Comment évaluer l’adhésion médicamenteuse ? Le point sur les méthodes

Medication adherence, related factors and outcomes among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are life-threatening conditions that can progress to death without treatment. Although strong medication adherence (MA) is known to enhance outcomes in chronic illnesses, its association with PAH and CTEPH was sporadically explored. This study aims to examine the MA of patients with PAH or CTEPH, identify factors associated with low adherence and explore the resulting outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by searching multiple databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar) from 6 March 1998 to 6 July 2023. We included studies reporting MA as primary or secondary end-points. Study selection, data extraction and methodological quality assessment were performed in duplicate.

RESULTS

20 studies involving 22 675 patients met the inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity was observed, particularly in the methods employed. MA means ranged from 0.62 to 0.96, with the proportion of patients exhibiting high MA varying from 40% (95% CI 35-45%) to 94% (95% CI 88-97%). Factors associated with low adherence included increased treatment frequency, time since diagnosis and co-payment. High MA seems to be associated with reduced hospitalisation rates, inpatient stays, outpatient visits and healthcare costs.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review underscores the heterogeneity of MA across studies. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that high MA could improve patients' clinical outcomes and alleviate the economic burden. Identifying factors consistently associated with poor MA could strengthen educational efforts for these patients, ultimately contributing to improved outcomes.

Observational and prospective study: evaluation of beliefs and representations of chronic treatments of polymedicated patients hospitalised in a vascular medicine and surgery department

OBJECTIVES

Today, the involvement of patients in their care is essential. As the population ages increases, the number of patients with chronic diseases is increasing. In the vascular medicine and surgery departments, patients are polymedicated and mostly suffer from several chronic diseases. Approximately 50% of patients with a chronic disease are not adherent. Among the factors that can influence therapeutic adherence are the beliefs and representations of patients.To evaluate the beliefs and representations of chronic treatments in patients with multiple medications and hospitalised in a vascular medicine and surgery department, and to evaluate the medication adherence, the knowledge and the importance patients attach to their treatments.

DESIGN

Observational, prospective and a single-centre study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a French tertiary hospital centre of around 3000 beds in 9 institutions.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult polymedicated (ie, minimum of five chronic treatments) patients hospitalised in a vascular medicine and surgery department were included after application of the exclusion criteria.

METHODS

Patient interviews were carried out in the department and were based on three interviewer-administered questionnaires (a global questionnaire, the Belief Medical Questionnaire and the GIRERD questionnaire).

RESULTS

Our study showed that patients perceived their treatments as beneficial rather than worrying. A correlation between medication adherence and beliefs was observed. 'Non-adherent'patients had a more negative overall view of medication than 'adherent' patients. The level of compliance and knowledge of our patients was low. Only 11% of the patients were 'good adherent', 16% of the patients could perfectly name their treatment and 36% knew all the indications.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of treatment representation and beliefs are central to understanding patient behaviour. Considering patients' representations will allow the identification of levers, and the development of actions and educational tools adapted to improve their adherence, their knowledge and therefore their drug management.

Evaluation of community pharmacist follow-up supported by the use of healthcare technology for type 2 diabetes patients

Background

Prevalence of type 2 diabetes is high in Belgium (estimated at over 10%, 1 patient out of 3 being unaware of their diagnosis). Management based on a change of lifestyle and the adoption of health-promoting behaviors, supplemented when needed with drug treatment, prevents complications, improves the patient's quality of life and reduces mortality. Multidisciplinary patient support is essential. In this, pharmacists have a key role, e.g. through therapeutic patient education activities, in which they are increasingly involved. Moreover, research suggests that the use of mobile technologies can be a useful tool for helping patients with their daily life and disease management.

Objectives

This study aims at exploring the benefits of community pharmacist follow-up supported by the use of mobile technologies in the monitoring of individuals with type 2 diabetes. The presented intervention aimed to reinforce the patients' willingness to actively participate in the management of their disease and to adopt favorable health behaviors, in order to increase their level of medication adherence.

Methods

A quantitative quasi-experimental study was conducted in community pharmacies throughout Belgium over a 6-month period with 3 data collection periods (before, during and after the intervention). Primary outcomes, related to the level of medication adherence, and secondary outcomes, considered as markers of the patient's overall health, were analyzed. In addition, qualitative data concerning participants' opinions on their experience were collected.

Results

66 patients participated in the study, with 50 remaining after 3 months and 46 completing the entire study. Statistical analyses did not show an improvement in the level of medication adherence. This parameter was high from the beginning, reflecting patients with controlled diabetes. However, statistically significant results were observed for systolic blood pressure and waist circumference (both improved), while other outcomes showed a positive trend or remained stable. Patient follow-up by the pharmacist was a positive experience for both parties which noted their interest and satisfaction for the project.

Conclusions

Although clinical results are not conclusive, patients were motivated and the attrition rate was low. Participants showed their interest in participating in this kind of project, opening up opportunities for further studies in the community pharmacy setting. As front-line health professionals, community pharmacists certainly have a key-role to play in therapeutic patient education and mobile technologies could be additional tools in this process.

[Medication adherence in renal transplantation: Evaluation, predictive factors and impact on humoral alloreactivity]

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess medication adherence to immunosuppressive treatment in kidney transplanted patients, to identify predictive factors of medication non-adherence and to analyse its impact on the development of Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) de novo, biomarkers of rejection in transplant recipients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional single-centre study was conducted to assess medication adherence to immunosuppressive treatment with the BAASIS (Basel Assessment of Adherence Scale for Immunosuppressives) self-report questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine non-adherence predictive factors and its role in the development of DSA de novo.

RESULTS

A total of 212 renal transplanted patients completed the BAASIS questionnaire: 36,3 % were non-adherent to their immunosuppressive treatment. Patient's age and taking azathioprine were independent predictors of non-adherence and "married or living together" family status was a protective factor in the multivariate analysis. Medication non-adherence was associated with DSA de novo development in the multivariate model and it multiplied their risk of development by 3.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, which detected a large proportion of patients who did not adhere to immunosuppressive treatment, highlighted non-adherence predictors and showed the association between non-adherence and development of DSA de novo. In case of non-adherent behavior, it is crucial to set up a personalised support for patients with a multidisciplinary approach of therapeutic education, in which the clinical pharmacist has a role.

[Implementation of pharmaceutical consultations in oncohematology in a teaching hospital: Over one year outcomes]

The development of Oral Cancer Therapies (OAT) raises the question of the therapeutic adherence of patients, put in difficulty by the isolation of the patient in the management of treatment and adverse reactions. Accompanying processes are developing, such as Pharmaceutical Consultations (PC), whose monitoring and education objectives are multiple. The PCs and their implementation are presented here, as well as the first results at 15months. The scope of the PCs was first defined, as well as their organization and supporting documents. A patient's medication history is carried out before the PC, then analyzed. The initial PC incorporates a discussion about patient's health habits, followed by information on the OAT, which is closed by the delivery of a follow-up diary. The follow-up PCs, distributed over the course of the first year following the initiation, allow to correct the erroneous knowledge of the patient, to support him in his difficulties and to detect any adverse effects. From May 2019 to August 2020, 81.2% of the 32 patients who initiated OAT took part in CP. A pharmacotherapeutic problem is encountered in 65.4% of them and a drug interaction with alternative or complementary medicines in 62.5% of patients which consuming. The PCs developed provide new elements compared to the recommendations and provide support for patients with toxicities that weaken their medical care throughout their care pathway.

Information and Communication Technologies in Lung Transplantation: Perception of Patients and Medical Teams

Optimal therapeutic management is a major determinant of patient prognosis and healthcare costs. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) represent an opportunity to enhance therapeutic management in complex chronic diseases, such as lung transplantation (LT). The objective of this study was to assess the preferences of LT patients and healthcare professionals regarding ICTs in LT therapeutic management. A cross-sectional opinion survey was conducted among lung transplant patients and healthcare professionals from the French lung transplantation centers. Five ICTs were defined (SMS, email, phone, internet, and smartphone application) in addition to face-to-face communication. An unsupervised approach by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) identified lung transplant patient profiles according to their preferences for ICTs. Fifty-three lung transplant patients and 15 healthcare professionals of the French LT centers were included. Both expected ICTs for treatment management and communication. Phone call, face-to-face, and emails were the most preferred communication tools for treatment changes and initiation. PCA identified four ICTs-related profiles (“no ICT”, “email”, “SMS”, and “oral communication”). “Email” and “oral communication” profiles are mainly concerned with treatment changes and transmission of new prescriptions. The “SMS” profile expected reminders for healthcare appointments and optimizing therapeutic management. This study provides practical guidance to enhance LT therapeutic management by ICT intervention. The type of ICT used should take into account patient profiles to improve adherence and thereby the prognosis. A combination of strategies including information, education by a multidisciplinary team, and reminders is a promising approach to ensure an optimal management of our patients.

[Therapeutic adherence among asthma patients: Variations according to age groups. How can it be improved? The potential contributions of new technologies]

While asthma patients' treatment adherence (TA) generally leaves to be desired, few data exist on TA evolution from age group to another. During the meeting of a working group of pneumo-pediatricians and adult pulmonologists, we reviewed the literature on adherence according to age group, examined explanations for poor adherence, and explored ways of improving adherence via new technologies. Asthma is a chronic disease for which TA is particularly low, especially during adolescence, but also among adults. Inhaled medications are the least effectively taken. Several explanations have been put forward: cost and complexity of treatments, difficulties using inhalation devices, poor understanding of their benefits, erroneous beliefs and underestimation of the severity of a fluctuating disease, fear of side effects, neglect, and denial (especially among teenagers). Poor TA is associated with risks of needless treatment escalation, aggravated asthma with frequent exacerbations, increased school absenteeism, degraded quality of life, and excessive mortality. Better compliance is based on satisfactory relationships between caregivers and asthmatics, improved caregiver training, and more efficient transmission to patients of relevant information. The recent evolution of innovative digital technologies opens the way for enhanced communication, via networks and dedicated applications, and thanks to connected inhalation devices, forgetfulness can be limited. Clinical research will also help to ameliorate TA. Lastly, it bears mentioning that analysis of the existing literature is hampered by differences in terms of working definitions and means of TA measurement.

Exploring the factors influencing adherence to oral anticancer drugs in patients with digestive cancer: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore the beliefs, perceptions and representations of patients in order to identify the determinants of oral anticancer drugs adherence and to take action in current practice to improve patient support in digestive oncology.

METHODS

We constructed a semi-directed interview guide which aimed to explore the patient's relationship with medication, their health history, their experiences at the time of the announcement of treatment, their confidence, their fears, their motivations to adhere to their treatment and the constraints linked to their treatment. The data were analysed and discussed using a thematic approach.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients agreed to participate in the study. The median age was 60 years. Ten patients had colorectal cancer, 3 patients had hepatocellular carcinoma, 3 patients had gastrointestinal stromal tumour and 1 patient had neuroendocrine pancreatic tumour. We identified five categories of factors influencing adherence: demographic and socioeconomic, disease-related, treatment-related, care system-related, and patient representation and pathways' factors. A majority of patients emphasised the importance of family support in the adherence process and the convenience of per os treatment compared to other intravenous treatments. However, several negative determinants emerged such as the toxicity of the treatment, fears of forgetting to take the medication, difficulties with the galenic formulation and negative beliefs of the family.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the need to address the different dimensions of the patient in order to understand his or her behaviour with regard to adherence and to identify the levers for improvement.

The eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale: validation of its Persian version in diabetic adults

Background:

Adherence to treatment is an important factor in the management of diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) among type 2 diabetes.

Methods:

This study carried out in Family Medicine Clinics (FMCs) in Tabriz, North West of Iran from May to September 2018. A total of 320 patients suffering from Type 2 diabetes were included. Content and face validity of the Persian version of MMAS-8 ‎ were quantitatively evaluated. The Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation (ICC) were calculated to assess the reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to assess the construct validity of the questionnaire.

Results:

Content and face validity of the Persian version of MMAS-8 were confirmed. Good internal consistency (Cronbach’s a = 0.83) and test–retest reliability (ICC= 0.87, P<0.001) were found. According to the results of the EFA, Persian version of MMAS-8 among diabetic patients had two dimensions: stopping to take medication due to the forgetfulness and for reasons other than forgetfulness.

Conclusion:

The Persian version of the MMAS-8 is a high valid and reliable questionnaire to screen medication adherence of Persian-speaking patients with diabetes.

Adherence to oral antibiotic therapy in patients with bone and joint infection: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

The management of bone and joint infections (BJI) is complex and requires prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Few data exist on adherence to anti-infectious treatment other than HIV, and none on BJI, even though compliance is considered as a major determinant of clinical outcome. This work aimed at evaluating adherence to oral antimicrobial treatment in patients with BJI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective observational blinded pilot study evaluating adherence by a 6-item questionnaire at 6 weeks (W6) and 3 months (M3) post-surgery. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with high, moderate and poor adherence at W6. Secondary endpoints included change in adherence between W6 and M3, and the exploration of potential variables influencing adherence.

RESULTS

Analysis was performed on 65 questionnaires obtained from 43 patients including 35 with device-associated BJI. At W6, 11 out of 34 patients were highly adherent to oral antibiotic therapy, 22 moderately adherent and 1 poorly adherent. There was no significant change in adherence to antibiotic therapy between W6 and M3. The only variable significantly associated with the level of adherence at W6 and M3 was the number of daily doses of antibiotic (P=0.04 and 0.02 at W6 and M3, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided a snapshot of patients' adherence in BJI. Adherence to antibiotic therapy appeared to be stable up to 3 months and a higher number of daily doses of antibiotic was associated with poorer adherence. These observations need to be confirmed in future large-scale studies using electronic pill monitoring systems.

Proposal for a Global Adherence Scale for Acute Conditions (GASAC): A prospective cohort study in two emergency departments

Background

Adherence in the context of patients with acute conditions is a major public health issue. It is neglected by the research community and no clinically validated generic scale exists to measure it.

Objective

To construct and validate a Global Adherence Scale usable in the context of Acute Conditions (GASAC) that takes into account adherence both to advice and to all types of prescriptions that the doctor may give. To measure adherence and to study its determinants.

Materials and method

We based the construction of the GASAC questionnaire on a theoretical model and a literature search. Then, between 2013 and 2014, we validated it in a prospective observational study in two hospital emergency departments. Patients were contacted by phone about one week after their consultation to answer several questionnaires, including GASAC and the Girerd self-administered questionnaire about medication adherence as a control.

Results

GASAC consists of four adherence subscales: drug prescriptions; blood tests/ radiography prescriptions; lifestyle advice and follow-up instructions. An analysis of the 154 sets of answers from patients showed that the GASAC drug subscale had satisfactory internal coherence (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78) and was correlated with the Girerd score, as was GASAC as a whole (p<0.01). The median score was 0.93 IQR [0.78–1] for a maximum value of 1 (n = 154). In multivariaable analysis, infection was more conducive of good adherence (cut off at ≥ 0.8; n = 115/154; 74.7% [67.0–81.3]) than trauma (OR 3.69; CI [1.60–8.52]). The Doctor-Patient Communication score (OR 1.06 by score point, CI [1.02–1.10]) also influenced adherence.

Conclusions

GASAC is a generic score to measure all dimensions of patient adherence following emergency departments visits, for use in clinical research and the evaluation of clinical practice. The level of adherence was high for acute conditions and Doctor-Patient Communication was a major determinant of adherence.

Improvement in adherence to Capecitabine and Lapatinib by way of a therapeutic education program

PURPOSE

A patient non-adherence with oral anticancer agents is a well-recognized barrier to effective treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of a therapeutic education program among non-adherent patients treated with Capecitabine alone or associated with Lapatinib.

METHODS

Sixty-five cancer patients were enrolled. Among them, 55 participated in the first observational phase of the study, measuring adherence using electronic MEMS pillboxes (medication event monitoring system). An adherence score was assessed in the form of a composite adherence score including intake dose and intake intervals. Ten non-adherent patients (adherence score < 80%) were included in the intervention phase of the study and were enrolled on a therapeutic education program. The efficacy of the program was evaluated on the basis of an improvement in adherence scores. We also studied factors influencing adherence.

RESULTS

The average adherence score was 83.6 ± 15.7% in the overall population. Forty-one patients were adherent (adherence score > 80%) and 14 patients were non-adherent (adherence score < 80%). The therapeutic education program for non-adherent patients (n = 10) increased their adherence score by 17.8% and led 60% of these patients to become adherent. The number of toxicities during the first cycles was a predictive factor for non-adherence.

CONCLUSION

This study showed an improvement in adherence to Capecitabine ± Lapatinib among non-adherent patients by way of a therapeutic education program.

Implementation of Medication Event Reminder Monitors among patients diagnosed with drug susceptible tuberculosis in rural Viet Nam: A qualitative study

Background

Despite the criticality of adherence to tuberculosis treatment, there is paucity of rigorous experimental research exploring the efficacy of interventions to promote adherence and a greater lack of inquiry addressing the integral role of adherence behaviour. The aim of this formative study was to examine the way in which the Wisepill evriMED Medication Event Reminder Monitor (MERM) was used among outpatients with drug susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis.

Methods

In depth interviews were conducted with 20 outpatients receiving treatment from two public healthcare facilities in Thanh Hoa, a rural province in northern Viet Nam. Patients had been enrolled in a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of using the MERM device upon adherence for between 1–3 months. The control group used the device without an alert, while the intervention group used the device with a daily alert and scheduled dosing history review.

Findings

All 20 patients interviewed were supportive of using the MERM device. Those able to be at home at the time that their treatment was due (50%) used the device as intended. Patients who worked all reported separating the time when the box was opened from the time at which they ingested their medication. Patients expressed fidelity to the prescribed medication taking time and concerns regarding the portability of the device. Limitations of the study surround the inclusion of a small sample population that did not experience factors that further compromise adherence.

Conclusions

Data recorded by the box did not always accurately reflect usage patterns. The alert in the intervention arm was able to support adherence only in patients who did not work while completing their treatment. MERM implementation can be improved by better aligning prescriber instructions with patients’ daily routines, and increasing the use of adherence data to guide adherence support practices. Healthcare staff need to be aware of potential barriers to optimal use of MERM devices. A rigorous qualitative approach to formative assessment is essential to inform the scale up of new digital technologies.

Adherence to immunomodulatory drugs in patients with multiple myeloma

Background

Immunomodulatory drugs (thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide; IMID) are widely used in the treatment of multiple myeloma patients. To date, few data are available on IMID adherence in multiple myeloma patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate IMID adherence and to compare two indirect methods to measure IMID adherence in multiple myeloma patients: a specific questionnaire and the medication possession ratio (MPR). Another aim was to explore this specific questionnaire for the assessment of IMID adherence in multiple myeloma patients.

Methods

All consecutive multiple myeloma patients, with at least two consecutive dispensations of thalidomide, lenalidomide or pomalidomide in our hospital were included in this prospective study. IMID adherence was measured using a specific questionnaire and the medication possession ratio. Relationship between the questionnaire scores and variables of interest was evaluated by multiple linear regression with a robust variance estimator.

Findings

Sixty-three patients were included in our study. The mean questionnaire score was 8.2±1.2 and the mean medication possession ratio value was 0.97±0.06. A total of 76% of patients were considered adherent according to the questionnaire (i.e. score ≥ 8), 94% according to the medication possession ratio (i.e. MPR ≥ 0.90), and 70% according to the questionnaire and the medication possession ratio. No statistically significant linear association was observed between the questionnaire score and any variables of interest including medication possession ratio. All Cronbach’s alpha were relatively low (range 0.0342–0.2443), showing a low correlation of the different questions with the questionnaire score.

Conclusions

Our study is the first prospective study evaluating IMID adherence in multiple myeloma patients in real life. The high adherence to IMIDs reported here, regardless of the drug, is encouraging considering the efficacy, toxicity and elevated cost of IMIDs. The specific questionnaire should be used with caution to evaluate IMID adherence.

[Evaluation of educational interventions with dialysis patient]

The treatment of end-stage renal disease requires a significant number of drug treatments. At patient level, daily management is somewhat difficult: Number of prescribed pills, medication side effects, treatment of asymptomatic diseases… The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of guidance tailored to each patient receiving hemodialysis, performed by the pharmacist (educational interventions). Adult haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia despite phosphate binders were eligible for study entry. The study was controlled with a retrospective group. The primary end point was a change in serum phosphate levels. The secondary end points were therapy adherence, knowledge regarding phosphate management and patient satisfaction with the programme. Sixteen patients in each group participated in the study. The mean serum phosphate level at endpoint was decreased by 0.25 mmol/L in the intervention group (0.41 mmol/L for patients with expectancy for this reduction) and by 0.11 mmol/L in the control group. Five patients normalized their serum phosphate level in the intervention group against three patients in the control group. The mean score of adherence decreased from 1.75 to 1.50. The main factors affecting adherence were forgetfulness or carelessness in taking medications and number of daily doses. This study showed the feasibility of an improvement in serum phosphate level and adherence driven by therapeutic education, though effect was highly amplified by the motivation induced by pharmaceutical guidance. Patients emphasize the importance of the involvement of pharmacist in their care.