Active and explorative individuals are often restless and excluded from studies measuring resting metabolic rate: Do alternative metabolic rate measures offer a solution?

Total energy expenditure is repeatable in adults but not associated with short-term changes in body composition

Low total energy expenditure (TEE, MJ/d) has been a hypothesized risk factor for weight gain, but repeatability of TEE, a critical variable in longitudinal studies of energy balance, is understudied. We examine repeated doubly labeled water (DLW) measurements of TEE in 348 adults and 47 children from the IAEA DLW Database (mean ± SD time interval: 1.9 ± 2.9 y) to assess repeatability of TEE, and to examine if TEE adjusted for age, sex, fat-free mass, and fat mass is associated with changes in weight or body composition. Here, we report that repeatability of TEE is high for adults, but not children. Bivariate Bayesian mixed models show no among or within-individual correlation between body composition (fat mass or percentage) and unadjusted TEE in adults. For adults aged 20–60 y (N = 267; time interval: 7.4 ± 12.2 weeks), increases in adjusted TEE are associated with weight gain but not with changes in body composition; results are similar for subjects with intervals >4 weeks (N = 53; 29.1 ± 12.8 weeks). This suggests low TEE is not a risk factor for, and high TEE is not protective against, weight or body fat gain over the time intervals tested.

Low total energy expenditure (TEE) has been a hypothesized risk factor for weight gain, but longitudinal repeatability of TEE is incompletely understood. Here the authors report that TEE is repeatable for adults, but not for children, and increases in TEE (adjusted for fat-free mass, fat mass, age and sex) are not associated with body composition changes in short-term longitudinal analyses.

Understanding the unexplained: The magnitude and correlates of individual differences in residual variance

Behavioral and physiological ecologists have long been interested in explaining the causes and consequences of trait variation, with a focus on individual differences in mean values. However, the majority of phenotypic variation typically occurs within individuals, rather than among individuals (as indicated by average repeatability being less than 0.5). Recent studies have further shown that individuals can also differ in the magnitude of variation that is unexplained by individual variation or environmental factors (i.e., residual variation). The significance of residual variation, or why individuals differ, is largely unexplained, but is important from evolutionary, methodological, and statistical perspectives. Here, we broadly reviewed literature on individual variation in behavior and physiology, and located 39 datasets with sufficient repeated measures to evaluate individual differences in residual variance. We then analyzed these datasets using methods that permit direct comparisons of parameters across studies. This revealed substantial and widespread individual differences in residual variance. The magnitude of individual variation appeared larger in behavioral traits than in physiological traits, and heterogeneity was greater in more controlled situations. We discuss potential ecological and evolutionary implications of individual differences in residual variance and suggest productive future research directions.

Daily energy expenditure of males following alternative reproductive tactics: Solitary roamers spend more energy than group-living males

In many species, males follow alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs), where one tactic (called bourgeois) has much higher reproductive success than alternative tactics followed by males with lower competitive ability. The extent to which ARTs differ in energetic costs is unknown, but it is important to understand the fitness payoffs of ARTs. We studied male African striped mice (Rhabdomys pumilio) which follow one of three ARTs: heavy bourgeois males defend harems of females and have 10 times higher reproductive success than smaller roamers, which have ten times higher reproductive success than philopatric males, which remain in their natal group and are the smallest males. Bourgeois and philopatric males live in social groups that defend one territory, while roamers are solitary and roam over larger areas. We predicted that roamers will face higher energetic costs compared to group-living males because they do not gain thermoregulatory benefits of huddling in groups and might travel larger distances as they have larger home ranges. We measured daily energy expenditure (DEE) of 30 males, resting metabolic rate (RMR) of 79 males, travel distances and daily ranges of 31 males and changes in body mass of 51 males. Roamers had higher DEE and higher RMR than both types of group-living males. Philopatric males had shorter travel distances and smaller daily ranges than both roamers and bourgeois males, which did not differ from each other. This indicates that the higher DEE of roamers compared to bourgeois males cannot be explained by larger travel distances. Philopatrics gained body mass faster than bourgeois males and roamers, thereby increasing their competitive ability and thus the probability of later switching to a tactic of higher reproductive success. Our results suggest that roamers suffer energetic costs that might reduce their ability of gaining body mass and thus the likelihood of switching to the bourgeois tactic, indicating evolutionary trade-offs between investing energy into roaming versus gaining body mass.

Food Availability Is the Main Driver of Seasonal Changes in Resting Metabolic Rate in African Striped Mice (Rhabdomys pumilio)

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) influences energy allocation to survival, growth, and reproduction, and significant seasonal changes in RMR have been reported. According to one hypothesis, seasonal changes in RMR are mainly attributable to seasonal changes in ambient temperature (T_a) and food availability. Studies on species from the temperate zone indicated that food availability is the main driver. However, whether this is generally true is unknown, because studies from the tropics and subtropics, where most species live, are rare. We studied the African striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) inhabiting a seasonal environment with hot dry seasons with low food availability and cold moist seasons with high food availability. Using 603 RMR measurements of 277 individuals, we investigated the relative importance of food availability and T_a on RMR during selected periods, in which one extrinsic factor varied while the other factor was relatively constant. At similar T_a, residual RMR increased with increasing levels of food availability. In contrast, different T_a did not influence residual RMR at similar levels of food availability. Thus, our study on a subtropical species gives support to the hypothesis, derived from temperate zone species, that food availability mainly drives seasonal changes in RMR.

Seasonal variation in energy expenditure in a rodent inhabiting a winter-rainfall desert

Animals that spend more energy than they obtain risk entering allostatic overload, reducing survival and fitness. They are predicted to adjust their daily energy expenditure (DEE) during periods of food scarcity. Adjustments of DEE to changes in food availability have been well-studied in species in temperate zones during winter, but less so in species enduring seasonal droughts. Likely mechanisms regulating DEE involve adjustments of activity and maintenance metabolism. Species that experience seasonal droughts and changes in food availability, like the African striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio), are appropriate model organisms to study the regulation of seasonal changes of DEE. We quantified DEE using the 'doubly labelled water' method, measured resting metabolic rate (RMR), and concomitantly determined activity levels using all-day focal observations of 69 free-living striped mice in the cold moist season with high food availability and the hot dry season with low food availability. Striped mice decreased their DEE in the food scarce dry season using multiple mechanisms, especially reductions in RMR, and reduced overall physical activity. This was further facilitated passively by reduced thermoregulatory costs. Our study demonstrates that animals reduce DEE via active and passive mechanisms in food-restricted environments, and highlights that several environmental factors should be considered simultaneously when aiming to understand how animals cope with harsh environments.