Merkle TP, Hofmann N, Knop C, Da Silva T. Can elderly individuals perform partial weight bearing on their lower limbs? A prospective cohort study using ambulatory real-time biofeedback.
J Orthop Surg Res 2023;
18:324. [PMID:
37106461 PMCID:
PMC10142256 DOI:
10.1186/s13018-023-03807-4]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Partial weight bearing in an orthosis and with forearm crutches is a widespread and well-accepted therapeutic principle after an injury of the lower extremity during early rehabilitation. Complying may be challenging to do under these circumstances, especially for elderly people. This study compares the spatiotemporal parameters and peak loads performed by a group of older participants before and after activating real-time biofeedback (BF) to determine whether they benefit from a biofeedback.
METHODS
Twenty-four healthy subjects between 61 and 80 years learned how to walk using forearm crutches in a lower leg orthosis while performing a weight of 20 kg using a bathroom scale with the aim of loading in a zone between 15 and 30 kg. After that, they completed a course that was on level ground (50 m) and another course on stairs (11 steps). They did a walk without BF first, and then with BF. Each step was given a maximum load, which was determined and statistically checked. In addition, spatiotemporal parameters were collected.
RESULTS
The classical teaching method with a bathroom scale was ineffective. Only 32.3% of the loads could be adequately carried by a person on level ground in the 15-30 kg target zone. On the stairs, it was 48.2% and 34.3%, respectively. Thus, on level ground, 52.7% of loads exceeded 30 kg. Downstairs it was 46.4%, and upstairs it was 41.6%. Subjects clearly benefit from activated biofeedback. Biofeedback significantly reduced missteps > 30 kg in every course. The loads decreased significantly to 25.0% on level ground, to 23.0% upstairs, and to 24.4% downstairs. At the same time, speed and stride length decreased per course while total time increased.
CONCLUSION
Partial weight bearing is more complex and difficult for the elderly. These study results may help better understand 3-point gait in older adults in an outpatient setting. When partial weight bearing is recommended, special follow-up attention must be given for this group. Age-based therapy strategies can be developed and monitored with the assistance of ambulatory biofeedback devices. Trial registration Retrospectively registered, https://www.drks.de/DRKS00031136 .
Collapse