Matched unrelated donor HSCT for thalassemia major using treosulphan based conditioning protocol for children: A single center experience from India

HSCT remains the only cure for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia until gene therapy strategies are proven to be safe

Patients with β-thalassemia suffer from severe anemia, iron overload and multiple complications, that affect their quality of life and well-being. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from an HLA-matched sibling donor, performed in childhood, has been the gold standard for thalassemic patients for decades. Unfortunately, siblings are available only for the minority of patients. Fully matched unrelated donors have been the second choice for cure, with equal results as far as overall survival is concerned, having though the cost of frequent and serious complications. On the other hand, haploidentical transplantation is performed more frequently during the last decade, with promising results. Gene therapy represents a novel therapeutic approach, with impressive results from clinical trials, both from gene addition strategies, as well as from the emerging gene editing tools. After reviewing current critical points of HSCT using alternative donors and assessing recently reported safety issues of gene therapy methods, we conclude that, although a breakthrough, the safety of gene therapy remains to be established.

Matched Family versus Alternative Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Thalassemia Major: Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center in South India

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative option available for patients with thalassemia major in India with increasing access to alternate donor transplantation for patients with no matched family donor. We aimed to analyze the impact of family and alternate donor HSCT on morbidity and mortality post-HSCT. We conducted a retrospective study in the department between July 2007 and December 2018 where all children who underwent HSCT for thalassemia major were included. A total of 264 children were included with a median age of 6 years (male/female, 1.4:1). The graft source was matched related donor (MRD) (76%; parent 15%, sibling 85%) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) (22%). All children received a myeloablative conditioning regimen with treosulfan/thiotepa/fludarabine in 93% and busulfan/cyclophosphamide in 7%. The source of stem cells was peripheral blood in 61%, bone marrow in 38%, and umbilical cord blood in 3%. The incidence of bacteremia was 14% versus 25% in MRD versus MUD groups. There was a higher incidence of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) in the MUD group (10% versus 3%). Engraftment occurred in 97% with a higher trend toward mixed chimerism in the MRD group (12% versus 2%). When indicated, whole-blood donor lymphocyte infusion was used to ensure complete chimerism in children in the MRD group. A statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD), both acute and chronic between the MUD versus MRD groups, 60% versus 20% and 41% versus 17%, respectively (P = .001). Similarly, immune cytopenia and cytomegalovirus reactivation were also significantly higher in the MUD group, 27% versus 1.4% and 25% versus 2%, respectively (P = .001). Thalassemia-free survival in our cohort was 96%, 94%, and 84% with a median follow-up of 65 months in the matched sibling donor, matched family donor, and MUD groups, respectively. Overall survival of 95% and 90% with a median follow-up of 65 months was noted in those who underwent transplantation less than and greater than 7 years of age, respectively. MUD transplantation for patients with thalassemia major involves specific challenges such as PRES and unusual manifestations of GVHD such as immune cytopenia. Early interventions to optimize supportive care and measures to reduce GVHD are required to ensure survival rates of over 90%.