Cognition coming about: Self-organisation and free-energy: Commentary on Wright, J.J. and Bourke, P.D. (2020) "The growth of cognition: Free energy minimization and the embryogenesis of cortical computation"

Blankets at birth: Transitional objects: Commentary on "The growth of cognition: Free energy minimization and the embryogenesis of cortical computation" by Wright and Bourke

Birth is accompanied by a complete reset of metabolic flows in the neonate, challenging the brain to fulfill the basic needs of life through action - breathing, feeding, crying. The perinatal period is fundamentally a transitional one, such that the basic conditions for thermodynamic self-regulation are re-established ex utero. Wright and Bourke lay out the core tenants of these conditions [1]; the emergence of regularities in cortical geometry and activity that allow "crisp" states. Before this can occur - in the immediate perinatal phase - electrical recordings of neonatal cortex suggest it passes through a highly critical regime - a phase transition - with disordered statistical fingerprints. The resolution of this state is a necessary condition for the more stable metabolic conditions that support the conjectures of Wright and Bourke.

Embodied skillful performance: where the action is

When someone masters a skill, their performance looks to us like second nature: it looks as if their actions are smoothly performed without explicit, knowledge-driven, online monitoring of their performance. Contemporary computational models in motor control theory, however, are instructionist: that is, they cast skillful performance as a knowledge-driven process. Optimal motor control theory (OMCT), as representative par excellence of such approaches, casts skillful performance as an instruction, instantiated in the brain, that needs to be executed-a motor command. This paper aims to show the limitations of such instructionist approaches to skillful performance. We specifically address the question of whether the assumption of control-theoretic models is warranted. The first section of this paper examines the instructionist assumption, according to which skillful performance consists of the execution of theoretical instructions harnessed in motor representations. The second and third sections characterize the implementation of motor representations as motor commands, with a special focus on formulations from OMCT. The final sections of this paper examine predictive coding and active inference-behavioral modeling frameworks that descend, but are distinct, from OMCT-and argue that the instructionist, control-theoretic assumptions are ill-motivated in light of new developments in active inference.