1
|
Fernandez LL, Rodriguez D, Griswold DP, Khun I, Aristizabal S, Aristizabal JH, Richards G, Pavek A, Jayaraman S. Innovative External Cranial Devices for Protecting a Craniectomy Site: A Scoping Review on Noninvasive Approaches for Patients Awaiting Cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01336. [PMID: 39248525 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a commonly performed procedure to alleviate high intracranial pressure. To enhance patient quality of life and minimize complications after DC in patients awaiting cranioplasty (CP), multidisciplinary teams have designed and implemented external protective prototypes, including 3-dimensional printing and plaster models, whenever feasible. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the evidence available on innovative external cranial devices that protect the craniectomy site for patients who have undergone DC while awaiting CP in high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries. METHODS This scoping review was conducted following the methodology outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Searches were performed in databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scielo, Scopus, and World Health Organization Global Health Index Medicus. Patent documents were also searched in Espacenet, Google Patents, and World Intellectual Property Organization. This scoping review included external protective devices for adult patients who underwent DC and CP, while invasive devices were excluded. RESULTS A total of 9 documents described external cranial devices, with 7 of them led by researchers from high-income countries, including the United States (n = 4), Singapore (n = 1), the United Kingdom (n = 1), and Hong Kong SAR, China (n = 1). Among these devices, 77.7% (n = 7) were created using 3-dimensional printing, while 22.3% (n = 2) were developed through plaster hand modeling. The individual study results were summarized. CONCLUSION Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3, SDG 9, and SDG 10 play a crucial role in the advancement of innovative strategies to ensure access to essential neurosurgical care, reduce global disparities in treatment outcomes, mitigate postoperative complications, and provide life-saving interventions. This scoping review provides fundamental evidence for multidisciplinary teams involved in designing noninvasive innovations to minimize the risks associated with post-DC complications. It is anticipated that more cost-effective models, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, can be implemented based on the findings of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura L Fernandez
- Clinical & Translational Science Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Center for Global Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Diana Rodriguez
- Universidad Metropolitana, Caracas, Venezuela
- University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Dylan P Griswold
- NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital & University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Isla Khun
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarita Aristizabal
- Division of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jorge H Aristizabal
- Division of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Grace Richards
- Center for Global Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Adriene Pavek
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sudha Jayaraman
- Center for Global Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pang SSY, Fang E, Chen KW, Leung M, Chow VLY, Fang C. Patient-specific 3D-printed helmet for post-craniectomy defect - a case report. 3D Print Med 2022; 8:4. [PMID: 35089457 PMCID: PMC8796519 DOI: 10.1186/s41205-022-00131-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients who undergo decompressive craniectomy (DC) are often fitted with a helmet that protects the craniectomy site from injury during rehabilitation. However, conventional “one-size-fits-all” helmets may not be feasible for certain craniectomy defects. We describe the production and use of a custom 3D-printed helmet for a DC patient where a conventional helmet was not feasible due to the craniectomy defect configuration. Case presentation A 65-year-old male with ethmoid sinonasal carcinoma underwent cranionasal resection and DC with free vastus lateralis flap reconstruction to treat cerebrospinal fluid leakage. He required an external helmet to protect the craniectomy site, however, the rim of a conventional helmet compressed the craniectomy site, and the straps compressed the vascular pedicle of the muscle flap. Computed topography (CT) scans of the patient’s cranium were imported into 3D modelling software and used to fabricate a patient-specific, strapless helmet using fused deposition modelling (FDM). The final helmet fit the patient perfectly and circumvented the compression issues, while also providing better cosmesis than the conventional helmet. Four months postoperatively, the helmet remains intact and in use. Conclusions 3D printing can be used to produce low-volume, patient-specific external devices for rehabilitation where standardized adjuncts are not optimal. Once initial start-up costs and training are overcome, these devices can be produced by surgeons themselves to meet a wide range of clinical needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherby Suet-Ying Pang
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Evan Fang
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| | - Kam Wai Chen
- Prosthetics and Orthotics Department, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Matthew Leung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Velda Ling-Yu Chow
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Christian Fang
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chua KSG, Krishnan RR, Yen JM, Plunkett TK, Soh YM, Lim CJ, Chia CM, Looi JC, Ng SG, Rao J. 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258296. [PMID: 34710123 PMCID: PMC8553164 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 3D-printed (3DP) customized temporary cranial protection solutions following decompressive craniectomy (DC) are currently not widely practiced. A pilot trial of a 3DP customized head protection prototype device (HPPD) on 10 subjects was conducted during the subacute rehabilitation phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS Subjects > 30 days post-DC with stable cranial flaps and healed wounds were enrolled. HPPD were uniquely designed based on individuals' CT scan, where the base conformed to the surface of the individual's skin covering the cranial defect, and the lateral surface three-dimensionally mirrored, the contralateral healthy head. Each HPPD was fabricated using the fused deposition modeling method. These HPPD were then fitted on subjects using a progressive wearing schedule and monitored over 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 follow-up (FU) weeks. Outcomes during FU included; reported wearing time/day (hours), subjective pain, discomfort, pruritus, dislodgment, cosmesis ratings; and observed wound changes. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability without pain or wound changes within 30 minutes of HPPD fitting. RESULTS In all, 10 enrolled subjects received 12 HPPDs [5/10 male, mean (SD) age 46 (14) years, mean (SD) duration post-DC 110 days (76)] and all subjects tolerated 30 minutes of initial HPPD fitting without wound changes. The mean (SD) HPPD mass was 61.2 g (SD 19.88). During 8 weeks of FU, no HPPD-related skin dehiscence was observed, while 20% (2/10) had transient skin imprints, and 80% (8/10) reported self-limiting pressure and pruritis. DISCUSSION Findings from this exploratory study demonstrated preliminary feasibility and safety for a customized 3DP HPPD for temporary post-DC head protection over 8 weeks of follow-up. Monitoring and regular rest breaks during HPPD wear were important to prevent skin complications. CONCLUSION This study suggests the potential for wider 3DP technology applications to provide cranial protection for this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Sui Geok Chua
- Tan Tock Seng Rehabilitation Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- * E-mail:
| | - Rathi Ratha Krishnan
- Tan Tock Seng Rehabilitation Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jia Min Yen
- Tan Tock Seng Rehabilitation Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tegan Kate Plunkett
- Tan Tock Seng Rehabilitation Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yan Ming Soh
- Tan Tock Seng Rehabilitation Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chien Joo Lim
- Clinical Research and Innovation Office, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Suan Gek Ng
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, TTSH Campus, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jai Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, TTSH Campus, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|