The capacity for volitional control of pharyngeal swallowing in healthy adults

Speech-Swallow Dissociation of Velopharyngeal Incompetence with Pseudobulbar Palsy: Evaluation by High-Resolution Manometry

Patients with pseudobulbar palsy often present with velopharyngeal incompetence. Velopharyngeal incompetence is usually observed during expiratory activities such as speech and/or blowing during laryngoscopy. These patients typically exhibit good velopharyngeal closure during swallowing, which is dissociated from expiratory activities. We named this phenomenon "speech-swallow dissociation" (SSD). SSD on endoscopic findings can help in diagnosing the underlying disease causing dysphagia. This endoscopic finding is qualitative, and the quantitative characteristics of SSD are still unclear. Accordingly, the current study aimed to quantitatively evaluate SSD in patients with pseudobulbar palsy. We evaluated velopharyngeal pressure during swallowing and expiratory activity in 10 healthy subjects and 10 patients with pseudobulbar palsy using high-resolution manometry, and compared the results between the two groups. No significant differences in maximal velopharyngeal contraction pressure (V-Pmax) were observed during dry swallowing between the pseudobulbar palsy group and healthy subjects (190.5 mmHg vs. 173.6 mmHg; P = 0.583). V-Pmax during speech was significantly decreased in the pseudobulbar palsy group (85.4 mmHg vs. 34.5 mmHg; P < 0.001). The degree of dissociation of speech to swallowing in V-Pmax, when compared across groups, exhibited a larger difference in the pseudobulbar palsy group, at 52% versus 80% (P = 0.001). Velopharyngeal pressure during blowing was similar to that during speech. Velopharyngeal closure in patients with pseudobulbar palsy exhibited weaker pressure during speech and blowing compared with swallowing, quantitatively confirming the presence of SSD. Pseudobulbar palsy often presents with SSD, and this finding may be helpful in differentiating the etiology of dysphagia.

Expanding Rehabilitation Options for Dysphagia: Skill-Based Swallowing Training

Over the past four decades, our understanding of swallowing neural control has expanded dramatically. However, until recently, advances in rehabilitation approaches for dysphagia have not kept pace, with a persistent focussing on strengthening peripheral muscle. This approach is no doubt very appropriate for some if not many of our patients. But what if the dysphagia is not due to muscles weakness? The purpose of this clinical manuscript is to reflect on where we have been, where we are now and perhaps where we need to go in terms of our understanding of swallowing motor control and rehabilitation of motor control impairments. This compilation is presented to clinicians in the hope that suggesting approaches "outside the box" will inspire clinicians to focus their attention "inside the box" to ultimately improve rehabilitation and long-term outcomes for patients with dysphagia.

Potential for Behavioural Pressure Modulation at the Upper Oesophageal Sphincter in Healthy Swallowing

Supratentorial structures are known to be involved in the neural control of swallowing, thus the potential for volitional manipulation of pharyngeal swallowing is of rehabilitative interest. The extent of volitional control of the upper oesophageal sphincter (UOS) during swallowing remains unclear. Prior research has shown that the UOS opening duration can be volitionally prolonged during execution of the Mendelsohn manoeuvre, which does not change the UOS opening time in isolation but the swallowing response in its entirety. This study explored the capacity of healthy adults to increase the period of pressure drop in the region of the UOS (UOS-Pdrop) during swallowing, through volitional UOS pressure modulation in the absence of altered pharyngeal pressure. The period of UOS-Pdrop was used as a proxy of UOS opening duration that is associated with a pressure decrease at the region of the UOS. Six healthy adults were seen 45 min daily for 2 weeks and for one follow-up session. During training, high-resolution manometry contour plots were provided for visual biofeedback. Participants were asked to maximally prolong the blue period on the monitor (period of UOS-Pdrop) without altering swallowing biomechanics. Performance was assessed prior to training start and following training. There was evidence within the first session for task-specific volitional prolongation of the period of UOS-Pdrop during swallowing with biofeedback; however, performance was not enhanced with further training. This may suggest that the amount to which the period of UOS-Pdrop may be prolonged is restricted in healthy individuals. The findings of this study indicate a potential of healthy adults to volitionally prolong UOS opening duration as measured by the period of pressure drop at the region of the UOS. Further research is indicated to evaluate purposeful pressure modulation intra-swallow in patient populations with UOS dysfunction to clarify if the specificity of behavioural treatment may be increased.

Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor skill learning in swallowing

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effects of cerebellar tDCS on motor learning for swallowing.

METHODS

In a double-blind RCT, 39 healthy adults received either sham, anodal tDCS, or cathodal tDCS in two sessions on two consecutive days. Following 20 min cerebellar tDCS (2 mA) or sham, they underwent swallowing skill training that targeted control of timing and magnitude of submental muscle activation during swallowing. Linear mixed models were used to identify the effects of stimulation on timing and magnitude accuracy as measured by the change in task performance for each training session, and for skill retention on days 3 and 10 post-intervention.

RESULTS

Only the sham group had a reduced temporal error from baseline to all following timepoints. When compared to error changes in the sham group, changes from baseline in temporal errors were higher at all timepoints post-intervention for the anodal group, and higher at both retention assessments for the cathodal group. Amplitude errors were smaller for all conditions at all timepoints post-intervention compared to baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebellar tDCS was found to inhibit temporal aspects of motor skill learning in swallowing. For the tDCS parameters used in this study, there is no support for use of tDCS to facilitate swallowing rehabilitation. Trial Registry Number (https://www.anzctr.org.au/): ACTRN12615000451505.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONCerebellar tDCS, in combination with motor skill training, has been demonstrated to increase motor skill learning in healthy individuals and neurologically impaired patients.In this study, cerebellar tDCS applied prior to swallowing skill training adversely affected timing measures of submental muscle activation during swallowing.In contrast to published outcomes in the corticospinal literature, both anodal and cathodal tDCS resulted in a relative inhibitory effect on motor skill learning in swallowing when compared to the sham condition.Swallowing skill training without tDCS produced increased accuracy in outcomes.

Aspects of the assessment and management of pharyngoesophageal dysphagia

Swallowing complaints are common and may have significant consequences for nutrition and pulmonary health. Etiology varies and different aspects of the deglutitive system may be affected. A thorough assessment from the oral cavity to the stomach will provide physiologic information that enables specific targeted management plans to be devised. Although the swallow trajectory bridges anatomic areas, there has previously been a tendency to compartmentalize assessment and treatment by arbitrary anatomic boundaries. It is now clear that this approach fails to appreciate the complexity of swallow mechanics and that systems (oral, pharyngeal, esophageal, and pulmonary) are intertwined and codependent. Swallowing specialists from different backgrounds and with complementary skill sets form a multidisciplinary team that can provide insight and address multiple areas of management. With the advent of new tools for instrumental evaluation, such as manometry, targeted rehabilitative strategies can be informed by physiology, increased in precision and breadth, and assessed quantitatively. Surgical approaches have evolved toward endoscopic techniques, and food technology is expanding options in dietary management. The multidisciplinary team is core to managing this varied and often neglected patient population. This review is for clinicians treating swallowing disorders and will explore the selected aspects of the assessment and management of pharyngoesophageal swallowing disorders.

Potential for Volitional Control of Resting Pressure at the Upper Oesophageal Sphincter in Healthy Individuals

Resting pressure at the upper oesophageal sphincter (UOS) has been reported to be susceptible to factors such as emotional stress or respiration. This exploratory study investigated the potential for behavioural modulation of UOS resting pressure in healthy adults to increase our understanding of volitional control of UOS pressure, and the potential development of rehabilitation approaches. Six healthy adults were seen one hour daily for two weeks (10 days) and for one post-training session after a training break of two weeks. Manipulation of UOS resting pressure was practised during a protocol of alternating increased and decreased pressure. A high-resolution manometry contour plot was used as a biofeedback modality. Participants were asked to explore how to achieve warmer and cooler colours (pressure increase and decrease, respectively) at the UOS resting pressure band, without changing head position or manipulating activity of other muscles. Performance was analysed prior to training start and following daily training. Participants were able to increase resting pressure following one week of practice; however, there was no evidence for purposeful pressure decrease. The increased resting pressure achieved by participants indicates a capacity for purposeful pressure modulation given intensive biofeedback training. The lack of volitional reduction in pressure may be explained by sustained pressure generation due to the intrinsic muscular characteristics of the UOS and a flooring effect in healthy subjects, in whom physiology mandates a minimum degree of resting pressure to fulfil the barrier function. Distention caused by the presence of the intraluminal catheter cannot be ruled out.

Pharyngeal Swallowing During Wake and Sleep

Sleep is associated with stages of relative cortical quiescence, enabling evaluation of swallowing under periods of reduced consciousness and, hence, absent volition. The aim of this study was to measure and characterize changes in the characteristics of pharyngeal swallows during sleep and wake using high-resolution manometry (HRM). Pharyngeal swallows were recorded with a ManoScan™ HRM in wake-upright, wake-supine, and sleep conditions in 20 healthy participants (mean 27 years; range 21-52). Velopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal segments were analysed separately. Contractile integral, mean peak pressure, inverse velocity of superior-to-inferior pharyngeal pressure, and time to first maximum pressure were analysed with custom-designed software. The supine-wake condition was compared to both upright-wake and sleep conditions using linear mixed effects models. No significant differences were found between supine-wake and upright-wake conditions on any measures. The mean peak pharyngeal pressure was lower during sleep than during the supine-wake condition for both the velopharynx (- 60 mmHg, standard error [SE] = 11, p < 0.001) and hypopharynx (- 59 mmHg, SE = 9, p = 0.001), as was the pharyngeal inverse velocity (- 12 ms/cm, SE = 4, p = 0.012) for the hypopharyngeal segment and the pharyngeal contractile integral (- 32 mmHg s cm, SE = 6, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in time to the first pharyngeal maximum pressure. This study used HRM to characterize and compare pharyngeal pressures during swallowing in both wake and sleep conditions. No differences were found between upright and supine awake conditions, a finding important to pharyngeal manometric measures made during supine positioning, such as in fMRI. Higher pressures and longer time-related measures of volitional pharyngeal swallowing when awake indicate that cortical input plays an important role in modulation of pharyngeal swallowing.