1
|
Jaarsma-Coes MG, Klaassen L, Marinkovic M, Luyten GPM, Vu THK, Ferreira TA, Beenakker JWM. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Clinical Care for Uveal Melanoma Patients-A Systematic Review from an Ophthalmic Perspective. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112995. [PMID: 37296958 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Conversely to most tumour types, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was rarely used for eye tumours. As recent technical advances have increased ocular MRI's diagnostic value, various clinical applications have been proposed. This systematic review provides an overview of the current status of MRI in the clinical care of uveal melanoma (UM) patients, the most common eye tumour in adults. In total, 158 articles were included. Two- and three-dimensional anatomical scans and functional scans, which assess the tumour micro-biology, can be obtained in routine clinical setting. The radiological characteristics of the most common intra-ocular masses have been described extensively, enabling MRI to contribute to diagnoses. Additionally, MRI's ability to non-invasively probe the tissue's biological properties enables early detection of therapy response and potentially differentiates between high- and low-risk UM. MRI-based tumour dimensions are generally in agreement with conventional ultrasound (median absolute difference 0.5 mm), but MRI is considered more accurate in a subgroup of anteriorly located tumours. Although multiple studies propose that MRI's 3D tumour visualisation can improve therapy planning, an evaluation of its clinical benefit is lacking. In conclusion, MRI is a complementary imaging modality for UM of which the clinical benefit has been shown by multiple studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam G Jaarsma-Coes
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa Klaassen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Marinkovic
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gregorius P M Luyten
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T H Khanh Vu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Teresa A Ferreira
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem M Beenakker
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jaarsma-Coes MG, Klaassen L, Verbist BM, Vu TK, Klaver YL, Rodrigues MF, Nabarro C, Luyten GP, Rasch CR, van Herk M, Beenakker JWM. Inter-Observer Variability in MR-Based Target Volume Delineation of Uveal Melanoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101149. [PMID: 36691449 PMCID: PMC9860418 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Several efforts are being undertaken toward MRI-based treatment planning for ocular proton therapy for uveal melanoma (UM). The interobserver variability of the gross target volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the important parameters to design safety margins for a reliable treatment. Therefore, this study assessed the interobserver variation in GTV delineation of UM on MRI. Methods and Materials Six observers delineated the GTV in 10 different patients using the Big Brother contouring software. Patients were scanned at 3T MRI with a surface coil, and tumors were delineated separately on contrast enhanced 3DT1 (T1gd) and 3DT2-weighted scans with an isotropic acquisition resolution of 0.8 mm. Volume difference and overall local variation (median standard deviation of the distance between the delineated contours and the median contour) were analyzed for each GTV. Additionally, the local variation was analyzed for 4 interfaces: sclera, vitreous, retinal detachment, and tumor-choroid interface. Results The average GTV was significantly larger on T1gd (0.57cm3) compared with T2 (0.51cm3, P = .01). A not significant higher interobserver variation was found on T1gd (0.41 mm) compared with T2 (0.35 mm). The largest variations were found at the tumor-choroid interface due to peritumoral enhancement (T1gd, 0.62 mm; T2, 0.52 mm). As a result, a larger part of this tumor-choroid interface appeared to be included on T1gd-based GTVs compared with T2, explaining the smaller volumes on T2. Conclusions The interobserver variation of 0.4 mm on MRI are low with respect to the voxel size of 0.8 mm, enabling small treatment margins. We recommend delineation based on the T1gd-weighted scans, as choroidal tumor extensions might be missed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam G. Jaarsma-Coes
- Leiden University Medical Center, Ophthalmology, Leiden, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Lisa Klaassen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Ophthalmology, Leiden, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Berit M. Verbist
- Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - T.H. Khanh Vu
- Leiden University Medical Center, Ophthalmology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Yvonne L.B. Klaver
- HollandPTC, Radiation oncology, Delft, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Myra F. Rodrigues
- HollandPTC, Radiation oncology, Delft, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Claire Nabarro
- Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Coen R.N. Rasch
- HollandPTC, Radiation oncology, Delft, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jan-Willem M. Beenakker
- Leiden University Medical Center, Ophthalmology, Leiden, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands,Corresponding author: Jan-Willem M. Beenakker
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keene KR, Kan HE, van der Meeren S, Verbist BM, Tannemaat MR, Beenakker JM, Verschuuren JJ. Clinical and imaging clues to the diagnosis and follow-up of ptosis and ophthalmoparesis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2022; 13:2820-2834. [PMID: 36172973 PMCID: PMC9745561 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Ophthalmoparesis and ptosis can be caused by a wide range of rare or more prevalent diseases, several of which can be successfully treated. In this review, we provide clues to aid in the diagnosis of these diseases, based on the clinical symptoms, the involvement pattern and imaging features of extra-ocular muscles (EOM). Dysfunction of EOM including the levator palpebrae can be due to muscle weakness, anatomical restrictions or pathology affecting the innervation. A comprehensive literature review was performed to find clinical and imaging clues for the diagnosis and follow-up of ptosis and ophthalmoparesis. We used five patterns as a framework for differential diagnostic reasoning and for pattern recognition in symptomatology, EOM involvement and imaging results of individual patients. The five patterns were characterized by the presence of combination of ptosis, ophthalmoparesis, diplopia, pain, proptosis, nystagmus, extra-orbital symptoms, symmetry or fluctuations in symptoms. Each pattern was linked to anatomical locations and either hereditary or acquired diseases. Hereditary muscle diseases often lead to ophthalmoparesis without diplopia as a predominant feature, while in acquired eye muscle diseases ophthalmoparesis is often asymmetrical and can be accompanied by proptosis and pain. Fluctuation is a hallmark of an acquired synaptic disease like myasthenia gravis. Nystagmus is indicative of a central nervous system lesion. Second, specific EOM involvement patterns can also provide valuable diagnostic clues. In hereditary muscle diseases like chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) and oculo-pharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) the superior rectus is often involved. In neuropathic disease, the pattern of involvement of the EOM can be linked to specific cranial nerves. In myasthenia gravis this pattern is variable within patients over time. Lastly, orbital imaging can aid in the diagnosis. Fat replacement of the EOM is commonly observed in hereditary myopathic diseases, such as CPEO. In contrast, inflammation and volume increases are often observed in acquired muscle diseases such as Graves' orbitopathy. In diseases with ophthalmoparesis and ptosis specific patterns of clinical symptoms, the EOM involvement pattern and orbital imaging provide valuable information for diagnosis and could prove valuable in the follow-up of disease progression and the understanding of disease pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin R. Keene
- CJ Gorter MRI Center, Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of NeurologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Hermien E. Kan
- CJ Gorter MRI Center, Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Duchenne CenterThe Netherlands
| | - Stijn van der Meeren
- Department of OphthalmologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Orbital Center, Department of OphthalmologyAmsterdam University Medical CentersAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Berit M. Verbist
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Jan‐Willem M. Beenakker
- CJ Gorter MRI Center, Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of OphthalmologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiation OncologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren
- Department of NeurologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Duchenne CenterThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fleury E, Trnková P, van Rij C, Rodrigues M, Klaver Y, Spruijt K, Naus N, Zolnay A, Pignol JP, Kiliç E, Hoogeman MS. Improving Organs-at-Risk Sparing for Choroidal Melanoma Patients: A CT-based Two-Beam Strategy in Ocular Proton Therapy with a Dedicated Eyeline. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:173-181. [PMID: 35487435 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the potential clinical benefit of a two-beam arrangement technique using three-dimensional (3D) imaging of uveal melanoma (UM) patients treated with proton therapy and a dedicated eyeline. MATERIAL/METHODS Retrospective CT-based treatment plans of 39 UM patients performed using a single beam (SB) were compared to plans with two beams (TB) optimized for better trade-offs in organs-at-risk sparing. The RBE-weighted prescribed dose was 60 Gy (DRBE, GTV = 60 Gy) in four fractions, assuming an RBE of 1.1. Dosimetric findings were analyzed for three patient groups based on tumor-optic nerve distance and UM staging (group GrA: ≤ 3 mm, T1 T2 UM; GrB: ≤ 3 mm, T3 UM; GrC: > 3 mm, T1 T2 T3 UM). Finally, two schedules were compared on biologically effective dose (BED): both beams being delivered either the same day (TB) or on alternate days (TBalter). RESULTS All strategies resulted in dosimetrically acceptable plans. A dose reduction to the anterior structures was achieved in 23/39 cases with the two-beam plans. D25% was significantly lowered compared to SB plans by 12.4 and 15.4 Gy RBE-weighted median dose in GrA and GrB, respectively. D2% was reduced by 18.6 and 6.0 Gy RBE-weighted median dose in GrA and GrB, respectively. A cost to the optic nerve was observed with a median difference up to 3.8 Gy RBE-weighted dose in GrB. BED differences were statistically significant for all considered parameters in favor of two beams delivered the same day. CONCLUSION A two-beam strategy appears beneficial for posterior tumors abutting the optic nerve. This strategy might have a positive impact on the risk of ocular complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Fleury
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Petra Trnková
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Caroline van Rij
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Yvonne Klaver
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Spruijt
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Naus
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andras Zolnay
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emine Kiliç
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mischa S Hoogeman
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Histopathologic and MR Imaging Appearance of Spontaneous and Radiation-Induced Necrosis in Uveal Melanomas: Initial Results. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14010215. [PMID: 35008378 PMCID: PMC8750257 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Uveal melanomas may undergo necrosis, both spontaneously or following radiotherapy. Nowadays radiotherapy is the preferred treatment, whereas enucleation of the eye is used in selected cases. In order to differentiate the effects of radiotherapy from spontaneous degenerative changes in uveal melanomas, we compared the appearance of necrosis, both from a histopathological point of view and from the perspective of MR imaging, in two groups of patients with uveal melanoma: a group who had undergone previous proton beam radiotherapy (secondary enucleation); a control group who had undergone enucleation without any previous radiotherapy treatment (primary enucleation). Irradiated and nonirradiated uveal melanomas differ on the basis of the histological appearance, the MR imaging appearance and the distribution of necrosis. We hope that the findings we observed could be extended to all patients with uveal melanomas treated with radiotherapy, and may enhance the accuracy of radiologists in evaluating MR examinations after radiotherapy. Abstract Necrosis in uveal melanomas can be spontaneous or induced by radiotherapy. The purpose of our study was to compare the histopathologic and MRI findings of radiation-induced necrosis of a group of proton beam-irradiated uveal melanomas with those of spontaneous necrosis of a control group of patients undergoing primary enucleation. 11 uveal melanomas who had undergone proton beam radiotherapy, MRI and secondary enucleation, and a control group of 15 untreated uveal melanomas who had undergone MRI and primary enucleation were retrospectively identified. Within the irradiated and nonirradiated group, 7 and 6 eyes with histological evidence of necrosis respectively, were furtherly selected for the final analysis; the appearance of necrosis was assessed at histopathologic examination and MRI. Irradiated melanomas showed a higher degree of necrosis as compared with nonirradiated tumors. Irradiated and nonirradiated lesions differed based on the appearance and distribution of necrosis. Irradiated tumors showed large necrotic foci, sharply demarcated from the viable neoplastic tissue; nonirradiated tumors demonstrated small, distinct foci of necrosis. Radiation-induced necrosis, more pigmented than surrounding viable tumor, displayed high signal intensity on T1-weighted and low signal intensity on T2-weighted images. The hemorrhagic/coagulative necrosis, more prevalent in nonirradiated tumors (4 out of 6 vs. 1 out of 7 cases), appeared hyperintense on T2-weighted and hypointense on T1-weighted images. Our study boosts the capability to recognize radiation-induced alterations in uveal melanomas at MRI and may improve the accuracy of radiologists in the evaluation of follow-up MR examination after radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Fleury E, Trnková P, Spruijt K, Herault J, Lebbink F, Heufelder J, Hrbacek J, Horwacik T, Kajdrowicz T, Denker A, Gerard A, Hofverberg P, Mamalui M, Slopsema R, Pignol J, Hoogeman M. Characterization of the HollandPTC proton therapy beamline dedicated to uveal melanoma treatment and an interinstitutional comparison. Med Phys 2021; 48:4506-4522. [PMID: 34091930 PMCID: PMC8457201 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Eye-dedicated proton therapy (PT) facilities are used to treat malignant intraocular lesions, especially uveal melanoma (UM). The first commercial ocular PT beamline from Varian was installed in the Netherlands. In this work, the conceptual design of the new eyeline is presented. In addition, a comprehensive comparison against five PT centers with dedicated ocular beamlines is performed, and the clinical impact of the identified differences is analyzed. MATERIAL/METHODS The HollandPTC eyeline was characterized. Four centers in Europe and one in the United States joined the study. All centers use a cyclotron for proton beam generation and an eye-dedicated nozzle. Differences among the chosen ocular beamlines were in the design of the nozzle, nominal energy, and energy spectrum. The following parameters were collected for all centers: technical characteristics and a set of distal, proximal, and lateral region measurements. The measurements were performed with detectors available in-house at each institution. The institutions followed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series (TRS)-398 Code of Practice for absolute dose measurement, and the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice, its modified version or International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report No. 78 for spread-out Bragg peak normalization. Energy spreads of the pristine Bragg peaks were obtained with Monte Carlo simulations using Geant4. Seven tumor-specific case scenarios were simulated to evaluate the clinical impact among centers: small, medium, and large UM, located either anteriorly, at the equator, or posteriorly within the eye. Differences in the depth dose distributions were calculated. RESULTS A pristine Bragg peak of HollandPTC eyeline corresponded to the constant energy of 75 MeV (maximal range 3.97 g/cm2 in water) with an energy spread of 1.10 MeV. The pristine Bragg peaks for the five participating centers varied from 62.50 to 104.50 MeV with an energy spread variation between 0.10 and 0.70 MeV. Differences in the average distal fall-offs and lateral penumbrae (LPs) (over the complete set of clinically available beam modulations) among all centers were up to 0.25 g/cm2 , and 0.80 mm, respectively. Average distal fall-offs of the HollandPTC eyeline were 0.20 g/cm2 , and LPs were between 1.50 and 2.15 mm from proximal to distal regions, respectively. Treatment time, around 60 s, was comparable among all centers. The virtual source-to-axis distance of 120 cm at HollandPTC was shorter than for the five participating centers (range: 165-350 cm). Simulated depth dose distributions demonstrated the impact of the different beamline characteristics among institutions. The largest difference was observed for a small UM located at the posterior pole, where a proximal dose between two extreme centers was up to 20%. CONCLUSIONS HollandPTC eyeline specifications are in accordance with five other ocular PT beamlines. Similar clinical concepts can be applied to expect the same high local tumor control. Dosimetrical properties among the six institutions induce most likely differences in ocular radiation-related toxicities. This interinstitutional comparison could support further research on ocular post-PT complications. Finally, the findings reported in this study could be used to define dosimetrical guidelines for ocular PT to unify the concepts among institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Fleury
- Department of RadiotherapyErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- Holland Proton Therapy CenterDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Petra Trnková
- Department of RadiotherapyErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- Departement of Radiation OncologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Kees Spruijt
- Holland Proton Therapy CenterDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Joël Herault
- Departement of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | | | - Jens Heufelder
- Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und EnergieBerlinGermany
- Department of OphthalmologyCharité ‐ Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Paul Scherrer Institute Center for Proton TherapyVilligenSwitzerland
| | - Tomasz Horwacik
- Institute of Nuclear PhysicsPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
| | | | - Andrea Denker
- Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und EnergieBerlinGermany
| | - Anaïs Gerard
- Departement of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | - Petter Hofverberg
- Departement of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | - Maria Mamalui
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Roelf Slopsema
- Department of Radiation OncologyEmory Proton Therapy CenterAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Department of RadiotherapyErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- Holland Proton Therapy CenterDelftThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Niendorf T, Beenakker JWM, Langner S, Erb-Eigner K, Bach Cuadra M, Beller E, Millward JM, Niendorf TM, Stachs O. Ophthalmic Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Where Are We (Heading To)? Curr Eye Res 2021; 46:1251-1270. [PMID: 33535828 DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1874021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging of the eye and orbit (MReye) is a cross-domain research field, combining (bio)physics, (bio)engineering, physiology, data sciences and ophthalmology. A growing number of reports document technical innovations of MReye and promote their application in preclinical research and clinical science. Realizing the progress and promises, this review outlines current trends in MReye. Examples of MReye strategies and their clinical relevance are demonstrated. Frontier applications in ocular oncology, refractive surgery, ocular muscle disorders and orbital inflammation are presented and their implications for explorations into ophthalmic diseases are provided. Substantial progress in anatomically detailed, high-spatial resolution MReye of the eye, orbit and optic nerve is demonstrated. Recent developments in MReye of ocular tumors are explored, and its value for personalized eye models derived from machine learning in the treatment planning of uveal melanoma and evaluation of retinoblastoma is highlighted. The potential of MReye for monitoring drug distribution and for improving treatment management and the assessment of individual responses is discussed. To open a window into the eye and into (patho)physiological processes that in the past have been largely inaccessible, advances in MReye at ultrahigh magnetic field strengths are discussed. A concluding section ventures a glance beyond the horizon and explores future directions of MReye across multiple scales, including in vivo electrolyte mapping of sodium and other nuclei. This review underscores the need for the (bio)medical imaging and ophthalmic communities to expand efforts to find solutions to the remaining unsolved problems and technical obstacles of MReye, with the objective to transfer methodological advancements driven by MR physics into genuine clinical value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thoralf Niendorf
- MRI.TOOLS GmbH, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan-Willem M Beenakker
- Department of Ophthalmology and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sönke Langner
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Katharina Erb-Eigner
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meritxell Bach Cuadra
- Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Radiology, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ebba Beller
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jason M Millward
- Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Oliver Stachs
- Department Life, Light & Matter, University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.,Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|