Campus physicians' tobacco interventions with university students: a descriptive study of 16 Ontario university clinics

Motivational interviewing intervention with college student tobacco users: providers' beliefs and behaviors

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed college student health providers' use of Motivational Interviewing (MI) with tobacco users, as well as their beliefs about the use of brief interventions to help college student tobacco users quit. MI is recommended by the United States Public Health Service to increase tobacco users' willingness to quit.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 83 clinicians from health clinics at 7 different universities in North Carolina.

METHODS

Paper-and-pencil baseline survey from a cluster randomized trial of college student health clinicians.

RESULTS

Twenty-two percent of respondents reported always or usually using MI during the past month for tobacco-using patients not ready to make a quit attempt. Student health providers also reported information with regards to their beliefs about tobacco cessation treatment, barriers to intervening with patients, and confidence in motivating students to consider quitting.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight the need to encourage clinicians' use of motivationally focused interventions with student tobacco users. [Table: see text].

Screening and Counseling for Tobacco Use in Student Health Clinics: Reports of Health Care Providers

PURPOSE

To assess tobacco screening and counseling in student health clinics, including facilitators, barriers, and associations with campus- and state-level variables.

DESIGN

We conducted a mixed-methods study with an online survey and qualitative interviews.

SETTING

Study setting was student health clinics on college campuses.

SUBJECTS

Subjects included 71 clinic directors or designees from 10 Southeastern states (quantitative survey) and 8 directors or designees from 4 Southeastern states (qualitative interviews).

MEASURES

Quantitative measures included demographics, screening and counseling practices, clinic-level supports for such practices, perceptions of tobacco on campus, institution size, public/private status, state tobacco farming revenue, and state tobacco control funding. Qualitative measures included barriers and facilitators of tobacco screening and counseling practices.

ANALYSIS

Logistic and linear regression models assessed correlates of screening and counseling. Qualitative data were analyzed using multistage interpretive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 55% of online survey respondents reported that their clinics screen for tobacco at every visit, whereas 80% reported their clinics offer counseling and pharmacotherapy. Barriers included lack of the following: time with patients, relevance to chief complaint, student self-identification as a tobacco user, access to pharmacotherapy, and interest in quitting among smokers. In multivariable models, more efforts to reduce tobacco use, student enrollment, and state-level cash receipts for tobacco were positively associated with clinic-level supports.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights missed opportunities for screening. Although reports of counseling were higher, providers identified many barriers.

Screening and brief intervention for tobacco use by student health providers on college campuses

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed college students' reports of tobacco screening and brief intervention by student health center providers.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 3,800 students from 8 universities in North Carolina.

METHODS

Web-based survey of a stratified random sample of undergraduates.

RESULTS

Fifty-three percent reported ever visiting their student health center. Of those, 62% reported being screened for tobacco use. Logistic regression revealed screening was higher among females and smokers, compared to nonsmokers. Among students who were screened and who reported tobacco use, 50% reported being advised to quit or reduce use. Brief intervention was more likely among current daily smokers compared to current nondaily smokers, as well as at schools with higher smoking rates. Screening and brief intervention were more likely at schools with lower clinic caseloads.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight the need to encourage college health providers to screen every patient at every visit and to provide brief intervention for tobacco users.

Evidence-based smoking cessation for college students

Despite a strong stance by the American College Health Association and years of prevention and control efforts on US college campuses, smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke remain a problem among college students. This article provides an overview of what is known about cigarette smoking in this population as well as existing interventions for smoking prevention, cessation, and exposure to secondhand smoke on college campuses. Strategies to reduce tobacco use are presented, many of which have been demonstrated to be effective in the short-term.