Early Initiation of Pediatric Palliative Care

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of critical care unit personnel regarding pediatric palliative care: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated the perceptions of healthcare providers in China regarding pediatric palliative care, particularly in critical care units (PICUs), where many children receive palliative care. To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of PICU personnel in China regarding pediatric palliative care.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in five cities in China (Shanghai, Suzhou, Chongqing, Chengdu and Yunnan) between November 2022 and December 2022.

RESULTS

The analysis included 204 participants (122 females), with 158 nurses and 46 physicians. The average knowledge, attitude and practice scores were 9.75 ± 2.90 points (possible range, 0-13 points), 38.30 ± 3.80 points (possible range, 12-60 points) and 35.48 ± 5.72 points (possible range, 9-45 points), respectively. Knowledge score was higher for physicians than for nurses (P < 0.001) and for personnel with previous training in pediatric palliative care (P = 0.005). According to structural equation modelling knowledge had a direct positive effect on attitude (β = 0.69 [0.28-1.10], p = 0.001), and indirect on practice (β = 0.82 [0.36-1.28], p < 0.001); attitude had significant effect on practice as well (β = 1.18 [0.81-1.56], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is room for improvement in the knowledge, attitudes and practices of PICU personnel in China regarding pediatric palliative care. The findings of this study may facilitate the design and implementation of targeted education/training programs to better inform physicians and nurses in China about pediatric palliative care.

Palliative care services in paediatric oncology centres across Europe: A cross-sectional survey

Background

Palliative care (PC) is an integral part of cancer treatment. However, data on service availability is limited in childhood cancers.

Aim

To describe the availability of PC services in paediatric oncology centres across Europe, and to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing and providing paediatric palliative care (PPC).

Methods

Paediatric oncology centres across Europe were invited to complete an online questionnaire.

Results

A total of 158 paediatric oncology centres from 27 European countries participated. More than half of the centres (n=102, 64.6%) reported offering specialised PPC (defined as 24/7 coverage services with specialized physician and a multidisciplinary team). Most centres included a multidisciplinary care team (n=123, 80.9%) and PC at home (n=105, 69.1%). In 38.7% centres, service capacity was reported to be lower than demand. In most centres, PC consultation was initiated for a refractory neoplasm (n=126, 81.2%). Few centres (n=11, 7.1%) offered PC consultation at the time of a new cancer diagnosis. Eighty-two centres (52.6%) reported having bereavement services. Negative parental perception (n=99, 64.7%) and late referrals (n=91, 59.5%) were major barriers to implementation perceived by health care providers.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that specialised PPC is available in more than half of paediatric oncology settings across Europe. Although half have had PPC available for >10 years, many cannot fulfil the demand for service. Barriers to implementation (i.e., parental education, staff training) should be addressed, with resources and services further expanded to cover the demand for PPC, including bereavement care.

Challenges in establishing optimal pediatric palliative care at the university hospital in Slovenia

The integration of pediatric palliative care (PPC) should become a standard of care for all children with life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses. There are many barriers and misperceptions in pediatrics which hinder the early implementation of PPC. The aim of the study was to design starting points for the establishment of accessible PPC with early involvement of patients in a tertiary-level children's hospital. An intervention, presentation, and discussion on PPC were offered by the hospital PPC team to all employees in the hospital. A total of 237 participants (physicians 30.4%, nurses 49.4%, psychologists 8.4%, and others) completed a questionnaire before and after the intervention. The personnel's knowledge, self-assessment of their ability to perform PPC, attitude to participate in PPC, and their awareness and understanding of the need for PPC were evaluated. The results were analyzed using Pandas and SciPy libraries in Python. The knowledge, awareness, and attitude of the physicians, nurses, and other professionals improved significantly after the intervention. However, the self-assessment of their ability to perform PPC did not increase. Previous experience with the death of a patient has proven to be a stimulus for self-initiative in acquiring knowledge in PPC and was linked with a better attitude and higher awareness of the need for PPC.Conclusions: More education and practical work tailored to the different professional profiles are needed, with adjustments for specific subspecialist areas, especially where patients could be included in early PPC. Although additional studies are needed, we identified the main directions for the further implementation of PPC in clinical practice in our setting.

Do We Need Palliative Care in Pediatric Nephrology? Patients' and Caregivers' Disease Experience

Chronic life-limiting illnesses such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) require integral support to the families concerned in addition to medical care. Palliative care is an option to facilitate families to address future concerns, such as procedures for acute life-threatening complications, or to relieve physical and psychosocial suffering. The exact needs of patients or parents have not yet been investigated. To assess needs in supportive palliative care, we conducted a monocentric qualitative interview study. We included patients 14 to 24 years old as well as parents of younger children (below 14 years) with CKD ≥ stage 3. In total, fifteen interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed with a deductive and descriptive approach using qualitative content analysis as described by Mayring. Sociodemographic data and basic information of disease were collected using questionnaires. In contrast to caregivers, adolescents and young adults do not express worries about their own mortality or reduced life expectancy. Rather, they report about their limitations to everyday life associated with the disease, especially in the areas of school and work. They wish to live a normal life. Caregivers are concerned about the future and the disease trajectory. They also describe difficulties in balancing the management of the disease with other responsibilities such as work and healthy siblings' needs. Patients and caregivers appear to need a chance to talk about their everyday struggles and disease-related fears and concerns. Talking about their concerns and needs may help deal with their emotions and facilitate acceptance of their situation characterized by a life-limiting disease. Our study confirms the need for psychosocial support in pediatric nephrology to address the needs of the affected families. This can be offered by pediatric palliative care teams.

International Standards for Pediatric Palliative Care: From IMPaCCT to GO-PPaCS

CONTEXT

Since the publication of the IMPaCCT project in 2007, much effort has been made to develop new approaches to pediatric palliative care (PPC). Fifteen years later, it is time to redefine the standards in PPC.

OBJECTIVES

An international group of experts in PPC has revised the standards in PPC through the GO-PPaCS project (Global Overview - PPC Standards). The goal was to update the PPC standards considering the specificity of different settings, resources, and emerging challenges. The present document is intended to reach all people directly or indirectly involved in PPC.

METHODS

A literature review in MEDLINE was conducted to expand on the fundamental points and current standards on PPC and to cover an international setting. The literature search (updated on the 15th of April 2021) was carried out using different combinations of keywords and focusing on papers published in English over the past 5 years (2016-2020), but older articles were considered when relevant. The consensus on the fundamental points, standards of care and paper contents was reached by open discussion.

RESULTS

Fundamental points were defined regarding the definition of PPC, eligibility criteria and the magnitude of the need for PPC, while standards were redefined for the following six areas: 1) clinical, developmental, psychological, social, ethical and spiritual needs; 2) end-of-life care; 3) care models and settings of care; 4) PPC in humanitarian emergencies; 5) care tools; and 6) education and training for healthcare providers.

CONCLUSION

The present document, developed with the contribution of an international group of experts from different countries, experiences and models of care, provides fundamental points and standards for a wider implementation of PPC worldwide.

Initiation of paediatric advance care planning: Cross-sectional survey of health professionals reported behaviour

BACKGROUND

Globally, initiation of paediatric advance care planning discussions is advocated early in the illness trajectory; however, evidence suggests it occurs at crisis points or close to end of life. Few studies have been undertaken to ascertain the prevalence and determinants of behaviour related to initiation by the healthcare professional.

METHOD

Underpinned by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model for behaviour change, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted in United Kingdom and Ireland using a purposive sample of health professionals. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied and nonparametric statistical analysis used. Open-ended questions were mapped and correlations between COM-B and demographic profiles identified.

RESULTS

Responses (n = 140): Paediatric advance care planning was viewed positively; however, initiation practices were found to be influenced by wide ranging diagnoses and disease trajectories. Whilst some tools and protocols exist, they were not used in a systematic manner, and initiation behaviour was often not guided by them. Initiation was unstandardized, individually led, guided by intuition and experience and based on a range of prerequisites. Such behaviour, combined with inconsistencies in professional development, resulted in varying practice when managing clinical deterioration. Professionals who felt adequately trained initiated more conversations (capability). Those working in palliative care specialties, hospice settings and doctors initiated more discussions (opportunity). There was no difference in Motivation between professions, clinical settings or specialisms, although 25% (n = 35) of responses indicated discomfort discussing death and 34% (n = 49) worried about families' emotional reaction.

CONCLUSION

Although advocated, paediatric advance care planning is a complex process, commonly triggered by the physical deterioration and rarely underpinned by support tools. The COM-B framework was useful in identifying fundamental differences in initiation behaviour; however, further research is required to explore the complexity of initiation behaviour and the system within which the care is being delivered to identify influences on initiation.