Misplaced peripherally inserted central catheter: an unusual cause of stroke

The Perfect Storm: Exam of a Medical Error and Factors Contributing to Its Possible Escalation

OBJECTIVE

After an initial medical misadventure, failure of recognition and continuing factors that could perpetuate the error are examined.

METHODS

A critical evaluation of the continuum of care after the initial error was conducted through chart review and comparison to published standards.

RESULTS

Analysis of the continuum of care after the original error demonstrated numerous system failures that should have alerted the providers to the initial error.

DISCUSSION

Technology, electronic medical records, lack of critical communications, and short cuts have the potential to not recognize patient care safety issues and potential harm.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical errors are multifactorial. Blame casting and accusations are not productive. Critical analysis of systems/processes, current technology, eliminating shortcuts, and critical communications may increase patient safety.

Late neurological deficit after attempted PICC insertion in the arm

INTRODUCTION:

Insertion of central catheters in peripheral vessels is a common procedure performed for a variety of indications, including parenteral nutrition. Hyperemesis gravidarum may require parenteral nutrition in exceptional situations. Although globally safe, insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) can lead to complications.

CASE REPORT:

We describe a case of a pregnant woman who required parenteral nutrition and underwent an unsuccessful PICC insertion attempt resulting in arterial puncture, and who 34 days later presented with right upper limb paresthesia. A pseudoaneurysm with nerve compression was diagnosed and treated by open surgery, without maternal or fetal complications.

CONCLUSION:

We recommend active surveillance ultrasound (e.g. in the first 24-48 h) of unsuccessful PICC insertion attempts, because late complications may occur and require invasive procedures for treatment.

Radiographic signs of non-venous placement of intended central venous catheters in children

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in children, and inadvertent arterial or extravascular cannulation is rare but has potentially serious complications.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the radiographic signs of arterial placement of CVCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed seven cases of arterially malpositioned CVCs on chest radiograph. These cases were identified through departmental quality-assurance mechanisms and external consultation. Comparison of arterial cases was made with 127 age-matched chest radiographs with CVCs in normal, expected venous location. On each anteroposterior (AP) radiograph we measured the distance of the catheter tip from the right lateral border of the thoracic spine, and the angle of the vertical portion of the catheter relative to the midline. On each lateral radiograph we measured the angle of the vertical portion of each catheter relative to the anterior border of the thoracic spine. When bilateral subclavian catheters were present, the catheter tips were described as crossed, overlapping or uncrossed.

RESULTS

On AP radiographs, arterially placed CVCs were more curved to the left, with catheter tip positions located farther to the left of midline than normal venous CVCs. When bilateral, properly placed venous catheters were present, all catheters crossed at the level of the superior vena cava (SVC). When one of the bilateral catheters was in arterial position, neither of the catheters crossed or the inter-catheter crossover distance was exaggerated. On lateral radiographs, there was a marked anterior angulation of the vertical portion of the catheter (mean angle 37 ± 15° standard deviation [SD] in arterial catheters versus 5.9 ± 8.3° SD in normally placed venous catheters).

CONCLUSION

Useful radiographic signs suggestive of unintentional arterial misplacement of vascular catheters include leftward curvature of the vertical portion of the catheter, left-side catheter tip position, lack of catheter crossover on the frontal radiograph, as well as exaggerated anterior angulation of the catheter on the lateral chest radiograph.

Cerebrovascular events associated with infusion through arterially malpositioned triple-lumen catheter: report of three cases and review of literature

Analysis of 10 adult patients treated from January 1998 to November 2004 for arterial misplacement of triple-lumen catheter (TLC) during internal jugular vein cannulation was performed. Three cases that developed neurologic symptoms occurring in the context of infusion through a TLC that was arterially malpositioned are presented, along with the review of literature. In 7 patients, the diagnosis of arterial misplacement was suspected by the color or flow characteristics of blood and confirmed by a combination of blood gas analysis, connecting catheter to transducer, and/or chest film. In the remaining 3 patients, intraarterial misplacement was not suspected. In these patients, the initial review of chest films by qualified physicians prior to starting infusion failed to detect malposition of the catheter. Retrospectively, subtle clues suggestive of arterially placed TLCs were found. All 3 patients developed neurologic symptoms. Initiation of neurologic workup delayed a correct diagnosis by 6 to >48 hours. A volumetric pump was used for infusion in all patients. Of the 3 patients with neurologic symptoms, 1 recovered completely, 1 became comatose, and 1 partially improved. Based on our observations and review of literature, we conclude that cursory examination of chest films to verify proper positioning of central venous catheter attempted through the internal jugular vein may fail to detect arterial malposition. Infusion by volumetric pump precludes backflow of blood in the intravenous tubing as an indicator. Neurologic symptoms concurrent with the infusion of fluids and medication should raise suspicion of accidental arterial infusion.