Validation study of the strategic and clinical quality indicators in postoperative pain management questionnaire in Turkish surgery patients

Validation and Scoring of the Greek Version of the Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management (SCQIPP) Questionnaire

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to validate the Greek version of the Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management (SCQIPP) questionnaire.

DESIGN

The study was designed as a prospective questionnaire survey.

METHODS

Overall, 210 elective surgical patients were included . SCQIPP consisted of 14 items that were scored on a five point scale. After the translation and linguistic adjustments, the tool was distributed to the surgical wards. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. The tool construct was generated by a principal axis factoring model with promax rotation.

FINDINGS

Base Cronbach's alpha was 0.814. Due to low inter-item and item-total correlations and the increase of Cronbach's alpha (0.834) when item two was deleted, 13 items were included in the current tool version. Factor analysis identified three district subscales: nursing care, pain management, and support. Subscale and convergent validity were confirmed. The mean score of the validated tool was 55.2 (Range: 44-63). A low level of care was highlighted in most items.

CONCLUSIONS

The Greek version of the SCQIPP questionnaire is a valid and efficient tool for the evaluation of the quality of care of postoperative pain management.

Relationship Between Quality of Care and Patient Care Outcomes for Postoperative Pain in Major Orthopedic Surgery: Analytical and Cross-Sectional Study

The quality of care provided for the management of postoperative pain and patient outcomes are key criteria for healthcare institutions. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the quality of care provided for the alleviation of postoperative pain experienced among patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery and the patient care outcomes. The study was designed as an analytical and cross-sectional study. The rates of pain severity and sleep interference, activity interference, affective experiences, and adverse effects due to postoperative pain were higher in female patients than in male patients. A significant positive correlation was identified between the quality of postoperative pain care and the perception of care (p < .05). Implementing nursing interventions to improve pain management and increase the quality of care appears to be vital elements for reducing adverse effects caused by pain and increasing the satisfaction with postoperative pain care.

Experience of Pain and Satisfaction with Pain Management in Patients After a Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery

PURPOSE

The descriptive study was performed to assess patients' pain experienced in the early postoperative period of a lumbar disc herniation surgery and their satisfaction with the pain management administered.

DESIGN

This was a descriptive and cross-sectional study conducted from May 8 to November 8, 2017.

METHODS

Data collection was performed during interviews through the Patient Information Form (20 questions), Turkish version of clinical quality indicators in the Postoperative Pain Management questionnaire (19 questions). The questionnaire included 14 items and 3 subdimensions named nursing interventions, pain management, and the environment. The remaining 5 questions were related to pain management satisfaction and pain severity. Questionnaire items scored on a 1 to 5 Likert scale. The higher the total score obtained from the questionnaire is the satisfaction with pain management increases.

FINDINGS

The mean score obtained from the total questionnaire was 51.4 (standard deviation: 6.6).Characteristics of patients with lumbar disc herniation did not influence the total score obtained from the instrument and its sub-dimensions (P > .05). Overall satisfaction with pain management was high (mean: 8.3; standard deviation: 1.6) on the 0 to 10 visual analog scale. There was a statistically significant difference between the length of hospital stay, the type of anesthesia used, having more pain than expected, and the satisfaction score of patients (P < .05). As the length of procedure increases, the average and current pain scores increase as well (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study indicate that despite pain experienced after the lumbar disc herniation surgery, patients' satisfaction with pain management was high. Encouraging nurses to implement systematic and evidence-based practices in pain management may help alleviate patients' pain after surgery and reduce variety of pain management practices among nurses.

Assessment of post-operative pain management among acutely and electively admitted patients - a Swedish ward perspective

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Swedish health care is regulated to involve the patient in every intervention process. In the area of post-operative pain, it is therefore important to evaluate patient experience of the quality of pain management. Previous research has focused on mapping this area but not on comparing experiences between acutely and electively admitted patients. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of post-operative pain management quality among acutely and electively admitted patients at a Swedish surgical department performing soft-tissue surgery.

METHODS

A survey study design was used as a method based on a multidimensional instrument to assess post-operative pain management: Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management (SCQIPP). Consecutive patients at all wards of a university hospital's surgical department were included. Data collection was performed at hospital discharge.

RESULTS

In total, 160 patients participated, of whom 40 patients were acutely admitted. A significant difference between acutely and electively admitted patients was observed in the SCQIPP area of environment, whereas acute patients rated the post-operative pain management quality lower compared with those who were electively admitted.

CONCLUSIONS

There may be a need for improvement in the areas of post-operative pain management in Sweden, both specifically and generally. There may also be a difference in the experience of post-operative pain quality between acutely and electively admitted patients in this study, specifically in the area of environment. In addition, low levels of the perceived quality of post-operative pain management among the patients were consistent, but satisfaction with analgesic treatment was rated as good.