Comparable investigation of binding interactions between three arene ruthenium(II) thiosemicarbazone complexes and calf thymus DNA

Potent saccharinate-containing palladium(II) complexes for sensitization to cancer therapy

Palladium(II) (Pd^II) complexes are among the most promising anticancer compounds. Both 2`-benzoylpyridine thiosemicarbazone (BpT) and saccharinate (Sac) are efficient metal chelators with potent anticancer activity. To explore a more effective new anticancer drug, we synthesized a series of Sac and BpT-containing Pd^II complexes coordinated with thiosemicarbazone (TSC)-derived ligands, and characterized them through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), elemental analysis, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Each target complex was composed of Pd^II, BpT, and one or two Sac molecules. Both the in vitro and in vivo anti-growth effects of those ligands and the obtained Pd^II complexes were investigated in the human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines A549 and Spc-A1. The coordination of Pd^II with the TSC-derivatives and Sac resulted in clearly greater anticancer activity than single ligands. These compounds were demonstrated to be safe for 293 T normal human kidney epithelial cells. The introduction of Sac into the TSC-derived Pd^II complex significantly enhanced anti-growth effects, and induced apoptosis of human lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo in a dose dependent manner. Moreover, the Pd^II complex containing two Sac molecules showed the most promising therapeutic effects, thereby confirming that Sac increases the cancer therapeutic efficacy of Pd^II complexes and providing a new strategy for exploring anticancer drugs for potential clinical treatment.

Comparative Studies on DNA-Binding Mechanisms between Enantiomers of a Polypyridyl Ruthenium(II) Complex

A pair of ruthenium(II) complex enantiomers, Δ- and Λ-[Ru(bpy)₂MBIP]²⁺ (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, MBIP = 2-(3-bromophenyl)imidazo[5,6-f]phenanthroline), were designed, synthesized, and characterized. Comparative studies between the enantiomers on their binding behaviors to calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) were conducted using UV-visible, fluorescence, and circular dichroism spectroscopies, viscosity measurements, isothermal titration calorimetry, a photocleavage experiment, and molecular simulation. The experimental results indicated that both the enantiomers spontaneously bound to CT-DNA through intercalation stabilized by the van der Waals force or the hydrogen bond and driven by enthalpy and that Δ-[Ru(bpy)₂MBIP]²⁺ intercalated into DNA more deeply than Λ-[Ru(bpy)₂MBIP]²⁺ did and exhibited a better DNA photocleavage ability. Molecular simulation further indicated that Δ-[Ru(bpy)₂MBIP]²⁺ more preferentially intercalated between the base pairs of CT-DNA to the major groove, and Λ-[Ru(bpy)₂MBIP]²⁺ more favorably intercalated to the minor groove. These research findings should be very helpful to the understanding of the stereoselectivity mechanism of DNA-bindings of metal complexes, and be useful for the design of novel metal-complex-based antitumor drugs with higher efficacy and lower toxicity.

Cytotoxicity evaluation and DNA interaction of RuII-bipy complexes containing coumarin-based ligands

Although there are various treatment options for cancer, this disease still has caused an increasing number of deaths, demanding more efficient, selective and less harmful drugs. Several classes of ruthenium compounds have been investigated as metallodrugs for cancer, mainly after the entry of imidazolH [trans-RuCl₄-(DMSO-S)(imidazole)] (NAMI-A) and indazolH [trans-RuCl₄-(Indazol)₂] (KP1019) in clinical trials. In this sense, Ru^II complexes with general formula [Ru(L1-3)(bipy)₂]PF₆ (1-3) (L1 = ethyl 3-(6-methyl-2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)-3-oxopropanoate, L2 = ethyl 3-(7-(diethylamino)-2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)-3-oxopropanoate, L3 = ethyl 3-(8-methoxy-2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)-3-oxopropanoate and bipy = bipyridine) have been synthesized. The crystal structure of 2 revealed that the Ru^II atom lies on a distorted octahedral geometry with the deprotonated ligand (L2^-) coordinated through β-ketoester group oxygen atoms. In vitro cytotoxic activity of the compounds was evaluated against 4T1 (murine mammary carcinoma) and B16-F10 (murine metastatic melanoma) tumor cells, and the non-tumor cell line BHK-21 (baby hamster kidney). Coordination with Ru^II resulted in expressive enhancement of cytotoxic activity. The precursors were inactive below 100 μM and the final Ru^II complexes (1-3) showed IC₅₀ ranging from 2.0 to 12.8 μM; 2 being the most potent compound. DNA interaction studies revealed a greater capacity of the complexes to interact with DNA than the ligands, where, 2 exhibited the highest K_b constant of 2.2 × 10⁴ M^-1. Fluorescence investigation demonstrated that 1-3 are capable of quenching the fluorescence emission of the EtdBr-DNA complex up to 40%. Molecular docking showed that the interaction of 1-3 between the DNA base pairs from the coumarin portion was with scores of 67.28, 68.62 and 64.88, respectively, and 75.45 for ellipticine, suggesting an intercalative mode of binding. Our findings show that the Ru^II complexes are eligible for continuing to be investigated as potential antitumor compounds.