Farnesoid X receptor antagonist exacerbates dyslipidemia in mice

FXR in liver physiology: Multiple faces to regulate liver metabolism

The liver is the central metabolic hub which coordinates nutritional inputs and metabolic outputs. Food intake releases bile acids which can be sensed by the bile acid receptor FXR in the liver and the intestine. Hepatic and intestinal FXR coordinately regulate postprandial nutrient disposal in a network of interacting metabolic nuclear receptors. In this review we summarize and update the "classical roles" of FXR as a central integrator of the feeding state response, which orchestrates the metabolic processing of carbohydrates, lipids, proteins and bile acids. We also discuss more recent and less well studied FXR effects on amino acid, protein metabolism, autophagic turnover and inflammation. In addition, we summarize the recent understanding of how FXR signaling is affected by posttranslational modifications and by different FXR isoforms. These modifications and variations in FXR signaling might be considered when FXR is targeted pharmaceutically in clinical applications.

Assessing the Selectivity of FXR, LXRs, CAR, and RORγ Pharmaceutical Ligands With Reporter Cell Lines

To characterize human nuclear receptor (NR) specificity of synthetic pharmaceutical chemicals we established stable cell lines expressing the ligand binding domains (LBDs) of human FXR, LXRα, LXRβ, CAR, and RORγ fused to the yeast GAL4 DNA binding domain (DBD). As we have already done for human PXR, a two-step transfection procedure was used. HeLa cells stably expressing a Gal4 responsive gene (HG5LN cell line) were transfected by Gal4-NRs expressing plasmids. At first, using these cell lines as well as the HG5LN PXR cells, we demonstrated that the basal activities varied from weak (FXR and LXRs), intermediate (PXR), to strong (CAR and RORγ), reflecting the recruitment of HeLa co-regulators in absence of ligand. Secondly, we finely characterized the activities of commercially available FXR, LXRα, LXRβ, CAR, RORγ, and PXR agonists/antagonists GW4064, feraxamine, DY268, T0901317, GW3965, WAY252623, SR9238, SR9243, GSK2033, CITCO, CINPA1, PK11195, S07662, SR1078, SR0987, SR1001, SR2211, XY018, clotrimazole, dabrafenib, SR12813, and SPA70, respectively. Among these compounds we revealed both, receptor specific agonists/antagonists, as well as less selective ligands, activating or inhibiting several nuclear receptors. FXR ligands manifested high receptor selectivity. Vice versa, LXR ligands behaved in non-selective manner, all activating at least PXR. CAR was selectively influenced by their ligands, while it also responded to several LXR ligands. Finally, although PXR was quite selectively activated or antagonized by its own ligands, it responded to several NRs ligands as well. Thus, using these reporter cell lines enabled us to precisely characterize the selectivity of pharmaceutical ligands for different nuclear receptors.

Update on FXR Biology: Promising Therapeutic Target?

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a metabolic nuclear receptor, plays critical roles in the maintenance of systemic energy homeostasis and the integrity of many organs, including liver and intestine. It regulates bile acid, lipid, and glucose metabolism, and contributes to inter-organ communication, in particular the enterohepatic signaling pathway, through bile acids and fibroblast growth factor-15/19 (FGF-15/19). The metabolic effects of FXR are also involved in gut microbiota. In addition, FXR has various functions in the kidney, adipose tissue, pancreas, cardiovascular system, and tumorigenesis. Consequently, the deregulation of FXR may lead to abnormalities of specific organs and metabolic dysfunction, allowing the protein as an attractive therapeutic target for the management of liver and/or metabolic diseases. Indeed, many FXR agonists have been being developed and are under pre-clinical and clinical investigations. Although obeticholic acid (OCA) is one of the promising candidates, significant safety issues have remained. The effects of FXR modulation might be multifaceted according to tissue specificity, disease type, and/or energy status, suggesting the careful use of FXR agonists. This review summarizes the current knowledge of systemic FXR biology in various organs and the gut–liver axis, particularly regarding the recent advancement in these fields, and also provides pharmacological aspects of FXR modulation for rational therapeutic strategies and novel drug development.

Antidyslipidemic potential of a novel farnesoid X receptor antagonist in a hamster model of dyslipidemia: Comparative studies of other nonstatin agents

We attempted to clarify the therapeutic capability of antagonists of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a nuclear receptor that regulates lipid and bile acid metabolism. Herein, we report the antidyslipidemic effects of a novel synthesized FXR antagonist, compound‐T1, utilizing a dyslipidemic hamster model. Compound‐T1 selectively inhibited chenodeoxycholic acid‐induced FXR activation (IC₅₀, 2.1 nmol·L⁻¹). A hamster model of diet‐induced hyperlipidemia was prepared to investigate the antidyslipidemic effects of compound‐T1 through comparative studies of the nonstatin lipid‐modulating agents ezetimibe, cholestyramine, and torcetrapib. In the hamster model, compound‐T1 (6 mg·kg⁻¹·day⁻¹, p.o.) increased the level of plasma high‐density lipoprotein (HDL)‐cholesterol (+22.2%) and decreased the levels of plasma non‐HDL‐cholesterol (−43.6%) and triglycerides (−31.1%). Compound‐T1 also increased hepatic cholesterol 7α‐hydroxylase expression and fecal bile acid excretion, and decreased hepatic cholesterol content. Moreover, the hamster model could reflect clinical results of other nonstatin agents. Torcetrapib especially increased large HDL particles compared with compound‐T1. Additionally, in the human hepatoma Huh‐7 cells, compound‐T1 enhanced apolipoprotein A‐I secretion at a concentration close to its IC₅₀ value for FXR. Our results indicated the usefulness of the hamster model in evaluating FXR antagonists and nonstatin agents. Notably, compound‐T1 exhibited beneficial effects on both blood non‐HDL‐cholesterol and HDL‐cholesterol, which are thought to involve enhancement of cholesterol catabolism and apolipoprotein A‐I production. These findings aid the understanding of the antidyslipidemic potential of FXR antagonists with a unique lipid and bile acid modulation.