Population Health and Academic Medical Centers

Transforming Health Care from Volume to Value: Moving the Needle Through Population Health

United States health systems face unique challenges in transitioning from volume-based to value-based care, particularly for academic institutions. Providing complex specialty and tertiary care dependent on servicing large geographic areas, and concomitantly meeting education and research academic missions may limit the time and resources available for focusing on the care coordination needs of complex local populations. Despite these challenges, academic medicine is well situated to capitalize on the promise of value-based care and to lead broad improvements in both teaching and nonteaching hospitals. If properly executed, value-based care and complex specialty care can be complementary and synergistic. We postulate that the transition from volume to value in population health requires all health care organizations to advance and formalize infrastructure in 3 core areas: organizational capabilities; provider engagement; and engagement of the patient, family, and community. Although these apply to all organizations, for academic health systems, this transition must also be interwoven with the other domains of the tripartite mission.

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Health System Interventions Aiming to Welcome and Protect Immigrant Patients: a Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

At the same time that federal policymakers have enforced restrictive immigration policies, healthcare systems across the USA are developing, and have implemented, interventions aimed at addressing immigration-related stressors faced by immigrant communities. Yet, little is known about the contextual determinants that influence their implementation success. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study identifies factors enabling or challenging the implementation of interventions aimed at mitigating immigration-related stressors in the healthcare context.

METHODS

We used a qualitative research design to conduct 38 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in implementation of interventions at 25 healthcare facilities across 5 states with the highest undocumented immigrant populations (California, Texas, New York, Florida, and Illinois). Interviews were conducted from May through August 2018. Constant comparative analysis was used to identify barrier and facilitator themes. Deductive coding was thereafter used to categorize themes according to CFIR domain.

RESULTS

Barriers to implementation included perceptions of legal complexity and challenges to adopting such systemic strategies. Facilitators included a national policy climate that had brought immigrant health to the forefront, allowing for leveraging momentum towards institutional change; communication among healthcare personnel; existing community partnerships with immigrant rights and service organizations; and a shared sense of mission centering health equity. Local variation in immigration-related policies (e.g., local law agencies enforcing federal immigration laws) and heterogeneity of local immigrant communities also impacted implementation. Champions and informal leaders were integral to institutional efforts but not sufficient for sustainability. Perceived urgency to act superseded evaluation considerations, with all interventions in initial phases of implementation. Future iterations and evaluations of these interventions are needed to establish best practices and implementation determinants.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic study describing implementation determinants of immigration-related interventions across health systems. Identifying these determinants provides guidance to other healthcare organizations to effectively strategize and ensure implementation success.

Redesign of US Medical Schools: A Shift from Health Service to Population Health Management

The integration of medical schools and clinical partners is effectively established through the formation of academic medical centers (AMCs). The tripartite mission of AMCs emphasizes the importance of providing critical clinical services, medical innovation through research, and the education of future health care leaders. Although AMCs represent only 5% of all hospitals, they contribute substantially to serving disadvantaged populations of patients, including an estimated 37% of all charity care and 26% of all Medicaid hospitalizations. Currently, most AMCs use a business model centered upon revenue generated from hospital services and/or practice plans. In the last decade, mounting financial demands have placed significant pressure on AMC finances because of the rising costs associated with complex clinical care and operating diverse graduate medical education programs. A shift toward population health-centric health care management strategies will profoundly influence the predominant forms of health care delivery in the United States in the foreseeable future. Health systems are increasingly pursuing new strategies to manage financial risk, such as forming Accountable Care Organizations and provider-sponsored plans to provide value-based care. Refocusing research and operational capacity toward population health management fosters collaboration and enables reintegration with hospital and clinical partners across care networks, and can potentially create new revenue streams for AMCs. Despite the benefits of population health integration, current literature lacks a blueprint to guide AMCs in the transformation toward sustainable population health management models. The purpose of this paper is to propose a modern conceptual framework that can be operationalized by AMCs in order to achieve a sustainable future.