Efficacy of porphyrin derivative, Chlorhexidine and PDT in the surface disinfection and roughness of Cobalt chromium alloy removable partial dentures

Effect of sanitizing solutions on cobalt chromium alloys for dental prostheses: A systematic review of in vitro studies

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Given the wide use of cobalt chromium (Co-Cr) alloys, especially for removable partial dentures, and the importance of chemical solutions to complement the cleaning of dental prostheses, safe disinfection products should be identified for the regular decontamination of Co-Cr dental prostheses.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review of in vitro studies was to determine the effects on the properties of Co-Cr dental alloys of the various chemical agents used to clean dental prostheses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In vitro studies were included based on a literature search conducted in March 2022 in the Medline/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library, and Embase databases. Independent reviewers performed the search, selection, extraction, and analysis of the data. The review was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the included articles was evaluated by using parameters adapted from the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines, and the risk of bias analysis was performed based on previous studies.

RESULTS

Among the 15 included studies, the chemical agents evaluated were alkaline peroxides and hypochlorites, mouthwashes containing cetylpyridinium chloride and chlorhexidine, diluted acids, and enzymes. Some peroxides produced increased ion release, surface roughness, and mass loss of the alloys. The hypochlorites were responsible for the greatest surface corrosion, yielding dark stains, rough regions, and depressions. Acetic and peracetic acids and mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine and cetylpyridinium did not produce significant changes in Co-Cr alloys. Most studies presented moderate risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the included studies, mouth rinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine and solutions with acetic and peracetic acid could be safely used to chemically sanitize Co-Cr prostheses. Alkaline peroxides should be used with caution, and alkaline hypochlorite solutions should be avoided.

The efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the disinfection of coronal and radicular dentine of primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Optimal endodontic disinfection by means of conventional root canal treatment of primary teeth remains a challenge. Recently, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been proposed as an adjunct to conventional endodontic treatment for microbial disinfection. The purpose of this review is to critically appraise and synthesize the currently-available evidence about the antimicrobial efficacy of aPDT (antimicrobial photodynamic therapy) when used as an adjunct to traditional root canal therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The focused question was ''In primary teeth needing root canal treatment (participants), is adjunct aPDT (intervention) more effective in disinfecting coronal and radicular dentine (outcomes) than root canal treatment alone (control)?'. The electronic research databases PubMED/Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, Embase and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) using relevant keyword phrases including 'antimicrobial photodynamic therapy', 'primary teeth', 'deciduous teeth', and 'endodontic treatment'. Original studies that described endodontic treatment of primary teeth or dentine using aPDT in comparison to conventional endodontic treatment were included. Case reports, reviews and other non-comparative studies were excluded. The literature search and quality assessment were carried out by two reviewers independently.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 9 studies were included in this review. Overall, majority of the studies concluded that adjunct aPDT improves the antimicrobial efficacy of conventional root canal therapy. However, several sources of bias were found in the studies.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the studies, it is concluded that aPDT is a suitable adjunct to improve the disinfection of conventional root canal treatment. However, future studies should focus on the clinical outcomes, in relation to the reduction of microbial counts to ascertain the efficacy of aPDT in disinfection of primary dentine.

Antimicrobial activity of cleansers on the cobalt-chromium surface of removable partial denture: a systematic review

This study aimed to review systematically the literature about the antimicrobial action of evaluated cleansers on the Co-Cr alloy of RPD. The search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Lilacs, Embase and Science Direct May, 2022. The review was performed based on PRISMA guidelines and recorded in Open Science Framework. Independent reviewers performed the search, selection, extraction, and analysis of the data. The risk of bias of the in vitro and clinical trials studies was analyzed by the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. A total of 187 articles were found and 9 were included. The cleansers that showed antimicrobial action were 2% and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 0.12% chlorhexidine and NitrAdine effervescent tablet. Polident, Corega Tabs effervescent tablets and 5 mg/mL chitosan solution showed intermediate effects. Propolis and green tea toothpaste were not effective. Three articles presented a high risk of bias and 6, low risk. The cleansers that showed the highest antimicrobial efficacy on Co-Cr alloy were 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate and NitrAdine and can be safely used on RPD framework.

Knowledge and application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy among restorative dentist in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

The aim was to identify the restorative dentist, knowledge and application of Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in dental practice; and to provide an overview of the potential challenges faced by restorative dentists (RD) in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

A 15-item cross sectional study questionnaire was distributed through online portal to assess the knowledge, and practice of RD towards aPDT and its practice. The questionnaire consisted of 3 sections, exploring the demographics of participants, knowledge, application and perception of aPDT using yes/no response and Likert scale. Response means, frequencies, and chi-square tests to compare subgroups based on gender, education level, and practice experience.

RESULTS

Out of 500 participants, 375 completed the survey forms (75% response rate). The majority was male (68%) with a mean age of 46 years. Respondents demonstrated a moderate level of knowledge (60.5%). Only 33% expressed confidence in aPDT as a standalone treatment, while 67% showed limited referrals to specialists. However, 88.5% expressed interest in receiving training and attending workshops for aPDT therapy. Education and experience significantly influenced overall knowledge question responses (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

Majority of restorative dentists demonstrated a moderate understanding of the role of aPDT in dentistry. More than two thirds of respondents (77%) believed that aPDT is an effective adjuvant therapy. Increased experience (> 10 years) and education (Post-graduates) showed higher application of aPDT. The study reveals the potential for incorporating aPDT knowledge into restorative dental practices, particularly among general dentists.

Influence of Contemporary Photoactivated Disinfection on the Mechanical Properties and Antimicrobial Activity of PMMA Denture Base: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of the contemporary photoactivated disinfection methods on the mechanical features and/or antimicrobial activity of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dentures bases.

METHODS

THE FOCUSED RESEARCH QUESTION WAS: : "What is the effect of contemporary photoactivated disinfection methods as compared to conventional disinfection protocols on the mechanical features and/or antimicrobial activity of PMMA dentures bases?". An electronic literature search was carried out by the author and a senior librarian specialized in health sciences on Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. In vitro investigations evaluating the antimicrobial and/or mechanical effects of photoactivated disinfectants as compared to conventional chemical disinfectants on the microbes formed on PMMA denture bases were included. Meta-analysis was performed for calculating the standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Four out of eight studies concluded that photoactivated disinfectants, including riboflavin-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT), hematoporphyrin-mediated PDT, poly-L-glycolic acid loaded with methylene blue, Erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser, erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser, and chitosan-mediated PDT, demonstrated a significant reduction in colony-forming unit per milliliter (CFU/mL) of exposed viable colonies of Escherichia coli (E. coli), Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Candida albicans (C. albicans) comparable to the conventionally used chemical disinfectants of PMMA denture bases. Contrarily, two studies concluded that the PMMA denture base colonized with C. albicans and disinfected with conventional chemical disinfectants showed the greatest anti-fungal efficaciousness. All the included studies concluded that the application of photoactivated disinfectants does not negatively impact the mechanical features of the PMMA denture bases colonized with microbes including E. coli, S. mutans, S. aureus, and C. albicans. The meta-analysis revealed statistically significant reduction in C. albicans counts (CFU/mL [Log10]) (p < 0.00001) and improvement in the flexural strength (p = 0.0002) of PMMA-based denture base after the application of conventional disinfectants, while a statistically significant improvement in the fracture strength of PMMA-based denture base was observed after the application of photoactivated disinfectants (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

According to the systematic review (qualitative synthesis), photoactivated disinfectants demonstrated comparable mechanical features and antimicrobial activity of PMMA dentures bases to conventional chemical disinfectants suggesting their potential to be utilized as an alternative to conventional chemical disinfectants. However, the meta-analysis (quantitative synthesis) revealed that the application of conventional disinfectants demonstrated better outcomes related to antimicrobial activity and flexural strength of PMMA-based denture based.

Experimentally Justified Choice of Optimal Antiseptic Solution for Hygienic Care of Oral Cavity and Dentures

INTRODUCTION: The range of antiseptic agents used in clinical practice, is rather wide. However, only single studies are devoted to comparative characteristics of their effectiveness in the conditions of the oral cavity. AIM: To choose the optimal antiseptic dental cleaner by experimental study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An aqueous solution of Furacilin (0.02%), chlorhexidine bigluconate (0.05%), Miramistin (0.01%), cetylpyridinium chloride (0.05%), hydrogen peroxide (3%), Iodinol, Rotokan, distilled water were used as washing liquids for elimination of dental plaque. The model of the dentition was created from quartz plates with an imitation of fresh plaque. Biomaterial imitating dental plaque included two solutions: 1) a strong fresh infusion of black tea leaves, cooled to +25C; 2) oatmeal jelly with temperature from +60C to +65C. The authors method of screening dental cleaners was used, based on comparing the transparency of the laboratory model of the dentition before and after exposure to the test solution by determination with an amperemeter of strength of the electric current in the photosensor device from the oxyhemograph sensor after white light emitted by a mini-emitter passed through biological material and plates and fell on it. RESULTS: The cleaning capacity of distilled water is the lowest (p 0.050.001). Rotokan, Furacilin and Iodinol have a low cleaning capacity, and Iodinol can cause a burn of the gingival cuff in case of high reaction to it, and allergic reactions. Hydrogen peroxide has an average degree of efficiency, but it dries the oral mucosa. Chlorhexidine bigluconate has the highest cleaning effect, Miramistin and cetylpyridinium chloride are slightly inferior to it (p 0.05). By the cleaning capacity, chlorhexidine bigluconate solution is significantly superior to hydrogen peroxide (p 0.05), Iodinol (p 0.02), Furacilin (p 0.02), Rotokan (p 0.01). CONCLUSION: The described method received the patent for invention of the Russian Federation No. 2019121293. Experimental studies have shown the best cleaning effect of 0.05% solution of chlorhexidine bigluconate.

Fracture strength of Er,Yag laser treated PMMA denture-based polymer (DBP) colonized with C. albicans, S. aureus, S.mutans, and E.coli

AIM

To assess and equate the efficacy of different disinfection protocols autoclave, chlorhexidine (CHX), PDT utilizing Rose Bengal (RB), chitosan, and Er, Yag laser and their effect on fracture strength of PMMA denture-based polymer (DBP) colonized with C. Albicans, S. aureus, S.mutans, and E.coli.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 50 (n = 10) PMMA DBP were manufactured and adulterated with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) of diverse microbial colonies inhabited by C. Albicans, S. aureus, S.mutans, and E.coli. The specimens were subjected to different denture disinfection approaches by randomly distributing in into five groups i.e., Er, Yag laser, RB, autoclave, CHX, and Chitosan, respectively for appraising antimicrobial effectiveness. PMMA fracture load was also assessed and statistical analysis was performed for CFU/mL (log10) of exposed C. Albicans, S. aureus, S.mutans, and E.coli by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test at a significance level of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Intergroup comparison disclosed that denture disinfection with Er, Yag laser, autoclave, Chitosan, and CHX (control) validated comparable antimicrobial efficacy to denture against all inspected CFU/mL (log10) (p>0.05). The intragroup comparison revealed that DBP sanitization with Er, Yag laser, autoclave, Chitosan, RB, and CHX substantiated equivalent effective antimicrobial efficacy in plummeting CFU/mL (log10) of S. mutans and E. coli (p>0.05) but in consideration to S.aureus and C.albicans, all groups resulted in declining their count except 5µm RB activated by PDT(p < 0.05). No significant difference was perceived in fracture load of PMMA denture base among Er, Yag laser, RB, chitosan, and CHX (control) (p > 0.05) except autoclave decontamination procedure that indicated the least fracture strength of DBP when disinfected (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Er, Yag laser, and Chitosan activated by PDT have the potential to be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine for disinfecting Polymethyl methacrylate denture base as they demonstrated the highest antimicrobial efficacy against E. coli, C. Albicans, S aureus, and S. mutans with optimal fracture load.

Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in disinfection of Candida biofilms on acrylic dentures: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyze and summarize the currently available scientific evidence concerning antifungal efficacy of aPDT against Candida on acrylic surface.

METHODS

The focused question was: '"Is aPDT effective in minimizing the counts of Candida on acrylic dentures". A literature search was conducted interpedently on the following electronic research databases: PubMED/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Embase. The MeSH terms used were: ((antimicrobial photodynamic therapy) OR (light) OR (laser) OR (photodynamic)) AND ((Candida) OR (denture stomatitis)) AND ((denture) OR (acrylic) OR (polymethylmethacrylate) OR (dental prosthesis)). Data was extracted from the studies and quality assessment was carried out using a modified version of the CONSORT checklist.

RESULTS

Eighteen in-vitro anti-microbial studies and 5 clinical studies were included. Twenty-two studies suggested that aPDT was effective in reducing the Candida count on acrylic dentures and one study did not have a significant effect. 19 out of 23 studies were graded as having 'medium' quality and 4 studies were graded as 'high'. Several photosensitizers, including methylene blue, porphyrin derivatives, toluidine blue-O and others were used. LED was the most popular light source used for photo-activation of the photosensitizers.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this review, aPDT is effective in reducing Candida growth on acrylic dentures and may prove to be clinical effective in preventing or treating denture stomatitis. However, more long-term clinical research is required before its clinical efficacy can be determined.

Efficacy of contemporary agents on disinfection and surface roughness of polyetheretherketone implant abutments

AIM

The present study was designed to estimate the disinfection and surface roughness (Ra) of colonized (E. coli, C. albicans, S.aureus, and S. mutans) PEEK implant abutment disinfected with PDT, chemical, and herbal agents.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) inoculated E.coli, C.albicans, S.mutans, and S.aureus in an in-vitro scenario using 60 PEEK implant abutment samples provided by the manufacturer. Following that, the samples were distributed in four disinfection methods categories - group 1: 5mM Rose Bengal PS (RB), group 2: ultrasonic disinfection (UD), group 3: 2% glutaraldehyde (GaH), and group 4: tea tree oil (TTO). To scrutinize the data and compare the means and standard deviations of CFU/mL (log10) for exposed E. coli, Candida albicans, S.aureus, and S.mutans, a two-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test were performed.

RESULTS

Specimens treated with 2% GaH, UD, and TTO validated a significant reduction in E. coli, C. albicans, S aureus, and S. mutans CFU/mL (log10) colonies. Intragroup assessment designated that there is no reduction in CFU/mL (log10) of E.coli and C.albicans when PEEK implant abutment specimens are irradiated with 5Mm RB. A decline is seen in values of S. aureus, and S. mutans microbial strains on treatment with all four cleansers while the computation of C.albicans and E.coli colonies unveiled significant reduction with GaH, UD, and TTO except RB (p<0.05). The results of Ra showed that PEEK fabricated implant abutment specimens, when treated with UD (3.472±0.561μm), displayed a significantly higher Ra value as compared to other analyzed cleansing methods.

CONCLUSION

. Disinfection with 2% glutaraldehyde and Tea tree oil showed maximum antimicrobial efficacy and lower Ra values for PEEK implant abutments colonized with bacterial strains of E.coli, C.albicans, S.aureus, and S.mutans.

Disinfection efficacy and fracture strength of PMMA denture-based polymer with chlorhexidine, PDT utilizing Rose Bengal and hematoporphyrin, and Er, Cr: YSGG laser

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess and compare disinfection efficacy and fracture strength of PMMA based DBPs using chlorhexidine (CHX), PDT utilizing Rose Bengal (RB) and hematoporphyrin HPD, and Er,Cr:YSGG laser (ECL) induced antimicrobial action against in-vitro biofilms colonized with C.albicans, S.aureus, S. mutans, and E. coli.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) of C.albicans, S.aureus, S. mutans and E. coli were cultured. Forty-eight PMMA-based denture base plates (DBPs) were prepared by heat-cure acrylic resin and contaminated by in-vitro biofilm under-stimulated in-vitro conditions. DBPs were treated with group1; ECL group 2; RB 5µm, group 3; HPD 500 mg/L and group 4; 0.12% CHX (controls) respectively, for the disinfection of biofilms. All photosensitizers (PS) were activated by LED at a different wavelength. Each contaminated DBP was sprayed on all its surfaces with the aforementioned photosensitizers and CHX. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the efficacy of disinfection and fracture load testing. Tukey multiple comparison tests were performed to compare means of CFU/mL (log10) for exposed E. coli, C. albicans, S aureus, and S. mutans.

RESULTS

Specimens in group 1 disinfected with erbium laser, group 3 disinfected with HPD, and group 4 sterilized with chemical disinfection were effective in decreasing bacterial load CFU/mL (log10) against C.albicans, S. aureus, S.mutans, and E. Coli (p>0.05). Intergroup comparison demonstrated ECL, CHX and HPD demonstrated a comparable reduction against C.albicans and S.aureus (p>0.05). Similarly, S.mutans and E.coli were sensitive against all experimental groups (p>0.05). no significant difference in fractural load analysis among the different investigated groups was noted (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

ECL and HPD photosensitizer revealed a significant reduction in CFU/ml of exposed viable colonies of C.albicans, S.aureus, S. mutans, and E. coli comparable to 0.12% CHX mediated disinfection of PMMA-based DBPs. Irrespective of the type of disinfection no influence of disinfection was noted on the fracture load of PMMA DBPs.