Ifenprodil for prolonged spinal blockades of motor function and nociception in rats

N(Omega)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester potentiates lidocaine analgesic and anaesthetic effect in rats

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the experiment was to study the effect of L-NAME (N(Omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester) and its cotreatment with lidocaine on the spinal block and infiltrative cutaneous analgesia.

METHODS

The quality of cutaneous analgesia was examined by the block of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflexes following needle stimuli in the rat. Spinal anaesthetic potency was assessed by measuring three neurobehavioral examinations of nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor function following intrathecal injection in the rat.

KEY FINDINGS

L-NAME (0.6, 6 and 60 nmol) when cotreatment with lidocaine (ED50) produced dose-related cutaneous analgesia. Coadministration of L-NAME (0.6 μmol) with lidocaine intensified (P < 0.01) and prolonged (P < 0.001) cutaneous analgesia, whereas subcutaneous L-NAME (0.6 μmol) and saline did not provoke cutaneous analgesic effects. Adding L-NAME (2.5 μmol) to lidocaine intrathecally prolonged spinal sensory and motor block (P < 0.01), while intrathecal L-NAME (2.5 μmol) or 5% dextrose (vehicle) produced no spinal block.

CONCLUSIONS

L-NAME at 60 nmol (the minimum effective dose) increases and prolongs the effect of cutaneous analgesia of lidocaine. L-NANE at an ineffective dose potentiates lidocaine analgesic and anaesthetic effects.

Intrathecal pramipexole and selegiline for sensory and motor block in rats

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to investigate spinal sensory and motor block by antiparkinsonian drugs (pramipexole and selegiline), and the combination of pramipexole and the local anesthetic lidocaine.

METHODS

Using a technique of spinal blockade in rats, the effects of pramipexole, selegiline, and coadministration of pramipexole and lidocaine on spinal blockades of motor and sensory function were investigated.

RESULTS

Under a concentration of 100 mM, pramipexole displayed more potent and had a longer duration of nociceptive, proprioceptive, and motor block than selegiline, whereas pramipexole and selegiline were less potent in comparison to lidocaine. Pramipexole produced spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive, and motor blocks in a dose-related manner. On the ED₅₀ (50% effective dose) basis, the rank-order potency on nociceptive, proprioceptive, and motor block was pramipexole < lidocaine. The spinal block duration of pramipexole was greater than lidocaine at every equipotent dose tested (ED₂₅, ED₅₀, and ED₇₅). Coadministration of lidocaine (ED₅₀ or ED₉₅) with pramipexole (4.5 μmol/kg) improved the effect (efficacy) and duration of the spinal block.

CONCLUSIONS

Pramipexole and selegiline were less potent than lidocaine to block sensory and motor responses. The duration of the spinal anesthetic effect of pramipexole was longer than lidocaine. At a non-effective dose, pramipexole increased the duration of efficacy of lidocaine.

Antimalarial primaquine for spinal sensory and motor blockade in rats

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the experiment was to estimate whether intrathecal antimalarial drugs could provoke spinal block, and their comparison with lidocaine.

METHODS

Rats were intrathecally administrated with antimalarial agents (primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine) and lidocaine, and neurobehavioural examinations (nociception, proprioception and motor function) were assessed; n = 8 per group. One-way and two-way analysis of variance were designed to analyse data.

KEY FINDINGS

At a concentration of 20 mM, primaquine (0.46 mg/rat) exhibited the longest duration and the most potent effect of nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor blockade (P < 0.01) among five drugs, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency of spinal blockade compared with lidocaine (0.29 mg/rat). In dose-dependent studies, primaquine was more potent (P < 0.01) than lidocaine for spinal block. At ED25, ED50 and ED75 equipotent doses, primaquine produced a greater duration of spinal motor, proprioceptive and nociceptive blockade when compared with lidocaine (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine produced spinal blockade. Primaquine was more potent and displayed a prolonged life of local anaesthetic effect compared with lidocaine, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency compared with lidocaine.

Phentolamine Reverses Epinephrine-Enhanced Skin Antinociception of Dibucaine in Rats

BACKGROUND

The objective of the experiment was to assess the antinociceptive effect of dibucaine, bupivacaine, and epinephrine. To assess the mechanism of action of the interaction between dibucaine and epinephrine, phentolamine, a nonselective α-adrenergic antagonist, was added to the mixture.

METHODS

We assessed sensory blockade with these drugs by injecting 0.6 mL of drug-in-saline in the dorsal thoracolumbar area of rats; pinprick of the "wheal" formed by the injectate was the area targeted for stimulation to elicit a cutaneous trunci muscle reflex. The sensory block of dibucaine was compared with that of bupivacaine or epinephrine. Drug-drug interactions were analyzed by isobologram. Phentolamine was added to investigate the antinociceptive effect of dibucaine coinjected with epinephrine.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that dibucaine, epinephrine, and bupivacaine produced dose-dependent skin antinociception. On the median effective dose (ED50) basis, the potency was higher for epinephrine (mean, 0.011 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.007-0.015] μmol) than for dibucaine (mean, 0.493 [95% CI, 0.435-0.560] μmol) (P < .01), while there were no significant differences between dibucaine and bupivacaine (mean, 0.450 [95% CI, 0.400-0.505] μmol). On the equipotent basis (75% effective dose, median effective dose, and 25% effective dose), sensory block duration provoked by epinephrine was greater (P < .01) than that provoked by dibucaine or bupivacaine. Coadministration of dibucaine with epinephrine produced a synergistic nociceptive block, whereas phentolamine blocked that synergistic block.

CONCLUSIONS

The preclinical data indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between the potency and duration of dibucaine and bupivacaine in this model. Epinephrine synergistically enhances the effects of dibucaine, while phentolamine partially blocked those effects. α-Adrenergic receptors play an important role in controlling synergistic analgesic effect of dibucaine combined with epinephrine.

Skin nociceptive block with pramoxine delivery by subcutaneous injection in rats

BACKGROUND

Pramoxine has been shown to produce spinal anesthesia, while cutaneous analgesia (peripheral) of pramoxine is not established. The experimental goal was to examine cutaneous antinociception produced by a local anesthetic (LA) pramoxine and compare this result with that of another well-known LA lidocaine.

METHODS

Cutaneous antinociception was evaluated by blockade of pinprick- induced cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) on the skin of rat's back. After the dose-related curves were constructed, the quality and duration of drug's (lidocaine and pramoxine) cutaneous antinociception were compared.

RESULTS

We showed that pramoxine, as well as lidocaine produced skin antinociception in a dose-related fashion. The relative potency (ED₅₀ [50% effective dose] basis) was lidocaine (5.44 [4.67-6.35] μmol) greater than pramoxine (42.1 [38.8-45.7] μmol) (p < 0.01). On the basis of equianalgesic doses (ED₇₅, ED₅₀, and ED₂₅), pramoxine caused equivalent duration of cutaneous antinociception to lidocaine.

CONCLUSIONS

These preclinical data indicated that pramoxine elicits skin antinociception dose-relatedly. Pramoxine exhibits a potency less than that of lidocaine while they have a comparable duration of skin antinociceptive action.

Subcutaneous infiltration of doxylamine on cutaneous analgesia in rats

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the effect of doxylamine, a first generation antihistamine, as a local analgesic agent by comparing its effect to bupivacaine.

METHODS

After blocking the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) by subcutaneous injection of doxylamine, we assessed doxylamine's cutaneous analgesic effect in rats. The dose-related effect and duration of doxylamine on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia were compared with that of bupivacaine.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that doxylamine, as well as the local anesthetic bupivacaine produced the cutaneous analgesic effects in a dose-related fashion. At the equipotent dose (50% effective doses (ED₅₀)), the relative potency was bupivacaine (0.41 (0.36-0.48) mmol)> doxylamine (7.39 (6.91-7.91)mmol) (p<0.01). On an equipotent basis (ED₂₅, ED₅₀ and ED₇₅), subcutaneous doxylamine resulted in greater duration of action (p<0.01) than bupivacaine at producing cutaneous analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of this experiment indicated that doxylamine has the local anesthetic property less potent than bupivacaine, but its nociceptive block duration is longer than that of bupivacaine at an equianalgesic dose.

Adding Dopamine to Proxymetacaine or Oxybuprocaine Solutions Potentiates and Prolongs the Cutaneous Antinociception in Rats

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the interaction of dopamine-proxymetacaine and dopamine- oxybuprocaine antinociception using isobolograms.

METHODS

This experiment uses subcutaneous drug (proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and dopamine) injections under the skin of the rat's back, thus simulating infiltration blocks. The dose-related antinociceptive curves of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine alone and in combination with dopamine were constructed, and then the antinociceptive interactions between the local anesthetic and dopamine were analyzed using isobolograms.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and dopamine produced a sensory block to local skin pinpricks in a dose-dependent fashion. The rank order of potency was proxymetacaine (0.57 [0.52-0.63] μmol/kg) > oxybuprocaine (1.05 [0.96-1.15] μmol/kg) > dopamine (165 [154-177] μmol/kg; P < .01 for each comparison) based on the 50% effective dose values. On the equianesthetic basis (25% effective dose, 50% effective dose, and 75% effective dose), the nociceptive block duration of proxymetacaine or oxybuprocaine was shorter than that of dopamine (P < .01). Oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine coinjected with dopamine elicited a synergistic antinociceptive effect and extended the duration of action.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine had a higher potency and provoked a shorter duration of sensory block compared with dopamine. The use of dopamine increased the quality and duration of skin antinociception caused by oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine.

Intrathecal pramoxine causes long-lasting spinal sensory and motor block in rats

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this experiment was to investigate spinal anaesthetic effects of pramoxine and its comparison with bupivacaine, a long-lasting local anaesthetic.

METHODS

After intrathecal injection, three neurobehavioural assessments, which consisted of nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block, were constructed in rats. The effects of bupivacaine and pramoxine (four doses of each drug) in a dose-related manner were conducted to obtain the ED₅₀ (50% effective dose). Pramoxine potency and duration at provoking spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block were compared with those of bupivacaine.

KEY FINDINGS

We manifested that pramoxine provoked dose-relatedly spinal blockades of nociception, proprioception and motor function. Based on the ED₅₀ , the rank potency at producing spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block was bupivacaine (0.90 (0.82-1.02), 1.00 (0.92-1.08) and 1.16 (1.02-1.34) μmol/kg) greater (P < 0.01 for the differences) than pramoxine (15.47 (14.04-17.05), 16.46 (15.06-17.99), and 17.77 (16.48-19.15) μmol/kg). The spinal block duration created by bupivacaine was not predominantly different (P > 0.05 for the differences) from that created by pramoxine at the equipotent doses (ED₇₅ , ED₅₀ and ED₂₅ ).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preclinical experiment indicated that pramoxine elicited a dose-related spinal block, was less potent than bupivacaine and had a similar duration of spinal block compared with bupivacaine.

Isobolographic analysis of the cutaneous antinociceptive interaction between bupivacaine co-injected with serotonin in rats

BACKGROUND

The aim of this experiment was to investigate a long-lasting local anesthetic bupivacaine combined with serotonin at inducing cutaneous antinociception.

METHODS

The skin antinociception, characterized by an inhibition of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) following the pinprick on the dorsal skin of rats, was evaluated. The cutaneous antinociceptive effects of bupivacaine alone, serotonin alone, or bupivacaine co-injected with serotonin in a dose-dependent fashion were constructed, while the drug-drug interactions were evaluated by isobologram.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous serotonin, as well as the local anesthetic bupivacaine provoked dose-related cutaneous antinociception. On an equipotent basis (50% effective dose [ED₅₀]), the relative potency was bupivacaine (0.43 [0.37-0.50] μmol)>serotonin (1.27 [1.15-1.40] μmol) (p<0.01). At the equi-anesthetic doses (ED₇₅, ED₅₀ and ED₂₅), the duration of bupivacaine was similar to that of serotonin at producing cutaneous antinociceptive effects. Co-administration of bupivacaine and serotonin displayed a synergistic antinociception.

CONCLUSIONS

The preclinical data demonstrated that serotonin is less potent in eliciting cutaneous antinociceptive effects but has the similar duration of action, compared with bupivacaine. We also found a more significant depth of the sensory block with bupivacaine+serotonin than bupivacaine alone.