The influence of a six degrees of freedom couch and an individual head support in patient positioning in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer

Organs-at-risk dose and normal tissue complication probability with dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) for head and neck cancer

We compared dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) to state-of-the-art volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for 46 head and neck cancer cases. DTRT had lower dose to salivary glands and swallowing structure, resulting in lower predicted xerostomia and dysphagia compared to VMAT. DTRT is deliverable on C-arm linacs with high dosimetric accuracy.

Robustness analysis of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for head and neck cancer

Background and purpose

Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) has been shown to improve healthy tissue sparing compared to volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). This study aimed to assess and compare the robustness of DTRT and VMAT treatment-plans for head and neck (H&N) cancer to patient-setup (PS) and machine-positioning uncertainties.

Materials and methods

The robustness of DTRT and VMAT plans previously created for 46 H&N cases, prescribed 50-70 Gy to 95 % of the planning-target-volume, was assessed. For this purpose, dose distributions were recalculated using Monte Carlo, including uncertainties in PS (translation and rotation) and machine-positioning (gantry-, table-, collimator-rotation and multi-leaf collimator (MLC)). Plan robustness was evaluated by the uncertainties' impact on normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for xerostomia and dysphagia and on dose-volume endpoints. Differences between DTRT and VMAT plan robustness were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test (α  = 5 %).

Results

Average NTCP for moderate-to-severe xerostomia and grade ≥ II dysphagia was lower for DTRT than VMAT in the nominal scenario (0.5 %, p = 0.01; 2.1 %, p < 0.01) and for all investigated uncertainties, except MLC positioning, where the difference was not significant. Average differences compared to the nominal scenario were ≤ 3.5 Gy for rotational PS (≤ 3°) and machine-positioning (≤ 2°) uncertainties, <7 Gy for translational PS uncertainties (≤ 5 mm) and < 20 Gy for MLC-positioning uncertainties (≤ 5 mm).

Conclusions

DTRT and VMAT plan robustness to the investigated uncertainties depended on uncertainty direction and location of the structure-of-interest to the target. NTCP remained on average lower for DTRT than VMAT even when considering uncertainties.

Dosimetric effect of six degrees of freedom couch top with rotational setup error corrections in proton therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the dosimetric effect of six degrees of freedom (6DoF) couch top with rotational corrections in proton therapy (PT).

METHODS

The water equivalent thickness (WET) was measured using a proton beam with a 6DoF couch top and patient immobilization base plate (PIBP) placed in front of a motorized water phantom. The accuracy verification was performed with the beam axis set perpendicular to the 6DoF couch top and tilted in 10° steps from 10° to 30°. Up to 3° rotational correction may be added during the actual treatment to correct the rotational setup error on our system. The measured and calculated values using the treatment planning system were compared. Additionally, the effect of the 3° difference was evaluated using actual measurements concerning each angle on the proton beam range.

RESULTS

The WET of the 6DoF couch top and PIBP were 8.5 ± 0.1 mm and 6.8 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. The calculation and the actual measurement at each angle agreed within 0.2 mm at the maximum. A maximum difference of approximately 0.6 mm was confirmed when tilted at 3° following 30° with the 6DoF couch top plus PIBP.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosimetric effect of the 6DoF couch top with rotational corrections in PT differs depending on the incidence angle on the couch top, and it increased with the increased oblique angle of incidence. However, the effect on the range was as small as 0.6 mm at the maximum. The amount of rotational correction, the angle of incidence of the beam, and the effect of rotational corrections on the proton beam range may differ depending on the structure of the couch top. Therefore, sufficient prior confirmation, and subsequent periodical quality assurance management are important.

Clinical Application of a Customized 3D-Printed Bolus in Radiation Therapy for Distal Extremities

In radiation therapy (RT) for skin cancer, tissue-equivalent substances called boluses are widely used to ensure the delivery of an adequate dose to the skin surface and to provide a radioprotective effect for normal tissue. The aim of this study was to develop a new type of three-dimensional (3D) bolus for RT involving body parts with irregular geometries and to evaluate its clinical feasibility. Two 3D-printed boluses were designed for two patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of their distal extremities based on computed tomography (CT) images and printed with polylactic acid (PLA). The clinical feasibility of the boluses was evaluated by measuring the in vivo skin dose at the tumor site with optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) and comparing the results with the prescribed and calculated doses from the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). The average measured dose distribution for the two patients was 94.75% of the prescribed dose and 98.8% of the calculated dose. In addition, the average measured dose during repeated treatments was 189.5 ± 3.7 cGy, thus demonstrating the excellent reproducibility of the proposed approach. Overall, the customized 3D-printed boluses for the RT of distal extremities accurately delivered doses to skin tumors with improved reproducibility.

Effectiveness of 6D couch with daily cone beam computed tomography in reducing PTV margins for glioblastoma multiforme

Objectives

Image-guided radiotherapy maximizes therapeutic index of brain irradiation by reducing setup errors during treatment. The aim of study was to analyze setup errors in the radiation treatment of glioblastoma multiforme and if decrease in planning target volume (PTV), margin is feasible using daily cone beam CT (CBCT) and 6D couch correction.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-one patients (630 fractions of radiotherapy) were studied in which corrections were made in 6° of freedom. We determined setup errors, impact of setup errors of initial three fractions CBCT versus rest of the treatment with daily CBCT, and mean difference in setup errors with or without application of 6D couch and volumetric benefit of reduction of PTV margin from 0.5 cm to 0.3 cm.

Results

The mean shift in the conventional directions, namely, vertical, longitudinal, and lateral was 0.17 cm, 0.19 cm, and 0.11 cm. There was significant change in vertical shift when first three fractions were compared with rest of the treatment with daily CBCT. When the effect of 6D couch was nullified, all directions showed increased error with longitudinal shift being significant. The number of setup errors of magnitude >0.3 cm was more significant when only conventional shifts were applied as compared with 6D couch. There was significant decrease in volume of brain parenchyma irradiated when margin of PTV was reduced from 0.5 cm to 0.3 cm.

Conclusion

Daily CBCT along with 6D couch correction can reduce setup error which allows reduction in PTV margin during radiotherapy planning in turn improving the therapeutic index.