Principes et applications thérapeutiques de la photothérapie dynamique

Reprint of: morphologic spectrum of treatment-related changes in prostate tissue and prostate cancer: an updated review

A wide range of treatment options are available to patients with prostate cancer. Some treatments are standard (currently used) while some are emerging therapies. Androgen deprivation therapy is typically reserved for localized or metastatic prostate cancer not amenable to surgery. Radiation therapy may be offered to individuals for local therapy with curative intent in low- or intermediate-risk disease that may have a high probability of progression on active surveillance or where surgery is not suitable. Focal therapy/ablation treatment is an alternative approach for those who prefer to avoid radical prostatectomy for localized disease of low- or intermediate-risk or as salvage therapy after failed radiation therapy. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy remain under investigation and are currently used for androgen-independent disease or hormone-refractory prostate cancer; however, a better understanding of therapeutic efficacy is needed. Histopathologic changes observed in benign and malignant prostate tissue induced by hormonal therapies and radiation therapy are well described, whereas treatment-related effects secondary to novel therapies continue to be documented although their clinical significance is not absolutely clear. An informed and accurate evaluation of post-treatment prostate specimens requires pathologists with diagnostic acumen and knowledge relating to the histopathologic spectrum associated with each treatment option. In situations when clinical history is lacking, but morphologic features are suggestive of prior treatment, pathologists are encouraged to consult clinical colleagues regarding prior treatment history including details of when treatment was initiated and duration of therapy. This review aims to provide a concise update of current and emerging therapies for prostate cancer, histologic alterations and recommendations on Gleason grading.

Morphologic spectrum of treatment-related changes in prostate tissue and prostate cancer: An Updated Review

A wide range of treatment options is available to patients with prostate cancer. Some treatments are standard (currently used) while some are emerging therapies. Androgen deprivation therapy is typically reserved for localized or metastatic prostate cancer not amenable to surgery. Radiation therapy may be offered to individuals for local therapy with curative intent in low- or intermediate-risk disease that may have a high probability of progression on active surveillance or where surgery is not suitable. Focal therapy/ablation treatment is an alternative approach for those who prefer to avoid radical prostatectomy for localized disease of low- or intermediate-risk or as salvage therapy following failed radiation therapy. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy remain under investigation and are currently used for androgen-independent disease or hormone-refractory prostate cancer; however a better understand therapeutic efficacy is needed. Histopathologic changes observed in benign and malignant prostate tissue induced by hormonal therapies and radiation therapy is well described, while treatment-related effects secondary to novel therapies continue to be documented although their clinical significance is not absolutely clear. An informed and accurate evaluation of post-treatment prostate specimens requires pathologists with diagnostic acumen and knowledge relating to the histopathologic spectrum associated with each treatment option. In situations when clinical history is lacking, but morphologic features are suggestive of prior treatment, pathologists are encouraged to consult clinical colleagues regarding prior treatment history including details of when treatment was initiated and duration of therapy. This review aims to provide a concise update of current and emerging therapies for prostate cancer, histologic alterations and recommendations on Gleason grading.

Nanomedicine associated with photodynamic therapy for glioblastoma treatment

Glioblastoma, also known as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), is the most recurrent and malignant astrocytic glioma found in adults. Biologically, GBMs are highly aggressive tumors that often show diffuse infiltration of the brain parenchyma, making complete surgical resection difficult. GBM is not curable with surgery alone because tumor cells typically invade the surrounding brain, rendering complete resection unsafe. Consequently, present-day therapy for malignant glioma remains a great challenge. The location of the invasive tumor cells presents several barriers to therapeutic delivery. The blood-brain barrier regulates the trafficking of molecules to and from the brain. While high-grade brain tumors contain some "leakiness" in their neovasculature, the mechanisms of GBM onset and progression remain largely unknown. Recent advances in the understanding of the signaling pathways that underlie GBM pathogenesis have led to the development of new therapeutic approaches targeting multiple oncogenic signaling aberrations associated with the GBM. Among these, drug delivery nanosystems have been produced to target therapeutic agents and improve their biodistribution and therapeutic index in the tumor. These systems mainly include polymer or lipid-based carriers such as liposomes, metal nanoparticles, polymeric nanospheres and nanocapsules, micelles, dendrimers, nanocrystals, and nanogold. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising treatment for a variety of oncological diseases. PDT is an efficient, simple, and versatile method that is based on a combination of a photosensitive drug and light (generally laser-diode or laser); these factors are separately relatively harmless but when used together in the presence of oxygen molecules, free radicals are produced that initiate a sequence of biological events, including phototoxicity, vascular damage, and immune responses. Photodynamic pathways activate a cascade of activities, including apoptotic and necrotic cell death in both the tumor and the neovasculature, leading to a permanent lesion and destruction of GBM cells that remain in the healthy tissue. Glioblastoma tumors differ at the molecular level. For example, gene amplification epidermal growth factor receptor and its receptor are more highly expressed in primary GBM than in secondary GBM. Despite these distinguishing features, both types of tumors (primary and secondary) arise as a result dysregulation of numerous intracellular signaling pathways and have standard features, such as increased cell proliferation, survival and resistance to apoptosis, and loss of adhesion and migration, and may show a high degree of invasiveness. PDT may promote significant tumor regression and extend the lifetime of patients who experience glioma progression.

Application of aluminum chloride phthalocyanine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for photodynamic inactivation of melanoma cells

Cutaneous melanoma is the most aggressive skin cancer and is particularly resistant to current therapeutic approaches. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a well-established photoprocess that is employed to treat some cancers, including non-melanoma skin cancer. Aluminum chloride phthalocyanine (ClAlPc) is used as a photosensitizer in PDT; however, its high hydrophobicity hampers its photodynamic activity under physiological conditions. The aim of this study was to produce solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) containing ClAlPc using the direct emulsification method. ClAlPc-loaded SLNs (ClAlPc/SLNs) were characterized according to their particle size and distribution, zeta potential, morphology, encapsulation efficiency, stability, and phototoxic action in vitro in B16-F10 melanoma cells. ClAlPc/SLN had a mean diameter between 100 and 200nm, homogeneous size distribution (polydispersity index <0.3), negative zeta potential, and spherical morphology. The encapsulation efficiency was approximately 100%. The lipid crystallinity was investigated using X-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry and indicated that ClAlPc was integrated into the SLN matrix. The ClAlPc/SLN formulations maintained their physicochemical stability without expelling the drug over a 24-month period. Compared to free ClAlPc, ClAlPc/SLN exerted outstanding phototoxicity effects in vitro against melanoma cells. Therefore, our results demonstrated that the ClAlPc/SLN described in the current study has the potential for use in further preclinical and clinical trials in PDT for melanoma treatment.

Post-treatment MRI aspects of photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Photodynamic therapy is a new focal therapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS

In this technique, a photosensitising agent is introduced intravenously, then activated by local laser illumination to induce tumour necrosis. Treatment efficacy is assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We illustrate specific post-treatment MRI aspects at early and late follow-up with pathological correlations.

TEACHING POINTS

• Dynamic phototherapy is a new and promising focal therapy for prostate cancer. • One-week MRI shows increased volume of the treated lobe and large, homogeneous necrosis area. • Six-month MRI shows significant changes of the prostate shape and signal. • Six-month MRI becomes "base line" appearance for further follow-up or monitoring.

Photodynamic therapy in urology: what can we do now and where are we heading?

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an innovative technique in oncologic urology. Its application appears increasingly realistic to all kind of cancers with technological progress made in treatment planning and light delivery associated with the emergence of novel photosensitizers. The aim of this study is to review applications of this technique in urology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature on PDT for urological malignancies with the following key words: photodynamic therapy, prostate cancer, kidney cancer, urothelial cancer, penile cancer and then by cross-referencing from previously identified studies.

RESULTS

Focal therapy of prostate cancer is an application of PDT. Clinical studies are ongoing to determine PDT efficacy and safety. PDT as salvage treatment after radiotherapy has been tested. Oncologic results were promising but important side effects were reported. Individual dosimetric planning is necessary to avoid toxicity. PDT was tested to treat superficial bladder carcinoma with promising oncologic results. Serious side effects have limited use of first photosensitizers generation. Second generation of photosensitizer allowed reducing morbidity. For upper urinary tract carcinoma and urethra, data are limited. Few studies described PDT application in penile oncology for conservative management of carcinoma in situ and premalignant lesions. For renal cancer, PDT was only tested on preclinical model despite of its potential application. No data is available concerning PDT application for testicular cancer.

CONCLUSION

PDT clinical applications in urology have proved a kind of efficiency balanced with an important morbidity. Development of new photosensitizer generations and improvement in illumination protocols should permit to decrease side effects.

[Photodynamic therapy and prostate cancer]

PURPOSE

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an innovative therapeutic modality in urologic oncology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed the current literature on principles and modalities of PDT in prostatic oncology.

RESULTS

Focal therapy of prostate cancer is an application field of PDT. Clinical phase II studies are ongoing to determine PDT efficacy and safety in this indication. PDT as salvage treatment after prostatic radiotherapy has been tested. Carcinologic results were promising but important side effects were reported. Individual dosimetric planification is necessary to avoid this toxicity.

CONCLUSION

PDT first clinical experience for prostate cancer has showed its technical feasibility. Several research ways are currently in study to improve carcinologic efficacy and to limit potential side effects.

[Towards a new treatment of retinoblastoma?]

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a recent approach for the treatment of small cancerous tumours, on-surface or accessible by endoscopy in which a dye (usually a tetrapyrrolic macrocycle) absorbs light and generates cytotoxic reactive oxygen species leading to cellular damage. Retinoblastoma (Rb) is a rare intraocular tumour of childhood. All the multifocal forms are hereditary and constitute a syndrome of genetic predisposition in the cancer. The current treatments with etoposide or carboplatine expose the patient to the late risk of second cancer. The use of PDT as cancer therapy is particularly attractive due to the use of few mutagenic and non-toxic photosensitizers (PS) prior light excitation and to the localized tumour illumination. The photoefficiency towards Rb of a glycoconjugated porphyrin is discussed and compared with the results obtained with a second-generation photosensitizer, the Foscan. Some in vivo results on an animal model of Rb are presented by a point of view of photoefficiency, biodistribution, pharmacokinetic and longitudinal follow-up of the PDT effect using a new non-invasive method of magnetic resonance imaging of real-time. Photodynamic treatments in association with non-invasive sodium imaging open ways for new treatment tailoring or treatment individualization of retinoblastoma in clinic.