Magnetoencephalographic Spike Analysis in Patients With Focal Cortical Dysplasia: What Defines a "Dipole Cluster"?

Association Between Magnetoencephalography-Localized Epileptogenic Zone, Surgical Resection Volume, and Postsurgical Seizure Outcome

PURPOSE

Surgical resection of magnetoencephalography (MEG) dipole clusters, reconstructed from interictal epileptiform discharges, is associated with favorable seizure outcomes. However, the relation of MEG cluster resection to the surgical resection volume is not known nor is it clear whether this association is direct and causal, or it may be mediated by the resection volume or other predictive factors. This study aims to clarify these open questions and assess the diagnostic accuracy of MEG in our center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 68 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent MEG followed by resective epilepsy surgery and had at least 12 months of postsurgical follow-up.

RESULTS

Good seizure outcomes were associated with monofocal localization (χ2 = 6.94, P = 0.001; diagnostic odds ratio = 10.2) and complete resection of MEG clusters (χ2 = 22.1, P < 0.001; diagnostic odds ratio = 42.5). Resection volumes in patients with and without removal of MEG clusters were not significantly different (t = 0.18, P = 0.86; removed: M = 20,118 mm3, SD = 10,257; not removed: M = 19,566 mm3, SD = 10,703). Logistic regression showed that removal of MEG clusters predicts seizure-free outcome independent of the resection volume and other prognostic factors (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete resection of MEG clusters leads to favorable seizure outcomes without affecting the volume of surgical resection and independent of other prognostic factors. MEG can localize the epileptogenic zone with high accuracy. MEG interictal epileptiform discharges mapping should be used whenever feasible to improve postsurgical seizure outcomes.

The Noninvasive Evaluation for Minimally Invasive Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery (MIPES): A Multimodal Exploration of the Localization-Based Hypothesis

Minimally invasive pediatric epilepsy surgery (MIPES) is a rising technique in the management of focal-onset drug-refractory epilepsy. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are based on small, focal interventions (such as parenchymal ablation or localized neuromodulation) leading to elimination of the seizure onset zone or interruption of the larger epileptic network. Precise localization of the seizure onset zone, demarcation of eloquent cortex, and mapping of the network leading to seizure propagation are required to achieve optimal outcomes. The toolbox for presurgical, noninvasive evaluation of focal epilepsy continues to expand rapidly, with a variety of options based on advanced imaging and electrophysiology. In this article, we will examine several of these diagnostic modalities from the standpoint of MIPES and discuss how each can contribute to the development of a localization-based hypothesis for potential surgical targets.

Presurgical accuracy of dipole clustering in MRI-negative pediatric patients with epilepsy: Validation against intracranial EEG and resection

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of interictal magnetic and electric source imaging (MSI and ESI) using dipole clustering in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative patients with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE).

METHODS

We localized spikes in low-density (LD-EEG) and high-density (HD-EEG) electroencephalography as well as magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings using dipoles from 11 pediatric patients. We computed each dipole's level of clustering and used it to discriminate between clustered and scattered dipoles. For each dipole, we computed the distance from seizure onset zone (SOZ) and irritative zone (IZ) defined by intracranial EEG. Finally, we assessed whether dipoles proximity to resection was predictive of outcome.

RESULTS

LD-EEG had lower clusterness compared to HD-EEG and MEG (p < 0.05). For all modalities, clustered dipoles showed higher proximity to SOZ and IZ than scattered (p < 0.001). Resection percentage was higher in optimal vs. suboptimal outcome patients (p < 0.001); their proximity to resection was correlated to outcome (p < 0.001). No difference in resection percentage was seen for scattered dipoles between groups.

CONCLUSION

MSI and ESI dipole clustering helps to localize the SOZ and IZ and facilitate the prognostic assessment of MRI-negative patients with DRE.

SIGNIFICANCE

Assessing the MSI and ESI clustering allows recognizing epileptogenic areas whose removal is associated with optimal outcome.

Practical Fundamentals of Clinical MEG Interpretation in Epilepsy

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neurophysiologic test that offers a functional localization of epileptic sources in patients considered for epilepsy surgery. The understanding of clinical MEG concepts, and the interpretation of these clinical studies, are very involving processes that demand both clinical and procedural expertise. One of the major obstacles in acquiring necessary proficiency is the scarcity of fundamental clinical literature. To fill this knowledge gap, this review aims to explain the basic practical concepts of clinical MEG relevant to epilepsy with an emphasis on single equivalent dipole (sECD), which is one the most clinically validated and ubiquitously used source localization method, and illustrate and explain the regional topology and source dynamics relevant for clinical interpretation of MEG-EEG.

Presurgical Evaluation Strategies for Intractable Epilepsy of Childhood

For children who continue to experience seizures despite treatment with antiseizure medications, epilepsy surgery can be considered. The goals of the presurgical evaluation are to determine the best surgical approach to render a good outcome. In patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy, the epileptogenic zone defines the minimal brain volume which must be resected for surgical success and to delineate the relationship of this region with functional cortex. A number of noninvasive tools for these tasks have emerged over the past decade, and existing technologies have been revised and improved. In this review, we examine the recent published evidence for these techniques, specifically as applied to the pediatric population. Discussed herein are the diagnostic value of methods such as video electroencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and supportive neuroimaging techniques including single photon emission tomography, photon emission tomography, and magnetoencephalography. Functional testing including functional magnetic resonance imaging, electrical stimulation mapping, and transcranial magnetic stimulation are considered in the context of pediatric epilepsy. The application of emerging techniques to preoperative testing such as source localization, image post-processing, and artificial intelligence is covered. We summarize the relative value of presurgical testing based on patient characteristics, including lesional or nonlesional MRI, temporal or extratemporal epilepsy, and other factors relevant in pediatric epilepsy such as pathological substrate and age.

A review of magnetoencephalography use in pediatric epilepsy: an update on best practice

Introduction: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a noninvasive technique that is used for presurgical evaluation of children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).Areas covered: The contributions of MEG for localizing the epileptogenic zone are discussed, in particular in extra-temporal lobe epilepsy and focal cortical dysplasia, which are common in children, as well as in difficult to localize epilepsy such as operculo-insular epilepsy. Further, the authors review current evidence on MEG for mapping eloquent cortex, its performance, application in clinical practice, and potential challenges.Expert opinion: MEG could change the clinical management of children with DRE by directing placement of intracranial electrodes thereby enhancing their yield. With improved identification of a circumscribed epileptogenic zone, MEG could render more patients as suitable candidates for epilepsy surgery and increase utilization of surgery.

Assessing the localization accuracy and clinical utility of electric and magnetic source imaging in children with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of conventional 21-channel EEG (conv-EEG), 72-channel high-density EEG (HD-EEG) and 306-channel MEG in localizing interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs).

METHODS

Twenty-four children who underwent epilepsy surgery were studied. IEDs on conv-EEG, HD-EEG, MEG and intracranial EEG (iEEG) were localized using equivalent current dipoles and dynamical statistical parametric mapping (dSPM). We compared the localization error (E_Loc) with respect to the ground-truth Irritative Zone (IZ), defined by iEEG sources, between non-invasive modalities and the distance from resection (D_res) between good- (Engel 1) and poor-outcomes. For each patient, we estimated the resection percentage of IED sources and tested whether it predicted outcome.

RESULTS

MEG presented lower E_Loc than HD-EEG and conv-EEG. For all modalities, D_res was shorter in good-outcome than poor-outcome patients, but only the resection percentage of the ground-truth IZ and MEG-IZ predicted surgical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG localizes the IZ more accurately than conv-EEG and HD-EEG. MSI may help the presurgical evaluation in terms of patient's outcome prediction. The promising clinical value of ESI for both conv-EEG and HD-EEG prompts the use of higher-density EEG-systems to possibly achieve MEG performance.

SIGNIFICANCE

Localizing the IZ non-invasively with MSI/ESI facilitates presurgical evaluation and surgical prognosis assessment.