Major or minor placenta previa: Does it make a difference?

A Multicenter, Retrospective Comparison Study of Pregnancy Outcomes According to Placental Location in Placenta Previa

Background: We investigated the association between placental location and pregnancy outcomes in placenta previa. Methods: This multi-center retrospective study enrolled 781 women who delivered between May 1999 and February 2020. We divided the dataset into anterior (n = 209) and posterior (n = 572) groups and compared the baseline characteristics and obstetric and neonatal outcomes. The adverse obstetric outcomes associated with placenta location were evaluated using a multivariate logistic analysis. Results: Gestational age at delivery in the anterior group (253.0 ± 21.6) was significantly lower than that in the posterior group (257.6 ± 19.1) (p = 0.008). The anterior group showed significantly higher parity, rates of previous cesarean section, non-vertex fetal positions, admissions for bleeding, emergency cesarean sections, transfusions, estimated blood loss, and combined placenta accrete spectrum (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, the anterior group had higher rates of transfusion (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.50-3.30), placenta accreta spectrum (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.21-3.97), and non-vertex fetal positions (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.09-5.88). Conclusions: These findings suggest that more caution is required in the treatment of patients with anterior placenta previa. Therefore, if placenta previa is diagnosed prenatally, it is important to determine the location of the body and prepare for massive bleeding in the anterior group.

Clinical significance of retained products of conception in placenta previa: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Retained products of conception (RPOC) often cause severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) but the clinical significance of RPOC in placenta previa is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of RPOC in women with placenta previa. The primary outcome was to evaluate risk factors of RPOC and the secondary outcome was to consider risk factors of severe PPH.

METHODS

Singleton pregnant women with placenta previa who underwent cesarean section (CS) and placenta removal during the operation at the National Defense Medical College Hospital between January 2004 and December 2021 were identified. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine the frequency and risk factors of RPOC and the association of RPOC with severe PPH in pregnant women with placenta previa.

RESULTS

This study included 335 pregnant women. Among these, 24 (7.2%) pregnant women developed RPOC. Pregnant women with prior CS (Odds Ratio (OR) 5.98; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.35-15.20, p < 0.01), major previa (OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.19-8.32, p < 0.01), and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) (OR 92.7; 95% CI 18.39-467.22, p < 0.01) were more frequent in the RPOC group. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior CS (OR 10.70; 95% CI 3.47-33.00, p < 0.01,) and PAS (OR 140.32; 95% CI 23.84-825.79, p < 0.01) were risk factors for RPOC. In pregnant women who have placenta previa with RPOC or without RPOC, the ratio of severe PPH were 58.3% and 4.5%, respectively (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the occurrence of prior CS (OR 9.23; 95% CI 4.02-21.20, p < 0.01), major previa (OR 11.35; 95% CI 3.35-38.38, p < 0.01), placenta at the anterior wall (OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.40-8.44, p = 0.01), PAS (OR 16.47; 95% CI 4.66-58.26, p < 0.01), and RPOC (OR 29.70; 95% CI 11.23-78.55, p < 0.01) was more in pregnant women with severe PPH. In the multivariate analysis for severe PPH, prior CS (OR 4.71; 95% CI 1.29-17.13, p = 0.02), major previa (OR 7.50; 95% CI 1.98-28.43, p < 0.01), and RPOC (OR 13.26; 95% CI 3.61-48.63, p < 0.01) were identified as risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior CS and PAS were identified as risk factors for RPOC in placenta previa and RPOC is closely associated with severe PPH. Therefore, a new strategy for RPOC in placenta previa is needed.

Desenlaces maternos según el tipo de placenta previa en un hospital de alta complejidad en Cali, Colombia. Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo

Objetivos: describir la frecuencia de complicaciones maternas en mujeres gestantes con placenta previa (PP) mayor o menor y evaluar una posible de asociación entre tipo de PP y la presencia de hemorragia materna severa y otros resultados maternos asociados. Materiales y métodos: cohorte retrospectiva, descriptiva. Se incluyeron gestantes con 20 semanas o más de embarazo, con diagnóstico confirmado de placenta previa, quienes fueron atendidas en un hospital de alto nivel de complejidad localizado en Cali (Colombia), entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2020. Se excluyeron las gestantes con diagnóstico de placenta previa y acretismo placentario concomitante. Las variables recolectadas fueron: edad materna, índice de masa corporal, tabaquismo, obesidad, paridad, presencia de sangrado, hemorragia posparto, manejo de la hemorragia posparto, transfusión y admisión a UCI de la gestante. Se realizó análisis descriptivo. El protocolo fue aprobado por el comité de ética de la Fundación Valle de Lili. Resultados: 146 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. La población estuvo constituida por mujeres con una mediana de edad de 32 años, sin antecedente quirúrgico, con diagnóstico prenatal de placenta previa a la semana 22. En el 70,5 % de los casos se trató de pacientes con placenta previa mayor. Las complicaciones más frecuentes fueron hemorragia posparto (37,9 % vs. 16,3 % para pacientes con placenta previa mayor y menor, respectivamente), requerimiento de transfusión (23,3 y 9,3 %, respectivamente) y el ingreso materno a la UCI (40,8 % vs. 18,6 %, respectivamente). No se registraron muertes maternas. Conclusiones: las mujeres con placenta previa experimentan una frecuencia elevada de complicaciones; probablemente, dicha frecuencia es más alta cuando se documenta placenta previa mayor. Se requieren más estudios que comparen la frecuencia de complicaciones maternas según el tipo de placenta previa.

Potential resolution of placenta previa from the 28th-to the 36th-week of pregnancy: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Placenta previa greatly contributes to severe antenatal and post-partum hemorrhage. Previous studies have mainly focused on the risk factors of placenta previa, with very few studies reporting which factors may affect the potential resolution of 28th-week previa. This study aimed to investigate the impact of maternal characteristics on potential resolution of placenta previa from the 28th-to the 36th-week of pregnancy.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal sub-cohort investigation was carried out among 368 pregnant women with 28th-week previa from the Longitudinal Placenta Previa Study (LoPPS). Logistic regression analysis was used to discover the connections between maternal covariates and the placental potential resolution. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to detect the associations between perioperative characteristics and volume of intraoperative bleeding.

RESULTS

Among pregnant women whose placenta completely or partially covered the internal os at the 28th-week of pregnancy, 37.5% were without placenta previa at the 36th-week and 25.8% converted into marginal placenta previa. There were significant correlation between placenta previa type and GHD (Beta: 2.808, 95% CI: 1.642, 7.138; p = 0.041), type of 28th-week previa (Beta: 6.767, 95% CI: 1.592, 18.767; p < 0.001), and number of prior cesarean sections (Beta: 3.326, 95% CI: 1.580, 9.081; p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

62.5% of the pregnant women with 28th-week placenta previa were still with previa at the 36 weeks of gestation (25.8% with marginal and 36.7% with partial/complete placenta previa). This proportion is even higher for 28th-week complete placenta previa.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100054068, December 8, 2021.

The routine use of prophylactic Bakri balloon tamponade contributes to blood loss control in major placenta previa

OBJECTIVE

To verify the blood loss control effect of routine prophylactic Bakri balloon tamponade on major and minor placenta previa (PP).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies that involved cesarean section (CS) for PP at our hospital. All participants were divided into Bakri balloon (underwent routine prophylactic use just after placenta removal) and non-balloon groups, and into major and minor PP groups. Clinical outcomes in major and minor PP were compared between balloon and non-balloon groups.

RESULTS

The balloon and non-balloon groups contained 74 and 89 patients, respectively. There were 41 and 33 (balloon group) and 48 and 41 (non-balloon group) major and minor PP cases, respectively. Intraoperative and perioperative blood losses of major PP were significantly lower in the balloon group than the non-balloon group (1045 ml versus 1553 ml, P = 0.016; and 1189 ml versus 1810 ml, P = 0.006, respectively). The frequency of massive postpartum hemorrhage (>500 ml) with major PP was lower in the balloon group than in the non-balloon group (2.4% versus 16.7%, P = 0.027), but with no significant difference with minor PP.

CONCLUSION

Routine prophylactic use of Bakri balloon tamponade during and after CS is effective in controlling blood loss in major PP.

Obstetric outcomes in major vs minor placenta praevia: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Placenta praevia (PP) is a rare obstetric condition associated with significant maternal and perinatal morbidity. Traditionally, the degree of PP has been classified into minor and major; however, there are very few robust studies that compare the maternal outcomes of these types of PP.

AIMS

To identify any significant differences in obstetric outcomes between major and minor PP, including antepartum, intraoperative and postpartum complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital between 2009 and 2018; all women were diagnosed with PP.

RESULTS

Of the total of 368 women recruited, over half of the participants were diagnosed with major PP (57%), while the remaining had minor PP. Women with major PP, compared to women with minor PP, had an increased risk of antepartum haemorrhage (odds ratio (OR) 2.77, P < 0.001), delivery at an earlier gestational age (36.1 vs 37.4 weeks), general anaesthesia (OR 3.25, P < 0.001), greater proportion of emergency lower segment (51% vs 40%) and classical caesarean (7.7% vs 3.8%), increased number of uterotonics (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.17, P < 0.031), greater blood loss (IRR 1.32, P < 0.001) and higher frequency of blood transfusion (IRR 2.00, P < 0.027), and longer postpartum hospital stay (IRR 1.26, P < 0.001). Hysterectomy was performed for three women with major PP, compared to one with minor PP.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of PP significantly impacts obstetric outcomes, with major PP associated with worse maternal morbidity antenatally, intraoperatively and postpartum. Therefore, to optimise patient care, this study emphasises the importance of identifying and distinguishing between different types of PP.