Medical Care of the Homeless: An American and International Issue

Characterization of Polymicrobial and Antibiotic-Resistant Infectious Keratitis in a County Hospital Setting

Purpose

Infectious keratitis is a serious cause of visual impairment, particularly in low-income communities. This study examines the associations between social risk factors and polymicrobial keratitis, multidrug resistance, pathogen spectrum, and outcomes at a county hospital.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital patients treated for infectious keratitis from 2010-2021. Multivariable regression was performed to analyze the relationships between social, medical, and psychiatric risk factors with polymicrobial growth, multidrug resistance, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Of 174 patients with infectious keratitis, 44 (25%) had polymicrobial growth. Six patients (14%) with polymicrobial growth had multidrug-resistant organisms. Homeless patients were more likely to present with polymicrobial infection (OR 3.4, p = 0.023), and polymicrobial infections were associated with multidrug-resistant organisms (p = 0.018). Smoking, drug use, HIV positivity, prior corneal pathology, and contact lens use were not associated with an increased risk of polymicrobial infection. Eleven patients (6.3%) were started on topical antibiotics prior to presentation; of these, none developed polymicrobial infections or multidrug-resistant organisms. Polymicrobial infections increased the likelihood to initiation of fortified antibiotics (OR 2.9, p = 0.011) but did not impact ulcer size, final visual acuity, time to resolution, or likelihood of emergent procedures.

Conclusions

Homelessness correlates with an increased risk of polymicrobial keratitis and subsequent multidrug resistance, supporting initiation of broad antibiotic coverage in this population. Prior topical antibiotics did not increase risk of polymicrobial infection. Polymicrobial infection did not significantly worsen clinical outcomes.

Saúde dos indivíduos em situação de rua

Introdução: A população em situação de rua é vulnerabilizada por diversos fatores que determinam ou condicionam sua saúde e ocasionam aumento dos índices de comorbidades clínicas, entre elas as doenças mentais, crônicas e infectocontagiosas. A marginalização dos indivíduos que se encontram em situação de rua abre uma lacuna na assistência em saúde que, por vezes, é suprida por organizações sem fins lucrativos que exercem um papel social elementar. Objetivo: Mapear o perfil clínico da população em situação de rua de Curitiba (PR) atendida por iniciativa voluntária no período de um ano. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo observacional descritivo de base documental realizado com fichas clínicas dos 509 pacientes maiores de 18 anos e que tiveram seu primeiro atendimento médico realizado pela Associação Médicos do Mundo, filial Curitiba (PR), no ano de 2019. Resultados: Indivíduos do sexo masculino, de etnia branca, faixa etária entre 36 e 45 anos, que cursaram o ensino fundamental e que se encontravam havia menos de um ano em situação de rua foram as condições sociodemográficas predominantes. As principais queixas motivadoras da procura pelo atendimento foram dor (45,19%), lesões cutâneas (15,71%) e queixas oftalmológicas (6,68%). Parte dos indivíduos mostrou acometimento crônico por hipertensão arterial sistêmica (9,03%), HIV/AIDS (3,53%) e diabetes mellitus (3,53%). Também foi identificada quantidade significativa de relatos de histórico de traumas físicos (59%). Encontrou-se correlação estatística entre hipertensão e medicamentos de uso contínuo (p=0,001). Menos que 10% dos indivíduos procuraram atendimento médico por queixas de saúde mental. Das mulheres que fizerem parte do estudo, 70% relataram fazer uso de substâncias e aproximadamente metade delas, uso regular de medicamentos. Já o uso de anticoncepcionais foi relatado por uma minoria delas (18,57%). Conclusões: As queixas de dor, as lesões cutâneas e as demandas oftalmológicas foram os principais motivadores da procura por ajuda médica pela população em situação de rua, além da prevalência de hipertensão arterial sistêmica como doença crônica. Os achados podem auxiliar e direcionar ações em saúde voltadas para essa população marginalizada.

Innovation and partnerships: Meeting the health care needs of a houseless population

Achieving health equity in the houseless population will take innovation, collaboration, and forward-thinking alternative models of health care. Using a foundation of disruptive innovation and an evidence-based care model, a group of nurses drew upon established partnerships to create Oregon's first nurse-owned and fully nurse-operated clinic serving the houseless population. The Harrington Health Clinic offers primary care, mental and behavioral health care, health and wellness, palliative care, and telemedicine services to men in a transitional housing program. Since its launch in January 2021, the clinic has served over 100 men spanning nearly 400 visits. The clinic attributes much of its success to registered nurses and nurse practitioners operating at the top of their scope, an academic affiliation that promotes learning-centered practices, and partnership with organizations similarly committed to just and equitable care. Through high quality, equitable primary care, this nurse managed and owned clinic has created a replicable solution that can impact houseless populations across the country.

Prevalence of Otolaryngology Diseases in an Urban Homeless Population

OBJECTIVE

Otolaryngology diseases are common among people experiencing homelessness; however, they are seldom evaluated in a specialist setting, and investigations on their prevalence have rarely been conducted. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prevalence of otolaryngology conditions in an urban homeless population.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Primary health care facility.

METHODS

The clinical records of patients referred to the medical facilities of the Primary Care Services of the Eleemosynaria Apostolica, Vatican City, between October 1, 2019, and July 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed; those reporting at least 1 otolaryngology disease were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 2516 records were retrospectively reviewed, and 484 (19.24%) were included in the study. The most common otolaryngology disease was pharyngotonsillitis (n = 118, 24.13%), followed by rhinitis with nasal obstruction (n = 107, 21.88%), hearing loss (n = 93, 19.01%), otitis (n = 81, 16.56%), abscess (n = 46, 9.40%), and sinusitis (n = 33, 6.74%). Head and neck cancer or precancerous lesions were reported in 34 subjects (7.02%). More than 1 simultaneous otolaryngology disorder was found in nearly 50% of our sample. A wide range of comorbidities was also reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm an elevated otolaryngology demand in the homeless population and encourage the development of more efficient and effective strategies for a population-tailored diagnosis and treatment of these conditions.

Visual and Ocular Conditions among a Homeless Adult Population of Boston

SIGNIFICANCE

The eye care needs of the homeless population in the United States are not well known. This study elucidates those needs for health care for the homeless programs and eye care practitioners. This information could result in an increase in the provision of necessary eye care services.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the extent of visual and ocular conditions, the frequency of eyeglass orders and receipt of eyeglasses, and the frequency of ophthalmology referrals and receipt of ophthalmological care in an adult homeless population in Boston.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective chart review was conducted for patients of the Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program's Pine Street Inn eye clinic from September 26, 2016, to December 31, 2017. Data on sociodemographics, medical history, comprehensive eye examination findings, glasses orders and receipt, and ophthalmology referrals and receipt of care were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 424 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the study population was 52.7 (interquartile range, 46 to 60), and the majority were male (74%). The most common systemic conditions were hypertension (40.6%) and diabetes (23.8%). The most common refractive error was presbyopia (67.7%), followed by astigmatism (38.9%), hyperopia (34.0%), and myopia (30.7%). The most common ocular conditions were dry eye (28.6%), visually or clinically significant cataract (20%), and glaucoma/glaucoma suspicion (13.9%). Refractive correction was indicated for 356 patients (84%), but 82 (29%) did not receive ordered eyeglasses. Ophthalmology referrals were placed for 61 patients (14.4%), yet only 20 (32.8%) of those referrals were completed.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant need for refractive correction and a large gap for ophthalmological care were found among the study population. Health care for the homeless programs and eye care practitioners should be aware of the visual and ocular needs of this patient population so as to better meet their needs.

The Impact of No Next of Kin Decision Makers on End-of-Life Care

For critically ill burn patients without a next of kin, the medical team is tasked with becoming the surrogate decision maker. This poses ethical and legal challenges for burn providers. Despite this frequent problem, there has been no investigation of how the presence of a next of kin affects treatment in burn patients. To evaluate this relationship, a retrospective chart review was performed on a cohort of patients who died during the acute phase of their burn care. Variables collected included age, gender, length of stay, total body surface area, course of treatment, and presence of a next of kin. In total, 67 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 14 (21%) did not have a next of kin involved in medical decisions. Patients without a next of kin were significantly younger (P = .02), more likely to be homeless (P < .01), had higher total body surface area burns (P = .008), had shorter length of stay (P < .001), and were five times less likely to receive comfort care (P = .01). Differences in gender and ethnicity were not statistically significant. We report that patients without a next of kin present to participate in medical decisions are transitioned to comfort care less often despite having a higher burden of injury. This disparity in standard of care demonstrates a need for a cultural shift in burn care to prevent the suffering of these marginalized patients. Burn providers should be empowered to reduce suffering when no decision maker is present.

Advancing the health of homeless populations through vaccinations

BACKGROUND

Homeless individuals and families are at an increased risk for contracting and transmitting communicable infections and diseases. Due to poor living conditions and limited access to health care resources, homeless people of all ages are vulnerable to acquiring communicable infections, such as pneumococcal pneumonia.

LOCAL PROBLEM

Less than 40% of sheltered and unsheltered homeless people in South Florida, who were interviewed for this project, knew their immunization status and/or were up-to-date with their recommended vaccine histories.

METHODS

The immunization project implemented a five-step process to provide pneumococcus (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23) and Prevnar 13 vaccinations to a convenience sample of adult homeless men and women (N = 209) participants, who completed the financial eligibility form (J11) during their intake process to admission, for sheltered services from two local clinics.

INTERVENTIONS

To promote herd immunity, the five-step process was followed. As per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, initial training was provided to homeless shelter health care providers on vaccine storage, handling, and vaccination. A subsequent 1-week follow-up was completed with participants to determine if any delayed vaccination adverse reactions occurred.

RESULTS

Descriptive statistics was used to examine data from the initial project implementation. Findings indicated that more African Americans (n = 117) participated in the project than Whites (n = 50), Hispanics (n = 35), or Haitians (n = 7).

CONCLUSIONS

Homeless individuals experience illnesses that are preventable through involvement with a structured immunization program. Collectively, nurse practitioners can reduce barriers to immunization by increasing vaccine coverage and introducing incremental policy changes that enhance the health status among homeless populations.

Differences in Utilization of Medical and Dental Services among Homeless People in South Korea

(1) Background: Homelessness contributes to both needs for care and barriers to access. This study aimed to explore the utilization of medical or dental services using Andersen's model for a vulnerable population of homeless in South Korea. (2) Methods: The data were applied from the first national survey for homeless people in South Korea, 2016. Totally 2032 persons participated in the interview survey. This study team requested the raw data through the public portal and analyzed them. (3) Results: The participants who were homeless for more than ten years, staying in small rooming house or shelter, non-employed, earning less than 500,000 won per month, and having a medical condition showed a significantly higher chance of using Medicaid. The use of outreach programs had a significant relationship with gender, duration of homelessness, and monthly income. Among dental patients, the homeless who did not consume alcohol, stayed in a shelter, and were employed had higher chances of using dental service. (4) Conclusions: Medicaid service was strongly related to enabling factors but outreach programs with predisposing factors. Dental service showed strong relationships with the enabling domain, but the pattern was opposite: the jobless had less chance to avail it. The policymakers need to consider these domains of service utilization to provide equitable access to healthcare services.

A modeling study exploring the impact of homelessness on rostered primary care utilization in Calgary, Canada

OBJECTIVE

For patients who belonged to physician rosters at a family medicine practice in the core of Calgary, Canada, we compared primary care utilization for those who were stably housed and those experiencing homelessness.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review accessed electronic medical record data for rostered patients who visited their family physician between July 1, 2015 and August 31, 2016. We assessed the association between homelessness status (defined as having been sheltered in overnight shelters and/or emergency/provisional housing during the study period) and the rate of visits to primary care (defined as the count of visits associated with a patient accounting for the length of the patient's relationship with their family physician) using multivariate negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1013 patients belonging to three family physician rosters, of whom 112 experienced homelessness during the study period (11.1%). The mean number of visits for patients who experienced homelessness was 9.6 (SD 10.5), compared to 4.2 (SD 3.6) visits for stably housed patients (p < 0.0001). The rate of accessing primary care for patients experiencing homelessness was 2.02 times greater than the rate for stably housed individuals (rate ratio [RR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.74-2.35; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In the context of an inner-city primary care clinic in Calgary, Canada, homelessness status is associated with an increased rate of visits to primary care. This work has implications for public health and health systems decision-makers involved in developing equitable health policy, as well as for frontline care providers who serve this vulnerable population.

Sick and unsheltered: Homelessness as a major risk factor for emergency care utilization

OBJECTIVE

Homelessness is a critical public health issue and socioeconomic epidemic associated with a disproportionate burden of disease and significant decrease in life expectancy. We compared emergency care utilization between individuals with documented homelessness to those enrolled in Medicaid without documented homelessness.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study consisting of electronic medical record review of demographics, chief complaints, and health care utilization metrics of adults with homelessness compared to a group enrolled in Medicaid without identified homelessness. The chart review spanned two years of emergency visits at a single urban, academic, tertiary care medical center. Descriptive statistics, bivariate and multivariate analyses were utilized.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 986 patients experiencing homelessness accounted for 7532 ED visits, with a mean of 7.6 (SD 19.9) and max of 316 visits. The control group of 3482 Medicaid patients had 5477 ED visits, with a mean of 1.6 visits (SD 2.1) and max of 49 visits. When controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and ESI, those living with homelessness were 7.65 times more likely to return to the ED within 30 days of their previous visit, 9.97 times more likely to return within 6 months, 10.63 times more likely to return within one year, and 11 times more likely to return within 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to non-homeless Medicaid patients, patients with documented homelessness were over seven times more likely to return to the ED within 30 days and over eleven times more likely to return to the ED in two years.