How antipsychotics work: the patients' perspective

Differentiation in Neurological Soft Sign Scores on Schizophrenic Patients with Antipsychotic Treatment

Background: Schizophrenia is a chronic mental illness that affects cognitive aspect of a patient which need long term care with antipsychotics. Long term use of antipsychotic itself causes neurobiological change in the brain which results in alteration of cognitive function. The latest research had demonstrated that NSS (Neurological Soft Sign) reflect a rather wide range of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia which was not accounted for by age, education or severity of global cognitive deficits. Therefore, we examined the effects and impact of antipsychotic Haloperidol and Risperidone treatment in schizophrenic patient using NSS scores. The Study showed that chronic schizophrenia patients had a higher NSS scores than acute patients. NSS also significantly associated with all neuropsychological domains of MMSE in both groups and were confirmed when age, education and severity of global cognitive deficits were not accounted for. This study also obtained a lower NSS score in patients who received Risperidone therapy compared to Haloperidol with p = 0.003. Out of 5 NSS domain in the Heidelberg scale, there was a significant improvement in motor coordination and motor sequencing (p = 0.004) and (p = 0.048) in patients who received Risperidone therapy compared to Haloperidol. There was an association between the chronicity of the disease and NSS, NSS also shows that it’s not influenced by age, education and severity of global cognitive deficits as a screening instrument. Finally the improvement of NSS scores in the Risperidone group was far superior compared to the Haloperidol group particularly in motor coordination and motor sequencing.

Positive and Negative Effects of Antipsychotic Medication: An International Online Survey of 832 Recipients

Background:

Antipsychotic medication is currently the treatment of choice for psychosis, but few studies directly survey the first-hand experience of recipients.

Objective:

To ascertain the experiences and opinions of an international sample of users of antipsychotic drugs, regarding positive and negative effects.

Methods:

An online direct-to-consumer questionnaire was completed by 832 users of antipsychotics, from 30 countries – predominantly USA, UK and Australia. This is the largest such sample to date.

Results:

Over half (56%) thought, the drugs reduced the problems they were prescribed for, but 27% thought they made them worse. Slightly less people found the drugs generally ‘helpful’ (41%) than found them ‘unhelpful’ (43%). While 35% reported that their ‘quality of life’ was ‘improved’, 54% reported that it was made ‘worse’. The average number of adverse effects reported was 11, with an average of five at the ‘severe’ level. Fourteen effects were reported by 57% or more participants, most commonly: ‘Drowsiness, feeling tired, sedation’ (92%), ‘Loss of motivation’ (86%), ‘Slowed thoughts’ (86%), and ‘Emotional numbing’ (85%). Suicidality was reported to be a side effect by 58%. Older people reported particularly poor outcomes and high levels of adverse effects. Duration of treatment was unrelated to positive outcomes but significantly related to negative outcomes. Most respondents (70%) had tried to stop taking the drugs. The most common reasons people wanted to stop were the side effects (64%) and worries about long-term physical health (52%). Most (70%) did not recall being told anything at all about side effects.

Conclusion:

Clinical implications are discussed, with a particular focus on the principles of informed consent, and involving patients in decision making about their own lives.

Self-Reported Cognitive Biases Are Equally Present in Patients Diagnosed With Psychotic Versus Nonpsychotic Disorders

We investigated the relation between subjective cognitive biases measured with the Dutch Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases (DACOBS-NL) and (1) the presence of a psychotic versus nonpsychotic psychiatric disorder, (2) the current dose of antipsychotic medication and current psychotic symptoms, and (3) the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) Psychoticism personality trait. Results showed that DACOBS-NL subjective cognitive biases (1) were equally present in patients diagnosed with nonpsychotic disorders compared with patients with a psychotic disorder, (2) could not be explained by the current dose of antipsychotic medication, nor by current psychotic symptoms, and (3) significantly correlated with all PID-5 Personality domains. Moreover, in predicting membership of the psychotic versus nonpsychotic psychiatric disorder group, the addition of the PID-5 domains in step 2 rendered the contribution of the DACOBS-NL subjective cognitive biases in step 1 nonsignificant. Further research is needed to clarify the interplay between cognitive biases and aberrant salience in the prediction of psychotic disorders.

Drug-centred psychopharmacology: a non-diagnostic framework for drug treatment†

We propose a ‘drug-centred’ framework for understanding the nature of drug treatment in psychiatry. In contrast to the prevailing ‘disease-centred’ model, which suggests that drugs work by targeting underlying abnormalities, the drug-centred model maintains that drugs exert their effects through their psychoactive properties. According to this view, distinctive drug-induced alterations to normal cognition, emotion and behaviour can modify the manifestations of mental disorders independent of diagnosis or aetiological theory. The drug-centred approach already forms the basis of some current practice, particularly off-label prescribing. Within this framework, the matching of drug-induced effects to symptoms or difficulties, taking into account the unwanted aspects of the drug-induced state, becomes the focus of a collaborative endeavour between doctor and patient, consistent with the principles of the recovery model. More research into the full range of effects that psychiatric drugs produce is required to ground a judicious drug-centred practice and inform psychiatric training.

The psychoactive effects of psychiatric medication: the elephant in the room

The psychoactive effects of psychiatric medications have been obscured by the presumption that these medications have disease-specific actions. Exploiting the parallels with the psychoactive effects and uses of recreational substances helps to highlight the psychoactive properties of psychiatric medications and their impact on people with psychiatric problems. We discuss how psychoactive effects produced by different drugs prescribed in psychiatric practice might modify various disturbing and distressing symptoms, and we also consider the costs of these psychoactive effects on the mental well-being of the user. We examine the issue of dependence, and the need for support for people wishing to withdraw from psychiatric medication. We consider how the reality of psychoactive effects undermines the idea that psychiatric drugs work by targeting underlying disease processes, since psychoactive effects can themselves directly modify mental and behavioral symptoms and thus affect the results of placebo-controlled trials. These effects and their impact also raise questions about the validity and importance of modern diagnosis systems. Extensive research is needed to clarify the range of acute and longer-term mental, behavioral, and physical effects induced by psychiatric drugs, both during and after consumption and withdrawal, to enable users and prescribers to exploit their psychoactive effects judiciously in a safe and more informed manner.

Changes in delusions in the early phase of antipsychotic treatment - an experience sampling study

It has been suggested that different aspects of delusions (conviction, distress, preoccupation) respond to treatment at different rates, and that the cognitive bias of 'Jumping to Conclusions' (JTC) may predict treatment outcome. This study investigates changes in delusion dimensions using Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM) and the role of JTC as a predictor of change during the initial 2 weeks of antipsychotic treatment on admission to hospital. Sixteen acute patients with delusions were assessed seven times per day for 14 days using computerised ESM. ESM assessed moment-by-moment experiences of affect, psychotic symptoms, and delusion dimensions. Clinical ratings were completed at baseline, 1 week and 2 weeks later. The 'beads' task was used to measure JTC at baseline. Delusion dimensions improved over the two weeks of antipsychotic treatment and admission to hospital. Different delusional dimensions changed at different rates, with distress and disruption being more responsive than conviction and preoccupation on both PSYRATS and ESM ratings. Eight out of 16 participants showed a JTC bias on the beads task at baseline. Exploratory analyses showed that JTC predicted changes in the ESM ratings of delusion conviction and distress, suggesting that reasoning biases may predict treatment response.

Drug attitude in adolescents: a key factor for a comprehensive assessment

OBJECTIVE

Very few studies have evaluated the subjective experience (SE) in children and adolescents treated with antipsychotics. The present study aimed to evaluate the SE of antipsychotics in adolescents diagnosed with different psychiatric conditions and to identify explanatory variables of adolescents' SE and compliance with treatment.

METHODS

The Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI) was used to evaluate SE in 67 adolescents in 2 different countries (Italy and United Kingdom). Compliance was measured using a Likert scale completed by both patients and parents. To evaluate other parameters correlated to the SE, the following scales were administered: Clinical Global Impression Scale, Children's Global Assessment Scale, Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, and EuroQoL (for quality of life). Multiple and logistic regression analyses were applied.

RESULTS

No significant difference in drug attitude was found between psychotic and nonpsychotic patients. Our results showed a highly significant association between DAI and compliance (Spearman index, 0.33; P = 0.005); for all other variables, DAI associated significantly only with quality of life (r = 0.25; P = 0.03). The multivariable analysis confirmed the presence of a strong association between compliance and DAI (P = <0.001). In our sample, drug attitude was the only variable found to be correlated with the compliance, whereas extrapyramidal adverse effects showed an only marginally significant association.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations provide confirmation, also in adolescents, that drug attitude is strongly correlated with treatment compliance and underline the need in clinical assessments to always consider the patient's viewpoint.

Nonaddictive instrumental drug use: Theoretical strengths and weaknesses

The potential to instrumentalize drug use based upon the detection of very many different drug states undoubtedly exists, and such states may play a role in psychiatric and many other drug uses. Nevertheless, nonaddictive drug use is potentially more parsimoniously explained in terms of sensation seeking/impulsivity and drug expectations. Cultural factors also play a major role in nonaddictive drug use.

What happened to the voices? A fine-grained analysis of how hallucinations and delusions change under psychiatric treatment

The Psychiatric Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS) have demonstrated their usefulness for the dimensional assessment of hallucinations and delusions. However, there is no evaluated German version of the PSYRATS to date. Also, in spite of theoretical conceptions about "detaching" effects of antipsychotics, there are few consolidated findings about how core symptomatic aspects of schizophrenia change during antipsychotic treatment. The present study aimed to fill this gap. A total of 40 schizophrenic voice-hearers were interviewed three times during the course of six months using a newly developed German version of the PSYRATS with very good psychometric properties. At the same time, psychopathology was assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). In the longitudinal course, a general symptomatic decrease became apparent only for auditory hallucinations but not for delusions. Specifically, the loudness of the hallucinated voices as well as the associated distress decreased early, while other aspects of the hallucinations took more time to fade. In this study, the PSYRATS proved to be a valuable tool for measuring the change of specific symptom dimensions. However, our results only partially supported the notion of a general detachment from symptoms due to psychiatric treatment.

The emerging biology of delusions

This article examines a model of how delusions may arise, not just in schizophrenia but also in a number of neurological and psychiatric conditions, through a combination of dysregulated dopamine release from ascending midbrain pathways and reasoning bias. Negative symptoms may also be related to dopamine dysregulation, with the precise mixture of positive and negative symptoms depending on the relative degree of dopamine dysregulation in particular mesocorticolimbic circuits. Evidence for this model is examined, and predictions arising from this model are described.

Neuronal correlates of affective theory of mind in schizophrenia out-patients: evidence for a baseline deficit

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia out-patients have deficits in affective theory of mind (ToM) but also on more basal levels of social cognition, such as the processing of neutral and emotional expressions. These deficits are associated with changes in brain activation in the amygdala and the superior temporal sulcus (STS). However, until now there have been no studies that examined these different levels of social cognition and their neurobiological underpinnings in patients within one design.

METHOD

Sixteen medicated schizophrenia out-patients and 16 matched healthy controls were studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a social cognition task that allows the investigation of affective ToM (aToM), emotion recognition and the processing of neutral facial expressions.

RESULTS

Patients showed a deficit in emotion recognition and a more prominent deficit in aToM. The performance in aToM and in emotion recognition was correlated in the control group but not in the schizophrenia group. Region-of-interest analysis of functional brain imaging data revealed no difference between groups during aToM, but a hyperactivation in the schizophrenia group in the left amygdala and right STS during emotion recognition and the processing of neutral facial expressions.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that schizophrenia out-patients have deficits at several levels of social cognition and provide the first evidence that deficits on higher-order social cognitive processes in schizophrenia may be traced back to an aberrant processing of faces per se.

Challenging conventional models of psychiatric drug therapy: an alternative patient-centered approach

Modern psychopharmacology is based on the presumption that psychiatric drugs work by helping to correct an underlying abnormal brain state, or a chemical imbalance. For this article, i have termed this the disease-centered model of psychiatric drug action. Educational and advertising campaigns that have promoted this notion have resulted in soaring rates of use of drugs such as antidepressants and antipsychotics. However, drug action has not always been understood in these terms. This article challenges the disease-centered model of psychiatric drug action, and presents an alternative drug-centered view. The drug-centered model is based on the understanding that psychiatric drugs have psychoactive properties. They produce altered, drug-induced states in the individuals who take them, which may suppress the symptoms of mental disorders. Greater knowledge regarding the drug-induced effects of psychiatric drugs would help patients and prescribers to assess the pros and cons of drug treatment more accurately, and to use drugs more effectively. Further implications of this view are discussed.

A critique of the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia and psychosis

The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia and psychosis originated from observations of the dopamine-blocking actions of early neuroleptic drugs. These results support the dopamine hypothesis, however, only on the assumption that the drugs act by reversing an underlying disease mechanism (or part of it). An alternative explanation is that the drugs work by inducing a state of neurological suppression that reduces the intensity of symptoms. Although stimulant drugs are known to induce episodes of psychosis, the mechanism for stimulant-induced psychosis has not been clarified, and stimulants are known to affect many neurotransmitters other than dopamine. Recent imaging studies suggest that there may be increased dopamine release in response to amphetamine administration compared to controls. Some studies indicate increased uptake of L-dopa in parts of the striatum, but some do not. The potential confounding effects of factors associated with dopamine release--such as movement, arousal, attention, stress, and smoking--have rarely been examined, and prior medication use may also have influenced results in some studies. Comparable research on other psychiatric conditions associated with increased arousal, stress, and physical activity is sparse. Research on dopamine concentrations in postmortem brain tissue, on homovanillic acid concentrations, and on dopamine receptors has been negative or inconclusive. Therefore, the idea that the symptoms of psychosis or schizophrenia are caused by the overactivity of dopamine is not supported by current evidence.

The subjective experience of taking antipsychotic medication: a content analysis of Internet data

OBJECTIVE

We explored the subjective effects associated with olanzapine, risperidone and older antipsychotics.

METHOD

We conducted a content analysis of an Internet database of comments about prescribed medications.

RESULTS

We analysed 223 comments on risperidone, 170 on olanzapine and 46 relating to three older antipsychotics. The predominant subjective effects produced by all drugs consisted of sedation, cognitive impairment and emotional flattening or indifference. Connections appeared between these effects and Parkinsonian-like symptoms with the older drugs, sexual impairment with risperidone and metabolic effects with olanzapine. The experience of akathisia was frequently linked to suicidal thoughts. Some respondents described how the drugs' subjective effects helped to reduce symptoms of mania, psychosis and anxiety.

CONCLUSION

The generalisability of Internet data is uncertain. However, the data suggest that adverse subjective effects play a central role in the experience of taking antipsychotic drugs and may be related to the drugs' desired benefits.

How do psychiatric drugs work?

Joanna Moncrieff and David Cohen argue that changing our view of the action of psychiatric drugs would help patients to become more involved with decisions about treatment

Potentiation of olanzapine substitution in rats discriminating clozapine by the D2/3 agonist quinpirole

The D2/3 agonist (+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine (PHNO) has been reported to enhance the ability of olanzapine to substitute for clozapine and attenuate olanzapine-induced response suppression in monkeys. These data suggest that the relatively marked D2/3 antagonist actions of olanzapine limit its substitution for clozapine. The work reported here replicated and extended these findings. Twelve rats were trained to discriminate clozapine (5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) from vehicle in an FR30 quantal food rewarded assay. The substitution curve for olanzapine (0-2.5 mg/kg) was then computed after treatment with either vehicle or a high dose (0.1 mg/kg) of the D2/3 agonist quinpirole. The olanzapine substitution curve was shifted significantly 5.2-fold in parallel to the left by quinpirole. Olanzapine suppressed responding significantly, but this effect was not attenuated or enhanced by quinpirole, which suppressed responding itself. Thus antagonist actions at D2/3 receptors clearly limit the ability of olanzapine to substitute for clozapine. These findings suggest that the clozapine versus vehicle discrimination is probably a bioassay for agents that resemble clozapine but which do not necessarily induce D2/3 antagonism. This discrimination may therefore not specifically detect clozapine-like antipsychotics, although it may be of value in developing such antipsychotics. The low discriminability of antipsychotics in general may be because antagonist actions at D2/3 receptors limit incentive salience in discrimination assays. These data are compatible with recent theorizing that therapeutic actions of antipsychotics in schizophrenia involve D2/3 receptor-mediated attenuation of stimulus salience.

The selective effect of antipsychotics on the different dimensions of the experience of psychosis in schizophrenia spectrum disorders

While most standard symptom scales regard the 'psychotic' or 'positive' dimension of schizophrenia as a single factor, several lines of evidence suggest that psychosis itself is a multidimensional phenomenon. The foregoing literature suggested at least five distinct dimensions to psychosis; to test this, we developed, validated and applied an instrument to measure these dimensions and then applied it to examine the effect of antipsychotics on the different dimensions of the psychotic experience. The Dimensions of Psychosis Instrument (DIPI) was administered to 91 psychotic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and a confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) was carried out to examine the five dimensions: cognitive preoccupation (CP) with the psychotic experience; emotional involvement (EM); behavioural impact (BI) of the experience; conviction (CO) in it; emotional; and external perspective (EP) about the experience. In a separate cohort of 17 prospectively treated patients, the impact of antipsychotics on these dimensions was assessed. BI showed the greatest improvement (32%) at 2 weeks, while CP and emotional improved somewhat less (22% and 14%, respectively). Improvement in CO was limited (6%) while EP showed no change. These results suggest that over the first few weeks of treatment, antipsychotics rapidly reduce the behavioural impact of the principal psychotic symptom and decrease cognitive and emotional preoccupation with it, without greatly altering the patients' conviction in or perspective about their psychotic experience.

The relationship between patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes in schizophrenia

In recent years, the goals of treatment in schizophrenia have evolved from objective improvements in psychotic symptoms to encompass patient-related factors such as subjective response and quality of life. In order to examine factors that influence patient satisfaction with treatment, subjective quality of life and subjective response to treatment, two literature searches were performed using PubMed. The first searched for articles of any kind with no time limits using the search parameters 'schizophrenia AND satisfaction', 'antipsychotic AND satisfaction', 'schizophrenia AND subjective response', 'schizophrenia AND therapeutic alliance', 'schizophrenia AND psychosocial OR psychoeducation'. Secondly, PubMed was searched between January 1990 and December 2005 using the key words 'satisfaction', 'subjective response' and 'quality of life' in combination with an array of atypical agents. Results demonstrated that patient satisfaction with antipsychotic therapy is influenced by multiple factors. The most frequently reported reasons for dissatisfaction include drug side effects, lack of involvement in treatment planning or decision-making and lack of involvement of family members in the care plan. The majority of studies have demonstrated that the atypical antipsychotics are associated with significant improvements in quality of life, functional status and patient satisfaction compared with conventional agents. The therapeutic alliance is key to achieving optimal outcomes, by providing information and education to meet patients' needs, while facilitating compliance with drug therapy to ensure better clinical outcomes. A long-acting atypical antipsychotic that can ensure medication delivery will provide a platform for psychosocial interventions, and thus may further increase patient satisfaction and, ultimately, improve long-term outcomes in schizophrenia.

How antipsychotics work-from receptors to reality

How does a small molecule blocking a few receptors change a patients' passionately held paranoid belief that the FBI is out to get him? To address this central puzzle of antipsychotic action, we review a framework linking dopamine neurochemistry to psychosis, and then link this framework to the mechanism of action of antipsychotics. Normal dopamine transmission has a role in predicting novel rewards and in marking and responding to motivationally salient stimuli. Abnormal dopamine transmission alters these processes and results in an aberrant sense of novelty and inappropriate assignment of salience leading to the experience of psychosis. Antipsychotics improve psychosis by diminishing this abnormal transmission by blocking the dopamine D2/3 receptor (not D1 or D4), and although several brain regions may be involved, it is suggested that the ventral striatal regions (analog of the nucleus accumbens in animals) may have a particularly critical role. Contrary to popular belief, the antipsychotic effect is not delayed in its onset, but starts within the first few days. There is more improvement in the first 2 weeks, than in any subsequent 2-week period thereafter. However, a simple organic molecule cannot target the complex phenomenology of the individual psychotic experience. Antipsychotics diminish dopamine transmission and thereby dampen the salience of the pre-occupying symptoms. Therefore, in the initial stage of an antipsychotic response, the patients experience a detachment from symptoms, a relegation of the delusions and hallucinations to the back of their minds, rather than a complete erasure of the symptoms. Only with time, and only in some, via the mediation of new learning and plasticity, is there a complete resolution of symptoms. The implications of these findings for clinical care, animal models, future target discovery and drug development are discussed.