1
|
Parant F, Delignette MC, Charpiat B, Lacaille L, Lebosse F, Monneret G, Mohkam K, Mabrut JY, Aubrun F, Heyer L, Antonini T. Tacrolimus Monitoring in Liver Transplant Recipients, Posttransplant Cholestasis: A Comparative Between 2 Commercial Immunoassays and a Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method. Ther Drug Monit 2024; 46:446-455. [PMID: 38648663 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000001201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholestasis commonly occurs after orthotopic liver transplantation. It can be extrahepatic because of mechanical obstruction or intrahepatic because of various causes. During cholestasis episodes, blood concentrations of tacrolimus (TAC) metabolites may increase, potentially affecting TAC concentrations measured by immunoassays. This study aimed to simultaneously evaluate the analytical performance of 2 TAC immunoassays, a quantitative microsphere system (QMS) immunoassay, and chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as a reference method in liver transplant recipients. METHODS This single-center study included 265 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. In total, 942 blood samples were collected. TAC trough concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS and 2 immunoassays in parallel. The plasma concentrations of conjugated bilirubin were measured in all samples. The results were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots and Passing-Bablok regressions. RESULTS The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that the TAC QMS immunoassay has a significant bias (+37%) compared with LC-MS/MS, and this bias was higher in patients with cholestasis with hyperbilirubinemia (≤+70% in patients with conjugated bilirubin >150 µmol/L). In comparison, the chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay showed acceptable analytical performance in patients with hyperbilirubinemia (bias <10%). CONCLUSIONS In agreement with previous findings, the TAC QMS immunoassay showed a positive bias compared with LC-MS/MS. This bias is remarkably high in patients with cholestasis and hyperbilirubinemia, suggesting the cross-reactivity of TAC metabolites with the monoclonal antibody used in the QMS immunoassay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Parant
- Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi-Sites (LBMMS), Hôpital Lyon-Sud-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | | | - Bruno Charpiat
- Service Pharmaceutique, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Louis Lacaille
- Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi-Sites (LBMMS), Hôpital de la Croix Rousse-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Fanny Lebosse
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Monneret
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Hôpital Édouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Kayvan Mohkam
- Service de Chirurgie Générale, Digestive et Transplantations Hépatiques et Intestinales, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse-Hospices Civils de Lyon, France; and
| | - Jean-Yves Mabrut
- Service de Chirurgie Générale, Digestive et Transplantations Hépatiques et Intestinales, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse-Hospices Civils de Lyon, France; and
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052, Lyon, France
| | - Frederic Aubrun
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Heyer
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Teresa Antonini
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bergan S, Brunet M, Hesselink DA, Johnson-Davis KL, Kunicki PK, Lemaitre F, Marquet P, Molinaro M, Noceti O, Pattanaik S, Pawinski T, Seger C, Shipkova M, Swen JJ, van Gelder T, Venkataramanan R, Wieland E, Woillard JB, Zwart TC, Barten MJ, Budde K, Dieterlen MT, Elens L, Haufroid V, Masuda S, Millan O, Mizuno T, Moes DJAR, Oellerich M, Picard N, Salzmann L, Tönshoff B, van Schaik RHN, Vethe NT, Vinks AA, Wallemacq P, Åsberg A, Langman LJ. Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. Ther Drug Monit 2021; 43:150-200. [PMID: 33711005 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stein Bergan
- Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mercè Brunet
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kamisha L Johnson-Davis
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Paweł K Kunicki
- Department of Drug Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Florian Lemaitre
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail)-UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre Marquet
- INSERM, Université de Limoges, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU de Limoges, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France
| | - Mariadelfina Molinaro
- Clinical and Experimental Pharmacokinetics Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ofelia Noceti
- National Center for Liver Tansplantation and Liver Diseases, Army Forces Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | - Tomasz Pawinski
- Department of Drug Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | | | - Maria Shipkova
- Synlab TDM Competence Center, Synlab MVZ Leinfelden-Echterdingen GmbH, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Teun van Gelder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Raman Venkataramanan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Department of Pathology, Starzl Transplantation Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eberhard Wieland
- Synlab TDM Competence Center, Synlab MVZ Leinfelden-Echterdingen GmbH, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
| | - Jean-Baptiste Woillard
- INSERM, Université de Limoges, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU de Limoges, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France
| | - Tom C Zwart
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Markus J Barten
- Department of Cardiac- and Vascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maja-Theresa Dieterlen
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, HELIOS Clinic, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Laure Elens
- Integrated PharmacoMetrics, PharmacoGenomics and PharmacoKinetics (PMGK) Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haufroid
- Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain and Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Satohiro Masuda
- Department of Pharmacy, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Olga Millan
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Tomoyuki Mizuno
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Dirk J A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Oellerich
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Picard
- INSERM, Université de Limoges, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU de Limoges, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France
| | | | - Burkhard Tönshoff
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ron H N van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nils Tore Vethe
- Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alexander A Vinks
- Department of Pharmacy, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Pierre Wallemacq
- Clinical Chemistry Department, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, LTAP, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anders Åsberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; and
| | - Loralie J Langman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muranushi H, Kanda J, Arai Y, Shindo T, Hishizawa M, Yamamoto T, Kondo T, Yamashita K, Matsubara K, Takaori‐Kondo A. Drug monitoring for mycophenolic acid in graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis in cord blood transplantation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:2464-2472. [PMID: 32386102 PMCID: PMC7688537 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS We performed the retrospective analysis to clarify the significance of drug monitoring for mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active form of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in prophylaxis for graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) in cord blood transplantation. METHODS We retrospectively analysed the data of 46 patients who underwent first cord blood transplantation and received GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus plus MMF. MPA levels were measured on days 7 and 21, and 24-hour areas under the curve (AUC0-24 ) were estimated. RESULTS The engraftment and 3-year overall survival rates of all patients were 94% and 78%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of sepsis before engraftment was higher in patients with AUC0-24 on day 7 of >60 μg h/mL than in other patients (33 vs 6%, P = .02). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was higher in patients with AUC0-24 on day 21 of ≤30 μg h/mL than in other patients (80 vs 50%, P = .04). The cumulative incidence of human herpesvirus 6 reactivation was higher in patients with AUC0-24 on day 21 of ≤48 μg h/mL (median) than in other patients (50 vs 19%, P = .03). CONCLUSION Blood level of MPA was associated with risk of acute GVHD and infection. A prospective trial evaluating the benefit of personalized MMF dosing using MPA levels is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Muranushi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Junya Kanda
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Yasuyuki Arai
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
- Department of Transfusion Medicine and Cell TherapyKyoto University HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Takero Shindo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Masakatsu Hishizawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Takashi Yamamoto
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and TherapeuticsKyoto University HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Tadakazu Kondo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Kohei Yamashita
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Kazuo Matsubara
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and TherapeuticsKyoto University HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Akifumi Takaori‐Kondo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| |
Collapse
|