Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel

Molecular and morphologic characterization of intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms of pancreas with novel potentially targetable fusions

Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms (ITPNs) are rare pancreatic tumors with distinct histological and molecular features. Distinction of ITPN from other pancreatic neoplasms is crucial given the known favorable prognosis and the high frequency and diversity of potentially targetable fusions in ITPN. While the histological features of ITPN are well documented, there are few reports on the cytological features, and molecular characterization of ITPN. The authors reported three cases diagnosed in their laboratory between 2016 and 2021. Clinical data, cytomorphological and histological features, with immunophenotypic and molecular characterizations of these cases are described and compared with those reported in the literature. All 3 cases were diagnosed as ITPN based on the microscopic presence of intraductal nodules composed of tightly packed small tubular glands lined by cuboidal cells lacking apparent mucin. On molecular profiling KRAS and TP53 variants were found in Case 1, FGFR2-INA fusion in Case 2, and STARD3NL-BRAF fusion was detected in Case 3. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed that the neoplastic cells in Case 1 were MUC2 positive and MUC6 negative, but in Cases 2 and 3, were negative for MUC2 and positive for MUC6. These results demonstrate the immunophenotypic and molecular variabilities of histologically similar pancreatic neoplasms. The absence of alterations characteristic of more common pancreatic neoplasms should prompt the consideration of fusion studies in morphologically relevant cases. The combination of morphological, IHC, and molecular analyses is important for reliable identification of ITPN given its potential clinical management implications.

Practical Considerations for Oncogenic Fusion Detection and Reporting in Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal rearrangements that result in oncogenic fusions can hold tremendous clinical significance in solid tumors, often with diagnostic or treatment implications.

CONTENT

Traditionally, low-throughput methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization were used to identify fusions in the clinical laboratory. With the rise of next-generation sequencing techniques and the broad adoption of comprehensive genomic profiling, the practice of screening for fusions as part of an oncologic workup has evolved. RNA sequencing methods are increasingly used, as these comprehensive high-throughput assays have many advantages over traditional techniques. Several RNA sequencing platforms are available, each with benefits and drawbacks. Regardless of the approach, systematic evaluation of the RNA sequencing results and the fusions identified by the assay should be performed. Assessment of fusion events relies upon evaluation of quality evidence, structural evidence, and functional evidence to ensure accurate fusion reporting and interpretation.

SUMMARY

Given the clinical significance of gene fusions in oncology, understanding the variety of assays available for fusion detection, their benefits and drawbacks, and how they are used in the identification and interpretation of gene fusions is important for the modern precision oncology practice.

Detection of Hybrid Fusion Transcripts, Aberrant Transcript Expression, and Specific Single Nucleotide Variants in Acute Leukemia and Myeloid Disorders with Recurrent Gene Rearrangements

INTRODUCTION

A variety of gene rearrangements and molecular alterations are key drivers in the pathobiology of acute leukemia and myeloid disorders; current classification systems increasingly incorporate these findings in diagnostic algorithms. Therefore, clinical laboratories require versatile tools, which can detect an increasing number and variety of molecular and cytogenetic alterations of clinical significance.

METHODS

We validated an RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay that enables the detection of: (i) numerous hybrid fusion transcripts (including rare/novel gene partners), (ii) aberrantly expressed EVI1 (MECOM) and IKZF1 (Del exons 4-7) transcripts, and (iii) hotspot variants in KIT, ABL1, NPM1 (relevant in the context of gene rearrangement status).

RESULTS

For hybrid fusion transcripts, the assay showed 98-100% concordance for known positive and negative samples, with an analytical sensitivity (i.e., limit of detection) of approximately 0.8% cells. Samples with underlying EVI1 (MECOM) translocations demonstrated increased EVI1 (MECOM) expression. Aberrant IKZF1 (Del exons 4-7) transcripts detectable with the assay were also present on orthogonal reverse transcription PCR. Specific hotspot mutations in KIT, ABL1, and NPM1 detected with the assay showed 100% concordance with orthogonal testing. Lastly, several illustrative samples are included to highlight the assay's clinically relevant contributions to patient workup.

CONCLUSION

Through its ability to simultaneously detect various gene rearrangements, aberrantly expressed transcripts, and hotspot mutations, this RNA-based NGS assay is a valuable tool for clinical laboratories to supplement other molecular and cytogenetic methods used in the diagnostic workup and in clinical research for patients with acute leukemia and myeloid disorders.

Consensus Recommendations to Optimize the Detection and Reporting of NTRK Gene Fusions by RNA-Based Next-Generation Sequencing

The detection of gene fusions by RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging method in clinical genetic laboratories for oncology biomarker testing to direct targeted therapy selections. A recent Canadian study (CANTRK study) comparing the detection of NTRK gene fusions on different NGS assays to determine subjects’ eligibility for tyrosine kinase TRK inhibitor therapy identified the need for recommendations for best practices for laboratory testing to optimize RNA-based NGS gene fusion detection. To develop consensus recommendations, representatives from 17 Canadian genetic laboratories participated in working group discussions and the completion of survey questions about RNA-based NGS. Consensus recommendations are presented for pre-analytic, analytic and reporting aspects of gene fusion detection by RNA-based NGS.

Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing - Part 1: Tissue collection and management

Biomarker testing is crucial for treatment selection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the quantity of available tissue often presents a key constraint for patients with advanced disease, where minimally invasive tissue biopsy typically returns small samples. In Part 1 of this two-part series, we summarise evidence-based recommendations relating to small sample processing for patients with NSCLC. Generally, tissue biopsy techniques that deliver the greatest quantity and quality of tissue with the least risk to the patient should be selected. Rapid on-site evaluation can help to ensure sufficient sample quality and quantity. Sample processing should be managed according to biomarker testing requirements, because tissue fixation methodology influences downstream nucleic acid, protein and morphological analyses. Accordingly, 10% neutral buffered formalin is recommended as an appropriate fixative, and the duration of fixation is recommended not to exceed 24–48 h. Tissue sparing techniques, including the ‘one biopsy per block’ approach and small sample cutting protocols, can help preserve tissue. Cytological material (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded [FFPE] cytology blocks and non-FFPE samples such as smears and touch preparations) can be an excellent source of nucleic acid, providing either primary or supplementary patient material to complete morphological and molecular diagnoses. Considerations on biomarker testing, reporting and quality assessment are discussed in Part 2.

Pan-tumor screening for NTRK gene fusions using pan-TRK immunohistochemistry and RNA NGS fusion panel testing

Targetable NTRK gene fusions can be detected across tumor types using methodologies such as pan-TRK IHC, DNA or RNA NGS testing, or FISH. Challenges for implementation of clinical testing for NTRK fusions may arise due to the range in NTRK fusion prevalence across tumors, endogenous levels of TRK expression in tissues, and the large number of potential fusion partners. In this study, we examined our experience evaluating driver mutation negative lung, urothelial or cholangiocarcinoma cases, in addition to cases with positive, equivocal, or weak staining by pan-TRK IHC for NTRK fusions. 63/127 (49.6%) of these cases were positive for pan-TRK IHC, of which 71.4% showed weak or focal staining, potentially due to physiologic or non-specific TRK expression. Of these 127 cases, 4 harbored a NTRK fusion (1 fusion was seen in two separate samples from the same patient) as confirmed by RNA fusion panel testing. Pan-TRK IHC was positive in 1 case with TPM3-NTRK1 fusion, equivocal in 1 case with GOLGA4-NTRK3 fusion, and negative in 2 samples with ADAM19-NTRK3 fusion. Our findings show that we were able to successfully identify NTRK fusions that resulted in targeted therapy. However, our results suggest limited sensitivity of pan-TRK IHC for NTRK3 fusions, and that the reduced specificity for pan-TRK IHC in tumors with physiologic or non-specific TRK expression, results in false positive samples that require confirmatory testing by RNA based NGS.

ALK Gene Rearrangements in Lung Adenocarcinomas: Concordance of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization, RNA In Situ Hybridization, and RNA Next-Generation Sequencing Testing

Introduction

The 2018 updated molecular testing guidelines for patients with advanced lung cancer incorporated ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis as an equivalent to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method recommended in 2013. Nevertheless, no specific recommendation for alternative methods was proposed owing to insufficient data. The aim of this study was to compare the results of ALK IHC, FISH, RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS), and RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) with available clinical data.

Methods

A search for lung carcinomas with ALK testing by greater than or equal to one modality (i.e., ALK IHC, FISH, NGS) was performed; a subset underwent RNA ISH. When available, clinical data were recorded.

Results

The results were concordant among all performed testing modalities in 86 of 90 cases (95.6%). Of the four discordant cases, two were ALK positive by FISH but negative by IHC, RNA NGS, and RNA ISH. The remaining two cases failed RNA NGS testing, one was IHC negative, FISH positive, RNA ISH negative and the second was IHC positive, FISH positive, RNA ISH equivocal. RNA NGS identified one rare and one novel ALK fusion. Sufficient therapy data were available in 10 cases treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors; three had disease progression, including one with discordant results (FISH positive, RNA NGS negative, IHC negative, RNA ISH negative) and two with concordant ALK positivity among all modalities.

Conclusions

Our results reveal high concordance among IHC, RNA NGS, and RNA ISH. In cases of discordance with available RNA NGS, FISH result was positive whereas IHC and ISH results were negative. On the basis of our data, multimodality testing is recommended to identify discrepant results and patients (un)likely to respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Comprehensive analysis of oncogenic fusions in mismatch repair deficient colorectal carcinomas by sequential DNA and RNA next generation sequencing

Background

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) harboring oncogenic fusions has been reported to be highly enriched in mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors with MLH1 hypermethylation (MLH1^me+) and wild-type BRAF and RAS. In this study, dMMR CRCs were screened for oncogene fusions using sequential DNA and RNA next generation sequencing (NGS).

Results

Comprehensive analysis of fusion variants, genetic profiles and clinicopathological features in fusion-positive dMMR CRCs was performed. Among 193 consecutive dMMR CRCs, 39 cases were identified as MLH1^me+BRAF/RAS wild-type. Eighteen fusion-positive cases were detected by DNA NGS, all of which were MLH1^me+ and BRAF/RAS wild-type. RNA NGS was sequentially conducted in the remaining 21 MLH1^me+BRAF/RAS wild-type cases lacking oncogenic fusions by DNA NGS, and revealed four additional fusions, increasing the proportion of fusion-positive tumors from 46% (18/39) to 56% (22/39) in MLH1^me+BRAF/RAS wild-type dMMR cases. All 22 fusions were found to involve RTK-RAS pathway. Most fusions affected targetable receptor tyrosine kinases, including NTRK1(9/22, 41%), NTRK3(5/22, 23%), ALK(3/22, 14%), RET(2/22, 9%) and MET(1/22, 5%), whilst only two fusions affected mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade components BRAF and MAPK1, respectively. RNF43 was identified as the most frequently mutated genes, followed by APC, TGFBR2, ATM, BRCA2 and FBXW7. The vast majority (19/22, 86%) displayed alterations in key WNT pathway components, whereas none harbored additional mutations in RTK-RAS pathway. In addition, fusion-positive tumors were typically diagnosed in elder patients and predominantly right-sided, and showed a significantly higher preponderance of hepatic flexure localization (P < 0.001) and poor differentiation (P = 0.019), compared to fusion-negative MLH1^me+ CRCs.

Conclusions

We proved that sequential DNA and RNA NGS was highly effective for fusion detection in dMMR CRCs, and proposed an optimized practical fusion screening strategy. We further revealed that dMMR CRCs harboring oncogenic fusion was a genetically and clinicopathologically distinctive subgroup, and justified more precise molecular subtyping for personalized therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-021-03108-6.