pH-dependent inhibition of tetrodotoxin-resistant Na(+) channels by diclofenac in rat nociceptive neurons

Ibuprofen modulates tetrodotoxin-resistant persistent Na+ currents at acidic pH in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to relieve various symptoms such as headache, arthralgia, and dental pain. While the primary mechanism of NSAID-based pain relief is the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2, several NSAIDs also modulate other molecular targets related to nociceptive transmission such as voltage-gated Na+ channels. In the present study, we examined the effects of NSAIDs on persistent Na+ current (INaP) mediated by tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) Na+ channels in small-to medium-sized trigeminal ganglion neurons using a whole-cell patch-clamp technique. At clinically relevant concentrations, all propionic acid derivatives tested (ibuprofen, naproxen, fenoprofen, and flurbiprofen) preferentially inhibited the TTX-R INaP. The inhibition was more potent at acidic extracellular pH (pH 6.5) than at normal pH (pH 7.4). Other NSAIDs, such as ketorolac, piroxicam, and aspirin, had a negligible effect on the TTX-R INaP. Ibuprofen both accelerated the onset of inactivation and retarded the recovery from inactivation of TTX-R Na+ channels at acidic extracellular pH. However, all NSAIDs tested in this study had minor effects on voltage-gated K+ currents, as well as hyperpolarization-activated and cyclic nucleotide-gated cation currents, at both acidic and normal extracellular pH. Under current-clamp conditions, ibuprofen decreased the number of action potentials elicited by depolarizing current stimuli at acidic (pH 6.5) extracellular pH. Considering that extracellular pH falls as low as 5.5 in inflamed tissues, TTX-R INaP inhibition could be a mechanism by which ibuprofen and propionic acid derivative NSAIDs modulate inflammatory pain.

Combinations of classical and non-classical voltage dependent potassium channel openers suppress nociceptor discharge and reverse chronic pain signs in a rat model of Gulf War illness

In a companion paper we examined whether combinations of K_v7 channel openers (Retigabine and Diclofenac; RET, DIC) could be effective modifiers of deep tissue nociceptor activity; and whether such combinations could then be optimized for use as safe analgesics for pain-like signs that developed in a rat model of GWI (Gulf War Illness) pain. In the present report, we examined the combinations of Retigabine/Meclofenamate (RET/MEC) and Meclofenamate/Diclofenac (MEC/DIC). Voltage clamp experiments were performed on deep tissue nociceptors isolated from rat DRG (dorsal root ganglion). In voltage clamp studies, a stepped voltage protocol was applied (-55 to -40 mV; V_h=-60 mV; 1500 msec) and K_v7 evoked currents were subsequently isolated by Linopirdine subtraction. MEC greatly enhanced voltage dependent conductance and produced exceptional maximum sustained currents of 6.01 ± 0.26 pA/pF (EC₅₀: 62.2 ± 8.99 μM). Combinations of RET/MEC, and MEC/DIC substantially amplified resting currents at low concentrations. MEC/DIC also greatly improved voltage dependent conductance. In current clamp experiments, a cholinergic challenge test (Oxotremorine-M, 10 μM; OXO), associated with our GWI rat model, produced powerful action potential (AP) bursts (85 APs). Optimized combinations of RET/MEC (5 and 0.5 μM) and MEC/DIC (0.5 and 2.5 μM) significantly reduced AP discharges to 3 and 7 Aps, respectively. Treatment of pain-like ambulatory behavior in our rat model with a RET/MEC combination (5 and 0.5 mg/kg) successfully rescued ambulation deficits, but could not be fully separated from the effect of RET alone. Further development of this approach is recommended.

Development of KVO treatment strategies for chronic pain in a rat model of Gulf War Illness

We examined whether combinations of K_v7 channel openers could be effective modifiers of deep tissue nociceptor activity; and whether such combinations could then be optimized for use as safe analgesics for pain-like signs that developed in a rat model of GWI (Gulf War Illness) pain. Voltage clamp experiments were performed on subclassified nociceptors isolated from rat DRG (dorsal root ganglion). A stepped voltage protocol was applied (-55 to -40 mV; V_h = -60 mV; 1500 ms) and K_v7 evoked currents were subsequently isolated by linopirdine subtraction. Directly activated and voltage activated K⁺ currents were characterized in the presence and absence of Retigabine (5-100 μM) and/or Diclofenac (50-140 μM). Retigabine produced substantial voltage dependent effects and a maximal sustained current of 1.14 pA/pF ± 0.15 (ED₅₀: 62.7 ± 3.18 μM). Diclofenac produced weak voltage dependent effects but a similar maximum sustained current of 1.01 ± 0.26 pA/pF (ED₅₀: 93.2 ± 8.99 μM). Combinations of Retigabine and Diclofenac substantially amplified resting currents but had little effect on voltage dependence. Using a cholinergic challenge test (Oxotremorine, 10 μM) associated with our GWI rat model, combinations of Retigabine (5 uM) and Diclofenac (2.5, 20 and 50 μM) substantially reduced or totally abrogated action potential discharge to the cholinergic challenge. When combinations of Retigabine and Diclofenac were used to relieve pain-signs in our rat model of GWI, only those combinations associated with serious subacute side effects could relieve pain-like behaviors.

Inhibition of Fast Nerve Conduction Produced by Analgesics and Analgesic Adjuvants-Possible Involvement in Pain Alleviation

Nociceptive information is transmitted from the periphery to the cerebral cortex mainly by action potential (AP) conduction in nerve fibers and chemical transmission at synapses. Although this nociceptive transmission is largely inhibited at synapses by analgesics and their adjuvants, it is possible that the antinociceptive drugs inhibit nerve AP conduction, contributing to their antinociceptive effects. Many of the drugs are reported to inhibit the nerve conduction of AP and voltage-gated Na⁺ and K⁺ channels involved in its production. Compound action potential (CAP) is a useful measure to know whether drugs act on nerve AP conduction. Clinically-used analgesics and analgesic adjuvants (opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ₂-adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and local anesthetics) were found to inhibit fast-conducting CAPs recorded from the frog sciatic nerve by using the air-gap method. Similar actions were produced by antinociceptive plant-derived chemicals. Their inhibitory actions depended on the concentrations and chemical structures of the drugs. This review article will mention the inhibitory actions of the antinociceptive compounds on CAPs in frog and mammalian peripheral (particularly, sciatic) nerves and on voltage-gated Na⁺ and K⁺ channels involved in AP production. Nerve AP conduction inhibition produced by analgesics and analgesic adjuvants is suggested to contribute to at least a part of their antinociceptive effects.

Inhibition by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs of compound action potentials in frog sciatic nerve fibers

AIMS

Although antinociception produced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is partly attributed to nerve conduction inhibition, this has not been thoroughly examined yet. The aim of the present study was to reveal quantitatively how various types of NSAIDs affect compound action potentials (CAPs), a measure of nerve conduction.

MAIN METHODS

CAPs were recorded from the frog sciatic nerve by using the air-gap method.

KEY FINDINGS

Soaking the sciatic nerve with acetic acid-based NSAIDs (diclofenac and aceclofenac) reduced the peak amplitude of CAP in a concentration-dependent manner; their IC₅₀ values were 0.94 and 0.47 mM, respectively. Other acetic acid-based NSAIDs (indomethacin, acemetacin and etodolac) also inhibited CAPs [the extent of inhibition: some 40% (1 mM), 40% (0.5 mM) and 15% (1 mM), respectively], except for sulindac and felbinac at 1 mM that had no effects on CAP peak amplitudes. A similar inhibition was produced by fenamic acid-based NSAIDs [tolfenamic acid (IC₅₀ = 0.29 mM), meclofenamic acid (0.19 mM), flufenamic acid (0.22 mM) and mefenamic acid] which are similar in chemical structure to diclofenac and aceclofenac; their derivatives (2,6-dichlorodiphenylamine and N-phenylanthranilic acid) also inhibited. On the other hand, salicylic acid-based (aspirin), propionic acid-based (ketoprofen, naproxen, ibuprofen, loxoprofen and flurbiprofen) and enolic acid-based (meloxicam and piroxicam) NSAIDs had no effects on CAP peak amplitudes.

SIGNIFICANCE

At least a part of antinociception produced by NSAIDs used as a dermatological drug to alleviate pain may be attributed to their inhibitory effects on nerve conduction, which depend on the chemical structures of NSAIDs.

Muscle Injury After Intramuscular Administration of Diclofenac: A Case Report Supported by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intramuscular injection of diclofenac is still frequently practiced, although there is ample evidence that the risk of local tissue intolerability is highly underestimated. The aim of this study was to evaluate local toxicity in a patient using magnetic resonance imaging. A patient who gave written informed consent received a medically indicated intramuscular administration of diclofenac 75 mg/2 mL. Simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging of the depot, a clinical–chemical evaluation and quantification of diclofenac in plasma was performed. A manifold enhancement of the T2-weighted magnetic resonance signal was observed in a muscle area of approximately 60 mL volume, with maximum signal intensity 30 min after injection, the time of maximum diclofenac plasma exposure. Plasma creatine kinase activity was elevated approximately sixfold within 8 h and normalized within 1 week, whereas the magnetic resonance enhancement disappeared within 5 weeks. Interestingly, the patient did not complain about any clinical symptoms at the injection site. Asymptomatic tissue injury after intramuscular injection of diclofenac, caused by intramuscular dosing, can be reliably evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging and should be applied early during the development of parenteral dosage forms.

Clinical Trials Registration Number: BB130/16 (Ethics Committee of the University Medicine Greifswald).

Indomethacin inhibits tetrodotoxin-resistant Na(+) channels at acidic pH in rat nociceptive neurons

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are well-known inhibitors of cyclooxygenases (COXs) and are widely used for the treatment of inflammatory pain; however several NSAIDs display COX-independent analgesic action including the inhibition of voltage-gated Na(+) channels expressed in primary afferent neurons. In the present study, we examined whether NSAIDs modulate tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) Na(+) channels and if this modulation depends on the extracellular pH. The TTX-R Na(+) currents were recorded from small-sized trigeminal ganglion neurons by using a whole-cell patch clamp technique. Among eight NSAIDs tested in this study, several drugs, including aspirin and ibuprofen, did not affect TTX-R Na(+) channels either at pH 7.4 or at pH 6.0. However, we found that indomethacin, and, to a lesser extent, ibuprofen and naproxen potently inhibited the peak amplitude of TTX-R Na(+) currents at pH 6.0. The indomethacin-induced inhibition of TTX-R Na(+) channels was more potent at depolarized membrane potentials. Indomethacin significantly shifted both the voltage-activation and voltage-inactivation relationships to depolarizing potentials at pH 6.0. Indomethacin accelerated the development of inactivation and retarded the recovery from inactivation of TTX-R Na(+) channels at pH 6.0. Given that indomethacin and several other NSAIDs could further suppress local nociceptive signals by inhibiting TTX-R Na(+) channels at an acidic pH in addition to the classical COX inhibition, these drugs could be particularly useful for the treatment of inflammatory pain.