Magnetic resonance guided elective neck irradiation targeting individual lymph nodes: A new concept

The Use of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer and Recommended Reporting Guidance

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become standard diagnostic workup for head and neck malignancies and is currently recommended by most radiological societies for pharyngeal and oral carcinomas, its utilization in radiotherapy has been heterogeneous during the last decades. However, few would argue that implementing MRI for annotation of target volumes and organs at risk provides several advantages, so that implementation of the modality for this purpose is widely accepted. Today, the term MR-guidance has received a much broader meaning, including MRI for adaptive treatments, MR-gating and tracking during radiotherapy application, MR-features as biomarkers and finally MR-only workflows. First studies on treatment of head and neck cancer on commercially available dedicated hybrid-platforms (MR-linacs), with distinct common features but also differences amongst them, have also been recently reported, as well as "biological adaptation" based on evaluation of early treatment response via functional MRI-sequences such as diffusion weighted ones. Yet, all of these approaches towards head and neck treatment remain at their infancy, especially when compared to other radiotherapy indications. Moreover, the lack of standardization for reporting MR-guided radiotherapy is a major obstacle both to further progress in the field and to conduct and compare clinical trials. Goals of this article is to present and explain all different aspects of MR-guidance for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer, summarize evidence, as well as possible advantages and challenges of the method and finally provide a comprehensive reporting guidance for use in clinical routine and trials.

Detectability and intra-fraction motion of individual elective lymph nodes in head and neck cancer patients on the Magnetic Resonance Image guided linear accelerator

Background and purpose

Individual elective lymph node irradiation instead of elective neck irradiation is a new concept for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients developed for the Magnetic Resonance Image guided linear accelerator (MR-linac). To prepare this, the detectability, volume changes and intra-fraction motion of elective lymph nodes on the MR-linac was assessed.

Materials and methods

A total of 15 HNC patients underwent diagnostic pre-treatment MRI. Additionally, two MR-linac scans were obtained with a 10-minute time difference in the first week of radiation treatment. Elective lymph node contours inside lymph node levels (Ib-V) were segmented on the pre-treatment MRI and the MR-linac scans and compared on number and maximal transversal diameter. Intra-fraction motion of elective lymph nodes on the MR-linac was estimated using Center of Mass (COM) distances and incremental isotropic expansion of lymph node segmentations.

Results

Of all 679 detected lymph nodes on the pre-treatment MRI, eight lymph nodes were not detectable on the first MR-linac scan and 16 new lymph nodes were detected. Lymph node diameters between the pre-treatment MRI scan and the MR-linac scan varied from -0.19 to + 0.13 mm. COM distances varied from 1.2 to 1.7 mm and lymph node contours had to be expanded with 3 mm.

Conclusions

Nearly all elective lymph nodes were detectable on the 1.5T MR-linac scan with no major changes in target volumes compared to the pre-treatment MRI. Simulated intra-fraction motion during the MR-linac scans was smaller than the 5-mm margin that will be used in the first elective lymph node radiation treatment.

DOSE AND VOLUME DE-ESCALATION OF RADIOTHERAPY IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER

Radiotherapy plays a key role in the treatment of head and neck cancer. However, irradiation of the head and neck region is associated with high rates of acute and chronic toxicity. Technological advances have led to better visualisation of target volumes and critical structures and improved dose conformality in the treatment volume. Despite this, acute toxicity has not been substantially reduced and late toxicity has a significant impact on patients' quality of life. The greater radiosensitivity of tumours associated with the HPV and the development of new imaging techniques have encouraged research into new deintensified strategies to reduce the side effects of radiotherapy. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on the strategies of de-escalated treatment in dose and/or volume in head and neck cancer.

Raaijmakers C, Philippens ME. Individual elective lymph node irradiation for the reduction of complications in head and neck cancer patients (iNode): A phase-I feasibility trial protocol

Introduction

The long-term complication rate in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients caused by radiotherapy (RT) can be decreased by restricting elective neck irradiation (ENI) from large adjacent lymph node levels to only individual elective lymph nodes. The primary objective of this study is to treat the first HNSCC patients with individual elective lymph node irradiation by means of a Magnetic Resonance-linac (MR-linac) in order to assess the feasibility.

Methods and analysis

In this phase I feasibility study, 20 patients will be included with histologically proven cT2-4N0-1M0 HNSCC originating from the oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx, planned for treatment with primary radiotherapy and bilateral elective neck irradiation (ENI). Patients will be treated with 35 fractions in six weeks, according to the DAHANCA schedule. Individual lymph nodes inside the conventional lymph node levels will be categorized in low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk based on cytology, histology and imaging parameters. Low-risk and intermediate-risk lymph nodes will irradiated in 20 and 23 fractions respectively, with a fraction dose of 2 Gy (=40/46 Gy EQD2). The high-risk lymph nodes and the primary tumor will be irradiated in 35 fractions of 2 Gy (=70 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2)). To limit treatment burden, 20 fractions will be applied on the MR-linac. The last 15 fractions (sequential boost at the primary tumor, intermediate-risk and high-risk lymph nodes) will be applied on a conventional linear accelerator. The main study endpoint is the percentage of fractions that are successfully completed on the MR-linac.

Ethics and dissemination

With individual elective lymph node irradiation we expect less toxicity and a better quality of life for HNSCC patients. However, as the treatment time on the MR-linac will be longer (30-45 vs 15 min per fraction) we need to examine if patients can endure this new treatment concept.

MRI visibility and displacement of elective lymph nodes during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients

Background and purpose

To decrease the impact of radiotherapy to healthy tissues in the head and neck region, we propose to restrict the elective neck irradiation to elective lymph nodes at risk of containing micro metastases instead of the larger lymph node volumes. To assess whether this new concept is achievable in the clinic, we determined the number, volume changes and displacement of elective lymph nodes during the course of radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

MRI scans of 10 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients were acquired before radiotherapy and in week 2, 3, 4 and 5 during radiotherapy. The weekly delineations of elective lymph nodes inside the lymph node levels (Ib/II/III/IVa/V) were rigidly registered and analyzed regarding number and volume. The displacement of elective lymph nodes was determined by center of mass (COM) distances, vector-based analysis and the isotropic contour expansion of the lymph nodes of the pre-treatment scan or the scan of the previous week in order to geographically cover 95% of the lymph nodes in the scans of the other weeks.

Results

On average, 31 elective lymph nodes in levels Ib-V on each side of the neck were determined. This number remained constant throughout radiotherapy in most lymph node levels. The volume of the elective lymph nodes reduced significantly in all weeks, up to 50% in week 5, compared to the pre-treatment scan. The largest median COM displacements were seen in level V, for example 5.2 mm in week 5 compared to the pre-treatment scan. The displacement of elective lymph nodes was mainly in cranial direction. Geographical coverage was obtained when the lymph node volumes were expanded with 7 mm in case the pre-treatment scan was used and 6.5 mm in case the scan of the previous week was used.

Conclusion

Elective lymph nodes of HNC patients remained visible on MRI and decreased in size during radiotherapy. The displacement of elective lymph nodes differ per lymph node level and were mainly directed cranially. Weekly adaptation does not seem to improve coverage of elective lymph nodes. Based on our findings we expect elective lymph node irradiation is achievable in the clinic.

Target Definition in MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Simple Summary

Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer has become more routine due to an increase in imaging quality and improvement in radiation techniques. With the availability of faster adaptive workflows, it is possible to adapt more easily to (daily) changes. MRI offers besides great anatomical imaging, also functional information about the tumor and surrounding tissue. The aim of this review is to provide current state of evidence about target definition on MRI for adaptive strategies in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Abstract

In recent years, MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has taken an increasingly important position in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue contrast in anatomical imaging compared to computed tomography (CT), but also provides functional and dynamic information with selected sequences. Due to these benefits, in current clinical practice, MRI is already used for target delineation and response assessment in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Because of the close proximity of target areas and radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs) during HNSCC treatment, MRgRT could provide a more accurate treatment in which OARs receive less radiation dose. With the introduction of several new radiotherapy techniques (i.e., adaptive MRgRT, proton therapy, adaptive cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) RT, (daily) adaptive radiotherapy ensures radiation dose is accurately delivered to the target areas. With the integration of a daily adaptive workflow, interfraction changes have become visible, which allows regular and fast adaptation of target areas. In proton therapy, adaptation is even more important in order to obtain high quality dosimetry, due to its susceptibility for density differences in relation to the range uncertainty of the protons. The question is which adaptations during radiotherapy treatment are oncology safe and at the same time provide better sparing of OARs. For an optimal use of all these new tools there is an urgent need for an update of the target definitions in case of adaptive treatment for HNSCC. This review will provide current state of evidence regarding adaptive target definition using MR during radiotherapy for HNSCC. Additionally, future perspectives for adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy will be discussed.