A Brief Historical Perspective of Cancer Rehabilitation and Contributions From the National Institutes of Health

Challenges in evaluating pelvic floor physiotherapy based strategies in low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review and qualitative analysis

AIM

Physiotherapy is an established treatment strategy for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). However, data on its efficacy are limited. This is in part due to the inherent challenges in study design in this context. This systematic review aims to analyse the methodology of studies using pelvic floor physiotherapy for treatment of LARS to elucidate the challenges and limitations faced, which may inform the design of future prospective trials.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken through MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library, yielding 345 unique records for screening. Five studies were identified for review. Content thematic analysis of study limitations was carried out using the Braun and Clarke method. Line-by-line coding was used to organize implicit and explicit challenges and limitations under broad organizing categories.

RESULTS

Key challenges fell into five overarching categories: patient-related issues, cancer-related issues, adequate symptomatic control, intervention-related issues and measurement of outcomes. Adherence, attrition and randomization contributed to potential bias within these studies, with imbalance in the baseline patient characteristics, particularly gender and baseline pelvic floor function scores. Outcome measurements consisted of patient-reported measures and quality of life measures, where significant improvements in bowel function according to patient-reported outcome measures were not reflected in the quality of life scores.

CONCLUSION

Upcoming trial design in the area of pelvic floor physiotherapy for faecal incontinence related to rectal cancer surgery can be cognisant of and design around the challenges identified in this systematic review, including the reduction of bias, exclusion of the placebo effect and the potential cultural differences in attitude towards a sensitive intervention.

Barriers and facilitators to cancer rehabilitation for patients with head and neck or lung cancer-a scoping review mapping structural and healthcare professionals' perspectives

PURPOSE

Rehabilitation can positively affect quality of life, functional status, and physiological status for patients with head and neck or lung cancer. However, barriers and facilitators regarding access, referral, and participation in rehabilitation have not been outlined in the literature either from a healthcare professional or from a structural perspective. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to identify and map barriers and facilitators from structural and healthcare professionals' perspectives in relation to access, referral, and participation in rehabilitation for patients with head and neck or lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two systematic searches were conducted in five databases mapping peer-reviewed research literature.

RESULTS

In total, 17 studies of 3918 potential sources were included. Seven themes were identified. Four themes concerned access: Understanding Patients' Resources; Collaboration Determining Access; Education, Knowledge, and Evidence Impact Access to Rehabilitation; and Resources Affecting Availability to Rehabilitation Services. Two themes concerned referral: Referral Criteria; and Elements Affecting Referral Pathway. One theme concerned participation: Factors Influencing Participation.

CONCLUSION

From structural and healthcare professionals' perspectives, barriers and facilitators impact access, referral and participation in rehabilitation. However, the findings on facilitators were limited; only one theme addressed participation and two findings concerned patients with low socioeconomic status.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHealthcare professionals should be mindful that a diverse array of barriers and facilitators may impact the rehabilitation pathway for patients with head, neck, and lung cancer.Engagement by healthcare professionals and structural initiatives are needed to ensure comprehensive access to information concerning rehabilitation options.Local guidelines should be developed to prescribe methods for informing and guiding patients towards suitable rehabilitation options.It is important that healthcare professionals take the individual patient's resources into account when navigating aspects of access, referral, and participation in rehabilitation.

Looking back: a review of policy implications for exercise oncology

The evidence to support the benefits of exercise for people living with and beyond cancer is robust. Still, exercise oncology interventions in the United States are only eligible for coverage by third-party payers within the restrictions of cancer rehabilitation settings. Without expanded coverage, access will remain highly inequitable, tending toward the most well-resourced. This article describes the pathway to third-party coverage for 3 programs that address a chronic disease and utilize exercise professionals: the Diabetes Prevention Program, Supervised Exercise Training for Peripheral Artery Disease, and Cancer Rehabilitation. Lessons learned will be applied toward expanding third-party coverage for exercise oncology programming.

Funcionalidade de pacientes oncológicos: um estudo transversal com o core set genérico da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde

Introdução: O câncer é considerado uma doença crônica e um dos principais problemas de saúde enfrentados pela população. Embora o tratamento possa melhorar a sobrevida dos pacientes oncológicos, os efeitos colaterais influenciam a qualidade de vida e impactam na capacidade funcional diária. Desde 2001, com a aprovação da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF), o entendimento da funcionalidade e o da incapacidade humana passaram a ser vistos sob nova dimensão. Objetivo: Classificar a funcionalidade de pacientes oncológicos em tratamento quimioterápico por meio do core set genérico da CIF. Método: Foi realizado um estudo transversal com 117 indivíduos em tratamento quimioterápico. Para classificar a funcionalidade foi aplicado o core set genérico da CIF, que possui sete categorias em três componentes da CIF. Resultados: Os maiores comprometimentos e deficiências relatados foram nas categorias: sensação de dor (69,2%); andar (61,5%); e funções emocionais (54,7%). Conclusão: Foi identificada uma amostra de pacientes oncológicos em tratamento quimioterápico com diferentes níveis de incapacidade funcional em todas as categorias classificadas.

Patient competencies, coping self-efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?

OBJECTIVE

The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion- and problem-focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond.

METHODS

N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self-report measures of PC, coping and self-efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed.

RESULTS

Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self-efficacy and coping. The PCs of self-regulation and managing distress and coping self-efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem- and emotion-focused PCs.

A randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of pre- and post-surgical pelvic floor physiotherapy for bowel symptoms, pelvic floor function, and quality of life of patients with rectal cancer: CARRET protocol

Background

There is scarcity of trials about preventative strategies for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in rectal cancer patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre- and post-surgical pelvic floor rehabilitation program on the bowel symptoms, pelvic floor function, and quality of life of rectal cancer patients.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial with parallel groups (pelvic floor rehabilitation versus control group), with a blinded evaluator. Participants and setting: 56 stage I to III rectal cancer patients aged from 18 to 80 years old undergoing sphincter preservation surgery at Hospital del Salvador and who have a sufficient knowledge of Spanish. Main outcome measures: ICIQ-B questionnaire for intestinal symptoms, high-resolution anorectal manometry (Alacer Multiplex 24-channel manometry equipment) for anorectal function, pelvic floor muscle strength test with Oxford Modified Scale, and a quality of life test with the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire. The evaluations will be carried out at five stages: before surgery, before and after the pelvic floor rehabilitation, and during a 3-month and 1-year follow-up. Interventions: one pre-rehabilitation session and 9 to 12 sessions of pelvic floor rehabilitation, including patient education, pelvic floor muscle exercises, pelvic floor electromyography biofeedback, and capacitive and sensory rectal training with a balloon probe. Rehabilitation will begin 3–5 weeks before the ileostomy is removed (four sessions) and around 3 weeks after stoma removal (5–8 sessions).

Discussion

We expect the program to improve the bowel symptoms, pelvic floor function, and quality of life of rectal cancer patients.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12620000040965. Registered on 21 January 2020.

Daily living and rehabilitation needs in patients and caregivers affected by myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN): A qualitative study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore experiences of daily living and identify rehabilitation needs in patients and caregivers living with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

BACKGROUND

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are chronic haematological cancers. Studies report a high symptom burden but little is known about supportive care and rehabilitation for this patient group.

DESIGN

Qualitative study with a phenomenological approach using focus group interviews to gather knowledge about the participants' lived experiences.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients and seven caregivers attending a 5-day rehabilitation course were interviewed in 12 focus groups. Systematic Text Condensation was used to analyse the interviews. Reporting adhered to COREQ.

RESULTS

Two main themes for patients were found: The loss of choice and identity due to the need to prioritise energy and The schism of being a person but also a patient. Patients described how living with myeloproliferative neoplasms meant having to prioritise energy and, therefore, losing freedom to choose activities. This changed their identity and impaired their quality of life. Patients of working age seemed to struggle the most in balancing the disease, family, social relationships and work. One main theme was found for caregivers: Influence of the disease. Caregivers reported how the disease limited their social lives, that the disease brought psychological strain, extra work, and that communication between couples was impaired. When both patients and caregivers participated in rehabilitation courses, they reported better understanding between couples and more open conversations. Rehabilitation needs identified were mainly in relation to psychosocial support and patient education, although needs varied across patients and caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and caregivers expressed difficulties in adjusting to the lives the disease enforced upon them. Our findings indicate that myeloproliferative neoplasms patients and their caregivers would benefit from a combined model of psychosocial support, patient education, peer support and rehabilitation interventions based on an individual needs assessment.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses can be responsible for individual needs assessments and refer patients and caregivers to suitable supportive care and rehabilitation interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS

The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection agency (J.nr. 2008-58-0035).

Training and Practice Patterns in Cancer Rehabilitation: A Survey of Physiatrists Specializing in Oncology Care

BACKGROUND

Cancer rehabilitation is an integral part of the continuum of care for survivors. Due to the increasing number of survivors, physiatrists commonly see cancer patients in their general practices. Essential to guiding the field is to understand the current training and practice patterns of cancer rehabilitation physicians.

OBJECTIVES

To assess current trends in training and practice for cancer rehabilitation physicians, including the level of burnout among providers in this field.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional descriptive survey study.

SETTING

Online survey.

PARTICIPANTS

American physicians who are affiliated with the Cancer Rehabilitation Physician Consortium (CRPC) of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R). The CRPC is a group of cancer rehabilitation providers (both fellowship-trained and not fellowship-trained) with the mission of furthering cancer rehabilitation medicine through education, research, and networking.

METHODS

All CRPC physicians were invited to complete a voluntary and anonymous 43-question online survey. The survey was conceived by a group of eight experts interested in providing additional information to the current literature regarding the training and practice in the cancer rehabilitation field.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Training, practice, opioid prescribing, and professional support.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 50 physicians participated (response rate = 74%). Respondents were from various states, the three most common being New York (16%, n = 6), Texas (16%, n = 6), and Massachusetts (11%, n = 4). About 57% (n = 21) of the respondents were employed in an academic medical center and 73% (n = 27) reported their primary departmental affiliation was Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R). Approximately 78% (n = 29) credited mentorship early in training for their interest in the field. More than half (54%, n = 20) either strongly agreed or agreed that cancer rehabilitation fellowship training is necessary for graduating physiatrists who plan to treat oncology patients/survivors. National PM&R meetings were the primary source of continuing education for 86% (n = 31). Sixty-five percent (n = 24), strongly agreed or agreed that cancer rehabilitation physiatrists should know how to prescribe opioids, and 35% (n = 13) reported prescribing them when appropriate. About 54% (n = 20) rated their level of burnout as low or very low, and more than half (51%, n = 19) believed their burnout level was lower than physiatrists treating other rehabilitation populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer rehabilitation is a growing subspecialty in PM&R, and most physiatrists in general practice will treat many survivors-often for neurologic or musculoskeletal impairments related to cancer or its treatment. Cancer rehabilitation physicians perceive that they have relatively low levels of burnout, and early mentorship and fellowship training is beneficial. Professional conferences and mentorship are a primary source for continuing education.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Combined exercise and nutritional rehabilitation in outpatients with incurable cancer: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The optimal components for rehabilitation in patients with incurable cancer are unclear. However, principles of exercise and nutrition-based interventions used in cancer cachexia may be applied usefully to this population of cancer patients. This systematic review examines current evidence for rehabilitation combining exercise and nutritional support in patients with incurable cancer.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched. Eligible studies included patients with incurable cancer and rehabilitation programmes combining exercise and nutritional interventions. Studies of cancer survivors, curative treatments, reviews, case note reviews, protocols and abstracts were excluded. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were applied to patient-important outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 2424 search results, 67 abstracts were reviewed and 24 full texts examined. Eight studies (n = 685) were included comprising two randomised control trials, three prospective, one exploratory and two secondary analyses. All examined multi-modal outpatient programmes. GRADE analysis revealed moderate evidence (B) for improvements in depression and physical endurance, low-quality evidence (C) for quality of life and fatigue and very low-quality evidence (D) for overall function and nutritional status.

CONCLUSION

There are limited data for multi-modal rehabilitation programmes combining exercise and nutritional interventions in patients with incurable cancer. However, studies to date report improvements in multiple domains, most notably physical endurance and depression scores. This supports the concept that multi-modal rehabilitation incorporating principles of cachexia management may be appropriate for the wider group of patients with incurable cancer. Further, high-quality studies are needed to define the optimal approach and outcome measures.