Real-world analysis of manual editing of deep learning contouring in the thorax region

Deep learning-assisted interactive contouring of lung cancer: Impact on contouring time and consistency

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a deep learning (DL)-assisted interactive contouring tool on inter-observer variability and the time taken to complete tumour contouring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine clinicians contoured the gross tumour volume (GTV) using the PET-CT scans of 10 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, either using DL-assisted or manual contouring tools. After contouring a case using one contouring method, the same case was contoured one week later using the other method. The contours and time taken were compared.

RESULTS

Use of the DL-assisted tool led to a statistically significant decrease in active contouring time of 23 % relative to the standard manual segmentation method (p < 0.01). The mean observation time for all clinicians and cases made up nearly 60 % of interaction time for both contouring approaches. On average the time spent contouring per case was reduced from 22 min to 19 min when using the DL-assisted tool. Additionally, the DL-assisted tool reduced contour variability in the parts of tumour where clinicians tended to disagree the most, while the consensus contour was similar whichever of the two contouring approaches was used.

CONCLUSIONS

A DL-assisted interactive contouring approach decreased active contouring time and local inter-observer variability when used to delineate lung cancer GTVs compared to a standard manual method. Integration of this tool into the clinical workflow could assist clinicians in contouring tasks and improve contouring efficiency.

Experience of Implementing Deep Learning-Based Automatic Contouring in Breast Radiation Therapy Planning: Insights From Over 2000 Cases

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the impact and clinical utility of an auto-contouring system for radiation therapy treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The auto-contouring system was implemented in 2019. We evaluated data from 2428 patients who underwent adjuvant breast radiation therapy before and after the system's introduction. We collected the treatment's finalized contours, which were reviewed and revised by a multidisciplinary team. After implementation, the treatment contours underwent a finalization process that involved manual review and adjustment of the initial auto-contours. For the preimplementation group (n = 369), auto-contours were generated retrospectively. We compared the auto-contours and final contours using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95).

RESULTS

We analyzed 22,215 structures from final and corresponding auto-contours. The final contours were generally larger, encompassing more slices in the superior or inferior directions. Among organs at risk (OAR), the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and contralateral breast demonstrated significantly increased DSC and decreased HD95 postimplementation (all P < .05), except for the lungs, which presented inaccurate segmentation. Among target volumes, CTVn_L2, L3, L4, and the internal mammary node showed increased DSC and decreased HD95 postimplementation (all P < .05), although the increase was less pronounced than the OAR outcomes. The analysis also covered factors contributing to significant differences, pattern identification, and outlier detection.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the adoption of an auto-contouring system was associated with an increased reliance on automated settings, underscoring its utility and the potential risk of automation bias. Given these findings, we underscore the importance of considering the integration of stringent risk assessments and quality management strategies as a precautionary measure for the optimal use of such systems.

Potential of E-Learning Interventions and Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Contouring Skills in Radiotherapy: The ELAISA Study

PURPOSE

Most research on artificial intelligence-based auto-contouring as template (AI-assisted contouring) for organs-at-risk (OARs) stem from high-income countries. The effect and safety are, however, likely to depend on local factors. This study aimed to investigate the effects of AI-assisted contouring and teaching on contouring time and contour quality among radiation oncologists (ROs) working in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-seven ROs were randomly assigned to either manual or AI-assisted contouring of eight OARs for two head-and-neck cancer cases with an in-between teaching session on contouring guidelines. Thereby, the effect of teaching (yes/no) and AI-assisted contouring (yes/no) was quantified. Second, ROs completed short-term and long-term follow-up cases all using AI assistance. Contour quality was quantified with Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) between ROs' contours and expert consensus contours. Groups were compared using absolute differences in medians with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

AI-assisted contouring without previous teaching increased absolute DSC for optic nerve (by 0.05 [0.01; 0.10]), oral cavity (0.10 [0.06; 0.13]), parotid (0.07 [0.05; 0.12]), spinal cord (0.04 [0.01; 0.06]), and mandible (0.02 [0.01; 0.03]). Contouring time decreased for brain stem (-1.41 [-2.44; -0.25]), mandible (-6.60 [-8.09; -3.35]), optic nerve (-0.19 [-0.47; -0.02]), parotid (-1.80 [-2.66; -0.32]), and thyroid (-1.03 [-2.18; -0.05]). Without AI-assisted contouring, teaching increased DSC for oral cavity (0.05 [0.01; 0.09]) and thyroid (0.04 [0.02; 0.07]), and contouring time increased for mandible (2.36 [-0.51; 5.14]), oral cavity (1.42 [-0.08; 4.14]), and thyroid (1.60 [-0.04; 2.22]).

CONCLUSION

The study suggested that AI-assisted contouring is safe and beneficial to ROs working in LMICs. Prospective clinical trials on AI-assisted contouring should, however, be conducted upon clinical implementation to confirm the effects.

Autocontouring of primary lung lesions and nodal disease for radiotherapy based only on computed tomography images

Background and purpose

In many clinics, positron-emission tomography is unavailable and clinician time extremely limited. Here we describe a deep-learning model for autocontouring gross disease for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for primary lung lesions and/or hilar/mediastinal nodal disease, based only on computed tomography (CT) images.

Materials and methods

An autocontouring model (nnU-Net) was trained to contour gross disease in 379 cases (352 training, 27 test); 11 further test cases from an external centre were also included. Anchor-point-based post-processing was applied to remove extraneous autocontoured regions. The autocontours were evaluated quantitatively in terms of volume similarity (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], surface Dice coefficient, 95th percentile Hausdorff distance [HD95], and mean surface distance), and scored for usability by two consultant oncologists. The magnitude of treatment margin needed to account for geometric discrepancies was also assessed.

Results

The anchor point process successfully removed all erroneous regions from the autocontoured disease, and identified two cases to be excluded from further analysis due to 'missed' disease. The average DSC and HD95 were 0.8 ± 0.1 and 10.5 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. A 10-mm uniform margin-distance applied to the autocontoured region was found to yield "full coverage" (sensitivity > 0.99) of the clinical contour for 64 % of cases. Ninety-seven percent of evaluated autocontours were scored by both clinicians as requiring no or minor edits.

Conclusions

Our autocontouring model was shown to produce clinically usable disease outlines, based on CT alone, for approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing lung radiotherapy. Further work is necessary to improve this before clinical implementation.

Assessment of deep learning-based auto-contouring on interobserver consistency in target volume and organs-at-risk delineation for breast cancer: Implications for RTQA program in a multi-institutional study

PURPOSE

To quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto-contouring in reducing potential IOV.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In phase 1, two breast cancer cases were randomly selected and distributed to multiple institutions for contouring six clinical target volumes (CTVs) and eight OAR. In Phase 2, auto-contour sets were generated using a previously published DL Breast segmentation model and were made available for all participants. The difference in IOV of submitted contours in phases 1 and 2 was investigated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The qualitative analysis involved using contour heat maps to visualize the extent and location of these variations and the required modification.

RESULTS

Over 800 pairwise comparisons were analysed for each structure in each case. Quantitative phase 2 metrics showed significant improvement in the mean DSC (from 0.69 to 0.77) and HD (from 34.9 to 17.9 mm). Quantitative analysis showed increased interobserver agreement in phase 2, specifically for CTV structures (5-19 %), leading to fewer manual adjustments. Underlying IOV differences causes were reported using a questionnaire and hierarchical clustering analysis based on the volume of CTVs.

CONCLUSION

DL-based auto-contours improved the contour agreement for OARs and CTVs significantly, both qualitatively and quantitatively, suggesting its potential role in minimizing radiation therapy protocol deviation.

The role of artificial intelligence in radiotherapy clinical practice

This review article visits the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiotherapy clinical practice. We will discuss how AI has a place in the modern radiotherapy workflow at the level of automatic segmentation and planning, two applications which have seen real-work implementation. A special emphasis will be placed on the role AI can play in online adaptive radiotherapy, such as performed at MR-linacs, where online plan adaptation is a procedure which could benefit from automation to reduce on-couch time for patients. Pseudo-CT generation and AI for motion tracking will be introduced in the scope of online adaptive radiotherapy as well. We further discuss the use of AI for decision-making and response assessment, for example for personalized prescription and treatment selection, risk stratification for outcomes and toxicities, and AI for quantitative imaging and response assessment. Finally, the challenges of generalizability and ethical aspects will be covered. With this, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current and future applications of AI in radiotherapy.

A geometry and dose-volume based performance monitoring of artificial intelligence models in radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer

Background and Purpose

Clinical Artificial Intelligence (AI) implementations lack ground-truth when applied on real-world data. This study investigated how combined geometrical and dose-volume metrics can be used as performance monitoring tools to detect clinically relevant candidates for model retraining.

Materials and Methods

Fifty patients were analyzed for both AI-segmentation and planning. For AI-segmentation, geometrical (Standard Surface Dice 3 mm and Local Surface Dice 3 mm) and dose-volume based parameters were calculated for two organs (bladder and anorectum) to compare AI output against the clinically corrected structure. A Local Surface Dice was introduced to detect geometrical changes in the vicinity of the target volumes, while an Absolute Dose Difference (ADD) evaluation increased focus on dose-volume related changes. AI-planning performance was evaluated using clinical goal analysis in combination with volume and target overlap metrics.

Results

The Local Surface Dice reported equal or lower values compared to the Standard Surface Dice (anorectum: (0.93 ± 0.11) vs (0.98 ± 0.04); bladder: (0.97 ± 0.06) vs (0.98 ± 0.04)). The ADD metric showed a difference of (0.9 ± 0.8)Gy for the anorectum D 1 cm 3 . The bladder D 5cm 3 reported a difference of (0.7 ± 1.5)Gy. Mandatory clinical goals were fulfilled in 90 % of the DLP plans.

Conclusions

Combining dose-volume and geometrical metrics allowed detection of clinically relevant changes, applied to both auto-segmentation and auto-planning output and the Local Surface Dice was more sensitive to local changes compared to the Standard Surface Dice. This monitoring is able to evaluate AI behavior in clinical practice and allows candidate selection for active learning.

Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning

Background and purpose

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring for treatment planning in radiotherapy needs extensive clinical validation, including the impact of editing after automatic segmentation. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a commercial system for Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) (prostate/seminal vesicles) and selected Organs at Risk (OARs) (rectum/bladder/femoral heads + femurs), evaluating also inter-observer variability (manual vs automatic + editing) and the reduction of contouring time.

Materials and methods

Two expert observers contoured CTVs/OARs of 20 patients in our Treatment Planning System (TPS). Computed Tomography (CT) images were sent to the automatic contouring workstation: automatic contours were generated and sent back to TPS, where observers could edit them if necessary. Inter- and intra-observer consistency was estimated using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). Radiation oncologists were also asked to score the quality of automatic contours, ranging from 1 (complete re-contouring) to 5 (no editing). Contouring times (manual vs automatic + edit) were compared.

Results

DSCs (manual vs automatic only) were consistent with inter-observer variability (between 0.65 for seminal vesicles and 0.94 for bladder); editing further improved performances (range: 0.76-0.94). The median clinical score was 4 (little editing) and it was <4 in 3/2 patients for the two observers respectively. Inter-observer variability of automatic + editing contours improved significantly, being lower than manual contouring (e.g.: seminal vesicles: 0.83vs0.73; prostate: 0.86vs0.83; rectum: 0.96vs0.81). Oncologist contouring time reduced from 17 to 24 min of manual contouring time to 3-7 min of editing time for the two observers (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Automatic contouring with a commercial AI-based system followed by editing can replace manual contouring, resulting in significantly reduced time for segmentation and better consistency between operators.

Clinical Implementation and Evaluation of Auto-Segmentation Tools for Multi-Site Contouring in Radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Tools for auto-segmentation in radiotherapy are widely available, but guidelines for clinical implementation are missing. The goal was to develop a workflow for performance evaluation of three commercial auto-segmentation tools to select one candidate for clinical implementation.

Materials and Methods

One hundred patients with six treatment sites (brain, head-and-neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis) were included. Three sets of AI-based contours for organs-at-risk (OAR) generated by three software tools and manually drawn expert contours were blindly rated for contouring accuracy. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the Hausdorff distance, and a dose/volume evaluation based on the recalculation of the original treatment plan were assessed. Statistically significant differences were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the post-hoc Dunn Test with Bonferroni correction.

Results

The mean DSC scores compared to expert contours for all OARs combined were 0.80 ± 0.10, 0.75 ± 0.10, and 0.74 ± 0.11 for the three software tools. Physicians' rating identified equivalent or superior performance of some AI-based contours in head (eye, lens, optic nerve, brain, chiasm), thorax (e.g., heart and lungs), and pelvis and abdomen (e.g., kidney, femoral head) compared to manual contours. For some OARs, the AI models provided results requiring only minor corrections. Bowel-bag and stomach were not fit for direct use. During the interdisciplinary discussion, the physicians' rating was considered the most relevant.

Conclusion

A comprehensive method for evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available auto-segmentation software was developed. The in-depth analysis yielded clear instructions for clinical use within the radiotherapy department.

Automated contouring and statistical process control for plan quality in a breast clinical trial

Background and purpose

Automatic review of breast plan quality for clinical trials is time-consuming and has some unique challenges due to the lack of target contours for some planning techniques. We propose using an auto-contouring model and statistical process control to independently assess planning consistency in retrospective data from a breast radiotherapy clinical trial.

Materials and methods

A deep learning auto-contouring model was created and tested quantitatively and qualitatively on 104 post-lumpectomy patients' computed tomography images (nnUNet; train/test: 80/20). The auto-contouring model was then applied to 127 patients enrolled in a clinical trial. Statistical process control was used to assess the consistency of the mean dose to auto-contours between plans and treatment modalities by setting control limits within three standard deviations of the data's mean. Two physicians reviewed plans outside the limits for possible planning inconsistencies.

Results

Mean Dice similarity coefficients comparing manual and auto-contours was above 0.7 for breast clinical target volume, supraclavicular and internal mammary nodes. Two radiation oncologists scored 95% of contours as clinically acceptable. The mean dose in the clinical trial plans was more variable for lymph node auto-contours than for breast, with a narrower distribution for volumetric modulated arc therapy than for 3D conformal treatment, requiring distinct control limits. Five plans (5%) were flagged and reviewed by physicians: one required editing, two had clinically acceptable variations in planning, and two had poor auto-contouring.

Conclusions

An automated contouring model in a statistical process control framework was appropriate for assessing planning consistency in a breast radiotherapy clinical trial.

Deep learning based automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk for 0.35 T MRgRT of lung tumors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) offers treatment plan adaptation to the anatomy of the day. In the current MRgRT workflow, this requires the time consuming and repetitive task of manual delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs), which is also prone to inter- and intra-observer variability. Therefore, deep learning autosegmentation (DLAS) is becoming increasingly attractive. No investigation of its application to OARs in thoracic magnetic resonance images (MRIs) from MRgRT has been done so far. This study aimed to fill this gap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

122 planning MRIs from patients treated at a 0.35 T MR-Linac were retrospectively collected. Using an 80/19/23 (training/validation/test) split, individual 3D U-Nets for segmentation of the left lung, right lung, heart, aorta, spinal canal and esophagus were trained. These were compared to the clinically used contours based on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). They were also graded on their clinical usability by a radiation oncologist.

RESULTS

Median DSC was 0.96, 0.96, 0.94, 0.90, 0.88 and 0.78 for left lung, right lung, heart, aorta, spinal canal and esophagus, respectively. Median 95th percentile values of the HD were 3.9, 5.3, 5.8, 3.0, 2.6 and 3.5 mm, respectively. The physician preferred the network generated contours over the clinical contours, deeming 85 out of 129 to not require any correction, 25 immediately usable for treatment planning, 15 requiring minor and 4 requiring major corrections.

CONCLUSIONS

We trained 3D U-Nets on clinical MRI planning data which produced accurate delineations in the thoracic region. DLAS contours were preferred over the clinical contours.

A simple single-cycle interactive strategy to improve deep learning-based segmentation of organs-at-risk in head-and-neck cancer

Background and purpose

Interactive segmentation seeks to incorporate human knowledge into segmentation models and thereby reducing the total amount of editing of auto-segmentations. By performing only interactions which provide new information, segmentation performance may increase cost-effectively. The aim of this study was to develop, evaluate and test feasibility of a deep learning-based single-cycle interactive segmentation model with the input being computer tomography (CT) and a small amount of information rich contours.

Methods and Materials

A single-cycle interactive segmentation model, which took CT and the most cranial and caudal contour slices for each of 16 organs-at-risk for head-and-neck cancer as input, was developed. A CT-only model served as control. The models were evaluated with Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff Distance 95th percentile and average symmetric surface distance. A subset of 8 organs-at-risk were selected for a feasibility test. In this, a designated radiation oncologist used both single-cycle interactive segmentation and atlas-based auto-contouring for three cases. Contouring time and added path length were recorded.

Results

The medians of Dice coefficients increased with single-cycle interactive segmentation in the range of 0.004 (Brain)-0.90 (EyeBack_merged) when compared to CT-only. In the feasibility test, contouring time and added path length were reduced for all three cases as compared to editing atlas-based auto-segmentations.

Conclusion

Single-cycle interactive segmentation improved segmentation metrics when compared to the CT-only model and was clinically feasible from a technical and usability point of view. The study suggests that it may be cost-effective to add a small amount of contouring input to deep learning-based segmentation models.