the hormonal microenvironment.

Photochemical Targeting of Mitochondria to Overcome Chemoresistance in Ovarian Cancer †

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy with a stubborn mortality rate of ~65%. The persistent failure of multiline chemotherapy, and significant tumor heterogeneity, has made it challenging to improve outcomes. A target of increasing interest is the mitochondrion because of its essential role in critical cellular functions, and the significance of metabolic adaptation in chemoresistance. This review describes mitochondrial processes, including metabolic reprogramming, mitochondrial transfer and mitochondrial dynamics in ovarian cancer progression and chemoresistance. The effect of malignant ascites, or excess peritoneal fluid, on mitochondrial function is discussed. The role of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in overcoming mitochondria-mediated resistance is presented. PDT, a photochemistry-based modality, involves the light-based activation of a photosensitizer leading to the production of short-lived reactive molecular species and spatiotemporally confined photodamage to nearby organelles and biological targets. The consequential effects range from subcytotoxic priming of target cells for increased sensitivity to subsequent treatments, such as chemotherapy, to direct cell killing. This review discusses how PDT-based approaches can address key limitations of current treatments. Specifically, an overview of the mechanisms by which PDT alters mitochondrial function, and a summary of preclinical advancements and clinical PDT experience in ovarian cancer are provided.

Photodynamic Diagnosis and Therapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastrointestinal Cancers: Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

Selective accumulation of a photosensitizer and the subsequent response in only the light-irradiated target are advantages of photodynamic diagnosis and therapy. The limited depth of the therapeutic effect is a positive characteristic when treating surface malignancies, such as peritoneal carcinomatosis. For photodynamic diagnosis (PDD), adjunctive use of aminolevulinic acid- protoporphyrin IX-guided fluorescence imaging detects cancer nodules, which would have been missed during assessment using white light visualization only. Furthermore, since few side effects have been reported, this has the potential to become a vital component of diagnostic laparoscopy. A variety of photosensitizers have been examined for photodynamic therapy (PDT), and treatment protocols are heterogeneous in terms of photosensitizer type and dose, photosensitizer-light time interval, and light source wavelength, dose, and dose rate. Although several studies have suggested that PDT has favorable effects in peritoneal carcinomatosis, clinical trials in more homogenous patient groups are required to identify the true benefits. In addition, major complications, such as bowel perforation and capillary leak syndrome, need to be reduced. In the long term, PDD and PDT are likely to be successful therapeutic options for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, with several options to optimize the photosensitizer and light delivery parameters to improve safety and efficacy.

Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with photodynamic therapy: Systematic review of current evidence

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal carcinomatosis results when tumour cells implant and grow within the peritoneal cavity. Treatment and prognosis vary based on the primary cancer. Although therapy with intention-to-cure is offered to selective patients using cytoreductive surgery with chemotherapy, the prognosis remains poor for most of the patients. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a cancer-therapeutic modality where a photosensitiser is administered to patients and exerts a cytotoxic effect on cancer cells when excited by light of a specific wavelength. It has potential application in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the evidence of using PDT to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis in both animals and humans (Medline/EMBASE searched in June 2017).

RESULTS

Three human and 25 animal studies were included. Phase I and II human trials using first-generation photosensitisers showed that applying PDT after surgical debulking in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis is feasible with some clinical benefits. The low tumour-selectivity of the photosensitisers led to significant toxicities mainly capillary leak syndrome and bowel perforation. In animal studies, PDT improved survival by 15-300%, compared to control groups. PDT led to higher tumour necrosis values (categorical values 0-4 [4=highest]: PDT 3.4±1.0 vs. control 0.4±0.6, p<0.05) and reduced tumour size (residual tumour size is 10% of untreated controls, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

PDT has potential in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis, but is limited by its narrow therapeutic window and possible serious side effects. Recent improvement in tumour-selectivity and light delivery systems is promising, but further development is needed before PDT can be routinely applied for peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Continuous or fractionated photodynamic therapy? Comparison of three PDT schemes for ovarian peritoneal micrometastasis treatment in a rat model

OBJECTIVE

This experimental study aimed to compare three illumination schemes to optimize hexaminolaevulinate (HAL)-PDT in a rat tumor model with advanced ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peritoneal carcinomatosis was induced by intraperitoneal 5×10(6)NuTu-19 cells injection in 60 female rats Fisher 344. Carcinomatosis was obtained 50 days post-tumor induction. Four hours post-intraperitoneal HAL (Photocure ASA, Oslo, Norway) injection, three different schemes of PDT were performed during 25 min on a 1cm(2) area. (A) Fractionated illumination (n=20) with an on-off cycle ("on": 2 min and "off": 1 min) at 30mW cm(-2) until a fluence of 30J cm(-2), (B) continuous illumination (n=20) at 30mW cm(-2) with a fluence of (45J cm(-2)C) continuous illumination (n=20) at 20mW cm(-2) with a fluence of 30J cm(-2). Laser light was generated using a 532nm KTP laser (Laser Quantum, Stockport, UK). Biopsies were taken 24h after treatment. Quantitative histology was performed. Necrosis value was determined: 0-no necrosis to 4-full necrosis. Depth of necrosis was then measured for each sample and correlated to Necrosis value.

RESULTS

HAL-PDT was efficient in producing necrosis irrespective of the scheme. Tumor destruction was superior with fractionated illumination compared to both continuous illumination schemes regarding to the depth of necrosis (213±113μm vs 154±133μm vs 171±155μm) (p<0.05) or to the full necrosis rate (50% vs 30% vs 10%) (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Fractionated illumination during photodynamic therapy (PDT) was shown to improve tumor response. Fractionated illumination with short intervals should be considered for an effective PDT of advanced ovarian cancer.

Protoporphyrin IX fluorescence photobleaching is a useful tool to predict the response of rat ovarian cancer following hexaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy

OBJECTIVE

Accurate dosimetry was shown to be critical to achieve effective photodynamic therapy (PDT). This study aimed to assess the reliability of in vivo protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence photobleaching as a predictive tool of the hexaminolevulinate PDT (HAL-PDT) response in a rat model of advanced ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Intraperitoneal 10(6) NuTu 19 cells were injected in 26 female rats Fisher 344. Peritoneal carcinomatosis was obtained 26 days post-tumor induction. Four hours post-intraperitoneal HAL (Photocure ASA, Oslo, Norway) injection, a laparoscopic procedure (D-light AutoFluorescence system, Karl Storz endoscope, Tuttlingen, Germany) and a fluorescence examination were made for 22 rats. The first group (LASER group, n=26) was illuminated with laser light using a 532 nm KTP laser (Laser Quantum, Stockport, UK) on 1 cm(2) surface at 45 J/cm(2). The second group (NO LASER group, n=26) served as controls. Biopsies were taken 24 hours after PDT. Semi-quantitative histology was performed and necrosis value was determined: 0--no necrosis to 4--full necrosis. Fluorescence was monitored before and after illumination on complete responders (NV=3-4; n=20) and non-responders (NV=0-2; n=6).

RESULTS

High PpIX photobleaching corresponded with complete responders whereas low photobleaching corresponded with non-responders (P<0.05). A direct linear correlation was shown between photobleaching and necrosis (R(2)=0.89).

CONCLUSION

In vivo PpIX fluorescence photobleaching is useful to predict the tissue response to HAL-PDT.