The neurosurgical treatment of patients in dystonic state – Overview of the literature

Deep brain stimulation versus pallidotomy for status dystonicus: a single-center case series

OBJECTIVE

First-line pharmacological therapies have shown limited efficacy in status dystonicus (SD), while surgery is increasingly reported as remediable in refractory cases. In this context, there is no evidence regarding which neurosurgical approach is the safest and most effective. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes and surgery-related complications of globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi DBS) and pallidotomy for the treatment of drug-resistant SD.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the records of patients with drug-resistant SD who had undergone GPi DBS or pallidotomy at their institution between 2003 and 2017. The severity of the dystonia was evaluated using the Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) Scale. Surgical procedures were performed bilaterally in all cases.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. After surgery, the mean follow-up was 40.6 ± 30 months. DBS ended the dystonic storm in 87.5% of cases (7/8), while pallidotomy had a success rate of 83.3% (5/6). No significant differences were observed between the two techniques in terms of failure rates (risk difference DBS vs pallidotomy -0.03, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.30), SD mean resolution time (DBS 34.8 ± 19 days, pallidotomy 21.8 ± 20.2 days, p > 0.05), or BAD scores at each postoperative follow-up (p > 0.05). The long-term hardware complication rate after DBS was 37.5%, whereas no surgery-related complications were noted following pallidotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The study data suggest that DBS and pallidotomy are equally safe and effective therapies for drug-resistant SD. The choice between the two techniques should be tailored on a case-by-case basis, depending on factors such as the etiology and evolution pattern of the underlying dystonia and the clinical conditions at the moment of SD onset. Given the limitation of the low statistical power of this study, further multicentric investigations are needed to confirm its findings.

Staged pallidotomy: MRI and clinical follow-up in status dystonicus

PURPOSE

We report on a patient affected by Status Distonicus who was treated with Deep Brain Stimulation electrodes implanted in the Globus Pallidus internus (Gpi) and used for serial radiofrequency lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The evolution of radiofrequency lesions was monitored by post-operative and late Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). After the first lesion the patient did improve, though not in a significant fashion. Therefore, three further radiofrequency lesions were delivered 2, 4 and 6 days respectively after surgery with subsequent improvement of dystonic movements.

RESULTS

MRI scans performed at 8 days, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery showed a diffuse T2-hyperintense and T1-hypointense GPi signal alteration which progressively decreased over time.

CONCLUSION

We confirm that the possibility to stage pallidotomies over time using a couple of new contacts is a safe and efficacious procedure in treating SD patients where the lesions themselves are limited by the appearance of side effects, or in patients showing a poor response to a single lesion. As far as we know, this is the first description of MRI evolution and monitoring of a staged pallidotomy.

Rethinking status dystonicus

Status dystonicus is a movement disorder emergency that has been a source of controversy in terms of terminology, phenomenology, and management since it was first described in 1982. Here we argue that the current use of the term status dystonicus falls well short of the precision needed for either clinical or academic use. We performed a critical review on this topic, describing possible pathophysiological mechanisms and areas of uncertainties. This review also addresses the problems derived by the extreme clinical heterogeneity of this condition, as the lack of an objective criterion useful for the definition, or the fact that status dystonicus may present not only in the context of a known dystonic syndrome. We propose a new possible definition that includes not only dystonia but also other hyperkinetic movements in the wide range of movement disorders that can be seen during an episode. The new definition keeps the term status dystonicus and highlights the fact that this is a medical emergency based on the impairment of bulbar and/or respiratory function requiring hospital admission as the principal feature. Furthermore, the new definition should not consider as necessary unspecific features as patient's condition at baseline, the distribution of dystonia, occurrence of systemic symptoms such as fever or laboratory findings. We hope that this proposal will stimulate the debate on this subject among our peers, further developing a clinical and pathophysiological understanding of status dystonicus. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.