1
|
Utsumi T, Suzuki H, Ishikawa H, Wakatsuki M, Okonogi N, Harada M, Ichikawa T, Akakura K, Murakami Y, Tsuji H, Yamada S. Identification of Early Biochemical Recurrence Predictors in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8815-8825. [PMID: 37887536 PMCID: PMC10605605 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30100636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study was to identify clinical predictors of early biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). A total of 670 high-risk PCa patients treated with CIRT and ADT were included in the study. Early BCR was defined as recurrence occurring during adjuvant ADT after CIRT or within 2 years after completion of ADT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify clinical predictors of early BCR. Patients were also classified according to the Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer (STAMPEDE) PCa classification. Early BCR was observed in 5.4% of the patients. Multivariate analysis identified clinical T3b stage and ≥75% positive biopsy cores as clinical predictors of early BCR after CIRT and ADT. The STAMPEDE PCa classification was also significantly associated with early BCR based on univariate analysis. These predictors can help clinicians identify patients who are at risk of early BCR. In the future, combination therapy of ADT with abiraterone may be an option for high-risk PCa patients who are at risk of early BCR, based on the results of the STAMPEDE study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takanobu Utsumi
- Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi, Chiba 285-8741, Japan; (T.U.); (H.S.)
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (M.W.); (N.O.); (M.H.); (H.T.); (S.Y.)
| | - Hiroyoshi Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi, Chiba 285-8741, Japan; (T.U.); (H.S.)
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (M.W.); (N.O.); (M.H.); (H.T.); (S.Y.)
| | - Masaru Wakatsuki
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (M.W.); (N.O.); (M.H.); (H.T.); (S.Y.)
| | - Noriyuki Okonogi
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (M.W.); (N.O.); (M.H.); (H.T.); (S.Y.)
| | - Masaoki Harada
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (M.W.); (N.O.); (M.H.); (H.T.); (S.Y.)
| | - Tomohiko Ichikawa
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 260-8670, Japan;
| | - Koichiro Akakura
- Department of Urology, Japan Community Health-Care Organization Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center, 5-1 Tsukudo-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8543, Japan;
| | - Yoshitaka Murakami
- Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, 5-21-16 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan;
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (M.W.); (N.O.); (M.H.); (H.T.); (S.Y.)
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (M.W.); (N.O.); (M.H.); (H.T.); (S.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wyatt JJ, McCallum HM, Maxwell RJ. Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 22:28-35. [PMID: 35493852 PMCID: PMC9048159 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR) imaging can potentially improve radiotherapy by enabling more accurate tumour delineation and dose painting. The use of PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning requires a comprehensive Quality Assurance (QA) programme to be developed. This study aimed to develop the QA tests required and assess their repeatability and stability. Materials and methods QA tests were developed for: MR image quality, MR geometric accuracy, electromechanical accuracy, PET-MR alignment accuracy, Diffusion Weighted (DW)-MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) accuracy and PET Standard Uptake Value (SUV) accuracy. Each test used a dedicated phantom and was analysed automatically or semi-automatically, with in-house software. Repeatability was evaluated by three same-day measurements with independent phantom positions. Stability was assessed through 12 monthly measurements. Results The repeatability Standard Deviations (SDs) of distortion for the MR geometric accuracy test were ⩽ 0.7 mm . The repeatability SDs in ADC difference from reference were ⩽ 3 % for the DW-MR accuracy test. The PET SUV difference from reference repeatability SD was 0.3 % . The stability SDs agreed within 0.6 mm , 1 percentage point and 1.4 percentage points of the repeatability SDs for the geometric, ADC and SUV accuracy tests respectively. There were no monthly trends apparent. These results were representative of the other tests. Conclusions QA Tests for radiotherapy planning PET-MR have been developed. The tests appeared repeatable and stable over a 12-month period. The developed QA tests could form the basis of a QA programme that enables high-quality, robust PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J. Wyatt
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Hazel M. McCallum
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Ross J. Maxwell
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Finnegan RN, Reynolds HM, Ebert MA, Sun Y, Holloway L, Sykes JR, Dowling J, Mitchell C, Williams SG, Murphy DG, Haworth A. A statistical, voxelised model of prostate cancer for biologically optimised radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 21:136-145. [PMID: 35284663 PMCID: PMC8913349 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Radiation therapy (RT) is commonly indicated for treatment of prostate cancer (PC). Biologicallyoptimised RT for PC may improve disease-free survival. This requires accurate spatial localisation and characterisation of tumour lesions. We aimed to generate a statistical, voxelised biological model to complement in vivomultiparametric MRI data to facilitate biologically-optimised RT. Material and methods Ex vivo prostate MRI and histopathological imaging were acquired for 63 PC patients. These data were co-registered to derive three-dimensional distributions of graded tumour lesions and cell density. Novel registration processes were used to map these data to a common reference geometry. Voxelised statistical models of tumour probability and cell density were generated to create the PC biological atlas. Cell density models were analysed using the Kullback-Leibler divergence to compare normal vs. lognormal approximations to empirical data. Results A reference geometry was constructed using ex vivo MRI space, patient data were deformably registered using a novel anatomy-guided process. Substructure correspondence was maintained using peripheral zone definitions to address spatial variability in prostate anatomy between patients. Three distinct approaches to interpolation were designed to map contours, tumour annotations and cell density maps from histology into ex vivo MRI space. Analysis suggests a log-normal model provides a more consistent representation of cell density when compared to a linear-normal model. Conclusion A biological model has been created that combines spatial distributions of tumour characteristics from a population into three-dimensional, voxelised, statistical models. This tool will be used to aid the development of biologically-optimised RT for PC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert N Finnegan
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- InghamInstitute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hayley M Reynolds
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- 5D Clinics, Claremont, Western Australia, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yu Sun
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- InghamInstitute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Sykes
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Blacktown Cancer & Haematology Centre, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jason Dowling
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, The Australian e-Health and Research Centre, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Catherine Mitchell
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott G Williams
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Connor LM, Skehan K, Choi JH, Simpson J, Martin J, Warren-Forward H, Dowling J, Greer P. Optimisation and validation of an integrated magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy planning solution. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 20:34-39. [PMID: 34901474 PMCID: PMC8640865 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only treatment planning is gaining in popularity in radiation oncology, with various methods available to generate a synthetic computed tomography (sCT) for this purpose. The aim of this study was to validate a sCT generation software for MRI-only radiotherapy planning of male and female pelvic cancers. The secondary aim of this study was to improve dose agreement by applying a derived relative electron and mass density (RED) curve to the sCT. Method and materials Computed tomography (CT) and MRI scans of forty patients with pelvic neoplasms were used in the study. Treatment plans were copied from the CT scan to the sCT scan for dose comparison. Dose difference at reference point, 3D gamma comparison and dose volume histogram analysis was used to validate the dose impact of the sCT. The RED values were optimised to improve dose agreement by using a linear plot. Results The average percentage dose difference at isocentre was 1.2% and the mean 3D gamma comparison with a criteria of 1%/1 mm was 84.0% ± 9.7%. The results indicate an inherent systematic difference in the dosimetry of the sCT plans, deriving from the tissue densities. With the adapted REDmod table, the average percentage dose difference was reduced to −0.1% and the mean 3D gamma analysis improved to 92.9% ± 5.7% at 1%/1 mm. Conclusions CT generation software is a viable solution for MRI-only radiotherapy planning. The option makes it relatively easy for departments to implement a MRI-only planning workflow for cancers of male and female pelvic anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. O'Connor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Cnr Edith & Platt St, Waratah, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia.
| | - Kate Skehan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Jae H. Choi
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - John Simpson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Jarad Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Jason Dowling
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Australian E-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter Greer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
[ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11: The First FDA-Approved 68Ga-Radiopharmaceutical for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14080713. [PMID: 34451810 PMCID: PMC8401928 DOI: 10.3390/ph14080713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
For the positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of prostate cancer, radiotracers targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) are nowadays used in clinical practice. Almost 10 years after its discovery, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 has been approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as the first 68Ga-radiopharmaceutical for the PET imaging of PSMA-positive prostate cancer in 2020. This radiopharmaceutical combines the peptidomimetic Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC with the radionuclide 68Ga, enabling specific imaging of tumor cells expressing PSMA. Such a targeting approach may also be used for therapy planning as well as potentially for the evaluation of treatment response.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sardaro A, Turi B, Bardoscia L, Ferrari C, Rubini G, Calabrese A, Ammirati F, Grillo A, Leo A, Lorusso F, Santorsola A, Stabile Ianora AA, Scardapane A. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance in Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiation Therapy Planning for Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Study. Front Oncol 2021; 10:603994. [PMID: 33585223 PMCID: PMC7874055 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.603994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (RT) has become pivotal in the treatment of prostate cancer recurrence (RPC) to optimize dose distribution and minimize toxicity, thanks to the high-precision delineation of prostate bed contours and organs at risk (OARs) under multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) guidance. We aimed to assess the role of pre-treatment mpMRI in ensuring target volume coverage and normal tissue sparing. Material and Methods Patients with post-prostatectomy RPC eligible for salvage RT were prospectively recruited to this pilot study. Image registration between planning CT scan and T2w pre-treatment mpMRI was performed. Two sets of volumes were outlined, and DWI images/ADC maps were used to facilitate precise gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation on morphological MRI scans. Two rival plans (mpMRI-based or not) were drawn up. Results Ten patients with evidence of RPC after prostatectomy were eligible. Preliminary data showed lower mpMRI-based clinical target volumes than CT-based RT planning (p = 0.0003): median volume difference 17.5 cm3. There were no differences in the boost volume coverage nor the dose delivered to the femoral heads and penile bulb, but median rectal and bladder V70Gy was 4% less (p = 0.005 and p = 0.210, respectively) for mpMRI-based segmentation. Conclusions mpMRI provides high-precision target delineation and improves the accuracy of RT planning for post-prostatectomy RPC, ensures better volume coverage with better OARs sparing and allows non-homogeneous dose distribution, with an aggressive dose escalation to the GTV. Randomized phase III trials and wider datasets are needed to fully assess the role of mpMRI in optimizing therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Barbara Turi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Lilia Bardoscia
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cristina Ferrari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rubini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Calabrese
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Federica Ammirati
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Antonietta Grillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Annamaria Leo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Santorsola
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Amato Stabile Ianora
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Scardapane
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thorwarth D. Imaging science and development in modern high-precision radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 12:63-66. [PMID: 33458297 PMCID: PMC7807660 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grosu AL, van der Heide UA. Imaging for radiation treatment planning and monitoring in prostate Cancer: Precision, personalization, individualization of therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 11:61-62. [PMID: 33458279 PMCID: PMC7807567 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|