Intramuscular Versus Buccal Midazolam for Pediatric Seizures: A Randomized Double-Blinded Trial

Intranasal Versus Buccal Versus Intramuscular Midazolam for the Home and Emergency Treatment of Acute Seizures in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines are the recommended first-line treatment of acute seizures. We wished to compare the efficacy, side effects, and satisfaction after midazolam administration by the buccal, intranasal, or intramuscular route in the treatment of acute seizures in children at homes and in emergency room (ER).

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed in children aged one month to 17 years with acute seizures lasting longer than five minutes. The primary end point was seizure cessation within 10 minutes of drug administration and no seizure recurrence within 30 minutes.

RESULTS

In the home group, 67 patients received midazolam via buccal route, 60 via intranasal route, and 69 via intramuscular route, whereas in the ER group, 37 patients received buccal, 34 received intranasal, and 34 received intramuscular midazolam. The primary end point was achieved in 94.2% and 85.3% after intramuscular midazolam in the home and ER groups, respectively. The intranasal midazolam was successful in stopping seizures in 93.3% in the home group and 88.2% in the ER group. The buccal route was effective in 91% in the home group and 78.4% in the ER group. There were no significant differences in efficacy between all groups (P = 0.763 and P = 0.509) among the home and ER groups, respectively. There were no significant cardiorespiratory events in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramuscular, intranasal, and buccal doses of midazolam resolved most seizures in prehospital and emergency settings. Our results indicate that there is no statistically significant difference detected between different routes of midazolam. Intranasal route showed the highest satisfaction rate among caregivers.

Sublingual and buccal drug administration in medical emergencies

Drug administration is crucial to achieve effective therapeutic drug outcomes. In medical emergencies, it is particularly convenient to use drugs that could be administered as an alternative to traditional routes (as oral or intravenous routes), that are not always suitable in these situations. Thus, sublingual and buccal routes offer an alternative to traditional routes, when a rapid onset of action is required. The main objective of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence for the use of sublingual and buccal drug administration in medical emergencies. The evidence obtained has been divided into four common scenarios found in the emergency department and intensive care units: cardiovascular emergencies, acute pain, agitation, and epileptic status. Moreover, the main advantages and disadvantages of sublingual and buccal routes are presented, as the future perspectives in the drug delivery field to overcome the limitations of these routes.

Association of midazolam route of administration and need for recurrent dosing among children with seizures cared for by emergency medical services

OBJECTIVE

National guidelines in the United States recommend the intramuscular and intranasal routes for midazolam for the management of seizures in the prehospital setting. We evaluated the association of route of midazolam administration with the use of additional benzodiazepine doses for children with seizures cared for by emergency medical services (EMS).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study from a US multiagency EMS dataset for the years 2018-2022, including children transported to the hospital with a clinician impression of seizures, convulsions, or status epilepticus, and who received an initial correct weight-based dose of midazolam (.2 mg/kg intramuscular, .1 mg/kg intravenous, .2 mg/kg intranasal). We evaluated the association of route of initial midazolam administration with provision of additional benzodiazepine dose in logistic regression models adjusted for age, vital signs, pulse oximetry, level of consciousness, and time spent with the patient.

RESULTS

We included 2923 encounters with patients who received an appropriate weight-based dose of midazolam for seizures (46.3% intramuscular, 21.8% intranasal, 31.9% intravenous). The median time to the first dose of midazolam from EMS arrival was similar between children who received intramuscular (7.3 min, interquartile range [IQR] = 4.6-12.5) and intranasal midazolam (7.8 min, IQR = 4.5-13.4) and longer for intravenous midazolam (13.1 min, IQR = 8.2-19.4). At least one additional dose of midazolam was given to 21.4%. In multivariable models, intranasal midazolam was associated with higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-1.76) and intravenous midazolam was associated with similar odds (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = .80-1.26) of requiring additional doses of benzodiazepines relative to intramuscular midazolam.

SIGNIFICANCE

Intranasal midazolam was associated with greater odds of repeated benzodiazepine dosing relative to initial intramuscular administration, but confounding factors could have affected this finding. Further study of the dosing and/or the prioritization of the intranasal route for pediatric seizures by EMS clinicians is warranted.

Optimal Management of Status Epilepticus in Children in the Emergency Setting: A Review of Recent Advances

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is the most common neurological emergency in children and the second most common neurological emergency in adults. Mortality is low, but morbidity, including neuro-disability, learning difficulties, and a de-novo epilepsy, may be as high as 22%. The longer the duration of CSE, the more difficult it is to terminate, and the greater the risk of morbidity. Convulsive status epilepticus is usually managed using specific national or local algorithms. The first-line treatment is administered when a tonic-clonic or focal motor clonic seizure has lasted five minutes (impending or premonitory CSE). Second-line treatment is administered when the CSE has persisted after two doses of a first-line treatment (established CSE). Randomised clinical trial (RCT) evidence supports the use of benzodiazepines as a first-line treatment of which the most common are buccal or intra-nasal midazolam, rectal diazepam and intravenous lorazepam. Alternative drugs, for which there are considerably less RCT data, are intra-muscular midazolam and intravenous clonazepam. Up until 2019, phenobarbital and phenytoin (or fosphenytoin) were the preferred second-line treatments but with no good supporting RCT evidence. Robust RCT data are now available which has provided important information on second-line treatments, specifically phenytoin (or fosphenytoin), levetiracetam and sodium valproate. Lacosamide is an alternative second-line treatment but with no supporting RCT evidence. Current evidence indicates that first, buccal or intranasal midazolam or intravenous lorazepam are the most effective and the most patient and carer-friendly first-line anti-seizure medications to treat impending or premonitory CSE and second, that there is no difference in efficacy between levetiracetam, phenytoin (or fosphenytoin) or sodium valproate for the treatment of established CSE. Pragmatically, levetiracetam or sodium valproate are preferred to phenytoin (or fosphenytoin) because of their ease of administration and lack of serious adverse side-effects, including potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias. Sodium valproate must be used with caution in children aged three and under because of the rare risk of hepatotoxicity and particularly if there is an underlying mitochondrial disorder.

Recent Advancements and Patents on Buccal Drug Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review

The major requirement for a dosage form to be successful is its ability to penetrate the site of application and the bioavailability of the drug released from the dosage form. The buccal drug delivery is an influential route to deliver the drug into the body. Here, in this context, various novel approaches that include lipoidal carriers like ethosomes, transferosomes, niosomes etc. and electrospun nanofibers are discussed, with respect to buccal drug delivery. These carriers can be easily incorporated into buccal dosage forms like patches and gels that are responsible for increased permeation across the buccal epithelium. The in vivo methods of evaluation on animal models are conscribed here. The novel biocarriers of lipoidal and non-lipoidal nature can be utilized by loading the drug into them, which are helpful in preventing drug degradation and other drawbacks as compared to conventional formulations. The globally patented buccal formulations give us a wide context in literature about the patents filed and granted in the recent years. When it comes to patient compliance, age is an issue, which is also solved by the buccal route. The pediatric buccal formulations are researched for the customization to be delivered to children. Diseases like mouth ulcers, oral cancer, Parkinson's disease, aphthous stomatitis etc. have been successfully treated through the buccal route, which infers that the buccal drug delivery system is an effective and emerging area for formulation and development in the field of pharmaceutics.

[Paediatric Life Support]

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Paediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). This section provides guidelines on the management of critically ill or injured infants, children and adolescents before, during and after respiratory/cardiac arrest.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Paediatric Life Support

These European Resuscitation Council Paediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines, are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the management of critically ill infants and children, before, during and after cardiac arrest.