The Heterodera glycines effector Hg16B09 is required for nematode parasitism and suppresses plant defense response

A novel sugar beet cyst nematode effector 2D01 targets the Arabidopsis HAESA receptor-like kinase

Plant-parasitic cyst nematodes use a stylet to deliver effector proteins produced in oesophageal gland cells into root cells to cause disease in plants. These effectors are deployed to modulate plant defence responses and developmental programmes for the formation of a specialized feeding site called a syncytium. The Hg2D01 effector gene, coding for a novel 185-amino-acid secreted protein, was previously shown to be up-regulated in the dorsal gland of parasitic juveniles of the soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines, but its function has remained unknown. Genome analyses revealed that Hg2D01 belongs to a highly diversified effector gene family in the genomes of H. glycines and the sugar beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii. For functional studies using the model Arabidopsis thaliana-H. schachtii pathosystem, we cloned the orthologous Hs2D01 sequence from H. schachtii. We demonstrate that Hs2D01 is a cytoplasmic effector that interacts with the intracellular kinase domain of HAESA (HAE), a cell surface-associated leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptor-like kinase (RLK) involved in signalling the activation of cell wall-remodelling enzymes important for cell separation during abscission and lateral root emergence. Furthermore, we show that AtHAE is expressed in the syncytium and, therefore, could serve as a viable host target for Hs2D01. Infective juveniles effectively penetrated the roots of HAE and HAESA-LIKE2 (HSL2) double mutant plants; however, fewer nematodes developed on the roots, consistent with a role for this receptor family in nematode infection. Taken together, our results suggest that the Hs2D01-AtHAE interaction may play an important role in sugar beet cyst nematode parasitism.

Recognition and Response in Plant-Nematode Interactions

Plant-parasitic nematodes spend much of their lives inside or in contact with host tissue, and molecular interactions constantly occur and shape the outcome of parasitism. Eggs of these parasites generally hatch in the soil, and the juveniles must locate and infect an appropriate host before their stored energy is exhausted. Components of host exudate are evaluated by the nematode and direct its migration to its infection site. Host plants recognize approaching nematodes before physical contact through molecules released by the nematodes and launch a defense response. In turn, nematodes deploy numerous mechanisms to counteract plant defenses. This review focuses on these early stages of the interaction between plants and nematodes. We discuss how nematodes perceive and find suitable hosts, how plants perceive and mount a defense response against the approaching parasites, and how nematodes fight back against host defenses.

[New genetic tools for plant defense against parasitic nematodes]

Нематоды относятся к числу значимых вредителей сельскохозяйственных растений. В обзоре рассмотрены последние данные о молекулярных механизмах устойчивости растений к цистообразующим и галловым нематодам, среди которых одни из наиболее вредоносных видов: Globodera rostochiensis, G. pallida, Heterodera schachtii, Meloidogyne chitwoodi и M. incognita. Например, золотистая картофельная нематода G. rostochiensis, зарегистрированная в 61 субъекте РФ на общей площади 1.8 млн га, способна приводить к потере от 19 до 90 % урожая картофеля. Биологические особенности нематод затрудняют разработку агротехнических способов борьбы с ними: цисты G. rostochiensis сохраняют жизнеспособность в почве в течение многих лет, нематициды токсичны или малоэффективны, поэтому предпочтительным методом борьбы с ними является интрогрессия генов устойчивости от родственных культурных и дикорастущих видов. Стратегия жизненного цикла цистообразующих и галловых нематод основана на способности личинок проникать в корни восприимчивых видов растений, репрограммировать клетки растения-хозяина, формирующие гигантские клетки или синцитии в качестве питающих структур, а также ингибировать иммунный ответ. Молекулярные механизмы, лежащие в основе такого взаимодействия в системе «патоген–хозяин», вызывают значительный интерес как с точки зрения управления морфогенезом растений, так и в аспекте разработки безопасных и эффективных способов борьбы с паразитическими нематодами. В обзоре рассмотрены данные об эффекторах, с помощью которых разные виды нематод контролируют иммунный ответ растения-хозяина, а также гены устойчивости (R-гены) и некоторые молекулярные механизмы, прерывающие формирование питающих структур и развитие паразита. Приведены новые данные о способах генетического контроля, основанных на одном из активно обсуждаемых в последнее время варианте механизма РНК-интерференции – HIGS (host induced gene silencing), представляющем собой адресное выключение экспрессии гена-мишени в клетках личинки нематоды с помощью специфических двуцепочечных РНК, синтезирующихся в клетках растения-хозяина. Индукция РНК-интерференции в клетках растений приводит к появлению молекул-медиаторов, способных инициировать аналогичный процесс в клетках фитофагов, взаимодействующих с растением, в том числе у личинок нематод. Описаны случаи, в которых такое адресное выключение экспрессии генов-мишеней приводило к нарушениям развития личинок и высокому уровню защиты сельскохозяйственных растений от наиболее опасных видов нематод.

RNA Interference and CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing for Crop Improvement: Paradigm Shift towards Sustainable Agriculture

With the rapid population growth, there is an urgent need for innovative crop improvement approaches to meet the increasing demand for food. Classical crop improvement approaches involve, however, a backbreaking process that cannot equipoise with increasing crop demand. RNA-based approaches i.e., RNAi-mediated gene regulation and the site-specific nuclease-based CRISPR/Cas9 system for gene editing has made advances in the efficient targeted modification in many crops for the higher yield and resistance to diseases and different stresses. In functional genomics, RNA interference (RNAi) is a propitious gene regulatory approach that plays a significant role in crop improvement by permitting the downregulation of gene expression by small molecules of interfering RNA without affecting the expression of other genes. Gene editing technologies viz. the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas) have appeared prominently as a powerful tool for precise targeted modification of nearly all crops' genome sequences to generate variation and accelerate breeding efforts. In this regard, the review highlights the diverse roles and applications of RNAi and CRISPR/Cas9 system as powerful technologies to improve agronomically important plants to enhance crop yields and increase tolerance to environmental stress (biotic or abiotic). Ultimately, these technologies can prove to be important in view of global food security and sustainable agriculture.

Comparative genomics of two inbred lines of the potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis reveals disparate effector family-specific diversification patterns

BACKGROUND

Potato cyst nematodes belong to the most harmful pathogens in potato, and durable management of these parasites largely depends on host-plant resistances. These resistances are pathotype specific. The current Globodera rostochiensis pathotype scheme that defines five pathotypes (Ro1 - Ro5) is both fundamentally and practically of limited value. Hence, resistant potato varieties are used worldwide in a poorly informed manner.

RESULTS

We generated two novel reference genomes of G. rostochiensis inbred lines derived from a Ro1 and a Ro5 population. These genome sequences comprise 173 and 189 scaffolds respectively, marking a ≈ 24-fold reduction in fragmentation as compared to the current reference genome. We provide copy number variations for 19 effector families. Four dorsal gland effector families were investigated in more detail. SPRYSECs, known to be implicated in plant defence suppression, constitute by far the most diversified family studied herein with 60 and 99 variants in Ro1 and Ro5 distributed over 18 and 26 scaffolds. In contrast, CLEs, effectors involved in feeding site induction, show strong physical clustering. The 10 and 16 variants cluster on respectively 2 and 1 scaffolds. Given that pathotypes are defined by their effectoromes, we pinpoint the disparate nature of the contributing effector families in terms of sequence diversification and loss and gain of variants.

CONCLUSIONS

Two novel reference genomes allow for nearly complete inventories of effector diversification and physical organisation within and between pathotypes. Combined with insights we provide on effector family-specific diversification patterns, this constitutes a basis for an effectorome-based virulence scheme for this notorious pathogen.