1
|
Essers M, Mesch L, Beugeling M, Dekker J, de Kruijf W. Setup and intra-fractional motion measurements using surface scanning in head and neck cancer radiotherapy- A feasibility study. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100563. [PMID: 38444887 PMCID: PMC10912619 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is applied to improve patient set-up and to monitor intra-fraction motion. Head and neck cancer (H&N) patients are usually fixated using 5-point thermoplastic masks, that are experienced as uncomfortable or even stressful. Therefore, the feasibility of irradiating H&N patients without a mask by using SGRT was examined. Material and methods Nineteen H&N patients were included in a simulation study. Once a week, before the standard treatment, a maskless treatment was simulated, using SGRT for setup and intrafraction motion monitoring. Initial patient setup accuracy and intrafraction motion was determined using ConeBeam CT (CBCT) images as well as SGRT before and after the (simulated) treatment. The clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin for intrafraction motion was calculated. Using patient questionnaires, the patient-friendliness H&N irradiation with and without mask was determined. Results Maskless setup with SGRT and CBCT was as accurate as with a mask. SGRT showed that intrafraction motion was gradual during the treatment. The CTV-PTV margin correcting for intrafraction motion was 1.7 mm for maskless treatment without interventions, and 1.2 mm if corrected for motions > 2 mm. For 19 % of fractions, the intrafraction motion, as detected by both SGRT and CBCT, was larger than 2 mm in at least one direction. Sixteen patients preferred maskless treatment, while 3 worried they would move too much. Conclusions Using SGRT and a standard head rest resulted in a patient-friendly treatment with accurate patient setup and acceptably small intrafraction motion for H&N patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Essers
- Institute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart Mesch
- Institute Verbeeten, Radiotherapy, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike Beugeling
- Institute Verbeeten, Radiotherapy, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Janita Dekker
- Institute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Willy de Kruijf
- Institute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rudat V, Shi Y, Zhao R, Xu S, Yu W. Setup accuracy and margins for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of head, thorax, abdomen, and pelvic target volumes. Sci Rep 2023; 13:17018. [PMID: 37813917 PMCID: PMC10562432 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44320-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The goal of the study was to evaluate the inter- and intrafractional patient setup accuracy of target volumes located in the head, thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic regions when using SGRT, by comparing it with that of laser alignment using patient skin marks, and to calculate the corresponding setup margins. A total of 2303 radiotherapy fractions of 183 patients were analyzed. All patients received daily kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography scans (kV-CBCT) for online verification. From November 2019 until September 2020, patient setup was performed using laser alignment with patient skin marks, and since October 2020, using SGRT. The setup accuracy was measured by the six degrees of freedom (6DOF) corrections based on the kV-CBCT. The corresponding setup margins were calculated using the van Herk formula. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the impact of multiple factors on the setup accuracy. The inter-fractional patient setup accuracy was significantly better using SGRT compared to laser alignment with skin marks. The mean three-dimensional vector of the translational setup deviation of tumors located in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis using SGRT was 3.6 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 mm to 3.9 mm) and 4.5 mm using laser alignment with skin marks (95% CI 3.9 mm to 5.2 mm; p = 0.001). Calculation of setup margins for the combined inter- and intra-fractional setup error revealed similar setup margins using SGRT and kV-CBCT once a week compared to laser alignment with skin marks and kV-CBCT every other day. Furthermore, comparable setup margins were found for open-face thermoplastic masks with AlignRT compared to closed-face thermoplastic masks with laser alignment and mask marks. SGRT opens the possibility to reduce the number of CBCTs while maintaining sufficient setup accuracy. The advantage is a reduction of imaging dose and overall treatment time. Open-face thermoplastic masks may be used instead of closed-face thermoplastic masks to increase the patient's comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Rudat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yanyan Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruping Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuyin Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dekker J, Essers M, Verheij M, Kusters M, de Kruijf W. Dose coverage and breath-hold analysis of breast cancer patients treated with surface-guided radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:72. [PMID: 37081477 PMCID: PMC10116713 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02261-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is used to ensure a reproducible patient set-up and for intra-fraction motion monitoring. The arm position of breast cancer patients is important, since this is related to the position of the surrounding lymph nodes. The aim of the study was to investigate the set-up accuracy of the arm of patients positioned using SGRT. Moreover, the actual delivered dose was investigated and an extensive breath-hold analysis was performed. METHODS 84 patients who received local or locoregional breast radiation therapy were positioned and monitored using SGRT. The accuracy of the arm position, represented by the clavicle position, was studied on the anterior-posterior kV-image. To investigate the effect of changes in anatomy and patient set-up, the actual delivered dose was calculated on cone-beam CT-scans (CBCT). A deformable registration of the CT to the CBCT was applied to deform the structures of the CT onto the CBCT. The minimum dose in percentage of the prescribed dose that was received by 98% of different CTV volumes (D98) was determined. An extensive breath-hold analysis was performed and definitions for relevant parameters were given. RESULTS The arm position of 77 out of 84 patients in total was successful, based on the clavicle rotation. The mean clavicle rotation was 0.4° (± 2.0°). For 89.8% of the patients who were irradiated on the whole-breast D98 was larger than 95% of the prescribed dose (D98 > 95%). D98 > 95% applied for 70.8% of the patients irradiated on the chest wall. Concerning the lymph node CTVs, D98 > 95% for at least 95% of the patients. The breath-hold analysis showed a mean residual setup error of - 0.015 (± 0.90), - 0.18 (± 0.82), - 0.58 (± 1.1) mm in vertical, lateral, and longitudinal direction, respectively. The reproducibility and stability of the breath-hold was good, with median 0.60 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.66-0.71] mm) and 0.20 mm (95% CI 0.21-0.23] mm), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Using SGRT we were able to position breast cancer patients successfully, with focus on the arm position. The actual delivered dose calculated on the CBCT was adequate and no relation between clavicle rotation and actual delivered dose was found. Moreover, breath-hold analysis showed a good reproducibility and stability of the breath-hold. Trial registration CCMO register NL69214.028.19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janita Dekker
- Instituut Verbeeten, Klinische fysica & instrumentatie, Postbus 90120, 5000 LA, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| | - Marion Essers
- Instituut Verbeeten, Klinische fysica & instrumentatie, Postbus 90120, 5000 LA, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 32, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Kusters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 32, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willy de Kruijf
- Instituut Verbeeten, Klinische fysica & instrumentatie, Postbus 90120, 5000 LA, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saito M, Ueda K, Suzuki H, Komiyama T, Marino K, Aoki S, Sano N, Onishi H. Evaluation of the detection accuracy of set-up for various treatment sites using surface-guided radiotherapy system, VOXELAN: a phantom study. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2022; 63:435-442. [PMID: 35467750 PMCID: PMC9124621 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the detection accuracy of a 3-dimensional (3D) body scanner, VOXELAN, in surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of each part of the human body using a whole-body human phantom. We used A Resusci Anne was used as the whole-body phantom. The detection accuracy of VOXELAN in a radiotherapy treatment room with a linear accelerator (LINAC) was evaluated for two reference images: reconstruction of the planning computed tomography (CT) image (CT reference) and scanning by VOXELAN before the treatment (scan reference). The accuracy of the translational and rotational directions was verified for four treatment sites (open face shell, breast, abdomen, and arm), using the magnitude of the 6D robotic couch movement as the true value. Our results showed that the detection accuracy improved as the displacement from the reference position decreased for all the sites. Using the scan reference, the average accuracy of the translational and rotational axes was within 1.44 mm and 0.41°, respectively, for all sites except the arms. Similarly, using the CT reference, the average accuracy was within 2.45 mm and 1.35°, respectively. Additionally, it was difficult for both reference images to recognize misalignment of the arms. In conclusion we discovered that VOXELAN achieved a high detection accuracy for the head with an open face shell, chest, and abdomen, indicating that the system is useful in a clinical setting. However, it is necessary to pay attention to location matching for areas with few features, such as surface irregularities and potential errors, when the reference image is created from CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahide Saito
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Koji Ueda
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Takafumi Komiyama
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Kan Marino
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Shinichi Aoki
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Naoki Sano
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dekker J, van Wagenberg TP, de Smet M, Essers M, Kusters M, de Kruijf W. Geometrical analysis for motion monitoring of rigid bodies with optical surface scanning in radiation oncology. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 20:105-110. [PMID: 34901475 PMCID: PMC8640514 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Surface guided radiotherapy can be used to improve patient setup and for accurate intra-fraction motion monitoring in correspondence to the isocenter. For a clinical relevant motion analysis the actual displacement of the entire clinical target volume (CTV) is necessary. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a novel assessment method for intra-fraction motion for rigid body structures based on motion data and a geometrical analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A threshold value on the volume coverage (VC(t)) of the CTV by the planning target volume (PTV) was proposed as online motion monitoring method. Moreover, offline analysis was performed by using heat maps and by calculating VCx, the volume coverage for at least x% of treatment time. The method was applied retrospectively to patient treatment data for whole brain radiation treatment without a thermoplastic mask. RESULTS In 132 out of 142 fractions in total the proportion of the CTV that was inside the PTV for at least 99% of the time (VC99) was more than 95%, for a CTV-to-PTV margin of 5 mm. The source-voxel heat map showed which part of the CTV had a reduced coverage and the target heat map showed the movement of the CTV. CONCLUSION Instead of using an action threshold on the movements of the isocenter, a threshold on the VC(t) of the CTV by the PTV was proposed. The heat maps and resulting values of VCx can be used to adapt the VC(t) threshold or the CTV-to-PTV margin for subsequent fractions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janita Dekker
- Instituut Verbeeten, Klinische Fysica & Instrumentatie, Postbus 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Teun Pieter van Wagenberg
- Instituut Verbeeten, Klinische Fysica & Instrumentatie, Postbus 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska de Smet
- Instituut Verbeeten, Klinische Fysica & Instrumentatie, Postbus 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Marion Essers
- Instituut Verbeeten, Klinische Fysica & Instrumentatie, Postbus 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Kusters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 32, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willy de Kruijf
- Instituut Verbeeten, Klinische Fysica & Instrumentatie, Postbus 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Comparison of treatment position with mask immobilization and standard diagnostic setup in intracranial MRI radiotherapy simulation. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:614-621. [PMID: 33881558 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01776-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to compare the quality of images resulting from magnetic resonance imaging of patients who underwent intracranial MRI simulation using two different setups (treatment position with mask immobilization and standard diagnostic setup). Due to a larger number of channels and lack of mask immobilization in the standard diagnostic setup, we would like to evaluate whether this is an appropriate technique for MRI treatment planning. METHODS In total, 70 patients who underwent MR imaging of the brain at 1.5T were included in the study (48 for 6‑channel flex coil, 22 for 24-channel HNU face bill coil). Contrast-enhanced 3D T1w and T2 FLAIR images were acquired. Images were subjectively compared for artifact appearance and general image quality by three radiographers. Objective comparison of contrast rate, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio was also performed. RESULTS FLAIR and contrast-enhanced 3D T1w images showed various artifacts, such as susceptibility and movement artifacts. There were no statistically significant differences regarding the evaluation of movement artifacts between two coils and two different immobilization methods. There were also no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between the 6‑channel flex coil and 24-channel HNU face bill coil regarding qualitative general image quality and objective measures. CONCLUSION There were no statistically significant differences between the occurrence of movement artifacts, overall image quality, and objective image quality in treatment position with mask immobilization and standard diagnostic setup. Based on this result, we can conclude that a standard diagnostic setup is also applicable in intracranial MRI treatment planning with no loss to image quality. Registration of the imaging plans was not performed in this study; therefore, it might still be necessary to perform measurements of tumor delineation matching and geometrical accuracy acceptance in our institution.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nierer L, Walter F, Niyazi M, Shpani R, Landry G, Marschner S, von Bestenbostel R, Dinkel D, Essenbach G, Reiner M, Belka C, Corradini S. Radiotherapy in oncological emergencies: fast-track treatment planning. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:215. [PMID: 32912293 PMCID: PMC7488151 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01657-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To report on our clinical experience with a newly implemented workflow for radiotherapy (RT) emergency treatments, which allows for a fast treatment application outside the regular working-hours, and its clinical applicability. METHODS Treatment planning of 18 emergency RT patients was carried out using diagnostic computed tomography (CT) without a dedicated RT simulation CT. The cone-beam CT (CBCT) deviations of the first RT treatment were analyzed regarding setup accuracy. Furthermore, feasibility of the "fast-track" workflow was evaluated with respect to dose deviations caused by different Hounsfield unit (HU) to relative electron density (rED) calibrations and RT treatment couch surface shapes via 3D gamma index analysis of exemplary treatment plans. The dosimetric uncertainty introduced by different CT calibrations was quantified. RESULTS Mean patient setup vs. CBCT isocenter deviations were (0.49 ± 0.44) cm (x), (2.68 ± 1.63) cm (y) and (1.80 ± 1.06) cm (z) for lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions, respectively. Three out of four dose comparisons between the emergency RT plan calculated on the diagnostic CT and the same plan calculated on the treatment planning CT showed clinically acceptable gamma passing rates, when correcting for surface artifacts. The maximum difference of rED was 0.054, while most parts of the CT calibration curves coincided well. CONCLUSION In an emergency RT setting, the use of diagnostic CT data for treatment planning might be time-saving and was shown to be suitable for many cases, considering reproducibility of patient setup, accuracy of initial patient setup and accuracy of dose-calculation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Nierer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Roel Shpani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Dominika Dinkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriela Essenbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Reiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Freislederer P, Kügele M, Öllers M, Swinnen A, Sauer TO, Bert C, Giantsoudi D, Corradini S, Batista V. Recent advanced in Surface Guided Radiation Therapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:187. [PMID: 32736570 PMCID: PMC7393906 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01629-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing acceptance and recognition of Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) as a promising imaging technique has supported its recent spread in a large number of radiation oncology facilities. Although this technology is not new, many aspects of it have only recently been exploited. This review focuses on the latest SGRT developments, both in the field of general clinical applications and special techniques.SGRT has a wide range of applications, including patient positioning with real-time feedback, patient monitoring throughout the treatment fraction, and motion management (as beam-gating in free-breathing or deep-inspiration breath-hold). Special radiotherapy modalities such as accelerated partial breast irradiation, particle radiotherapy, and pediatrics are the most recent SGRT developments.The fact that SGRT is nowadays used at various body sites has resulted in the need to adapt SGRT workflows to each body site. Current SGRT applications range from traditional breast irradiation, to thoracic, abdominal, or pelvic tumor sites, and include intracranial localizations.Following the latest SGRT applications and their specifications/requirements, a stricter quality assurance program needs to be ensured. Recent publications highlight the need to adapt quality assurance to the radiotherapy equipment type, SGRT technology, anatomic treatment sites, and clinical workflows, which results in a complex and extensive set of tests.Moreover, this review gives an outlook on the leading research trends. In particular, the potential to use deformable surfaces as motion surrogates, to use SGRT to detect anatomical variations along the treatment course, and to help in the establishment of personalized patient treatment (optimized margins and motion management strategies) are increasingly important research topics. SGRT is also emerging in the field of patient safety and integrates measures to reduce common radiotherapeutic risk events (e.g. facial and treatment accessories recognition).This review covers the latest clinical practices of SGRT and provides an outlook on potential applications of this imaging technique. It is intended to provide guidance for new users during the implementation, while triggering experienced users to further explore SGRT applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Kügele
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M. Öllers
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A. Swinnen
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - T.-O. Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - C. Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - D. Giantsoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - V. Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nagtegaal SH, van Lier AL, den Boer AA, Kramer MC, Fanetti G, Eppinga WS, Philippens ME, Verhoeff JJ, Seravalli E. Does an immobilization mask have added value during planning magnetic resonance imaging for stereotactic radiotherapy of brain tumours? Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 13:7-13. [PMID: 33458301 PMCID: PMC7807597 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE When using an immobilization mask, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) head receive coil cannot be used and patients may experience discomfort during the examination. We therefore wish to assess the added value of an immobilization mask during all MRI scans intended for cranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS An MRI was acquired with and without a thermoplastic immobilization mask in ten patients eligible for SRT. A planning computed tomography (CT) scan was also made, to which the two MRIs were independently registered. Additionally, the MRI without immobilization was registered to the MRI in mask. On each sequence, gross tumour volume (GTV), the right eye, brain stem and chiasm were delineated. The absolute differences in centre-of-gravity coordinates and Dice coefficients of the volumes of the delineated structures between the two MRIs were compared. RESULTS Differences in GTV volume between the two MRIs were low, with median Dice coefficients between 0.88 and 0.91. Similarly, the median absolute differences in centre-of-gravity coordinates between the GTVs, organs at risk and landmarks delineated on the two MRIs were within 0.5 mm. The 95% confidence intervals of the median absolute differences in the three GTV coordinates was within 1 mm, which corresponds to the target volume safety margin used to account for possible errors during the SRT treatment chain. CONCLUSIONS The effect of scanning a patient without the immobilization mask falls within acceptable bounds of error for the geometrical accuracy of the SRT treatment chain. Consequently, placing the head in treatment position during all MRI scans for patients undergoing radiotherapy of brain metastasis is deemed unnecessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anne A. den Boer
- UMC Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Enrica Seravalli
- UMC Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|