Constraint-induced movement therapy: a narrative review

A Simplified Estimation of Abnormal Reflex Torque due to Elbow Spasticity Using Neuro-musculoskeletal Model

This paper is to develop a simplified estimation method of internal torque for clinical use, such as spasticity assessment. Compared with many parameters to be tuned, the proposed estimation method only has a single tuning parameter by simplifying the neuro-musculoskeletal model. Moreover, based on forward dynamics, the proposed method uses EMG signals as the input, and uses muscle activation dynamics and musculotendon dynamics to calculate internal torque. A biomechanical method based on dynamometer was applied to determine the tuning parameter and to validate the estimation result of the proposed model. Through a pilot study with healthy subjects and stroke patients, we found that the proposed estimation method would be helpful for spasticity assessment.

A new EMG-based index towards the assessment of elbow spasticity for post-stroke patients

The commonly used method for grading spasticity in clinical applications is Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). The MAS-based method depends on the subjective evaluations and the experience of physicians, which may lead to imprecise and inconsistent evaluations. In this study, we propose a novel index (A-ApA, which was calculated with the root mean square (RMS) of agonist muscle activity by the mean between the RMS of agonistic and antagonistic muscle activations extracted from surface electromyography (sEMG) signals to quantitatively assess elbow spasticity. 39 post-stroke patients with elbow spasticity caused by hemiplegia participated in the experiments, and their elbow spasticity was assessed with MAS by one experienced physiotherapist. Patients were thereafter divided into four groups according to the MAS scales. The sEMG signals were recorded simultaneously on the patients' biceps and triceps when they extended or bended their elbows passively. The correlations between MAS and RMS of sEMG signals as well as the newly proposed index were calculated. The results demonstrated that the correlation between the MAS and the sEMG-based index in the assessment of elbow spasticity was significant. This suggests that the EMG-based index would be helpful for the assessment of spasticity..

A new approach to assess the spasticity in hamstrings muscles using mechanomyography antagonist muscular group

Several pathologies can cause muscle spasticity. Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) can rank spasticity, however its results depend on the physician subjective evaluation. This study aims to show a new approach to spasticity assessment by means of MMG analysis of hamstrings antagonist muscle group (quadriceps muscle). Four subjects participated in the study, divided into two groups regarding MAS (MAS0 and MAS1). MMG sensors were positioned over the muscle belly of rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM) muscles. The range of movement was acquired with an electrogoniometer placed laterally to the knee. The system was based on a LabVIEW acquisition program and the MMG sensors were built with triaxial accelerometers. The subjects were submitted to stretching reflexes and the integral of the MMG (MMG(INT)) signal was calculated to analysis. The results showed that the MMG(INT) was greater to MAS1 than to MAS0 [muscle RF (p = 0.004), VL (p = 0.001) and VM (p = 0.007)]. The results showed that MMG was viable to detect a muscular tonus increase in antagonist muscular group (quadriceps femoris) of spinal cord injured volunteers.

Randomized trial of distributed constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor control and function after stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy of distributed constraint-induced therapy (dCIT), bilateral arm training (BAT), and control treatment (CT) on motor control and functional performance of the upper limb in stroke patients.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients with mean stroke onset of 16.20 months and mild to moderate motor impairment were randomized to dCIT, BAT, or CT groups. Each group received treatment for 2 h/d and 5 d/wk for 3 weeks. Pretreatment and posttreatment measures included reaching kinematic variables in unilateral and bilateral tasks, the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and the Motor Activity Log (MAL).

RESULTS

The dCIT and BAT groups had smoother reaching trajectories in the unilateral and bilateral tasks than the CT group. The BAT group, but not the dCIT group, generated greater force at movement initiation than the CT group during the unilateral and bilateral tasks. The dCIT patients had decreased WMFT time and higher functional ability scores than the CT patients. MAL results pointed to better performance in the amount and quality of use of the affected arm than BAT and CT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

BAT and dCIT exhibited similar beneficial effects on movement smoothness but differential effects on force at movement initiation and functional performance. Therefore, BAT is a better option if improvement of force generation is the treatment goal, and dCIT is more appropriate for improving functional ability and use of the affected arm in daily life. These findings may assist in the planning of individually tailored rehabilitation therapies.

Is forced use of the paretic upper limb beneficial? A randomized pilot study during subacute post-stroke recovery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of two weeks of forced use of the paretic upper limb, as a supplement to the rehabilitation programme in the subacute phase after stroke, on self-rated use of that limb.

DESIGN

A randomized, non-blind, parallel group, clinical, before-and-after trial. A forced use group and a conventional group were followed up one and three months after intervention.

SETTING

In- and outpatient units of rehabilitation at a University Hospital.

SUBJECTS

Thirty patients were allocated to two groups, 15 in each, 1-6 months (mean 2.4) after stroke onset. Twenty-six patients completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients of both groups participated in two weeks of daily training on weekdays. In addition, the forced use group wore a restraining sling on the non-paretic arm for up to 6 hours per weekday.

MAIN MEASURE

The Motor Activity Log; patients scored 0-5 for 30 daily tasks concerning both amount of use and quality of movement.

RESULTS

The forced use group tended to achieve larger improvements immediately post-intervention, but this was not clearly demonstrated. The small differences also levelled out up to the three-month follow-up, with both groups earning an approximately 1.0 score point on both scales of the Motor Activity Log.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study did not reveal any additional benefit of forced use on self-rated performance in daily use of the paretic upper limb. Both groups performed fairly extensive, active training with a similar duration, amount and content.