The effect of photodynamic therapy on postoperative pain in teeth with primary endodontic infection

Efficacy of laser adjuvant therapy in the management of post-operative endodontic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative endodontic pain (PEP) is crucial in clinical practice. Recently, the effects of various laser adjuvant therapies in endodontic treatments have been widely evaluated. However, as a virtually side-effect-free treatment, its effect on postoperative pain management during endodontic treatment remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to compare the efficacy of laser adjuvant therapy for pain management after endodontic treatment.

METHOD

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for articles published until 12 February 2023. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated based on the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Data on continuous outcomes of visual analogue scale pain scores are expressed as standard mean difference (SMD) and dichotomous outcomes of pain prevalence as relative risk (RR).

RESULTS

We included 22 studies, of which 15 enrolled 892 patients with visual analogue scale pain scores and 7 enrolled 422 patients with pain prevalence. Of the 22 studies, seven studies had a low risk of bias, 10 had a moderate risk of bias and 5 had a high risk of bias. For pain level, the pooled outcomes indicated reduced pain scores in all laser adjuvant therapy, including low-level laser therapy (SMD = -0.86 [95% CI: -1.16, -0.55] in 24 h and SMD = -0.64 [95% CI: -0.84, -0.43] in 48 h), diode laser therapy (SMD = -0.27 [95% CI: -0.50, -0.04] in 48 h) and photodynamic therapy (SMD = -1.12 [95% CI: -2.18, -0.05] in 24 h). For postoperative pain incidence, a significant correlation was observed with reduced pain incidence rates in the photodynamic therapy group (pooled RR = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.72]) but not in the low-level laser therapy group (RR = 0.89 [95% CI: 0.30, 2.70] at 12 h and RR = 0.57 [95% CI: 0.09, 3.72] at 24 h).

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality evidence suggests that laser adjuvant therapies such as low-level laser therapy, diode laser therapy and photodynamic therapy have a positive impact on reducing postoperative endodontic pain intensity. However, the differences in PEP management effects between laser therapies are unknown, and no significant differences were observed among the subgroups.

REGISTRATION

CRD 42023402872 (PROSPERO).

Lasers efficacy in pain management after primary and secondary endodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Postoperative pain is a common concern following root canal treatments (RCT), impacting both patients and oral health practitioners. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of laser treatment modalities in reducing postoperative pain compared to conventional methods after primary and secondary RCT in permanent mature teeth. A search of three electronic databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and The Cochrane Library) was conducted, using a broad range of keywords and terms. Gray literature and manual searches were conducted to complement the search. The inclusion criteria included randomized clinical trials based on the objective of the secondary study. A minimum sample size of 10 participants per group and a clearly defined criterion for postoperative pain assessment were required. The characteristics of the included studies were presented as tables. The Cochrane collaboration tool RoB 2.0 was used to assess the risk of bias within each study. Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the studies independently, and discrepancies were resolved through consultation with a third reviewer. A random-effects model was employed for meta-analysis to estimate the overall effect measure. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test and the I2 index. Publication bias was explored via Funnel plots and Egger's test. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to assess variations among laser methods and examine the influence of independent factors. The significance threshold for all analyses was set at 5% (α = 0.05). Intraoral laser therapy demonstrated no significant advantage over conventional treatments but consistently outperformed placebo, particularly from 4 to 72 h post-treatment. Low-level laser therapy provided slight pain reduction in the first 8 h, though its effectiveness diminished in retreatment scenarios. Photodynamic therapy and laser disinfection showed marginal benefits, especially shortly after treatment, with reduced efficacy in longer-term or retreatment contexts. Further research is needed to explore different applications of laser modalities and assess distinct prognostic factors in more detail.

The impact of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on pain and oral health-related quality of life: A literature review

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) is a non-invasive approach used for microbial decontamination, and it can also be beneficial as an adjunctive strategy for oral infections. The success of treatment in the long term is increasingly recognized to be influenced by patient's perception of the disease and its improvement. Recently, aPDT has been suggested as a dual approach to tissue repair, pain relief, and enhancement of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). The first pathway involves the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects of aPDT. It not only eliminates microorganisms but also helps regulate the immune response and reduce inflammation, leading to a faster and more effective healing process. This, in turn, provides relief from pain and associated symptoms, aiding in the management of treatment complications. The second pathway involves aPDT's ability to modulate nociception and alleviate pain. aPDT induces analgesia by releasing neurotransmitters such as β-endorphin, serotonin, and acetylcholinesterase. It also interacts with mitochondria through photoreceptors, initiating intracellular processes that alleviate pain. Furthermore, the therapy inhibits nerve fibers, reducing nerve impulse conduction and altering the pain threshold. Considering that the impact on patients' pain and OHRQoL is an important aspect of the decision-making process, this study aimed to review patient-based outcome measures during aPDT and assess its effects on pain and OHRQoL in patients. Understanding these factors will contribute to a better assessment of the overall benefits and effectiveness of aPDT as a treatment option for oral infections.

Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Different Single-file Glide Path Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate postoperative pain intensity following glide-path preparation using the ProGlider (PG) and WaveOne Gold Glider (WOGG) systems in asymptomatic teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05955742) maxillary and mandibular molars with asymptomatic apical periodontitis of 78 patients (age, 18-65 years) were included. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: control (n = 26), PG (n = 26), and WOGG (n = 26). All the systems were used according to the manufacturer's instructions, and all the root canal treatments were completed by a single operator within 2 sessions. Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale at 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Analgesics administered and abscess formation were also recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U, Bonferroni Dunn, Friedman, Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

The postoperative pain at 12 and 18 hours was lower in the WOGG group than in the other groups (P < .05). The postoperative pain scores at 6 and 24 hours were higher among women than among men (P < .05). The highest postoperative pain scores were observed at 6 hours (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The WOGG glide-path file system was associated with less postoperative pain than the other systems. Abscess formation and analgesic use were higher in the PG group than in the other groups. Postoperative pain was greater in women than in men.

Application of Photodynamic Therapy in Pediatric Dentistry: Literature Review

Microbiological control of dental pathologies presents a significant clinical challenge for dental surgeons, particularly considering drug-resistant microorganisms. To address this issue, Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) has emerged as an effective and complementary technique for microbial reduction. This therapy involves the application of a photosensitizer dye (PS) either topically or systemically, followed by exposure to low-power lasers with appropriate visible light wavelengths. PDT has found a valuable place in dentistry across various specialties, including surgery, periodontics, endodontics, dentistry, implantology, orthodontics, and pediatrics. In the realm of pediatric dentistry, managing microorganisms during dental treatments has become a major challenge. Considering its promising results and ease of application, Photodynamic Therapy presents an interesting alternative for clinical practice. However, it is important to note that specific protocols must be followed for each application, encompassing the type of photosensitizer, concentration, pre-irradiation time, light type, wavelength, energy, power, and mode of light delivery. Researchers have been steadily refining these protocols to facilitate PDT's integration into clinical practice. The objective of this review is to describe in which procedures and oral health problems in children PDT can be applied. In this sense, we list what the literature brings about the possibilities of applying PDT in a pediatric dentistry clinic.

Clinical study of antimicrobial efficacy of laser ablation therapy with indocyanine green in root canal treatment

INTRODUCTION

Laser ablation (LA) therapy is used as an adjunct to endodontic treatment to improve microbial reduction. However, studies evaluating the impact of LA with Indocyanine Green (ICG) are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of LA therapy with ICG in root canal treatment.

METHODS

Sixty patients with periapical lesions in teeth with a single canal, absence of pain, edema, and previous treatment were selected. Patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups according to apical sizes used (n = 20): 25/04; 30/04 and 35/04 were the final sizes used. In half the patients of each group, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite was used as an irrigating solution; and in the other half, saline solution was used. After instrumentation, all patients received LA therapy with ICG. Root canal sampling was performed prior to (S1) and after (S2) root canal instrumentation, and immediately after LA therapy with ICG (S3). Colony-forming units (CFU) were counted and statistical tests were applied (p <0.05).

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in CFU from S1 to S2 in all treatment protocols (p<0.05). 2.5% sodium hypochlorite as an irrigating solution showed a greater microbial reduction compared to saline solution (p<0.05). LA therapy with ICG further reduced the microbial counts significantly (S2 to S3, S1 to S3) whether sodium hypochlorite or saline was used (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LA therapy with ICG significantly increased microbial reduction in root canals, regardless of instrumentation sizes or irrigation solution used.

Tooth color change after photodynamic therapy in endodontics: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

A smile is considered one of the most important soft skills in social interaction. It is known that some photosensitizer agents (PS) used in photodynamic therapy (PDT) during root canal treatment could play a significant role in tooth color change, and thus the main objective of this systematic review is to address whether performing PDT can influence tooth color change and to synthesize the most effective methods to remove PS from the root canal system.

METHODS

This study followed the PRISMA 2020 statement, and the protocol was registered at the Open Science Framework. Two blinded reviewers searched five databases up to November 20^th, 2022: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The eligibility criteria were studies that investigated tooth color change after PDT in endodontics.

RESULTS

A total of 1695 studies were retrieved, and 7 were included in the qualitative analysis. All the included studies were in vitro evidence and investigated five different PS: methylene blue, toluidine blue O, malachite green, indocyanine green, and curcumin. Besides curcumin and indocyanine green, the remaining agents all caused tooth color change, and no method employed was effective in fully removing these PS from inside the root canal system CONCLUSIONS: Even though the findings showed that curcumin and indocyanine green did not influence tooth color change, the present evidence should be interpreted with caution since it is based on laboratory studies with questionable methods, and all efforts should be employed to avoid this undesirable side effect during clinical practice.

Effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on the reduction of bacteria and virulence factors in teeth with primary endodontic infection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of supplemental photodynamic therapy for improving the bacterial removal and the levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) by conducting a clinical trial.

METHODOLOGY

Twenty-four root canals with pulp necrosis and periapical lesion were selected and randomly divided into conventional group using endodontic treatment with chemo-mechanical preparation (CMP) alone (n = 12) and a group using antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) after CMP (n = 12). The samples were collected before and after CMP (conventional group) and after photodynamic therapy (aPDT group). A photosensitizer (0.005% methylene blue) was applied to the root canal for 3 minutes after CMP, whereas aPDT was performed by using a red laser with a power of 30Mw and energy density of 9J/cm² for 90 s per root canal. Culture technique was performed to determine the bacterial colony forming units. LPS and LTA levels were quantified by using limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively.

RESULTS

All samples showed growth of viable bacteria on Fastidious Anaerobe Agar (FAA), with an average of 5.19 × 10⁵ CFU/ mL. CMP was effective in decreasing viable bacteria (p < 0.05), whereas there was a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the samples treated with aPDT compared to those submitted to CMP. LPS and LTA were detected in all initial samples, with mean values of 20.561 EU/mL and 430.91 pg/mL, respectively. Both CMP and aPDT groups significantly decreased the levels of LPS and LTA (p < 0.05), with a statistical difference between the groups regarding aPDT (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to CMP proved to be effective in improving root canal disinfection and reducing the LPS and LTA levels in teeth with primary endodontic infection.

Clinical applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in dentistry

Given the emergence of resistant bacterial strains and novel microorganisms that globally threaten human life, moving toward new treatment modalities for microbial infections has become a priority more than ever. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been introduced as a promising and non-invasive local and adjuvant treatment in several oral infectious diseases. Its efficacy for elimination of bacterial, fungal, and viral infections and key pathogens such as Streptococcus mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Candida albicans, and Enterococcus faecalis have been investigated by many invitro and clinical studies. Researchers have also investigated methods of increasing the efficacy of such treatment modalities by amazing developments in the production of natural, nano based, and targeted photosensitizers. As clinical studies have an important role in paving the way towards evidence-based applications in oral infection treatment by this method, the current review aimed to provide an overall view of potential clinical applications in this field and summarize the data of available randomized controlled clinical studies conducted on the applications of aPDT in dentistry and investigate its future horizons in the dental practice. Four databases including PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, Scopus and Embase were searched up to September 2022 to retrieve related clinical studies. There are several clinical studies reporting aPDT as an effective adjunctive treatment modality capable of reducing pathogenic bacterial loads in periodontal and peri-implant, and persistent endodontic infections. Clinical evidence also reveals a therapeutic potential for aPDT in prevention and reduction of cariogenic organisms and treatment of infections with fungal or viral origins, however, the number of randomized clinical studies in these groups are much less. Altogether, various photosensitizers have been used and it is still not possible to recommend specific irradiation parameters due to heterogenicity among studies. Reaching effective clinical protocols and parameters of this treatment is difficult and requires further high quality randomized controlled trials focusing on specific PS and irradiation parameters that have shown to have clinical efficacy and are able to reduce pathogenic bacterial loads with sufficient follow-up periods.

Global research trends on photodynamic therapy in endodontics: A bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an adjunctive treatment that aims to inactivate microorganisms through an oxidative reaction produced by irradiating a photosensitizing agent. The quest for improved root canal disinfection has sought supplementary methods when performing chemomechanical procedures. From this perspective, PDT protocols were proposed as an auxiliary approach in endodontics. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate publication metrics and research trends related to this scope.

METHODS

This review is reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 recommendations. Two blinded and independent reviewers systematically searched five electronic databases until December 2021. The acquired bibliometric parameters were analyzed through descriptive statistics and graphical mappings with VOSViewer software.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 342 studies from 84 journals originating from 33 countries. About 85% of the included studies were published over the last decade. Most of the available evidence is laboratory-based (74.5%), and the main clinical outcomes evaluated were microbiological load reduction and postoperative pain. Mayram Pourhajibagher is the researcher with the most publications as the first author (n = 16). Tehran University of Medical Sciences carried out the highest number of studies (n = 29), and Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy is the journal that most published on the theme (n = 111).

CONCLUSIONS

This bibliometric analysis mapped and discussed the scientific progress and publication metrics in PDT in endodontic research. Additionally, future perspectives were highlighted and should focus on discovering new photosensitizer agents, standardizing optimal photoactivation protocols, and conducting more clinical-oriented research.

Interaction effects between macromolecules and photosensitizer on the ability of AlPc and InPc-loaded PHB magnetic nanoparticles in photooxidatizing simple biomolecules

The parameters used in the preparation of polymeric nanoparticles can influence its ability to photooxidate biomolecules. This work evaluated the effects of four parameter to prepare Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) nanoparticle loaded with aluminum and indium phthalocyanine (AlPc and InPc), together with iron oxide nanoparticles, assessing their influence on the size, the entrapment efficiency, and the nanoparticles recovery efficacy. The capability of free, and encapsulated, AlPc and InPc in photooxidating the bovine serum albumin (BSA) and tryptophan (Trp) was monitored by fluorescence. The AlPc-loaded nanoparticles had a larger size and a greater entrapment efficiency than that obtained by InPc-loaded nanoparticles. The free InPc was more efficient than the free AlPc to photooxidize the BSA and Trp; whereas the encapsulated AlPc was more efficient than encapsulated InPc to photooxidize the biomolecules. The higher hydrophobicity of the AlPc, combined with the greater aggregation state and the major interaction with the BSA, quenching the capacity of the free AlPc to photooxidate the biomolecules; whereas the greater interaction of the AlPc with PHB reduce the aggregation effect on the free molecules in the aqueous phase and increase the entrapment efficiency, resulting in an improving of the photodynamic efficiency and an increase of the photooxidation rate constant.

Photodynamic Therapy in Root Canal Disinfection: A Case Series and Mini-Review

Introduction: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is now a widely used treatment modality in many fields of dentistry, including endodontics. The most common application of PDT in endodontics is to disinfect root canals. The purpose of this study was to present the experience of using PDT in root canal disinfection of three patients. Case Presentation: Three patients referred to the Endodontics Department of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences were treated using 0.1 mg/mL Toluidine Blue (FotoSan® agent; CMS Dental, Denmark) irradiated with a light-emitting diode (LED) lamp (FotoSan®; CMS Dental, Denmark) with a mean wavelength of 630 nm and a mean power density of 3 W/cm2 over two 30-second periods. Conclusion: PDT using LED lighting can be used in conjunction with conventional root canal treatment (RCT) to achieve great results.