1
|
Krishnamoorthi R, Ganapathy A A, Hari Priya VM, Kumaran A. Future aspects of plant derived bioactive metabolites as therapeutics to combat benign prostatic hyperplasia. JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY 2024; 330:118207. [PMID: 38636573 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.118207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), characterized by prostate enlargement due to cell proliferation, is a common urinary disorder in men over 50, manifesting as lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Currently, several therapeutic options are accessible for treating BPH, including medication therapy, surgery and watchful waiting. Conventional drugs such as finasteride and dutasteride are used as 5α-reductase inhibitors for the treatment of BPH. However long-term use of these drugs is restricted due to their unpleasant side effects. Despite the range of available medical therapies, the effective treatment against BPH is still inadequate. Certain therapeutic plants and their phytochemicals have the aforementioned goals and work by regulating this enzyme. AIM OF THE STUDY This review aims to provide a comprehensive insight to advancements in diagnosis of BPH, modern treatment methods and the significance of ethnobotanically relevant medicinal plants as alternative therapeutics for managing BPH. MATERIAL AND METHODS A thorough and systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases and search engines such as PubMed, Web of Science, NCBI and SciFinder till October 2023. Specific keywords such as "benign prostatic hyperplasia", "medicinal plants", "phytochemicals", "pharmacology", "synergy", "ethnobotany", "5-alpha reductase", "alpha blocker" and "toxicology". By include these keywords, a thorough investigation of pertinent papers was assured, and important data about the many facets of BPH could be retrieved. RESULTS After conducting the above investigation, 104 herbal remedies were found to inhibit Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibition, alpha-blockers, or 5α -reductase inhibition effects which are supported by in vitro, in vivo and clinical trial studies evidence. Of these, 89 plants have ethnobotanical significance as alpha-blockers, alpha-reductase inhibition, or PDE-5 inhibition, and the other fifteen plants were chosen based on their ability to reduce BPH risk factors. Several phytocompounds, including, rutaecarpine, vaccarin, rutin, kaempferol, β-sitosterol, quercetin, dicaffeoylquinic acid, rutaevin, and phytosterol-F have been reported to be useful for the management of BPH. The use of combination therapy offers a strong approach to treating long-term conditions compare to single plant extract drugs. Furthermore, several botanical combinations such as lycopene and curcumin, pumpkin seed oil and saw palmetto oil, combinations of extracts from Funtumia africana (Benth.) Stapf and Abutilon mauritianum (Jacq.) Medik., and Hypselodelphys poggeana (K.Schum.) Milne-Redh. and Spermacoce radiata (DC.) Sieber ex Hiern are also supported through in vitro and in vivo studies for managing BPH through recuperation in patients with chronic long-term illnesses, as measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score. CONCLUSION The review proposes and endorses careful utilization of conventional medications that may be investigated further to discover possible PDE-5, 5 alpha-reductase, an alpha-blocker inhibitor for managing BPH. Even though most conventional formulations, such as 5 alpha-reductase, are readily available, systemic assessment of the effectiveness and mechanism of action of the herbal constituents is still necessary to identify novel chemical moieties that can be further developed for maximum efficacy. However, there exist abundant botanicals and medicinal plants across several regions of Africa, Asia, and the Americas, which can be further studied and developed for utilization as a potential phytotherapeutic for the management of BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raman Krishnamoorthi
- Chemical Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (NIIST), Thiruvananthapuram, 695 019, Kerala, India
| | - Anand Ganapathy A
- Chemical Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (NIIST), Thiruvananthapuram, 695 019, Kerala, India; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India
| | - V M Hari Priya
- Chemical Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (NIIST), Thiruvananthapuram, 695 019, Kerala, India; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India
| | - Alaganandam Kumaran
- Chemical Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (NIIST), Thiruvananthapuram, 695 019, Kerala, India; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pandolfo SD, Del Giudice F, Chung BI, Manfredi C, De Sio M, Damiano R, Cherullo EE, De Nunzio C, Cacciamani GE, Cindolo L, Porpiglia F, Mirone V, Imbimbo C, Autorino R, Crocerossa F. Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy versus other treatment modalities for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6500 cases. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:495-510. [PMID: 36402815 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00616-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend simple prostatectomy or endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) as treatment of choice for bladder prostatic obstruction (BPO) caused by large prostate glands. We aimed to provide a wide-ranging analysis of the currently available evidence, comparing safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) versus open simple prostatectomy (OSP), laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP), and laser EEP. METHODS A systematic search was performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for retrospective and prospective studies comparing RASP to OSP or LSP or laser EEP (HoLEP/ThuLEP). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations were followed to design the search strategies, selection criteria, and evidence report. A meta-analysis evaluated perioperative safety and effectiveness outcomes. The weighted mean difference and risk ratio were used to compare continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for RCT article assessing risk of bias. RESULTS 15 studies, including 6659 patients, were selected for meta-analysis: 13 observational studies, 1 non-randomized prospective study, and 1 randomized controlled trial. RASP was associated with statistically significant longer operative time (OT) and lower postoperative complication rate, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), and transfusion rate (TR) compared to OSP. LSP showed longer LOS and lower postoperative SHIM score, with no difference in OT, EBL, and complications. Compared to laser EEP, RASP presented longer LOS and catheterization time and higher TR. ThuLEP presented shorter OT than RASP. No difference were found in functional outcomes between groups both subjectively (IPSS, QoL) and objectively (Qmax, PVR). CONCLUSION RASP has become a size-independent treatment for the management of BPO caused by a large prostate gland. It can duplicate the functional outcomes of OSP while offering a better safety profile. When compared to LSP, the latter still stands as a valid lower-cost option, but it requires solid laparoscopic skill sets and therefore it is unlikely to spread on larger scale. When compared to laser EEP, RASP offers a shorter learning curve, but it still suffers from longer catheterization time and LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Department of Urology, Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin I Chung
- Department of Urology, Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Marco De Sio
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Urology Unit, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Edward E Cherullo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Urology Unit, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni E Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Luca Cindolo
- Department of Urology, Villa Stuart, Private Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Urology Unit, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choi SW, Sohn DW, Ha US, Hong SH, Lee JY, Cho HJ. Urethra-Sparing Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Postoperative Antegrade Ejaculation. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4867. [PMID: 37510981 PMCID: PMC10381243 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report a comparative analysis of extraperitoneal urethra-sparing robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (EUS-RASP) versus robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) using the Freyer approach for patients with a large prostate volume greater than 80 mL. METHODS A total of 32 patients underwent EUS-RASP, and 30 underwent RASP from April 2018 to November 2021. All the perioperative data and 6-month follow-up data were collected prospectively. We retrospectively evaluated baseline characteristics and functional outcomes, including International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSSs) and quality of life (QOL), maximum flow rate, and post-void residual volume, between the two groups. Sexual function was analyzed in the EUS-RASP group. RESULTS The patients undergoing EUS-RASP and RASP had comparable baseline characteristics and functional outcomes. The EUS-RASP group showed a shorter operative time (123.4 ± 15.2 min vs. 133.7 ± 21.4 min, p = 0.034), length of hospital stay (2.9 ± 1.5 days vs. 4.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.001), and catheterization time (2.4 ± 1.7 days vs. 8.1 ± 2.4 days, p < 0.001). A total of 14/32 (43.8%) patients reported normal preoperative ejaculatory function in the EUS-RASP group, and 11/14 (78.6%) maintained antegrade ejaculation postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Extraperitoneal urethra-sparing RASP is an effective and feasible procedure that can improve voiding function and allow for the maintenance of ejaculatory function in patients with large prostates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sae Woong Choi
- Department of Urology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 07345, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wan Sohn
- Department of Urology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 07345, Republic of Korea
| | - U-Syn Ha
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Hoo Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Youl Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyuk Jin Cho
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Riveros C, Di Valerio E, Bacchus M, Chalfant V, Leelani N, Thomas D, Jazayeri SB, Costa J. Predictors of readmission and impact of same-day discharge in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Prostate Int 2023; 11:20-26. [PMID: 36910904 PMCID: PMC9995658 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is becoming the gold standard for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our objective was to identify predictors of 30-day readmission and the impact of same-day discharge after HoLEP. Methods Using NSQIP data from 2011 to 2019, we identified men who underwent HoLEP for the treatment of BPH. We compared patients based on time of discharge and readmission status. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis (MLRA) to identify independent factors associated with 30-day readmission. Results A total of 3,489 patients met inclusion criteria with 833 (23.88%) being discharged within 24 hours and 2,656 (76.12%) discharged after 24 hours. There were 158 (4.53%) 30-day readmissions, mostly due to hematuria and urinary tract infection. Patients being readmitted were older (72 vs. 70 years old, P = 0.001), were more likely to have preoperative anemia (36.7% vs. 23.1%; P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (29.7% vs. 19.7%; P < 0.001), bleeding disorder (10.8% vs. 2.8%; P < 0.001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (≥3: 70.3% vs. 46.7%; P < 0.001) and a higher frailty burden (5-item modified frailty index [5i-mFI] ≥ 2: 36.1% vs. 19.1%; P < 0.001) compared to their counterparts. Factors independently associated with 30-day readmission were bleeding disorder (OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.63-5.11; P < 0.001), 5i-mFI ≥ 2 (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.03-2.71; P = 0.038) and an ASA score ≥3 (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.21-2.70; P = 0.004); however, same-day discharge was not found to be a significant predictor of 30-day readmissions. Conclusion The overall readmission rate after HoLEP is low. Patients discharged within 24 hours have similar rates of readmission compared to patients discharged after 24 hours. We found bleeding disorder, frailty burden, and ASA score to be independent predictors of 30-day readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Riveros
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Michael Bacchus
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Gainesville FL, USA
| | - Victor Chalfant
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Navid Leelani
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Devon Thomas
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Joseph Costa
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nagakura Y, Hayashi M, Kajioka S. Lifestyle habits to prevent the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Analysis of Japanese nationwide datasets. Prostate Int 2022; 10:200-206. [PMID: 36570647 PMCID: PMC9747574 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) refers to nonmalignant hyperplasia of prostate tissue, which causes lower urinary tract symptoms and has become a global public health concern in the aging population. The purpose of this study is to identify modifiable factors, which would prevent or delay BPH development. Methods The association between BPH marker drugs and climate-, socioeconomic-, health condition-, and lifestyle habits-related variables was investigated by analyzing nationwide datasets which were collected in 2018, aggregated by prefecture (administrative unit), and published by Japanese ministries. Uroselective α1 receptor blockers and dutasteride were used as marker drugs referring to BPH prevalence. Correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, and binomial logistic regression analysis were conducted with 47 Japanese prefectures as the unit. Results The variables which showed |r| > 0.5 by correlation analysis were exercise habits (r = -0.5696), smoking habits (r = 0.6116), and daily drinking (r = 0.6001) for uroselective α1 receptor blockers, and antihypertensive medication (r = 0.5971), smoking habits (r = 0.6598), a small amount of drinking (r = -0.5292), and serum alanine aminotransferase (r = 0.6814) for dutasteride. Multiple linear regression equations were constructed by including these variables (R 2 = 0.5453 for uroselective α1 receptor blockers and R 2 = 0.5673 for dutasteride). Binomial logistic regression analysis found a significant association between climate in the resident area and BPH development. Conclusion This ecological study, analyzing Japanese nationwide datasets, demonstrates that healthy lifestyle habits, especially avoidance of smoking, implementation of exercise in daily life, and a small amount of alcohol consumption, are important to prevent or delay BPH development. High blood pressure and high serum alanine aminotransferase are suggested as risk factors of BPH development.
Collapse
Key Words
- ALT, serum alanine aminotransferase
- BMI, body mass index
- BP, blood pressure
- BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia
- Ccr, creatinine clearance
- Climate
- HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol
- HbA1c, hemoglbinA1c
- Health condition
- LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol
- Lifestyle habits
- MHLW, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
- NDB, National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups
- Socioeconomic variable
- VIF, variance inflation factor
- eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukinori Nagakura
- School of Pharmacy at Fukuoka, International University of Health and Welfare, 137-1, Enokizu, Okawa-city, Fukuoka 831-8501, Japan,Corresponding author. School of Pharmacy at Fukuoka, International University of Health and Welfare, 137-1, Enokizu, Okawa-city, Fukuoka 831-8501, Japan.
| | - Maya Hayashi
- The Ministry of Justice in Japan, Correction Bureau, 1-1-1 Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8977, Japan
| | - Shunichi Kajioka
- School of Pharmacy at Fukuoka, International University of Health and Welfare, 137-1, Enokizu, Okawa-city, Fukuoka 831-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Analysis of Risk Factors and Nursing Strategies for Postoperative Hemorrhage of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2022; 2022:4205015. [PMID: 35646136 PMCID: PMC9135509 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4205015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This study is to investigate the risk factors analysis and nursing strategies for postoperative bleeding of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Totally, 240 BPH patients after surgical excision admitted to Hengshui People's Hospital between January 2019 and January 2020 were recruited. Of the 240 BPH patients, 20 had postoperative bleeding, accounting for 8.3% of all enrollments. Risk factors for postoperative bleeding included large prostate, diabetes, hypertension, urinary tract infection within 1 week before surgery, and the absence of epidural analgesia pumps. There were 87 patients receiving routine nursing (routine group) and 153 patients receiving routine nursing plus hemorrhage prevention care (study group). The study group had fewer cases of postoperative bleeding than the routine group. The influencing factors of postoperative bleeding in patients with prostatic hyperplasia include systemic and local factors, and corresponding hemorrhage prevention care should be performed based on the principle of evidence-based care to reduce the risk of postoperative bleeding.
Collapse
|
7
|
Dun RL, Mao JM, Yu C, Zhang Q, Hu XH, Zhu WJ, Qi GC, Peng Y. Simplified Chinese version of the international prostate symptom score and the benign prostatic hyperplasia impact index: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Int 2022; 10:162-168. [PMID: 36225281 PMCID: PMC9520413 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong-Liang Dun
- Urology Surgery, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian-Min Mao
- Andrology, Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Yu
- Urology Surgery, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Urology Surgery, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Hua Hu
- Urology Surgery, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Jing Zhu
- Urology Surgery, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Guang-Chong Qi
- Urology Surgery, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Peng
- Urology Surgery, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Narang G, Kellner D, Krambeck A, Humphreys M. Reimbursement of surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia: are we disincentivizing complex care? Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:318-323. [PMID: 35249967 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of how surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) procedures are compensated in the United States and the implications of the current reimbursement system on the care of patients. RECENT FINDINGS The resource-based relative value care system is Medicare's current reimbursement model. There is strong evidence that the current system does not adequately account for complex care. Consequently, for BPH surgical procedures, treatment options best suited for complex patients are not adequately reimbursed which may have implications on healthcare delivery and outcomes. SUMMARY Inadequate reimbursement for certain BPH procedures may disincentivize the care of complex patients. Procedures such a holmium laser enucleation of the prostate are well suited for complex patients but have a steep learning curve. The incentive to learn and offer such procedures to complex patients may be unfairly influenced by reimbursement levels, which in the end penalizes patients and the treatments available to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gopal Narang
- Mayo Clinic Arizona Department of Urology, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Amy Krambeck
- Northwestern Department of Urology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center preliminary study in Korea. Prostate Int 2022; 10:123-128. [PMID: 36225286 PMCID: PMC9520426 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) are the two most important therapeutic modalities for large benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, there are currently no studies comparing these two treatments in a Korean setting. In this study, the authors seek to compare the safety and efficacy associated with these procedures. Methods The authors retrospectively analyzed 59 male patients who underwent HoLEP (n = 26) or RASP (n = 33) at single center. The following preoperative data were compared: age, the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), transrectal ultrasonography, uroflowmetry, and hemoglobin. Intraoperative data included operation time and specimen weight. Postoperative data included change in IPSS, uroflowmetry, and hemoglobin. Length of stay, catheterization time, and complications were also reviewed. Results No significant differences between the two groups were found in terms of age, total prostate, and transitional volume. Postoperatively, both groups showed similar improvement in the maximum flow rate, post-void residual urine, IPSS, and quality of life. Intraoperatively, there were no differences regarding operation time and resected prostate volume. Catheter removal time and length of stay were significantly shorter in the HoLEP group than the RASP group. In addition, postoperative hemoglobin changes were significantly lower in the HoLEP group. However, incontinence rates at 1 month and 2 months postoperative in the RASP group were lower than the HoLEP group. Conclusions Both HoLEP and RASP can produce excellent postoperative outcomes. However, catheter removal time, length of stay, and hemoglobin changes were more favorable in the HoLEP group. On the other hand, postoperative incontinence was more favorable in the RASP group. These factors must be heavily considered when deciding surgical the method for large benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Collapse
|
10
|
Scarcella S, Castellani D, Gauhar V, Teoh JYC, Giulioni C, Piazza P, Bravi CA, De Groote R, De Naeyer G, Puliatti S, Galosi AB, Mottrie A. Robotic-assisted versus open simple prostatectomy: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Investig Clin Urol 2021; 62:631-640. [PMID: 34729963 PMCID: PMC8566792 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) compared to open simple prostatectomy (OP). MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed to assess the differences in perioperative course and functional outcomes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and surgical indication. The incidences of complications were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method and expressed as odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-values. Perioperative course and functional outcomes were pooled using the inverse variance of the mean difference (MD), 95% CI, and p-values. Analyses were two-tailed and the significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS Eight studies were accepted. Meta-analysis showed significantly longer surgical time (MD, 43.72; 95% CI, 30.57-56.88; p<0.00001) with a significantly lower estimated blood loss (MD, -563.20; 95% CI, -739.95 to -386.46; p<0.00001) and shorter postoperative stay (MD, -2.85; 95% CI, -3.72 to -1.99; p<0.00001) in RASP. Catheterization time did not differ (MD, 0.65; 95% CI, -2.17 to 3.48; p=0.65). The risk of blood transfusion was significantly higher in OP (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17-0.33; p<0.00001). The risk of recatheterization (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.32-11.93; p=0.47), postoperative urinary infections (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.23-3.51; p=0.87) and 30-day readmission rate (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.61-1.51; p=0.86) did not differ. At 3-month follow-up, functional outcomes were similar. CONCLUSIONS RASP demonstrated a better perioperative outcome and equal early functional outcomes as compared to OP. These findings should be balanced against the longer operative time and higher cost of robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Scarcella
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, NUHS, Jurong East, Singapore
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Carlo Giulioni
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Geert De Naeyer
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|