Cyclic pamidronate infusion for neonatal-onset osteogenesis imperfecta

Cyclic intravenous pamidronate for an infant with osteogenesis imperfecta type II

A woman in her 30s underwent a 17-week ultrasound which revealed short bowed long bones. Fetal CT at 28 weeks' gestation showed decreased ossification of the skull, a small bell-shaped thorax, hypoplastic vertebrae, and shortening and bowing of the long bones, leading to the diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) type II. The newborn was delivered via caesarean delivery, and tracheal intubation was performed due to the respiratory distress. A heterozygous variant in COL1A1 (c.1679G>T, p. Gly358Val) was ascertained, confirming the diagnosis of OI type II.Cyclic intravenous pamidronate was started at 41 days old with dose modification and was successfully administered every month. Currently, the infant is 8 months old without any new bone fracture. He was extubated successfully at 7 months of age and is now stable using high flow nasal cannula. The efficacy, safety, and optimal dose and timing of cyclic pamidronate for OI type II remain undefined. We report our experience of successful cyclic intravenous pamidronate treatment for an infant with OI type II.

Zoledronic Acid Treatment in Infants and Toddlers with Osteogenesis Imperfecta is Safe and Effective: A Tertiary Care Centre Experience

Context

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder of the extracellular matrix of bone characterized by low bone mass manifesting as frequent fractures, delayed motor development, pain, and impaired quality of life. The intravenous bisphosphonate, pamidronate is an established treatment for OI. Recently, zoledronic acid (ZA) has been used for the management of OI.

Aim

To assess the efficacy and safety of ZA in children below five years of age with OI.

Settings and Design

A hospital-based prospective observational study.

Methods and Material

Patients with OI aged less than five years attending our centre were treated with intravenous ZA at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg every six months. Subjects were closely monitored for clinical and biochemical variables, adverse events, and new-onset fractures. The response to therapy was assessed by monitoring clinical variables including the degree of bony pains, number of fractures, height/length standard deviation score (SDS), and motor developmental milestones. All patients were analysed at baseline and at the end of two years for biochemical parameters and clinical severity score (CSS) as proposed by Aglan et al. with modifications.

Results

After two years of treatment, OI patients showed a significant decline in the rate of fractures (p < 0.001), improvement in ambulation (p = 0.005), alleviation of pain (p < 0.001), and improvement in height SDS (p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in CSS after two years of therapy. Apart from mild flu-like symptoms and mild asymptomatic hypocalcaemia immediately post-infusion, no other adverse effect was noted.

Conclusion

ZA therapy in infants and children below five years of age with OI was effective and safe and a more convenient alternative to pamidronate.

Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics in Osteogenesis Imperfecta With Collagen Defect

Purpose

To identify the characteristic corneal biomechanical properties of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), and to compare the corneal biomechanical properties between OI and keratoconus.

Methods

We included 46 eyes of 23 patients with OI, 188 eyes of 99 keratoconus patients, and 174 eyes of 92 normal controls to compare corneal biomechanical parameters between OI corneas, keratoconus, and normal controls by using Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST).

Results

Patients with OI had significantly higher Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) (P < 0.001), higher tomographic and biomechanical index (TBI) (P = 0.040), lower Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF) (P = 0.034), and lower stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1) (P < 0.001) compared with normal controls. In contrast, OI group showed lower CBI (P < 0.001), lower TBI (P < 0.001), higher CBiF (P < 0.001), and higher SP-A1 (P = 0.020) than keratoconus group. Notably, the stress-strain index (SSI) was not significantly different between the OI and normal controls (P = 1.000), whereas keratoconus showed the lowest SSI compared with OI group (P = 0.025) and normal controls (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although the corneal structures of OI patients are less stable and easier to deform as compared to those of the control group, there is no significant difference in material stiffness observed between the OI and normal controls. In contrast, the corneas of keratoconus showed not only lower structural stability and higher deformability but also lower material stiffness compared with those of OI cornea and normal controls.

Translational Relevance

The biomechanical alterations are different between OI corneas and keratoconus.

Bone health in childhood and adolescence: an overview on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning, fracture surveillance and bisphosphonate therapy for low-middle-income countries

Bone accrual in childhood determines bone health in later life. Loss of bone strength in early life can lead to increased morbidity and reduced quality of life in childhood and adolescence. Increased availability of assessment tools and bisphosphonate therapy, together with increased awareness on the significance of fracture history and risk factors, have led to greater opportunities, to improve detection and optimize management of children and adolescents with bone fragility globally, including those in lower resource settings. Bone mineral density z-scores and bone mineral content are surrogate measures of bone strength, which can be measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), in growing individuals. DXA can aid in the diagnosis and management of primary and secondary bone fragility disorders in childhood. DXA helps evaluate children with clinically significant fractures, and monitor those with bone fragility disorders, or at high risk for compromised bone strength. Obtaining DXA images can however be challenging, especially in younger children, due to difficulty in positioning and movement artefacts, while paediatric DXA interpretation can be confounded by effects of growth and puberty. Furthermore, access to DXA facilities as well as appropriate paediatric reference norms and expertise for interpretation, may not be easily available especially in lower resource settings. Pediatric bone experts are now placing increasing emphasis on the fracture phenotype and clinical context to diagnose osteoporosis over bone mineral density (BMD) by DXA. Low trauma vertebral fractures are now recognized as a hallmark of bone fragility, and spinal fracture surveillance by either conventional lateral thoracolumbar radiographs or vertebral fracture assessment by DXA is gaining increasing importance in diagnosing childhood osteoporosis, and initiating bone protective therapy. Furthermore, it is now understood that even a single, low-trauma long bone fracture can signal osteoporosis in those with risk factors for bone fragility. Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy is the mainstay of treatment for childhood bone fragility disorders. Other supportive measures to improve bone strength include optimizing nutrition, encouraging weight bearing physical activity within the limits of the underlying condition, and treating any associated endocrinopathies. With this paradigm shift in childhood osteoporosis evaluation and management, lack of DXA facilities to assess BMD at baseline and/or provide serial monitoring is not a major barrier for initiating IV bisphosphonate therapy in children in whom it is clinically indicated and would benefit from its use. DXA is useful, however, to monitor treatment response and optimal timing for treatment discontinuation in children with transient risk factors for osteoporosis. Overall, there is lack of awareness and paucity of guidelines on utilizing and adopting available resources to manage paediatric bone disorders optimally in lower-resource settings. We provide an evidence-based approach to the assessment and management of bone fragility disorders in children and adolescents, with appropriate considerations for lower resource settings including LMIC countries.

Drug Treatment of Low Bone Mass and Other Bone Conditions in Pediatric Patients

Osteoporosis may affect young individuals, albeit infrequently. In childhood, bone mass increases, reaching its peak between the second and third decades; then, after a period of stability, it gradually declines. Several conditions, including genetic disorders, chronic diseases, and some medications, can have an impact on bone homeostasis. Diagnosis in young patients is based on the criteria defined by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD), published in 2013. High risk factors should be identified and monitored. Often simple interventions aimed to eliminate the underlying cause, to minimize the negative bone effects linked to drugs, or to increase calcium and vitamin D intake can protect bone mass. However, in selected cases, pharmacological treatment should be considered. Bisphosphonates remain the main therapeutic agent for children with significant skeletal fragility and are also useful in a large number of other bone conditions. Denosumab, an anti-RANKL antibody, could become a potential alternative treatment. Clinical trials to evaluate the long-term effects and safety of denosumab in children are ongoing.

Do Bisphosphonates Alleviate Pain in Children? A Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this systematic review is to analyze the effectiveness of bisphosphonates (BPs) to treat bone pain in children and adolescents who have diseases with skeletal involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

We included 24 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 3 non-randomized controlled trials, 10 non-randomized open-label uncontrolled studies, 8 retrospective studies, and 1 study with design not specified). The majority of included studies assessed pain from a unidimensional approach, with pain intensity the most frequently evaluated dimension. Only 38% of studies used validated tools; visual analogue scale was the most frequently employed. BPs were used to alleviate bone pain in a wide variety of pediatrics conditions such as osteogenesis imperfecta, secondary osteoporosis, osteonecrosis related to chemotherapy, chronic non-bacterial osteitis, idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis, unresectable benign bone tumor, and cancer-related pain. Twenty of the 24 studies reported a positive effect of BPs for alleviating pain in different pathologies, but 58% of the studies were categorized as having high risk of bias. Intravenous BPs are helpful in alleviating bone pain in children and adolescents. It is advised that our results be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity of the doses used, duration of treatments, and types of pathologies included. In addition, this review shows the paucity of high-quality evidence in the available literature and further research is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Before the completion of this review, the protocol was registered to PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews), PROSPERO 2020 ID # CRD42020158316. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020158316.

Zoledronic acid in children with osteogenesis imperfecta and Bruck syndrome: a 2-year prospective observational study

Treatment with zoledronic acid (ZA) over 2 years, among 33 children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and five Bruck syndrome cases, showed reduction in fracture rates, pain, and improvement in bone mineral density (BMD) and motor milestones of development. This is the first study reporting the use of bisphosphonates in patients with Bruck syndrome (BS).

INTRODUCTION

OI and BS are genetic disorders that result in bone fragility and reduced BMD. There is little literature describing the efficacy and safety of ZA in this population. In this study, we assess the response to treatment with ZA at six monthly intervals in Egyptian children with OI and BS for a period of 2 years.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with OI and five patients with BS were treated with 0.1 mg/kg ZA intravenously every 6 months for 2 years during which they were followed up using different parameters. A clinical severity score (CSS) was applied to the patients before and 2 years after the start of therapy. Comparison of disease severity and response to ZA treatment between autosomal-dominant (AD) and autosomal-recessive (AR) OI patients was also done.

RESULTS

After 6 months of treatment, OI and BS patients showed a significant increase in BMD Z-scores (P < 0.003 in the spine and P < 0.004 in the hip), together with a significant drop in fracture rate (P < 0.001), relief of pain (P < 0.001), and improvement in ambulation (P < 0.001). CSS was significantly reduced after 2 years of treatment in both OI and BS patients. AR-OI patients were more severely affected than AD-OI patients and showed more significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid proved to be safe and effective in the treatment of OI and BS. The biannual infusion protocol was convenient to patients. There was a positive correlation between disease severity and benefits of the treatment. The use of the CSS proved to be of value in the assessment of the degree of severity in OI, and with some modifications, it was a valuable tool for the assessment of response to treatment.

[Osteogenesis imperfecta]

BACKGROUND

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is the most common genetic disease of bone and is characterized by fragile bones and growth disorders of varying severity. Most cases of OI are inherited autosomal dominant and caused by a mutation in the collagen type I gene.

DIAGNOSTICS

Indications for OI are bone fragility, stunted growth, scoliosis, skull deformities, blue sclera, loss of hearing, dentinogenesis imperfecta and increased laxity of ligaments and skin. In most cases it is possible to make a clinical diagnosis but a skin biopsy or genetic testing can be useful; however, negative results for these tests do not exclude OI.

THERAPY

Therapy must be carried out in a multidisciplinary team and includes conservative (e.g. physiotherapy, rehabilitation programs and orthopedic aids), operative (e.g. intramedullary stabilization procedures) and pharmaceutical (e.g. biphosphonates and growth hormones) procedures.

PROGNOSIS

The prognosis depends on the type of OI and ranges from normal life expectations for type 1 patients up to up to perinatal mortality for type II patients.