The effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in individuals with neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

High-frequency laser therapy: a new alternative to physiotherapy in the treatment of cervical disk hernia

Introduction

High-frequency laser therapy has been increasingly used in several musculoskeletal disorders, but there is still a lack of evidence for the usage of the device in neck pain. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of physiotherapy, high-frequency laser, and exercise therapy methods in the treatment of pain in cervical disk herniation.

Methods

It was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients aged between 18 and 65 with neck pain and a diagnosis of cervical disk hernia were included in the study. Patients with a history of cervical surgery, rheumatism, cancer, or pacemaker were excluded from the study. The patients were randomized into 15 sessions of physiotherapy, high-frequency laser, or exercise therapy groups and evaluated with a range of motion, visual analog score, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form Health Survey-36 before treatment, after treatment, and in 1st and 3rd months. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In total, 150 patients were analyzed. There was a significant improvement in range of motion, visual analog score, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form Health Survey-36 scores in three groups after 3-month follow-up (p < 0.05). The improvement was statistically greater in the physiotherapy and high-frequency laser therapy groups (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between these two groups (p > 0.05).

Discussion

The results in the physiotherapy and high-frequency laser therapy groups were better than the exercise group. They may be alternatives to each other in cervical disk hernia treatment.

Quality appraisal of systematic reviews on high-intensity laser therapy for musculoskeletal pain management: an umbrella review

Musculoskeletal pain (MSP) remains one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Recent approaches to treating this condition have prompted the development of several systematic reviews investigating the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT), whose analgesic mechanisms are based on photobiomodulation neural inhibition, endorphin and serotonin release and anti-inflammatory effects. To assess the methodological quality, reliability, and validity of the systematic reviews (SRs) on HILT in MSP. This study is an overview of SRs (umbrella review) with an observational, retrospective, and secondary design. The search considered PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases (updated October 23, 2024). The primary focus was on the methodological quality of the reviews and their reporting of pain intensity results. The HILT effects on pain intensity were reported using mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD). The quality assessment was conducted using the A Measurement Instrument to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist (AMSTAR-2), and the findings were synthesized narratively. The MD and SMD obtained from all reviews were presented using forest plots. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test assessed MD and SMD distributions for pain intensity across meta-analyses. The average MD and SMD, along with their respective confidence intervals (CI), were estimated and presented based on the aggregate study outcomes. Twenty SRs were included, fourteen of which conducted meta-analyses covering diverse musculoskeletal disorders such as knee osteoarthritis, epicondylalgia, myofascial pain, frozen shoulder, plantar fasciitis, neck, and low back pain. The primary databases used were PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The AMSTAR-2 average score was 12.9 points (± 1.8), indicating varying methodological quality with one or two criteria resulting in low or critically low. HILT's best analgesic effects are observed in frozen shoulder disorder (MD = -2.23 cm; 95% CI:-3.3,-1.2; p < 0.01), knee osteoarthritis (MD = -1.9 cm; 95% CI:-2.0,-1.8;p < 0.01), low back pain (MD = -1.9 cm; 95% CI = -2.9,-1.0; p < 0.01), and myofascial pain (MD = -1.9 cm; 95% CI:-2.6,-1.2; p < 0.01). Largest effect sizes are for neck pain (SMD = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.2,3.0, p < 0.05) and low back pain (SMD = 1.1 (95% CI = 1.4,0.8; p < 0.01). This review underscores the generally low to critically low methodological quality of SRs on HILT, as assessed by AMSTAR-2. Key areas for improvement for future SRs of RCTs include addressing publication bias, disclosing funding sources, and enhancing search strategies and discussions on heterogeneity. The scarcity of RCTs for conditions such as temporomandibular disorders, carpal tunnel syndrome, and myofascial pain highlights the need for further research. SRs on spinal disorders, frozen shoulder, and neck pain demonstrated the most favorable analgesic effects, providing valuable insights for clinical practice and future RCTs.

Laser therapy for Bell's palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

This meta-analysis investigated therapeautic effects of laser therapies in patients with Bell's palsy (BP). The authors performed the literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using the following search terms: (facial paralysis OR Bell's palsy OR facial palsy OR idiopathic facial paralysis) AND (laser OR low-level laser OR photobiomodulation OR phototherapy). Relevant studies published before October 29th 2024 were identified. Randomized trials comparing the outcomes of laser therapies with other interventions, including electrical stimulation and control or usual care in patients with BP were included. The mean difference (MD) was determined as the effect size for continuous outcomes, and outcome accuracy was determined using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Twelve studies were included, with a total of 597 patients. Nine studies were further included in the quantitative analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed that laser therapy significantly improved disease severity (House-Brackmann facial paralysis scale) (MD = -1.51, 95% CI = -2.43 to -0.59), facial asymmetry (Sunnybrook facial grading system) (MD = 20.63, 95% CI = 10.33 to 30.94), and facial function and disability (Facial disability index) (MD = 17.91, 95% CI = 5.60 to 30.22) when compared with control care in adult patients. Moreover, laser therapy significantly improved facial severity (MD = 21.05, 95% CI = 16.77 to 25.33) when compared with electrical stimulation. In addition, no adverse effects of laser therapy were reported. Laser therapy has favorable effects on disease severity, facial asymmetry, and facial function and disability for patients with BP.

Effect of High-Intensity Laser Therapy on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To provide a strong foundation for the use of high-intensity laser therapy in carpel tunnel syndrome, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of short- and long-term follow-up studies.

DESIGN

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Sample sizes of included studies ranged from 16 to 98 patients ( N = 308). Overall, a significant difference between the treatment and control groups were found across majority of the measures. Studies using a 4-wk follow-up period, however, only found significantly greater benefits for high-intensity laser therapy in visual analog scale compared with placebo ( P = 0.0191), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation ( P = 0.0026), and low-intensity laser therapy 20 J/cm 2 ( P < 0.0002), and exercise ( P < 0.0001). For improvement in visual analog scale score over a long treatment period, high-intensity laser therapy was also preferred over control group ( P < 0.0071). Insufficient evidence exists to determine effect of high-intensity laser therapy on nerve conduction examinations. The only statistically significant differences observed in examinations were in relation to sensory nerve action potential ( P = 0.0083) and sensory nerve conduction velocity ( P = 0.0468).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate evidence exists regarding efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy compared with placebo, high-intensity laser therapy + wrist splint, and exercise in a short period of follow-up time but evidence on long-term follow-up is limited.