1
|
Lavecchia M, Myers J, Bainbridge D, Incardona N, Levine O, Steinberg L, Schep D, Vautour J, Kumar SJ, Seow H. Education modalities for serious illness communication training: A scoping review on the impact on clinician behavior and patient outcomes. Palliat Med 2024; 38:170-183. [PMID: 37424275 PMCID: PMC10865772 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231186180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several clinician training interventions have been developed in the past decade to address serious illness communication. While numerous studies report on clinician attitudes and confidence, little is reported on individual education modalities and their impact on actual behavior change and patient outcomes. AIM To examine what is known about the education modalities used in serious illness communication training and their impact on clinician behaviors and patient outcomes. DESIGN A scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Methods Manual for Scoping Reviews was conducted to examine studies measuring clinician behaviors or patient outcomes. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for English-language studies published between January 2011 and March 2023. RESULTS The search identified 1317 articles: 76 met inclusion criteria describing 64 unique interventions. Common education modalities used were: single workshop (n = 29), multiple workshops (n = 11), single workshop with coaching (n = 7), and multiple workshops with coaching (n = 5); though they were inconsistently structured. Studies reporting improved clinician skills tended to be in simulation settings with neither clinical practice nor patient outcomes explored. While some studies reported behavior changes or improved patient outcomes, they did not necessarily confirm improvements in clinician skills. As multiple modalities were commonly used and often embedded within quality improvement initiatives, the impact of individual modalities could not be determined. CONCLUSION This scoping review of serious illness communication interventions found heterogeneity among education modalities used and limited evidence supporting their effectiveness in impacting patient-centered outcomes and long-term clinician skill acquisition. Well-defined educational modalities and consistent measures of behavior change and standard patient-centered outcomes are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Lavecchia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeff Myers
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daryl Bainbridge
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nadia Incardona
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Oren Levine
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Leah Steinberg
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Schep
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Joanna Vautour
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Engel M, Kars MC, Teunissen SCCM, van der Heide A. Effective communication in palliative care from the perspectives of patients and relatives: A systematic review. Palliat Support Care 2023; 21:890-913. [PMID: 37646464 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951523001165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In palliative care, effective communication is essential to adequately meet the needs and preferences of patients and their relatives. Effective communication includes exchanging information, facilitates shared decision-making, and promotes an empathic care relationship. We explored the perspectives of patients with an advanced illness and their relatives on effective communication with health-care professionals. METHODS A systematic review was conducted. We searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane for original empirical studies published between January 1, 2015 and March 4, 2021. RESULTS In total, 56 articles on 53 unique studies were included. We found 7 themes that from the perspectives of patients and relatives contribute to effective communication: (1) open and honest information. However, this open and honest communication can also trigger anxiety, stress, and existential disruption. Patients and relatives also indicated that they preferred (2) health-care professionals aligning to the patient's and relative's process of uptake and coping with information; (3) empathy; (4) clear and understandable language; (5) leaving room for positive coping strategies, (6) committed health-care professionals taking responsibility; and (7) recognition of relatives in their role as caregiver. Most studies in this review concerned communication with physicians in a hospital setting. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Most patients and relatives appreciate health-care professionals to not only pay attention to strictly medical issues but also to who they are as a person and the process they are going through. More research is needed on effective communication by nurses, in nonhospital settings and on communication by health-care professionals specialized in palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijanne Engel
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke C Kars
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia C C M Teunissen
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes van der Heide
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bylund CL, Vasquez TS, Peterson EB, Ansell M, Bylund KC, Ditton-Phare P, Hines A, Manna R, Singh Ospina N, Wells R, Rosenbaum ME. Effect of Experiential Communication Skills Education on Graduate Medical Education Trainees' Communication Behaviors: A Systematic Review. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2022; 97:1854-1866. [PMID: 35857395 PMCID: PMC9712157 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A better understanding of how communication skills education impacts trainees' communication skills is important for continual improvement in graduate medical education (GME). Guided by the Kirkpatrick Model, this review focused on studies that measured communication skills in either simulated or clinical settings. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effect of experiential communication skills education on GME trainees' communication behaviors. METHOD Five databases were searched for studies published between 2001 and 2021 using terms representing the concepts of medical trainees, communication, training, and skills and/or behaviors. Included studies had an intervention design, focused only on GME trainees as learners, used experiential methods, and had an outcome measure of communication skills behavior that was assessed by a simulated or standardized patient (SP), patient, family member, or outside observer. Studies were examined for differences in outcomes based on study design; simulated versus clinical evaluation setting; outside observer versus SP, patient, or family member evaluator; and length of training. RESULTS Seventy-seven studies were ultimately included. Overall, 54 (70%) studies reported some positive findings (i.e., change in behavior). There were 44 (57%) single-group pre-post studies, 13 (17%) nonrandomized control studies, and 20 (26%) randomized control studies. Positive findings were frequent in single-group designs (80%) and were likely in nonrandomized (62%) and randomized (55%) control trials. Positive findings were likely in studies evaluating communication behavior in simulated (67%) and clinical (78%) settings as well as in studies with outside observer (63%) and SP, patient, and family member (64%) evaluators. CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrates strong support that experiential communication skills education can impact GME trainees' communication behaviors. Marked heterogeneity in communication trainings and evaluation measures, even among subgroups, did not allow for meta-analysis or comparative efficacy evaluation of different studies. Future studies would benefit from homogeneity in curricular and evaluation measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carma L Bylund
- C.L. Bylund is professor, Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Taylor S Vasquez
- T.S. Vasquez is a doctoral student, Department of Public Relations, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Emily B Peterson
- E.B. Peterson is senior research analyst, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Margaret Ansell
- M. Ansell is associate university librarian and associate chair, Health Science Center Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kevin C Bylund
- K.C. Bylund is associate professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Philippa Ditton-Phare
- P. Ditton-Phare is medical education support officer (psychiatry), Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - April Hines
- A. Hines is journalism and mass communications librarian, George A. Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ruth Manna
- R. Manna is associate director, Patient Experience Partnerships, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Naykky Singh Ospina
- N. Singh Ospina is associate professor, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Robert Wells
- R. Wells is science writer, Office of Research, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
| | - Marcy E Rosenbaum
- M.E. Rosenbaum is professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tan XH, Foo MA, Lim SLH, Lim MBXY, Chin AMC, Zhou J, Chiam M, Krishna LKR. Teaching and assessing communication skills in the postgraduate medical setting: a systematic scoping review. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:483. [PMID: 34503497 PMCID: PMC8431930 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02892-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor communication skills can potentially compromise patient care. However, as communication skills training (CST) programs are not seen as a priority to many clinical departments, there is a discernible absence of a standardised, recommended framework for these programs to be built upon. This systematic scoping review (SSR) aims to gather prevailing data on existing CSTs to identify key factors in teaching and assessing communication skills in the postgraduate medical setting. METHODS Independent searches across seven bibliographic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus and Google Scholar) were carried out. Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) was used to guide concurrent thematic and content analysis of the data. The themes and categories identified were compared and combined where possible in keeping with this approach and then compared with the tabulated summaries of the included articles. RESULTS Twenty-five thousand eight hundred ninety-four abstracts were identified, and 151 articles were included and analysed. The Split Approach revealed similar categories and themes: curriculum design, teaching methods, curriculum content, assessment methods, integration into curriculum, and facilitators and barriers to CST. Amidst a wide variety of curricula designs, efforts to develop the requisite knowledge, skills and attitudes set out by the ACGME current teaching and assessment methods in CST maybe categorised into didactic and interactive methods and assessed along Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Learning Evaluation. CONCLUSIONS A major flaw in existing CSTs is a lack of curriculum structure, focus and standardisation. Based upon the findings and current design principles identified in this SSR in SEBA, we forward a stepwise approach to designing CST programs. These involve 1) defining goals and learning objectives, 2) identifying target population and ideal characteristics, 3) determining curriculum structure, 4) ensuring adequate resources and mitigating barriers, 5) determining curriculum content, and 6) assessing learners and adopting quality improvement processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiu Hui Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Malia Alexandra Foo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Shaun Li He Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Marie Bernadette Xin Yi Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Annelissa Mien Chew Chin
- Medical Library, National University of Singapore Libraries, Block MD 6, 14 Medical Drive, #05-01, Singapore, 117599, Singapore
| | - Jamie Zhou
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Lien Centre of Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, 8College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD 11, 10 Medical Drive, #02-03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Use of Simulation to Improve Emotional Competence at End-of-Life Care for Healthcare Professionals and Students: A Scoping Review. Clin Simul Nurs 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
6
|
Kelley LT, Coderre-Ball AM, Dalgarno N, McKeown S, Egan R. Continuing Professional Development for Primary Care Providers in Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review. J Palliat Med 2020; 23:1104-1124. [PMID: 32453657 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: This review updates and expands on previous reviews of educational interventions for primary care providers (PCPs) involved in palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) and is the first to include early studies related to medical assistance in dying (MAiD). Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was conducted across five electronic databases to locate published interventional studies related to ongoing PEoLC and/or MAiD education for primary care professionals. A descriptive summary of results and a narrative discussion of common themes and comparisons are provided. Results: Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The researchers found a myriad of interventions, including courses based, practical experience, mentoring, and workshops. The researchers categorized results by four domains: attitude, confidence, knowledge, and skills. Across domains, seven educational topics emerged: general care, interprofessional collaboration, nutrition, pain and symptom management, patient communication, and professional coping. Overall, studies employed various methodologies, but often relied on cross-sectionally measured self-assessment. Two articles were found that measured the impact of MAiD education. Conclusion: These findings suggest that PEoLC education can improve PCPs' perceived attitudes, confidence, knowledge, and skills across multiple areas of palliative care practice. While PCPs across studies valued educational interventions, the findings relating to the impact of PEoLC education on PCP's provision of effective PEoLC were unclear. However, most interventions resulted in enhanced confidence and knowledge. To date, there are only two studies that have examined MAiD educational programs. There is a need for studies of higher rigor with more emphasis on follow-up to clarify the impact training has on those involved in PEoLC and MAiD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah T Kelley
- Office of Professional Development and Educational Scholarship, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela M Coderre-Ball
- Office of Professional Development and Educational Scholarship, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy Dalgarno
- Office of Professional Development and Educational Scholarship, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra McKeown
- Bracken Health Sciences Library, and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rylan Egan
- Health Quality Programs, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fischer F, Helmer S, Rogge A, Arraras JI, Buchholz A, Hannawa A, Horneber M, Kiss A, Rose M, Söllner W, Stein B, Weis J, Schofield P, Witt CM. Outcomes and outcome measures used in evaluation of communication training in oncology - a systematic literature review, an expert workshop, and recommendations for future research. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:808. [PMID: 31412805 PMCID: PMC6694634 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6022-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication between health care provider and patients in oncology presents challenges. Communication skills training have been frequently developed to address those. Given the complexity of communication training, the choice of outcomes and outcome measures to assess its effectiveness is important. The aim of this paper is to 1) perform a systematic review on outcomes and outcome measures used in evaluations of communication training, 2) discuss specific challenges and 3) provide recommendations for the selection of outcomes in future studies. METHODS To identify studies and reviews reporting on the evaluation of communication training for health care professionals in oncology, we searched seven databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, PsychARTICLES and Web of Science). We extracted outcomes assessed and the respective assessment methods. We held a two-day workshop with experts (n = 16) in communication theory, development and evaluation of generic or cancer-specific communication training and/or outcome measure development to identify and address challenges in the evaluation of communication training in oncology. After the workshop, participants contributed to the development of recommendations addressing those challenges. RESULTS Out of 2181 references, we included 96 publications (33 RCTs, 2 RCT protocols, 4 controlled trials, 36 uncontrolled studies, 21 reviews) in the review. Most frequently used outcomes were participants' training evaluation, their communication confidence, observed communication skills and patients' overall satisfaction and anxiety. Outcomes were assessed using questionnaires for participants (57.3%), patients (36.0%) and observations of real (34.7%) and simulated (30.7%) patient encounters. Outcomes and outcome measures varied widely across studies. Experts agreed that outcomes need to be precisely defined and linked with explicit learning objectives of the training. Furthermore, outcomes should be assessed as broadly as possible on different levels (health care professional, patient and interaction level). CONCLUSIONS Measuring the effects of training programmes aimed at improving health care professionals' communication skills presents considerable challenges. Outcomes as well as outcome measures differ widely across studies. We recommended to link outcome assessment to specific learning objectives and to assess outcomes as broadly as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Fischer
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - S. Helmer
- Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - A. Rogge
- Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - J. I. Arraras
- Radiotherapeutic Oncology Department & Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - A. Buchholz
- Department of Medical Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Centre, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A. Hannawa
- Center for the Advancement of Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety (CAHQS), Faculty of Communication Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - M. Horneber
- Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Pneumology and Oncology/Hematology, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nuernberg, Nuernberg, Germany
| | - A. Kiss
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M. Rose
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Outcomes Measurement Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
| | - W. Söllner
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg General Hospital, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - B. Stein
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg General Hospital, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - J. Weis
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Self-Help Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - P. Schofield
- Department of Psychology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria Australia
| | - C. M. Witt
- Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meinema JG, Buwalda N, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Visser MR, van Dijk N. Intervention Descriptions in Medical Education: What Can Be Improved? A Systematic Review and Checklist. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2019; 94:281-290. [PMID: 30157087 PMCID: PMC6365274 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many medical education studies focus on the effectiveness of educational interventions. However, these studies often lack clear, thorough descriptions of interventions that would make the interventions replicable. This systematic review aimed to identify gaps and limitations in the descriptions of educational interventions, using a comprehensive checklist. METHOD Based on the literature, the authors developed a checklist of 17 criteria for thorough descriptions of educational interventions in medical education. They searched the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and ERIC databases for eligible English-language studies published January 2014-March 2016 that evaluated the effects of educational interventions during classroom teaching in postgraduate medical education. Subsequently, they used this checklist to systematically review the included studies. Descriptions were scored 0 (no information), 1 (unclear/partial information), or 2 (detailed description) for each of the 16 scorable criteria (possible range 0-32). RESULTS Among the 105 included studies, the criteria most frequently reported in detail were learning needs (78.1%), content/subject (77.1%), and educational strategies (79.0%). The criteria least frequently reported in detail were incentives (9.5%), environment (5.7%), and planned and unplanned changes (12.4%). No article described all criteria. The mean score was 15.9 (SD 4.1), with a range from 8 (5 studies) to 25 (1 study). The majority (76.2%) of articles scored 11-20. CONCLUSIONS Descriptions were frequently missing key information and lacked uniformity. The results suggest a need for a common standard. The authors encourage others to validate, complement, and use their checklist, which could lead to more complete, comparable, and replicable descriptions of educational interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennita G. Meinema
- J.G. Meinema is a PhD student, Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Academic Medical Center–University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3706-1360
| | - Nienke Buwalda
- N. Buwalda is a PhD student, Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Academic Medical Center–University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2635-2912
| | - Faridi S. van Etten-Jamaludin
- F.S. van Etten-Jamaludin is clinical librarian, Academic Medical Center–University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mechteld R.M. Visser
- M.R.M. Visser is senior researcher, Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Academic Medical Center–University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nynke van Dijk
- N. van Dijk is professor of general practice/family medicine, Academic Medical Center–University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Myers J, Cosby R, Gzik D, Harle I, Harrold D, Incardona N, Walton T. Provider Tools for Advance Care Planning and Goals of Care Discussions: A Systematic Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2018. [PMID: 29529884 DOI: 10.1177/1049909118760303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning and goals of care discussions involve the exploration of what is most important to a person, including their values and beliefs in preparation for health-care decision-making. Advance care planning conversations focus on planning for future health care, ensuring that an incapable person's wishes are known and can guide the person's substitute decision maker for future decision-making. Goals of care discussions focus on preparing for current decision-making by ensuring the person's goals guide this process. AIM To provide evidence regarding tools and/or practices available for use by health-care providers to effectively facilitate advance care planning conversations and/or goals of care discussions. DATA SOURCES A systematic review was conducted focusing on guidelines, randomized trials, comparative studies, and noncomparative studies. Databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the proceedings of the International Advance Care Planning Conference and the American Society of Clinical Oncology Palliative Care Symposium. CONCLUSIONS Although several studies report positive findings, there is a lack of consistent patient outcome evidence to support any one clinical tool for use in advance care planning or goals of care discussions. Effective advance care planning conversations at both the population and the individual level require provider education and communication skill development, standardized and accessible documentation, quality improvement initiatives, and system-wide coordination to impact the population level. There is a need for research focused on goals of care discussions, to clarify the purpose and expected outcomes of these discussions, and to clearly differentiate goals of care from advance care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff Myers
- 1 Sinai-Bridgepoint Palliative Care Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roxanne Cosby
- 2 Program in Evidence-Based Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Danusia Gzik
- 3 North Simcoe Muskoka Regional Cancer Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Barrie, Canada
| | - Ingrid Harle
- 4 Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.,5 Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Deb Harrold
- 3 North Simcoe Muskoka Regional Cancer Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Barrie, Canada
| | - Nadia Incardona
- 6 Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Ontario, Canada.,7 Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tara Walton
- 8 Ontario Palliative Care Network Secretariat, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schrank B, Rumpold T, Amering M, Masel EK, Watzke H, Schur S. Pushing boundaries-culture-sensitive care in oncology and palliative care: a qualitative study. Psychooncology 2016; 26:763-769. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 07/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Schrank
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy; University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences; Tulln Austria
| | - Tamara Rumpold
- Clinical Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine I; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - Michaela Amering
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - Eva Katharina Masel
- Clinical Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine I; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - Herbert Watzke
- Clinical Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine I; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - Sophie Schur
- Clinical Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine I; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thoonsen B, Groot M, Verhagen S, van Weel C, Vissers K, Engels Y. Timely identification of palliative patients and anticipatory care planning by GPs: practical application of tools and a training programme. BMC Palliat Care 2016; 15:39. [PMID: 27044254 PMCID: PMC4820918 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-016-0112-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Palliative care is mainly restricted to terminal care. General practitioners (GPs) are not trained to early identify palliative patients with cancer, COPD or heart failure. With the help of the RADboud indicators for PAlliative Care needs (RADPAC), we trained GPs to identify patients’ needs and to make a proactive care plan. They were also able to join two role-plays where they discussed the patient’s future, and consulted a palliative care consultant to fine-tune the care plan. We evaluated the programme with the GPs and consultants and noted its impact on their daily practice. Methods Two years after they had participated in the programme, we held semi-structured interviews with the GPs and a focus group interview with the consultants and performed a thematic content analysis. Results Six consultants and nine GPs participated in the programme. Most GPs and consultants mentioned positive changes in the thinking or acting of GPs regarding early palliative care. A number continued to use the tool to identify patients; most of the others noted they had internalised the indicators. Although half of them still considered discussing end-of-life aspects difficult, particularly in patients with organ failure, the others were more easily able to discuss the future with their palliative patients. Conclusion Although most GPs and consultants were positive about the training programme and applying it in daily practice, we conclude that in future programmes, more attention needs to paid to timely identification of palliative patients with COPD or CHF and how to discuss the future with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bregje Thoonsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Groot
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Stans Verhagen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Chris van Weel
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Services Research and Quality, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Kris Vissers
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Engels
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Radboud University Medical Center, Post box 9101, Internal code 549, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kumar SP, Goyal M, Sisodia V, Kumar VK. Availability, Current issues, and Anticipation Training for Clinician-Patient Communication in Palliative Care: Learning and Doing or Learning by Doing? Indian J Palliat Care 2014; 20:245-6. [PMID: 25191017 PMCID: PMC4154177 DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.138405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Senthil P Kumar
- Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana, India
| | - Manu Goyal
- Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana, India
| | - Vaishali Sisodia
- Srinivas College of Physiotherapy and Research Centre, Pandeshwar, Karnataka, India
| | - Vijaya K Kumar
- Department of Physiotherapy, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|