1
|
An anthropomorphic 3D printed inhomogeneity thorax phantom slab for SBRT commissioning and quality assurance. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:575-583. [PMID: 36806158 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01233-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Anthropomorphic phantoms with tissue equivalency are required in radiotherapy for quality assurance of imaging and dosimetric processes used in radiotherapy treatments. Commercial phantoms are expensive and provide limited approximation to patient geometry and tissue equivalency. In this study, a 5 cm thick anthropomorphic thoracic slab phantom was designed and 3D printed using models exported from a CT dataset to demonstrate the feasibility of manufacturing anthropomorphic 3D printed phantoms onsite in a clinical radiotherapy department. The 3D printed phantom was manufactured with polylactic acid with an in-fill density of 80% to simulate tissue density and 26% to simulate lung density. A common radio-opacifier, barium sulfate (BaSO4), was added 6% w/w to an epoxy resin mixture to simulate similar HU numbers for bone equivalency. A half-cylindrical shape was cropped away from the spine region to allow insertion of the bone equivalent mixture. Two Gafchromic™ EBT3 film strips were inserted into the 3D printed phantom to measure the delivery of two stereotactic radiotherapy plans targeting lung and bone lesions respectively. Results were analysed within SNC Patient with a low dose threshold of 10% and a gamma criterion of 3%/2 mm and 5%/1 mm. The resulting gamma pass rate across both criterions for lung and bone were ≥ 95% and approximately 85% respectively. Results shows that a cost-effective anthropomorphic 3D printed phantom with realistic heterogeneity simulation can be fabricated in departments with access a suitable 3D printer, which can be used for performing commissioning and quality assurance for stereotactic type radiotherapy to lesions in the presence of heterogeneity.
Collapse
|
2
|
Naghavi SA, Tamaddon M, Garcia-Souto P, Moazen M, Taylor S, Hua J, Liu C. A novel hybrid design and modelling of a customised graded Ti-6Al-4V porous hip implant to reduce stress-shielding: An experimental and numerical analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1092361. [PMID: 36777247 PMCID: PMC9910359 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1092361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Stress shielding secondary to bone resorption is one of the main causes of aseptic loosening, which limits the lifespan of hip prostheses and exacerbates revision surgery rates. In order to minimise post-hip replacement stress variations, this investigation proposes a low-stiffness, porous Ti6Al4V hip prosthesis, developed through selective laser melting (SLM). The stress shielding effect and potential bone resorption properties of the porous hip implant were investigated through both in vitro quasi-physiological experimental assays, together with finite element analysis. A solid hip implant was incorporated in this investigation for contrast, as a control group. The stiffness and fatigue properties of both the solid and the porous hip implants were measured through compression tests. The safety factor of the porous hip stem under both static and dynamic loading patterns was obtained through simulation. The porous hip implant was inserted into Sawbone/PMMA cement and was loaded to 2,300 N (compression). The proposed porous hip implant demonstrated a more natural stress distribution, with reduced stress shielding (by 70%) and loss in bone mass (by 60%), when compared to a fully solid hip implant. Solid and porous hip stems had a stiffness of 2.76 kN/mm and 2.15 kN/mm respectively. Considering all daily activities, the porous hip stem had a factor of safety greater than 2. At the 2,300 N load, maximum von Mises stresses on the hip stem were observed as 112 MPa on the medial neck and 290 MPa on the distal restriction point, whereby such values remained below the endurance limit of 3D printed Ti6Al4V (375 MPa). Overall, through the strut thickness optimisation process for a Ti6Al4V porous hip stem, stress shielding and bone resorption can be reduced, therefore proposing a potential replacement for the generic solid implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Ataollah Naghavi
- Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, University College London, Stanmore, United Kingdom
| | - Maryam Tamaddon
- Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, University College London, Stanmore, United Kingdom
| | - Pilar Garcia-Souto
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mehran Moazen
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Taylor
- Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, University College London, Stanmore, United Kingdom
| | - Jia Hua
- School of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chaozong Liu
- Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, University College London, Stanmore, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Chaozong Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hasandoost L, Marx D, Zalzal P, Safir O, Hurtig M, Mehrvar C, Waldman SD, Papini M, Towler MR. Comparative Evaluation of Two Glass Polyalkenoate Cements: An In Vivo Pilot Study Using a Sheep Model. J Funct Biomater 2021; 12:jfb12030044. [PMID: 34449631 PMCID: PMC8395762 DOI: 10.3390/jfb12030044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is used to manage bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). However, the application of PMMA has been associated with complications such as volumetric shrinkage, necrosis, wear debris, and loosening. Glass polyalkenoate cements (GPCs) have potential bone cementation applications. Unlike PMMA, GPC does not undergo volumetric shrinkage, adheres chemically to bone, and does not undergo an exothermic setting reaction. In this study, two different compositions of GPCs (GPCA and GPCB), based on the patented glass system SiO2-CaO-SrO-P2O5-Ta2O5, were investigated. Working and setting times, pH, ion release, compressive strength, and cytotoxicity of each composition were assessed, and based on the results of these tests, three sets of samples from GPCA were implanted into the distal femur and proximal tibia of three sheep (alongside PMMA as control). Clinical CT scans and micro-CT images obtained at 0, 6, and 12 weeks revealed the varied radiological responses of sheep bone to GPCA. One GPCA sample (implanted in the sheep for 12 weeks) was characterized with no bone resorption. Furthermore, a continuous bone-cement interface was observed in the CT images of this sample. The other implanted GPCA showed a thin radiolucent border at six weeks, indicating some bone resorption occurred. The third sample showed extensive bone resorption at both six and 12 weeks. Possible speculative factors that might be involved in the varied response can be: excessive Zn2+ ion release, low pH, mixing variability, and difficulty in inserting the samples into different parts of the sheep bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leyla Hasandoost
- Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science, Biomedical Engineering Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada; (L.H.); (D.M.); (S.D.W.); (M.P.)
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Daniella Marx
- Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science, Biomedical Engineering Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada; (L.H.); (D.M.); (S.D.W.); (M.P.)
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Paul Zalzal
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada;
- Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Oakville, ON L6J 3L7, Canada
| | - Oleg Safir
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada;
| | - Mark Hurtig
- Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada;
| | - Cina Mehrvar
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada;
| | - Stephen D. Waldman
- Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science, Biomedical Engineering Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada; (L.H.); (D.M.); (S.D.W.); (M.P.)
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - Marcello Papini
- Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science, Biomedical Engineering Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada; (L.H.); (D.M.); (S.D.W.); (M.P.)
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada;
| | - Mark R. Towler
- Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science, Biomedical Engineering Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada; (L.H.); (D.M.); (S.D.W.); (M.P.)
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dumas JL, Dal R, Zefkili S, Robilliard M, Losa S, Birba I, Vu-Bezin J, Beddok A, Calugaru V, Dutertre G, De Marzi L. Addressing the dosimetric impact of bone cement and vertebroplasty in stereotactic body radiation therapy. Phys Med 2021; 85:42-49. [PMID: 33965740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Bone cement used for vertebroplasty can affect the accuracy on the dose calculation of the radiation therapy treatment. In addition the CT values of high density objects themselves can be misrepresented in kVCT images. The aim of our study is then to propose a streamlined approach for estimating the real density of cement implants used in stereotactic body radiation therapy. METHODS Several samples of cement were manufactured and irradiated in order to investigate the impact of their composition on the radiation dose. The validity of the CT conversion method for a range of photon energies was investigated, for the studied samples and on six patients. Calculations and measurements were carried out with various overridden densities and dose prediction algorithms (AXB with dose-to-medium reporting or AAA) in order to find the effective density override. RESULTS Relative dose differences of several percent were found between the dose measured and calculated downstream of the implant using an ion chamber and TPS or EPID dosimetry. If the correct density is assigned to the implant, calculations can provide clinically acceptable accuracy (gamma criteria of 3%/2 mm). The use of MV imaging significantly favors the attribution of a correct equivalent density to the implants compared to the use of kVCT images. CONCLUSION The porosity and relative density of the various studied implants vary significantly. Bone cement density estimations can be characterized using MV imaging or planar in vivo dosimetry, which could help determining whether errors in dose calculations are due to incorrect densities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Luc Dumas
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France.
| | - Romaric Dal
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Sofia Zefkili
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Magalie Robilliard
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Sandra Losa
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Imène Birba
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Jérémi Vu-Bezin
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Beddok
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | | | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France; Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm LITO, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|