Breaking bad news about cancer in China: Concerns and conflicts faced by doctors deciding whether to inform patients

Informing or concealing - Dynamics of telling disease-related bad news among family members of older cancer patients: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

With the dramatic rise in the number of older cancer patients, the question of whether or not to tell older patients of bad news becomes an urgent and common challenge. However, existing studies concentrated on the three types of disclosure decisions and their reasons, including full disclosure, partial disclosure, and avoidance of disclosure, and the evolution process and factors influencing family members' disclosure decisions are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Explore the experience and factors of the shift between disclosure and concealment among family members of older cancer patients.

METHODS

A qualitative study was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 family members at two general hospitals and one community hospital between December 2022 and June 2023. The interview data were analyzed using a content analysis approach.

RESULTS

The treatment plan symbolizes the "hope of survival" and it is the fundamental factor for the shift between concealment and disclosure. There are three themes of family members in making decisions during the diagnostic and therapeutic process: (a) When bad news is approaching: Keep calm in the midst of chaos, (b) when a treatment plan is determined: Hope for survival dictates disclosure decisions, and (c) when the patient's disease deteriorated: Finding hope in hopelessness.

CONCLUSIONS

Disclosure and concealment are a complex and dynamic process. The factor of the shift lies in the "hope of survival" symbolized by the treatment plan. The key to disclosure by family members is to give patients enough hope to control or cure a patient's disease, or prolong the life of patients and improve their quality of life.

Predicaments and coping strategies in implementing cancer truth-telling: a qualitative content analysis

PURPOSE

The patient-centered communication principles in Western countries are widely esteemed. In Eastern countries, a family-centered approach to medical decision-making is preferred. However, the predicaments faced by attending physicians and their coping strategies in the process of truth-telling about cancer are unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to understand attending physicians' predicaments and coping strategies in implementing truth-telling for cancer in Taiwan.

METHODS

This study used a qualitative description approach to conduct in-depth interviews with attending physicians. Data were collected from two medical centers in Taiwan. Purposive sampling was also conducted. A total of 17 attending physicians participated in individual semi-structured interviews. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive content analysis was used to analyze and develop the subcategories, generic categories, and main categories.

RESULTS

Four main categories emerged: (1) Causing harm to the patient: Family members' cooperation is needed. (2) Family members' request to conceal the truth: Physicians should judge based on the patient's disease condition. (3) Delayed treatment: Physicians should prioritize establishing confidence. (4) Delivering bad news about relapse: Physicians have different coping strategies.

CONCLUSION

Physicians in Taiwan face challenges but prioritize family-centered care despite having coping strategies to protect patients. When faced with a scenario in which family members request concealment of truth, most physicians cooperate with them to determine the level and method of disclosing unfavorable news to patients. Physicians should prioritize patients' psychological needs when they experience relapse or metastasis or face strong negative emotions.

"Let them be": Family members' perspectives on the participation of advanced cancer patients in nursing research: A qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Recruiting advanced cancer patients is crucial for nursing research in cancer care. However, nurse researchers often face various socio-cultural challenges, particularly in mainland China, where cultural taboos around death pose significant obstacles. An unexplored constraint in this context is the pivotal role Chinese family members play in patients' healthcare decision-making. This research gap underscores the need for a deeper understanding of Chinese family members' perspectives on the engagement of advanced cancer patients in nursing research.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perceptions and concerns of family members regarding the recruitment and participation of advanced cancer patients in nursing research.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted.

SETTINGS

Three cancer hospitals in mainland China.

PARTICIPANTS

A purposive sample of 18 family members, consisting of children or spouses of advanced cancer patients, was recruited as participants.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data between September 2022 and January 2023. The thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified: The absence of prior participation, Family members' reluctance to facilitate patient involvement, and Strategies to encourage patients' future participation. Family members were hesitant to allow their relatives with advanced cancer to engage in nursing research, primarily due to concerns about distressing patients, the use of potential sensitive language, stigma, and the risks involved in participation. To address these concerns, they emphasized the importance of gaining family approval prior to patient enrolment. They highlighted the need of family involvement on behalf of sick relatives in research, advocating for the inclusion of a wide range of patients rather than targeting specific subgroups. They also reiterated the significance of choosing the right time for participation and avoiding using sensitive terms such as 'cancer', 'dying', and 'death' when engaging with patients. Moreover, they proposed the recruitment of patients by trusted professionals, shortening the duration of research activities and simplifying research procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides fresh insights into the perspectives of family members concerning the recruitment and engagement of advanced cancer patients in nursing research. It emphasizes the importance of addressing their concerns and recommendations, aiding nurse researchers in developing culturally sensitive recruitment strategies and fostering the inclusive participation of advanced cancer patients in nursing research within the context of family-centered care and cultural taboos surrounding death.

Qualitative study on the perception of good death in patients with end-stage cancer in oncology nurses

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perception of good death of patients with end-stage cancer by nurses in the oncology department.

METHOD

In the study we used a phenomenological approach and semi-structured interviews. A total of 11 nurses from the oncology department of a Grade A hospital in Taizhou were interviewed on the cognition of good death from July 1 to September 30, 2022. Colaizzi's analysis method was used to analyse the interview data. This study followed the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).

RESULT

Four themes were identified: a strong sense of responsibility and mission; To sustain hope and faith; The important role of family members; Improve patients' quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The nurses in the department of oncology have a low level of knowledge about the "good death", and the correct understanding and view of the "good death" is the premise of the realization of " good death". The ability of nursing staff to improve the "good death", attention, and meet the needs and wishes of individuals and families, is the guarantee of the realization of "good death".

Breaking bad news in oncology practice: experience and challenges of oncology health professionals in Ethiopia - an exploratory qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experience and challenges health professionals face during breaking bad news (BBN) to patients with cancer in the oncology centre of Black Lion Specialized Hospital (BLSH), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2019.

DESIGN

An exploratory qualitative phenominological study using in-depth interviews was carried out in the only radiotherapy integrated oncology centre in Ethiopia during March 2019. Purposeful maximum variation sampling was used to select participants. OpenCode (V.4.02) assisted thematic analysis approach was employed to analyse the data.

PARTICIPANTS

Eleven oncology health practitioners (oncologists, residents and nurses) working at the oncology centre were interviewed. Repeated interviews and analysis were done until theoretical saturation.

RESULTS

All participants were cognisant of the positive outcome of proper and effective practice of BBN. However, they were practicing it empirically, no standardised protocols or guidelines were in place. Four dimensions of challenges were mentioned: (1) setup centric: unconducive environment, lack of protocols or guidelines, inaccessible treatment, and psychotherapy or counselling services; (2) health care centric, such as inadequate expertise, inadequate time due to patient load,treatment backlog, and referral system; (3) patients/family centric: poor medical literacy level, poor compliance, and family interference; and (4) sociocultural: wrong perception of families on BBN and treatment modalities, and opposition from religious leaders.

CONCLUSION

BBN is challenging for professionals caring for patients in the oncology centre of BLSH. Hence, there is a critical need to improve practices. Change efforts may focus on the development of contextualised, content and context specific practice oriented training programmes and curriculum interventions. Raising awareness of the community and religious leaders regarding the nature and treatment of cancer may also be a helpful adjunct.

Informed consent in cancer clinical care: Perspectives of healthcare professionals on information disclosure at a tertiary institution in Uganda

INTRODUCTION

While there have been several studies examining the understanding and quality of informed consent in clinical trials of cancer therapies, there is limited empirical research on health practitioners' experiences on the informed consent process in cancer care, especially from low resource settings. This study explored health professionals' perspectives on information disclosure during the consenting process in cancer care.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive approach was used to collect data. Face to face interviews were conducted with 10 purposively selected healthcare professionals who were actively involved in soliciting informed consent at a cancer treatment centre in Uganda. A thematic approach was used to interpret the results.

RESULTS

There were five key themes, and these included information disclosure to patients; assessment of patients' cancer awareness, treatment preferences and expectations; informed consent practices; barriers to optimal informed consent and information disclosure; and recommendations for improving the consenting process. All respondents appreciated the value of disclosing accurate information to patients to facilitate informed decision making. However, the informed consent process was deemed sub-optimal. Respondents asserted that patients should be the psychological wellbeing of patients should be protected by mentally preparing them before disclosing potentially distressing information. All healthcare professionals were appreciative of the central role the family plays in the consenting process.

CONCLUSION

Overall, informed consent practices were not ideal because of the several challenges. Inadequate time is devoted to information disclosure and patient education; there is lack of privacy; and informed consent documentation is poor. There is a need for significant improvement in informed consent practices and healthcare professional-patient communication.

Family roles in informed consent from the perspective of young Chinese doctors: a questionnaire study

BACKGROUND

Based on the principle of informed consent, doctors are required to fully inform patients and respect their medical decisions. In China, however, family members usually play a special role in the patient's informed consent, which creates a unique "doctor-family-patient" model of the physician-patient relationship. Our study targets young doctors to investigate the ethical dilemmas they may encounter in such a model, as well as their attitudes to the family roles in informed consent.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed including general demographic characteristics, the fulfillment of the obligation to fully inform, who will be informed, and the ethical dilemmas in decision-making. We recruited a total of 421 doctors to complete this questionnaire, of which 368 met the age requirements for this study. Cross tabulation and Pearson's chi-squared test were used to analyze the differences between types of patients for categorical variables, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Our data shows that only 20 doctors (5.40%) stated "informing the patient alone is sufficient" when it comes to informing patients of their serious conditions. The rest of the participants would ensure that the family was informed. When facing elderly patients with decision-making capacity, the data was statistically different (3.8%; P < 0.001) The primary reason for ensuring that family members be informed differs among the participants. In addition, when family members asked doctors to conceal the patient's medical condition for the best interests of patients, 270 doctors (73.4%) would agree and cooperate with the family. A similar proportion (79.6%) would do so when it comes to elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Chinese doctors pay extra attention to informing the patient's family, which may not be in the patient's best interests. (2) Chinese doctors treat adult (but not elderly) patients and elderly patients differently when it comes to informing family members. (3) When family members request that doctors withhold information from patients "in the best interest of the patient," the majority choose to comply with the request, although this may cause them distress.

Communication strategies used by medical physicians when delivering bad news at the Maputo Central Hospital, Mozambique: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Physicians' communication with patients and their families is important during both the disease diagnosis and prognosis stages and through the follow-up process. Effective physician communication improves patients' quality of life and satisfaction with care and helps reduce suffering for those newly diagnosed with advanced progressive illnesses. This study aims to identify the communication strategies physicians use in the transition to palliative care and how these professionals perceive their academic and clinical preparation concerning this task.

METHODS

A cross-sectional and quantitative study. Physicians providing palliative care at the Maputo Central Hospital, Mozambique, were invited to complete a 17-question questionnaire. This questionnaire was based on a Brazilian adaptation of the Setting-Perception-Invitation-Knowledge-Emotions-Strategy (SPIKES) tool, the P-A-C-I-E-N-T-E protocol, with additional questions regarding socio-demographic details and the integration of "communication of bad news" into hospital training.

RESULTS

Of the 121 participants, 62 (51.2%) were male, and 110 (90.9%) were general practitioners, with a median age of 36 years old. They had worked in clinical practice for a median of 8 years and in their current department for three years. The majority of the participants considered that they have an acceptable or good level of bad news communication skills and believed that they do it in a clear and empathic way, paying attention to the patient's requests and doubts; however, most were not aware of the existing tools to assist them in this task and suggested that delivering bad news ought to be integrated into the undergraduate medical course and included in hospital training.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds to our understanding of physicians' strategies when communicating bad news in the context of palliative care at one Mozambique hospital. As palliative care is not fully implemented in Mozambique, it is important to use protocols suitable to the country's healthcare level to improve how doctors deal with patients and their family members.

Communication with cancer patients: the perspective of caregivers versus non-caregivers in Iran

Objective

This study investigated and compared the attitudes of healthy Iranian individuals (n = 302) in forms of two groups of caregivers and non-caregivers of cancer patients about the communication with cancer patients, and their personal wish to know the diagnosis if they ever had cancer. In addition, this study aimed to identify how many participants in the caregivers' group had spoken with their family member affected by cancer about their illness.

Methods

Caregivers (50.7%) and non-caregivers (49.3%) responded to two questionnaires regarding their general attitudes about communicating with cancer patients, and their willingness to know about their illness if they had cancer.

Results

The majority of participants (92.8%), especially in the caregiver group, agreed with the right of patients to know the diagnosis and prognosis, and also wished to know if they ever had cancer. However, around 64% of caregivers never talked about cancer with the affected patients.

Conclusion

Participants generally believed that patients have the right to know the diagnosis and prognosis, and they also wished to know if they ever had cancer. However, in reality many cancer patients are not included in communication sessions in Iran. Health professionals should focus on how to create a balance between medical bioethics with cultural influences on communication with patients.

Breaking bad news: Awareness and practice of the SPIKES protocol among general surgery residents at a tertiary care institute in northern India

Background In general surgery, a clinician is commonly required to break bad news. However, training in communication is not a part of the formal curriculum either in medical school or in surgical residency and there is a paucity of data on awareness of the SPIKES (Setting up the interview, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge sharing, Emotion, Strategy and Summary) protocol among practising surgeons and residents in India. Methods We did a cross-sectional study in the Department of General Surgery at our institution. Junior residents were invited to take part in a one-on-one interview. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the findings of the study. Comparison for categorical data was done using Fisher exact test or chi-square test (whichever was applicable). Results A total of 82 residents with mean (SD) age of 27 (2.5) years (range 23-37 years) participated in the study. Only 31 (37.8%) had ever received training for breaking bad news, though 80 (97.6%) had broken bad news at least once. Twenty-one (26.3%) participants had a bad experience while breaking bad news. Seventy-seven (93.9%) participants felt the need for training in breaking bad news and 76 of them were willing to attend the same. Although the complete SPIKES protocol was followed only by 25 (31.3%) residents, 46 (56.1%) felt that it was practically possible to follow the SPIKES protocol. Conclusion Resident doctors in general surgery face situations of breaking bad news and adherence to the SPIKES protocol is poor. Formal training at every level may enhance their communication skills and enable better healthcare delivery.

Informed consent in cancer clinical drug trials in China: a narrative literature review of the past 20 years

BACKGROUND

Although the number of cancer clinical drug trials is increasing rapidly in China, issues concerning informed consent in this research context are understudied. By performing a narrative literature review, we aim to describe the current situation and identify the most salient challenges affecting informed consent in cancer clinical drug trials among adult patients in China since 2000.

METHODS

We searched Web of Science (WOS), PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database on Disc (CBMdisc), Chinese Scientific Journals Fulltext Database (CQVIP), and WANFANG Data to identify relevant publications since 2000. Data were extracted by three reviewers on six items pertaining to study type, theme, and challenges.

RESULTS

We identified 37 unique manuscripts, from which 19 full texts were obtained and six were included in the review. All six studies were published in Chinese journals, and the publication years of the majority (five out of six) of the studies were 2015 or later. The authors of the six studies were all from clinical departments or ethical review committees at five hospitals in China. All of the included publications were descriptive studies. Publications reported challenges related to the following aspects of informed consent: information disclosure, patient understanding, voluntariness, authorization, and procedural steps.

CONCLUSION

Based on our analysis of publications over the past two decades, there are currently frequent challenges related to various aspects of informed consent in cancer clinical drug trials in China. Furthermore, only a limited number of high-quality research studies on informed consent in cancer clinical drug trials in China are available to date. Efforts toward improvement of informed consent practice, in the form of guidelines or further regulations in China, should draw on both experience from other countries and high-quality local evidence.

Good death from cancer-the patient view: systematic review of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

An in-depth understanding of what constitutes a good death among patients with cancer is vital to providing patient-centred palliative care. This review aimed to synthesise evidence on the perceptions of a good death among patients with cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review involved a synthesis of qualitative data. A three-step process suggested by the Joanna Briggs Institute was used to synthesise the data.

RESULTS

A total of 1432 records were identified, and five articles met the inclusion criteria. Seven synthesised findings emerged: (1) being aware of cancer, (2) pain and symptom management, (3) dying well, (4) being remembered after death, (5) individual perspectives of a good death, (6) individual behaviours leading to a good death, and (7) culture and religions. A structural framework was developed to elicit two layers that could be regarded as determinants of a good death. One layer suggested how multiple external issues impact a good death, whereas the other layer involves patients' internal attributes that shape their experiences of a good death. The elements in the two layers were inter-related to exert a crossover effect on good death in specific cultural and religious contexts.

CONCLUSION

A good death is a process initiated from the time of awareness of cancer and extends beyond demise. Holistic approaches encompassing the management of physical and psychological distress along with psychosocial behavioural interventions to enhance patients' positive perspectives and behaviours are recommended to improve their quality of life and death.

Increasing clinical medical service satisfaction: An investigation into the impacts of Physicians' use of clinical decision-making support AI on patients' service satisfaction

BACKGROUND

The medical industry is one of the key industries for the application of artificial intelligence (AI). Although it is believed that the combination of CDSS and physicians could improve the medical service, there are still many concerns about the usage of CDSS. Based on these concerns, limited studies have answered the question that when a physician makes decision independently or with AI's help, will there be any differences in patients' satisfaction with the medical service?

METHODS

This study uses the service fairness theory as a theoretical lens and employs three vignette experiments to address this research gap. There are totally 740 subjects recruited to participate into the three experiments. Group comparison methods and structural equation model are used to verify the hypotheses.

RESULTS

The experimental results reveal that: (1) physicians using AI can reduce patients' service satisfaction (M_difference=0.404,p=0.004); (2) the negative relationship between AI usage and service satisfaction can partially be mediated through distributive fairness and procedural fairness; (3) physicians actively informing their patients about the usage of AI can help mitigate the reduction in service satisfaction (M_difference=0.400,p=0.003) and three types of fairness M_difference^distributive=0.307,p=0.042;M_difference^procedural=0.483,p<0.001;M_difference^{interactional}=0.253,p=0.027.

CONCLUSION

This study investigates the effect of physicians using decision-making support AI on their patients' service satisfaction. These results contribute to the existing literature pertaining to AI and fairness theory, and also help in formulating some practical suggestions for medical staff and AI development companies.

Voice of persons with a life-limiting illness in conversation with healthcare professionals: systematic review and meta-synthesis

BACKGROUND

Healthcare organisations are transforming the way care is delivered to people with a life-limiting illness with an increased focus on recognising the voice of the persons experiencing the illness and putting them in the centre of decision-making. However, the clinical practice remains largely based on the views of healthcare professionals and families or carers of the person with the illness.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesise the best available evidence on the experience of persons living with a life-limiting illness about expressing their voice during communication with healthcare professionals.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

REVIEW METHODS

A structured search was conducted to identify qualitative studies that reported on the experience of persons living with a life-limiting illness. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists. The review was undertaken using the JBI and PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

The expression of the voice of persons living with a life-limiting illness is influenced by: (1) the uncertain future surrounding illness trajectory and prognosis; (2) what is known from experience, media, family and friends; (3) emotional and psychological factors and (4) control and personal autonomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In the early stages of a life-limiting illness, the voice of those experiencing the disease is not always audible. Instead, this voice is potentially present but silent and carried and promoted within healthcare professionals' values of accountability, professionalism, respect, altruism, equality, integrity and morality.

Breaking bad news in medical services: a comprehensive systematic review

Objective

This study was performed with the aims of screening the previous studies on breaking bad news in all medical wards.

Methods

Eligible observational studies were selected. The quality of the studies was assessed using the STROBE checklist. The findings were reported using Garrard's table. All the stages of the present study were performed in terms of the PRISMA statement.

Results

Totally, 40 articles were included in the study and 96 items were extracted. The results show that breaking bad news is a recipient-centered process. Respect, empathy, and support were reported. The news presenters are better to use guidelines based on evidence-based findings. It is suggested that the presenter should use simple and understandable content. Moreover, suitable time and space are important to present the news. The results show the importance of paying enough attention to the emotions of the recipient and the need to provide support after breaking bad news.

Conclusion

The recipient must be the center of the programs. It is necessary to pay attention to the characteristics of the news presenter, the news content, and finally the support.Practice Implication: Understand the recipient, trained presenter, and use of the evidence-based results, improve the breaking bad news outcome.

Information disclosure to cancer patients in Mainland China: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to systematically examine Chinese cancer patients' and families' preferences for information disclosure to the patient, patient awareness, and predictors of patient awareness.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Web of Science, Scopus, Proquest, Taylor & Francis Online, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched in April 2022 and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database in July 2022 for quantitative studies. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were included, and the average quality score was 0.65/1. Meta-analyses showed that 89.6% and 81.8% of cancer patients wanted to know their diagnosis and prognosis, respectively. Meanwhile, 50.0% and 32.4% of families prefer diagnosis disclosure and prognosis disclosure to the patient, respectively. Significantly more patients than families favored disclosure to the patient. In reality, only 59.3% of cancer patients know their diagnosis, and 19.9% know their prognosis. For predictors, while patients' gender, cancer type (breast cancer or not), treatment method (operation or other), or complications (yes or no) do not influence diagnosis awareness, being younger, being married, having higher educational attainment, having early-stage rather than late-stage cancer, and being in a higher-grade hospital all predict better chances of knowing a diagnosis. No study explored predictors of patients' prognosis awareness. The findings did not vary according to publication time or sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese cancer patients are eager to know their diagnosis and prognosis, but families are hesitant about disclosure to the patient, and patients' awareness is low. While cultural, legal, and medical backgrounds lay the foundation for information disclosure in Mainland China, case-by-case practical factors also make a difference.

Decision Making Near End of Life: A Qualitative Exploration of the Lived Experiences of Jordanian Healthcare Providers

BACKGROUND

Discussions related to a patient's prognosis and interventions near end of life are challenging and stressful for healthcare providers. Many reported experiencing emotional distress and discomfort during the decision-making process.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the lived experience of nurses and physicians who participate in decision making near the end of a patient's life.

METHODS

A descriptive, phenomenological approach was used with a purposive sample of 7 nurses and 6 physicians from 2 palliative and end-of-life care institutions in Jordan. Data derived from focus group discussions conducted online via the ZOOM video communication application, and analysis followed Colaizzi's qualitative methodology.

RESULTS

Three major themes emerged from the healthcare providers' experiences. Initially, the participants described how they "strive toward optimal decision-making near end of life," "the overwhelming experience of decision making near end of life," and finally, their struggle in sharing details about the end of life when patients ask and whether to tell or not to tell them as "the time for hard talk."

CONCLUSIONS

The healthcare providers' experiences revealed several issues of decision making near a patient's end of life, such as a lack of appropriate training and administrative support, emotional distress, fear of legal liability, and the burden of a hard talk with patients. These findings necessitate institutional support of setting appropriate policies and guidelines, staff counseling, and healthcare provider support.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Institutions providing palliative and end-of-life care can use this study's findings to support their staff by setting appropriate practice guidelines and providing staff training and counseling.

How Do Treatment Preferences of Patients With Cancer Compare With Those of Oncologists and Family Members? Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment in China

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the treatment preference among oncologists, patients with lung cancer, and their family members in China.

METHODS

A face-to-face discrete choice experiment survey was conducted among oncologists, patients, and their family members. Participants completed 13 choice sets describing 6 key attributes, namely, overall survival time, risk of severe adverse effect, severity of pain, appetite, physical functioning status, and monthly cost. Mixed logit model and latent class analysis were used to estimate attribute level preference weights and the relative importance (RI) for attributes. The willingness to pay (WTP) and maximum acceptable risk (MAR) were also estimated. The RI, WTP, and MAR of oncologists, patients, and family members were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 121 oncologists and 161 dyads of patients and family members completed the survey. Overall survival time, physical functioning status, and pain were the 3 most important attributes across all 3 groups. Oncologists and family members had higher RI on overall survival time than patients (48% and 51% vs 38%). Patients had higher RI on physical functioning status and pain (23% and 14%) than oncologists (13% and 12%) and family members (16% and 11%). For extending survival, patients had the least WTP, and family members had the highest MAR. The latent class analysis identified 2 classes in the patient group and 3 classes in oncologist and family member groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences in preferences for survival, risk, quality of life, and costs associated with cancer treatments among patients, oncologists, and family members. This finding highlights the need of involving patients in treatment decision making in China.

Physicians’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practice toward Ethical and Medical Issues of Palliative Care in Suez Canal University Hospital

Objectives:

Palliative care (PC) includes a varied range of medical and ethical aspects that should be considered. The role of physicians in PC is crucial so this work explores physicians’ knowledge, attitude and practice toward PC in Suez Canal University hospital in Egypt.

Material and Methods:

A questionnaire survey investigating physician’s knowledge, attitude and practice in PC in 30 questions besides their personal and professional data.

Results:

Nearly 31% of participants received education in PC. Only 5.5% realised that PC should be introduced to patients at all health-care levels. Most participants (70.9%) were not aware about the WHO three-step analgesic ladder. About 57.7% and 43.6% of participants preferred informing terminal patients about their diagnosis and prognosis, respectively. More than half of participants (58.6%) agreed that the medical intervention decision is the patient’s right and 63.2% agreed that do not resuscitate choice is the patient or his family right if he is incompetent. Participants who do not have advance care plans discussions with their terminal patients represented 53.6%.

Conclusion:

This study indicated lack of knowledge and insufficient professionalism during management of terminal patients regarding some medical and ethical issues of PC. Formal education and training are urgently needed to improve the holistic vision and practice of PC in Egypt.

Chinese physicians' perceptions of palliative care integration for advanced cancer patients: a qualitative analysis at a tertiary hospital in Changsha, China

Background

Little previous research has been conducted outside of major cities in China to examine how physicians currently perceive palliative care, and to identify specific goals for training as palliative care access expands. This study explored physicians’ perceptions of palliative care integration for advanced cancer patients in Changsha, China.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with physicians (n = 24) specializing in hematology or oncology at a tertiary hospital.

Results

Most physicians viewed palliative care as equivalent to end-of-life care, while a minority considered it possible to integrate palliative care with active treatment. Almost all physicians maintained separate conversations about palliative care with family members and patients, communicating more directly with family members than with patients about prognosis and goals of care. Physicians described experiencing ethical tension between the desire of family members to protect the patient from knowing they have advanced cancer, and the patient’s “right to decide” about palliative treatment. Physicians varied overall regarding perceptions of the role they should have in discussions about goals of care.

Conclusions

As palliative care access expands in China, medical training should encourage earlier integration of palliative care for advanced cancer, address ethical issues faced by physicians communicating about palliative care, and establish guidance on the role of the physician in discussions about goals of care.

Preferences of the Saudi Population in Breaking Bad Medical News: A Regional Study

Objective

To explore the preference among the Saudi population regarding breaking bad news (BBN) for the participant cases and their relatives and to determine the associated sociodemographic factors.

Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients and companions attending inpatient and outpatient clinics of a tertiary care hospital in Western Saudi Arabia from 15 Jan to 30 May 2015. A six-item scale was designed to assess preference regarding diagnosis disclosure in three hypothetical conditions including chronic disease, incurable disease, and cancer if the participant or a close relative is concerned, separately. A BBN preference score (BBN-PS) was computed (range=0-6), with a higher score indicating a greater preference to disclose the diagnosis. Eventual motivations for diagnosis disclosure or withholding were explored.

Result

Five hundred participants were included; 56.0% were females and 55.0% were aged between 18 and 25 years. Preference to be informed with one’s diagnosis varied between 81.8% for incurable disease and 94.2% for chronic disease with complications. Preference to inform a relative with their diagnosis ranged between 69.0% for incurable disease and 86.8% for chronic disease with complications. Preference for diagnosis withholding was lower among participants of the younger age category (38.2% vs 51.2% or higher, p=0.002), with higher education (42.4% vs 60.8%, p=0.001), and working or studying in the medical field (39.7% vs 51.9%, p=0.006), compared to their counterparts, respectively. The most common motivations toward diagnosis disclosure preference were to enable the concerned person participate in their therapeutic decision (36.4%) and cope with the disease (27.4%); while preference toward diagnosis withholding was most commonly motivated by apprehensions regarding the psychological and social impact of the diagnosis (61.6%).

Conclusion

A non-negligible proportion of individuals prefer concealing a diagnosis of cancer or incurable disease to a relative, with an inter-generational disparity showing a shift to diagnosis disclosure in the young generations. There is an unmet need for evidence-based protocols for BBN based on a comprehensive assessment of patients’ expectations and needs, considering their cultural and religious values as well as the specific sociodemographic and clinical factors.

Knowledge, attitudes and preferences of palliative and end-of-life care among patients with cancer in mainland China: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of patients with cancer of palliative care and their preferences regarding end-of-life care in mainland China.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

This study was conducted in a tertiary cancer hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred forty-seven patients with cancer were recruited and consented to fill out the questionnaires.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The participants' knowledge and attitudes of palliative care and their preferences of end-of-life care involving place of care, place of death, truth disclosure and treatments during end-of-life were measured.

RESULTS

In total, 239 questionnaires were valid. The vast majority of patients with cancer (81.2%) had never heard about palliative care or related policies, and only a few of them (5.8%) had somewhat or totally understanding of palliative care. Most participants (75.3%) had supportive attitudes towards palliative care. In terms of preferences for end-of-life care, most patients with cancer preferred to be cared for at home at the end of their life and to die at home. The majority of patients with cancer (65.7%) wanted to know their diagnosis or prognosis of the disease, regardless of the type of disease. More than half of the participants (54%) wished to improve their quality of life rather than prolong their life expectancy. More than a third of the patients with cancer preferred to entrust a family member or agent to sign medical decision agreements for them.

CONCLUSIONS

It is essential for healthcare providers to improve the understanding of patients with cancer of palliative care and be aware of the end-of-life care preferences of patients with cancer, in order to provide support that enables patients with cancer to receive end-of-life care that is accordant with their wishes.

Differences in Lung Cancer Treatment Preferences Among Oncologists, Patients and Family Members: A Semi-Structured Qualitative Study in China

BACKGROUND

Cancer treatment decision-making often needs to balance benefits, harms, and costs. This study sought to identify the differences in cancer treatment preference among oncologists, patients and their family members in China.

METHODS

A semi-structured face-to-face qualitative interview was conducted among oncologists, patients and their family members recruited in four tertiary hospitals in China. The interview guide was developed based on literature review and expert consultation. Participants were asked to indicate their preferences when making lung cancer treatment decisions. All interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, and thematic analyzed. The preferences were compared among three groups of participants.

RESULTS

A total of 17 participants (5 oncologists, 6 dyads of patients and family members) were interviewed between June and July 2019. Five themes, namely, survival benefit, adverse effect/symptom, treatment process, treatment cost, and the impact on daily life were identified. The oncologists and family members gave highest priority on survival benefit, while the patients are concerned most about treatment cost and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals different preferences for cancer treatment among oncologists, patients and their family members in China. Education is needed to empower patients and family members and promote share decision-making in this country.

Discussing Prognosis with Empathy to Cancer Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our goal was to provide healthcare professionals (HCPs) with evidence-based data about what can be done to handle prognostic discussions with empathy.

RECENT FINDINGS

First, disclosing prognosis involves a good reason to do so and making sure that the patient will be able to process the discussion. Second, communication tips are given for the three dimensions of empathy: "establishing rapport with the patient," which should not be overlooked; the emotional dimension, which involves an accurate understanding of the patient and communication skills; and the "active/positive" dimension which is about giving hope, explaining things clearly and helping patients take control with shared decision-making and a planned future. Although communication tips are helpful, empathy training should be based more on the development of HCPs' emotional skills, in order to help them regulate their emotions and thus be more comfortable with those of patients and families. Furthermore, research into empathy toward minorities and relatives is needed.

The physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure: from nurses' perspective

BACKGROUND

Collaboration between physicians and nurses is critical. However, a limited number of studies have provided insights into the status of physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an electronic questionnaire among Chinese nurses who attended a provincial conference. The Nurse-Physician Collaboration Scale was administered to nurses to assess the collaboration in truth disclosure from their perspective. A multiple-choice question was asked to assess the perceived difficulties in truth disclosure. Descriptive statistics, univariate, and multiple stepwise regression analyses were performed to evaluate physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure.

RESULTS

A total of 287 nurses completed the survey, and 279 of them reported that they had carried out truth disclosures among patients. The average score for physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure was 3.98 ± 0.72. The majority of nurses (73.1-81%) responded positively to different dimensions of collaboration in truth disclosure. The results of multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that seniority (B = - 0.111, 95% confidence interval [CI] = - 0.167-- 0.055, p < 0.001) and frequency of truth disclosure (B = 0.162, 95%CI = 0.076-0.249, p < 0.001) were the only two factors associated with collaboration in truth disclosure between physicians and nurses. The most common barrier perceived by nurses was fear of patients' negative emotions or their suicide attempts after truth telling.

CONCLUSIONS

Most nurses responded positively to physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure. Various difficulties existed in the practice of truth-telling collaboration. Further studies are required to test the potential interventions to promote cooperation between nurses and physicians in truth disclosure.

Clinical discussion of Medical Aid-in-Dying: minimizing harms and ensuring informed choice

OBJECTIVE

The implementation of medical aid-in-dying (MAID) poses new challenges for clinical communication and counseling. Among these, health care providers must consider whether to initiate a discussion of MAID with eligible patients who do not directly ask about it. Norms and policies concerning this issue vary tremendously across jurisdictions where MAID is legally authorized, reflecting divergent assumptions about patients' rights to information about end-of-life options and the purpose and potential harms of clinical disclosure.

METHOD

This discussion forum essay draws on informed consent doctrine to analyze two policies concerning clinical communication about MAID: the legal prohibition against provider-initiated discussions of MAID in Victoria, Australia, and the Canadian Association of MAID Assessors and Providers (CAMAP) position that providers have an ethical and professional responsibility to inform eligible patients about MAID.

CONCLUSIONS

Informed consent requires that clinicians strike a balance between minimizing potential harms to patients caused by initiating discussions of MAID and the imperative to inform and counsel patients about all of their legally available medical options.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Clinicians should be aware of both the importance of communication as a tool to inform patients and the potential for clinical language to cause harm to or to unduly influence patients.

"Imagine You Have ALS": Death Education to Prepare for Advance Treatment Directives

The study presents the results of qualitative research carried out within a death education project dedicated to advance treatment directives (ATDs) in which it was proposed to participants to empathize with people who had received a diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). The study involved 104 people who discussed and reflected on issues related to the knowledge of having to die, palliative care and ATDs, investigating what choices they would have made if they had received such a diagnosis. Finally, they were asked to write a paper describing their impressions and hypothetical choices. Qualitative analysis has elucidated among fundamental themes. Four thematic areas emerged from the data analysis: (1) ATDs and the family; (2) the importance of reducing pain and suffering; (3) emotions and considerations regarding death, illness and spirituality; and (4) opinions on the DeEd course. It has emerged that some people are unfamiliar with palliative care or the right to self-determination and that addressing these issues helps manage the thought of the future with less terror. The experience of death education has therefore proven to be very positive in dealing with complex and often censored issues, allowing thinking about death in a less distressing way.

Oncologists' Experience of Delivering Bad News in Korea

This study explored oncologists' experiences of delivering bad news to patients with cancer and their families. Nine oncologists recruited from three superior hospitals in Korea completed in-depth interviews. The results of thematic analyses identified four themes: precursors to bad news delivery, why it is difficult to deliver bad news, when it is more difficult to deliver bad news, and strategies of delivering bad news. The participants felt unprepared for the task and stressed because breaking bad news goes against their responsibility to do no harm and their professional objective to promote healing. Although they were unclear about best practices regarding communication styles, they individualized their communication style to meet the needs of their patients, who have an array of cultural, social, and spiritual backgrounds. Understanding oncologists' perceptions of bad news delivery can inform culturally appropriate interventions for alleviating their stress and improving patient-physician relationships in communication of bad news.