Effect of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy versus therapy combined with CO2 laser pretreatment for patients with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

Effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 treatment

BACKGROUND

Both the traditional loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and the newly developed 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) are used to treat high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of these two therapies have rarely been compared. Thus, this study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the two treatment regimens.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients in two groups (60 + 60) with grade 2 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2) were voluntary treated with photodynamic therapy or LEEP between June 2020 and December 2022. Follow-up was conducted at 3, 4-6, and 7-12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Although the total effective rate of LEEP was higher during the first 6 months after treatment, both the total effective rate of lesion degradation and the double-negative rate of high-risk HPV16/18 and liquid-based cervical cytology by ALA-PDT treatment increased with time and finally exceeded those of LEEP at 7-12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

ALA-PDT may be more promising than LEEP for treating patients with CIN2 because of the better CIN2 degradation and high-risk HPV negativity, less damage, and greater fertility conservation, especially after 6 months.

Comparative Study of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy and the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for the Treatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

The loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is a common treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) mediated by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) is a non-invasive modality that has been used for treating precancerous diseases and HPV infections. This comparative study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ALA PDT and the LEEP in the treatment of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). Patient records were reviewed and HSIL patients with HPV infections (24-51 years old) who underwent PDT or LEEP treatment were selected. Efficacy was analyzed blindly based on HPV-DNA, cytology, and colposcopy-directed biopsy obtained at 6 months after treatment. Treatment-related discomfort and side effects were also analyzed. Cure rates of 88.1% and 70.0% were achieved for the PDT group and LEEP group (p < 0.05), respectively. HPV-negative conversion rates of 81.0% and 62.0% were achieved for the PDT group and LEEP group (p < 0.05), respectively. The overall lesion remission rate of the PDT group was 19% higher than that of the LEEP group. The incidence of side effects was much lower in the PDT group. These results show that ALA PDT is a feasible non-invasive treatment for cervical HSIL.

Efficacy and influencing factors of CO2 laser, topical photodynamic therapy versus therapy combined with CO2 laser pretreatment for vaginal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with high-risk HPV infection

BACKGROUND

Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) is a group of diseases of squamous epithelial dysplasia and carcinoma in situ occurring in the vagina, which is associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser, 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (PDT) and PDT combined with CO2 laser pretreatment for VaIN1 with HR-HPV infection, and analyze the factors affecting the clearance of HR-HPV.

METHODS

Patients with HR-HPV infection and pathological diagnosis of VaIN1 and received laser or PDT or PDT combined with laser pretreatment were recruited. A total of 45 patients received one to three times CO2 laser (laser Group), 15 patients received three times PDT (PDT Group) and 15 patients received CO2 laser once and PDT three times (laser + PDT Group). HPV testing, cytology and colposcopy examinations at 3-6 months and 9-12 months after treatment were analyzed to assess the outcomes of the treatment.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in regression rate of VaIN1 among the laser Group, the PDT Group and the laser + PDT Group (3-6 month follow-up: 57.78% vs 73.3% vs 80 %, 9-12 month follow-up: 68.89% vs 80% vs 86.67 %, P>0.05). HR-HPV remission rates were also similar in the three groups (3-6 month follow-up: 26.67% vs 46.67% vs 46.67 %, 9-12 month follow-up: 40 % in all groups, P>0.05). Compared to HR-HPV negative group, patients in the HR-HPV positive group were older and had more pregnancies. Menopause and multiple vaginal lesions were more common in the HR-HPV positive group. Adverse reactions were mild in the PDT Group. The laser Group and the laser + PDT Group had more adverse effects, such as increased vaginal secretion, vaginal bleeding, scarring and local pain.

CONCLUSION

For patients with VaIN1 at risk of progression, ALA-PDT presents itself as a viable choice for those who are well-informed and can consent to its costs and benefits. The addition of CO2 laser pretreatment may not increase the benefit of ALA-PDT treatment of VaIN1. Older age, menopause, more times of pregnancies, and multiple vaginal lesions might affect HR-HPV regression.

Photodynamic therapy with HiPorfin for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion at childbearing age

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HiPorfin® photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of young women at reproductive age with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) of the cervix.

METHODS

Prospective study of 41 patients aged 28.8 ± 4.6 years old with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) Ⅱ-Ⅲ at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from March 2019 to January 2023. HiPorfin® (2 mg/kg) was infused intravenously, and 48-72 h later, 630-nm laser irradiation was performed in cervical canal and cervical surface with an irradiation dose of 100-120 J/cm2 and 150 J/cm2 respectively.

RESULTS

All 41 patients with no recurrence had been observed at least 12 months follow-up period after PDT. The number of nulliparous women was 30 (30/41, 73.2 %). CIN Ⅱ were 22 cases (22/41,53.7 %) and CIN Ⅲ were 19 cases (19/41,46.3 %). Complete response (CR) was in 95.5 % (21/22) patients with CIN Ⅱ and 78.9 % (15/19) patients with CIN Ⅲ at 6 months follow-up. Meanwhile, CR rate was 100.0 % (22/22) and 84.2 % (16/19) in CIN Ⅱ and CIN Ⅲ group respectively at 12 months. Pre-treatment, all patients (41/41,100 %) were Human papilloma virus (HPV) positive. HPV eradication rate was 63.4 % (26/41), 73.2 % (30/41) and 92.7 % (38/41) at 3, 6 and 12 months after PDT respectively. Before treatment, cytology ≥ atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) was 78.0 % (32/41). Negative conversion ratio of cytology was 75.0 % (24/32), 90.6 % (29/32) and 100.0 % (32/32) at 3, 6 and 12 months after PDT respectively. There were no serious adverse effects in patients during and after PDT.

CONCLUSION

HiPorfin-PDT is a promising and organ-saving approach for cervical HSIL, which also eradicates HPV infection effectively and can be a beacon of hope for the young women with fertility preservation requirement.

A comparative study of treatment of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) is one of two categories of cervical intraepithelial lesions. Given that controversy exists regarding its management, this comparative study aimed to evaluate the effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) in treating LSIL of the high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)-infected cervix.

METHODS

A total of 218 patients (25-45 years old) with cervical LSIL associated with HR-HPV who underwent ALA-PDT, loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), or observation only were included. The clearance rates of cervical LSIL and HR-HPV between the ALA-PDT, LEEP, and observation groups were compared at 6 and 12 months follow-up. Adverse reactions were also compared. The factors affecting the clearance on ALA-PDT of cervical LSIL were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in lesion and HR-HPV clearance rates between the ALA-PDT and LEEP groups at 6 and 12 months. However, the lesion and HR-HPV clearance rates were significantly higher in the ALA-PDT group than that in the observation group. The adverse reaction rate was significantly lower in the ALA-PDT group than in the LEEP group.

CONCLUSION

For patients with cervical LSIL, the lesion and HR-HPV clearance rates after ALA-PDT were close to those after LEEP and significantly higher than in the observation group. Moreover, the adverse reaction rate for ALA-PDT was much lower than that for LEEP. Therefore, ALA-PDT provides a new option for the minimally invasive treatment of cervical LSIL.