Placental infarcts in the collaborative perinatal project: Variable associations infer variable constructs

Are there sex differences in fetal growth strategies and in the long-term effects of pregnancy complications on cognitive functioning?

Males and females have been proposed to have different prenatal growth strategies, whereby males invest more in fetal growth and less in placental development, leaving them more susceptible to early-life adversity. We tested predictions of this hypothesis using data from the National Collaborative Perinatal Project. Male newborns were heavier than females, but there was no difference in placental weight, adjusting for birthweight. Among infants born prior to 33 weeks, the difference in birthweight between males and females was greater among those who did not survive than among those who did, potentially reflecting a strategy whereby males maintained growth in the face of prenatal insults, while females adjusted growth. However, there was no significant difference in mortality between the sexes. Being born small-for-gestational age or very preterm (prior to 33 weeks) was associated with significantly reduced performance for most of the cognitive traits examined at 7 years, although maternal preeclampsia was associated with reduced performance in fewer traits. Generally, these effects of early-life adversity (poor fetal growth, prematurity, and preeclampsia) did not differ between the sexes. However, analyzing the sexes separately (rather than testing the interaction between sex and adversity) resulted in numerous spurious sex-specific effects, whereby the effect of early-life adversity appeared to be significant in one sex but not the other. Overall, we found little support for the hypothesis that males prioritize growth more than females, and that this makes them more susceptible to early-life adversity. Furthermore, our results show that analyzing the sexes separately, rather than testing the adversity by sex interaction, can be highly misleading.

Placental characteristics and risks of maternal mortality 50 years after delivery

INTRODUCTION

Adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm delivery and preeclampsia are associated with a higher maternal risk for subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. While such pregnancy conditions are related to abnormal placentation, little research has investigated whether pathologic placental measures could serve as a risk factor for future CVD mortality in mothers.

METHODS

Longitudinal study of 33,336 women from the Collaborative Perinatal Project (CPP; 1959-1966) linked to mortality information through December 2016. Pathologists took extensive morphological and histopathological measures. Apart from assessing associations with morphological features, we derived an overall composite score and specific inflammation-related, hemorrhage-related, and hypoxia-related pathologic placenta index scores. Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mortality adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine percent of women died with mean (standard deviation, SD) time to death of 39 (12) years. Mean (SD) placental weight and birthweight were 436 g (98) and 3156 g (566), respectively. Placenta-to-birthweight ratio was associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.03: 1.01, 1.05 per SD in ratio). In cause-specific analyses, it was significantly associated with respiratory (HR 1.06), dementia (HR: 1.10) and liver (HR 1.04) related deaths. CVD, cancer, diabetes and kidney related deaths also tended to increase, whereas infection related deaths did not (HR 0.94; 0.83, 1.06). Placental measures of thickness, diameters, and histopathological measures grouped by inflammatory, hemorrhagic, or hypoxic etiology were not associated with mortality.

DISCUSSION

Placental weight in relation to birthweight was associated with long-term maternal mortality but other histopathologic or morphologic features were not.

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in younger adults: A critical discussion of unmet medical needs, with a focus on pregnancy

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are traditionally regarded as a disease of older adults, though a not negligible fraction of cases occurs at a younger age, including women of childbearing potential. MPN in younger patients, indeed, offer several challenges for the clinical hematologist, that goes from difficulties in reaching a timely and accurate diagnosis to a peculiar thrombotic risk, with a relatively high incidence of thromboses in unusual sites (as the splanchnic veins or the cerebral ones). Moreover, the issue of pregnancy is recently gaining more attention as maternal age is rising and molecular screening are widely implemented, leading to a better recognition of these cases, both before and during pregnancy. In the present work we aim at discussing four clinical topic that we identified as areas of uncertainty or true unmet medical needs in the management of younger patients with MPN, with a particular focus on the topic of pregnancy. For each of these topics, we critically reviewed the available evidence that support treatment decisions, though acknowledging that recommendations in this field are mostly based on expert opinion or derived from guidelines of other clinical conditions that share with MPN a high vascular risk, as antiphospholipid syndrome. Taking into consideration both the lack of evidence-based data and the clinical heterogeneity of MPN, we support an individualized strategy of counseling and management for both young patients and for expectant mother with MPN.