Photodynamic therapy with epidermal ablation using fractional CO 2 laser for treating superficial basal cell carcinoma: A case series

Photodynamic Therapy in Pigmented Basal Cell Carcinoma-A Review

This review summarizes the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of the pigmented subtype of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) based on the current literature. PDT is a light-activated treatment, non-invasive, that selectively destroys tumor cells and tissues via the interaction of a photosensitizer, light, and molecular oxygen. It can induce cancer cell death through direct tumor vascular damage or via the induction of immune response. However, human skin is also an absorption and scattering medium since it contains hemoglobin and melanin that act as chromophores. Eumelanin can be considered a light-absorber and an intracellular antioxidant that can neutralize PDT-induced ROS and, therefore, decrease PDT success. Various factors, including tumor depth, the degree of pigmentation in malignant cells, and the individual's skin phototype, can impact the outcome of this intricate biochemical process. It has been widely recognized that PDT exhibits limited efficacy in the treatment of pigmented lesions. However, new combination techniques such as curettage or debulking before PDT show promising results in the treatment of pigmented BCC.

Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery

Importance

Laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is used for various medical and cosmetic applications. However, there is insufficient evidence-based guidance to assist clinicians performing LADD.

Objective

To develop recommendations for the safe and effective use of LADD.

Evidence Review

A systematic literature review of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted in December 2019 to identify publications reporting research on LADD. A multidisciplinary panel was convened to draft recommendations informed by the systematic review; they were refined through 2 rounds of Delphi survey, 2 consensus meetings, and iterative review by all panelists until unanimous consensus was achieved.

Findings

Of the 48 published studies of ablative fractional LADD that met inclusion criteria, 4 were cosmetic studies; 21, oncologic; and 23, medical (not cosmetic/oncologic), and 6 publications of nonablative fractional LADD were included at the request of the expert panel, producing a total of 54 studies. Thirty-four studies (63.0%) were deemed to have low risk of bias, 17 studies (31.5%) had moderate risk, and 3 (5.5%) had serious risk. The key findings that informed the guidelines developed by the expert panel were as follows: LADD is safe in adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with all Fitzpatrick skin types and in patients with immunosuppression; it is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ, actinic cheilitis, hypertrophic scars, and keloids; it is useful for epidermal and dermal analgesia; drug delivery may be increased through the application of heat, pressure, or occlusion, or by using an aqueous drug solution; laser settings should be selected to ensure that channel diameter is greater than the delivered molecule; antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, except with impaired wound healing; antiviral prophylaxis is recommended when treating the face and genitalia; and antifungal prophylaxis is not recommended. The guideline's 15 recommendations address 5 areas of LADD use: (I) indications and contraindications; (II) parameters to report; (III) optimization of drug delivery; (IV) safety considerations; and (V) prophylaxis for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review and Delphi consensus approach culminated in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for safe and effective use of LADD in a variety of applications. Future research will further improve our understanding of this novel treatment technique.

Fractional CO2-assisted photodynamic therapy improves the clinical outcome and patient's satisfaction in toenail onychomycosis treatment: an intra-patient comparative single-center study

Background: Device-based therapies have been used for onychomycosis patients with intolerance to systemic treatments. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) improves onychomycosis, while fractional carbon dioxide (FrCO₂) augments the topical drug delivery. Comparative studies between PDT alone and laser-assisted one are lacking.Objective: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PDT alone versus FrCO₂-assisted PDT for treatment of onychomycosis.Methods: Twenty-one patients with bilateral onychomycosis of toenails with nearly the same degree of affection were enrolled in this prospective intra-patient-controlled study. The right affected toenail was treated via PDT alone. The left toenail was treated via a FrCO₂ followed immediately by PDT. The sessions were bimonthly for a total of six sessions. Direct microscopy, fungal cultures, clinical evaluation, onychomycosis severity index scoring, and patient's satisfaction were assessed before and 12 weeks after the last session.Results: Both treatments reduced significantly the onychomycosis severity index (p < .05) without significant difference between them. The improvement in nail appearance and patient's satisfaction were higher in laser-assisted PDT than PDT alone (p < .05).Conclusion: Both treatments effectively reduced the severity of onychomycosis with a high degree of safety and tolerability. Fractional CO₂-assisted PDT enhanced the clinical outcome via improving the nail appearance and patient's satisfaction.Key messagePhotodynamic therapy has a good success rate in clearing onychomycosis. Addition of fractional CO₂ to photodynamic therapy improves the nail appearance and induces better satisfaction to treatment.