1
|
Hart XM, Gründer G, Ansermot N, Conca A, Corruble E, Crettol S, Cumming P, Hefner G, Frajerman A, Howes O, Jukic MM, Kim E, Kim S, Maniscalco I, Moriguchi S, Müller DJ, Nakajima S, Osugo M, Paulzen M, Ruhe HG, Scherf-Clavel M, Schoretsanitis G, Serretti A, Spina E, Spigset O, Steimer W, Süzen SH, Uchida H, Unterecker S, Vandenberghe F, Verstuyft C, Zernig G, Hiemke C, Eap CB. Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: Focus on antipsychotics. World J Biol Psychiatry 2024:1-86. [PMID: 38913780 DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2024.2366235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialised tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalise drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging. METHODS In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 45 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)). RESULTS Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings. CONCLUSION All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimise treatment effects, minimise side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalised drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xenia Marlene Hart
- Department of Molecular Neuroimaging, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Gerhard Gründer
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Partner Site Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicolas Ansermot
- Department of Psychiatry, Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, Prilly, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Conca
- Dipartimento di Psichiatria, Comprensorio Sanitario di Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Emmanuelle Corruble
- Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Equipe MOODS, Inserm U1018, CESP (Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Sante des Populations), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Severine Crettol
- Department of Psychiatry, Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, Prilly, Switzerland
| | - Paul Cumming
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
- School of Psychology and Counseling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Gudrun Hefner
- Forensic Psychiatry, Vitos Clinic for Forensic Psychiatry, Eltville, Germany
| | - Ariel Frajerman
- Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Equipe MOODS, Inserm U1018, CESP (Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Sante des Populations), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Oliver Howes
- Department of Psychosis Studies, IoPPN, King's College London, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences (ICS), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Marin M Jukic
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
- Pharmacogenetics Section, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Euitae Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seoyoung Kim
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Ignazio Maniscalco
- Dipartimento di Psichiatria, Comprensorio Sanitario di Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Sho Moriguchi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel J Müller
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Pharmacogenetics Research Clinic, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shinichiro Nakajima
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Martin Osugo
- Department of Psychosis Studies, IoPPN, King's College London, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences (ICS), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Paulzen
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- JARA - Translational Brain Medicine, Alexianer Center for Mental Health, Aachen, Germany
| | - Henricus Gerardus Ruhe
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Maike Scherf-Clavel
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Georgios Schoretsanitis
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Edoardo Spina
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Olav Spigset
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Werner Steimer
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sinan H Süzen
- Department of Pharmaceutic Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hiroyuki Uchida
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stefan Unterecker
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Frederik Vandenberghe
- Department of Psychiatry, Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, Prilly, Switzerland
| | - Celine Verstuyft
- Equipe MOODS, Inserm U1018, CESP (Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Sante des Populations), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Pharmacogenetics and Hormonology, Bicêtre University Hospital Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Gerald Zernig
- Department of Pharmacology, Medical University Innsbruck, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Private Practice for Psychotherapy and Court-Certified Witness, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Christoph Hiemke
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Chin B Eap
- Department of Psychiatry, Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, Prilly, Switzerland
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- Center for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pennazio F, Brasso C, Villari V, Rocca P. Current Status of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Mental Health Treatment: A Review. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14122674. [PMID: 36559168 PMCID: PMC9783500 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) receives growing interest in different psychiatric clinical settings (emergency, inpatient, and outpatient services). Despite its usefulness, TDM remains underemployed in mental health. This is partly due to the need for evidence about the relationship between drug serum concentration and efficacy and tolerability, both in the general population and even more in subpopulations with atypical pharmacokinetics. This work aims at reviewing the scientific literature published after 2017, when the most recent guidelines about the use of TDM in mental health were written. We found 164 pertinent records that we included in the review. Some promising studies highlighted the possibility of correlating early drug serum concentration and clinical efficacy and safety, especially for antipsychotics, potentially enabling clinicians to make decisions on early laboratory findings and not proceeding by trial and error. About populations with pharmacokinetic peculiarities, the latest studies confirmed very common alterations in drug blood levels in pregnant women, generally with a progressive decrease over pregnancy and a very relevant dose-adjusted concentration increase in the elderly. For adolescents also, several drugs result in having different dose-related concentration values compared to adults. These findings stress the recommendation to use TDM in these populations to ensure a safe and effective treatment. Moreover, the integration of TDM with pharmacogenetic analyses may allow clinicians to adopt precise treatments, addressing therapy on an individual pharmacometabolic basis. Mini-invasive TDM procedures that may be easily performed at home or in a point-of-care are very promising and may represent a turning point toward an extensive real-world TDM application. Although the highlighted recent evidence, research efforts have to be carried on: further studies, especially prospective and fixed-dose, are needed to replicate present findings and provide clearer knowledge on relationships between dose, serum concentration, and efficacy/safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Pennazio
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Claudio Brasso
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Vincenzo Villari
- Psychiatric Emergency Service, Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, A.O.U. “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino”, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Rocca
- Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lähteenvuo M, Tiihonen J. Antipsychotic Polypharmacy for the Management of Schizophrenia: Evidence and Recommendations. Drugs 2021; 81:1273-1284. [PMID: 34196945 PMCID: PMC8318953 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01556-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a debilitating illness with a lifetime prevalence estimate of 0.6% and consists of symptoms from the positive, negative, and cognitive domains. Social support, therapy, psychoeducation, and overall case management are very important aspects of the treatment of schizophrenia. However, as abnormalities in neurotransmission are one of the key findings of schizophrenia pathology, pharmacotherapies are cornerstones of the management of schizophrenia. Antipsychotics have been used as the primary pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. These agents often have a good effect on reducing positive symptoms, but may not markedly improve negative symptoms or cognitive defects. However, at least 20% of individuals with schizophrenia do not experience a substantial response from monotherapy with antipsychotics. Further, despite evolving treatment protocols and advances in early recognition of the disorder, 70% of patients with schizophrenia require long-term, even lifetime, medication to control their symptoms and do not achieve complete recovery. To address these shortcomings, clinicians and research scientists have explored different combinations of treatments, polypharmacy, to improve the treatment of patients. Antipsychotic polypharmacy has been shown to cause more side effects than monotherapy, which is the main reason why most treatment guidelines caution against it. Antipsychotic monotherapy should be strived for and clozapine should be tried at the latest if two monotherapy trials with other antipsychotics have failed and no absolute contraindications exist. If residual symptoms exist despite trials of adequate dose and duration, other reasons that may reduce treatment effect should be ruled out. Long-acting injectables or blood concentration measurements should be considered to affirm compliance and proper serum levels. Antipsychotic polypharmacy should be considered and discussed with patients from whom the aforementioned procedures do not produce a satisfactory treatment result. In some cases, antipsychotic polypharmacy may produce better results than other forms of treatment augmentation, such as benzodiazepines. In particular, combining aripiprazole with clozapine may be effective in reducing treatment side effects or residual symptoms, and this is likely to hold true for combining other partial dopamine D2 agonists with clozapine as well, although currently scant data exist. More research is needed, both in controlled but also real-world settings, to define optimal antipsychotic polypharmacy and/or other psychotropic treatment augmentation strategies for specific patient groups and situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markku Lähteenvuo
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvankuja 65, 70240, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Jari Tiihonen
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvankuja 65, 70240, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm City Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|