Does Hypnotizability Affect Neurovascular Coupling During Cognitive Tasks?

Physiological Correlates of Hypnotizability: Hypnotic Behaviour and Prognostic Role in Medicine

Studies in the field of experimental hypnosis highlighted the role of hypnotizability in the physiological variability of the general population. It is associated, in fact, with a few differences which are observable in the ordinary state of consciousness and in the absence of suggestions. The aim of the present scoping review is summarizing them and indicate their relevance to the neural mechanisms of hypnosis and to the prognosis and treatment of a few medical conditions. Individuals with high, medium and low hypnotizability scores display different cerebral functional differences-i.e., functional equivalence between imagery and perception/action, excitability of the motor cortex, interoceptive accuracy-possibly related to brain structural and functional characteristics, and different control of blood supply at peripheral and cerebral level, likely due to different availability of endothelial nitric oxide. These differences are reviewed to support the idea of their participation in hypnotic behaviour and to indicate their prognostic and therapeutic usefulness in a few medical conditions.

Cerebrovascular reactivity during visual stimulation: Does hypnotizability matter?

Hypnotizability is a trait associated with several physiological correlates including cardiovascular control. The present study aimed to investigate the posterior cerebral artery flow velocity (PCAv) in basal closed eyes (B) and during visual stimulation (VS) conditions in med-highs and med-lows. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were submitted to the hypnotic assessment through the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, form A which classified 13 low-to-medium (med-lows) and 10 high-to-medium (med-highs) hypnotizable participants. One subject scoring 6 out of 12 was excluded from the comparisons between groups. Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and partial pressure of end-tidal CO₂ were monitored during both B and VS conditions. Simultaneously, PCAv was assessed by transcranial Doppler. Cerebrovascular Reactivity (CVR) was computed as a percentage of the PCAv change occurring during VS with respect to B (ΔPCAv). During VS both groups increased their PCAv (mean ± SD: 7.9 ± 5.2 %) significantly with no significant group difference. However, among med-highs, CVR was negatively correlated with hypnotizability scores. Thus, higher hypnotizability may be associated with lower metabolic demand in response to VS only within med-highs hypnotizable participants.