Utilization of the Premature Birth Knowledge Scale to Assess Pediatric Provider Knowledge of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes

Differential Susceptibility: An Explanation for Variability in Life Course Health and Developmental Outcomes

Differential susceptibility theory posits that some individuals, with specific characteristics, are more, or less susceptible than others, to both adverse and beneficial environmental influences. It offers a perspective for understanding the directional trajectories across the life course affected by daily context and individual characteristics, in order to identify influential components. The aim of this article is to describe differential susceptibility theory, critically evaluate research findings in which the theory is tested, and consider implications of differential susceptibility theory as a theoretical framework for nursing science. Preterm birth trajectories and outcomes research are used as a lens for this examination.

Recommendations to optimize life-long health and wellbeing for people born preterm

The preterm birth rate in the United States is 10%, with 8% being born between 36 and 32 weeks of gestation, and the remaining 2% born less than 31 weeks of gestation. The global preterm birth rate varies from 5% to 18%, with varying survival rates. These percentages signify a population of people that will receive health care across the life course without ever being asked about a preterm birth history. With a steady rise in the survival rate of preterm infants being discharged home from the neonatal intensive care unit, with limited referrals for neonatal or developmental follow up, it is essential adult care providers ask the right questions and identify risk factors for this vulnerable population. This review describes the recently published, evidence-based recommendations for addressing preterm history across the life course. A robust review of the literature has demonstrated that the long-term sequelae of being born preterm can adversely affect health and quality of life. The following will offer preterm birth history recommendations based on assessment and diagnosis, prevention and management and referral and treatment. The goal of the recommendations is to create awareness among adult health providers in acknowledging a past medical history of preterm birth and providing appropriate preventive care, therefore shifting the paradigm of care from reactive intervention to proactive care.

Survey of clinical staff knowledge on the long-term outcomes of very preterm infants delivered in a tertiary referral hospital

AIM

To assess knowledge of our neonatal intensive care unit clinical staff regarding preterm neurodevelopmental outcomes using the 33-item Preterm Birth Knowledge Scale (PB-KS).

METHODS

An anonymous convenience sampling survey of clinical staff in the Neonatal Directorate was conducted between July and December 2019. PB-KS, demographic information and prior staff education on long-term outcomes in very preterm infants were collected.

RESULTS

There were 56 responses (five neonatologists, eight paediatric trainees, 41 neonatal nurses and two allied health staff). Responses were scored as correct or incorrect. The mean score on the PB-KS was 19.5 (range: 4-29 out of 40) with 50% correct answers. Accuracy was highest (96%) for rates of cerebral palsy and lowest (11%) for estimation of quality of life among preterm survivors. Staff reported training in long-term outcomes of preterm infants through attending a conference/seminar (20%) or a combination of formal training and seminars (41.1%). Over half of our clinical staff reported a lack of formal training. Formally trained clinical staff scored significantly better in this survey. Didactic seminars were indicated as preferred choice for staff education.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of our survey will assist in developing a customised educational programme to address identified gaps in the knowledge of clinical staff as our survey also showed significantly better scores among staff who were formally trained about long-term outcomes in very preterm infants. Staff responses indicated that knowledge on long-term outcomes was variable but more accurate with regard to more severe disabilities and shorter-term developmental outcomes.

Addressing Preterm Birth History With Clinical Practice Recommendations Across the Life Course

Preterm birthrates, coupled with excellent preterm birth survival rates, guarantee that every health care provider, regardless of specialty, is caring for patients who were born preterm. Patients and families may not share a preterm birth history however, eliciting this information is important for mitigating potential risk. Long-term health outcomes research supports health implications associated with preterm birth throughout the life course. Through an in-depth review of literature and validation from health care experts in pediatric and adult care, recommendations for primary care providers were developed. The aim was to enhance the identification of those born prematurely, empower health care providers to employ familiar screening strategies, and advocate for mitigations strategies with anticipatory guidance and health promotion. These recommendations advocate a paradigm shift toward proactive intervention, rather than the reactive practice of waiting for children to fail to meet specific milestones or begin to show comorbid tendencies.

The Influence of preterm birth beyond infancy: Umbrella review of outcomes of adolescents and adults born preterm

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In recent decades, increased neonatal survival has enabled research of long-term outcomes of those born preterm. The purpose of this article is to present the findings of an umbrella review, an examination of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses, to examine the outcomes of adolescents and adults born preterm.

METHODS

The research was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for umbrella reviews. A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases with the search years 2010 through September 2018 yielded 16 reviews for inclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The 16 reviews included in this umbrella review represent five clinical outcomes: neurodevelopmental (3 reviews), mental/behavioral health (5 reviews), cardiovascular (4 reviews), pulmonary (3 reviews), and life experience outcomes (4 reviews). One review included data for multiple clinical outcomes. This umbrella review highlights the adolescent and adult risks related to cognitive scores, executive function, anxiety, depression, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, long-term effects on systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoproteins and cholesterol levels, pulmonary symptoms, including asthma, pulmonary function, radiographic changes in the lungs, sports and leisure participation, and educational attainment and employment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a preponderance of evidence that supports targeted screening for a history of preterm birth by all health care providers. This screening should facilitate the promotion of healthy lifestyles and improving psychosocial and neurodevelopmental difficulties through early and continued support services. Curricular and practice standards are advocated to support this change.

Umbrella Review of School Age Health Outcomes of Preterm Birth Survivors

Preterm birth affects approximately 10% of U.S. births, with survival rates close to 95%. All health care providers, regardless of population or setting, are treating preterm birth survivors. The purpose of this manuscript is to present an umbrella review of the health outcomes of 2- to 12-year-old children who were born preterm. The current umbrella review consisted of 29 reviews, 14 meta-analyses, eight systematic reviews, and seven described as both meta-analysis and systematic review. Studies were grouped into six health outcome categories: neurodevelopmental, motor and/or cerebral palsy, pulmonary, mental and/or behavioral health, quality of life and/or leisure, and eczema. The analysis supports a resounding recommendation to recognize preterm birth, at all gestations, as a risk factor to health and educational outcomes. Increased attention to developmental screenings is critical, specifically recognition that children who are on the lower ranges of normal may benefit from therapies or interventions that support the attainment of future skills.

Health and educational implications of prematurity in the United States: National Survey of Children's Health 2011/2012 data

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Preterm birth is a significant public health issue, with children born prematurely experiencing educational and health difficulties throughout childhood. The aim of the descriptive secondary data analysis was to compare health implications and educational experiences in children born prematurely compared with children born at term.

METHODS

The 2011/2012 National Survey of Children's Health data set was explored using separate chi-square tests of homogeneity to investigate differences in the occurrence of chronic health conditions and educationally relevant outcomes: individualized family services plan/individualized education plan (IFSP/IEP), and grade repetition between children born prematurely compared with those born at term.

CONCLUSIONS

The six most frequently occurring chronic health conditions that disproportionally affected children born prematurely include the following: attention deficit disorder/attention deficit hyperactive disorder (odds ratio [OR], 1.59), anxiety (OR, 1.63), asthma (OR, 1.7), learning disability (OR, 2.07), speech problems (OR, 2.27), and developmental delay (OR, 3.17). Preterm birth negatively affects the educational experience of CBP as measured by increased report of IFSP/IEP and repeated grades across all age categories.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

All health care providers have an important role in preventing preterm birth and in supporting the children and families affected by preterm birth. Appreciation of the incidence and prevalence of the health conditions and educational difficulties associated with preterm birth is essential for facilitating access to appropriate resources. Beyond patient interactions, these modifiable yet additive factors should inform health policy and planning.